Dual-Warhead Conjugate Based on Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Dimer Loaded with α-Amanitin and Monomethyl Auristatin E Exhibits Superior Cytotoxicity towards Cancer Cells Overproducing Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1.

Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) is a promising therapeutic strategy for various cancers associated with alterations in the FGFR1 gene. In this study, we developed a highly cytotoxic bioconjugate based on fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), which is a natural ligand of this receptor, and two potent cytotoxic drugs-α-amanitin and monomethyl auristatin E-with completely independent mechanistic modes of action. Utilizing recombinant DNA technology, we produced an FGF2 N- to C-end dimer that exhibited superior internalization capacity in FGFR1-positive cells. The drugs were site-specifically attached to the targeting protein using SnoopLigase- and evolved sortase A-mediated ligations. The resulting dimeric dual-warhead conjugate selectively binds to the FGFR1 and utilizes receptor-mediated endocytosis to enter the cells. Moreover, our results demonstrate that the developed conjugate exhibits about 10-fold higher cytotoxic potency against FGFR1-positive cell lines than an equimolar mixture of single-warhead conjugates. The diversified mode of action of the dual-warhead conjugate may help to overcome the potential acquired resistance of FGFR1-overproducing cancer cells to single cytotoxic drugs.

Nuclear Localization Sequence of FGF1 Is Not Required for Its Intracellular Anti-Apoptotic Activity in Differentiated Cells.

Fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) is considered primarily as a ligand for FGF surface receptors (FGFRs) through which it activates a number of cellular responses. In addition to its canonical mode of action, FGF1 can act intracellularly, before secretion or after internalization and translocation from the cell exterior. The role of FGF1 inside the cell is to provide additional protection against apoptosis and promote cell survival. The FGF1 protein contains a specific N-terminal nuclear localization sequence (NLS) that is essential for its efficient transport to the nucleus. Here, we investigated the role of this sequence in the anti-apoptotic response of FGF1. To this end, we produced recombinant FGF1 variants with mutated or deleted NLS and added them to apoptosis-induced cells in which FGFR1 was inactive, either as a result of chemical inhibition or kinase-dead mutation. After internalization, all FGF1 variants were able to protect the differentiated cells from serum starvation-induced apoptosis. To verify the results obtained for NLS mutants, we knocked down LRRC59, a protein that mediates the nuclear transport of FGF1. Upon LRRC59 silencing, we still observed a decrease in caspase 3/7 activity in cells treated exogenously with wild-type FGF1. In the next step, FGF1 variants with mutated or deleted NLS were expressed in U2OS cells, in which apoptosis was then induced by various factors (e.g., starvation, etoposide, staurosporine, anisomycin and actinomycin D). Experiments were performed in the presence of specific FGFR inhibitors to eliminate FGFR-induced signaling, potentially activated by FGF1 proteins released from damaged cells. Again, we found that the presence of NLS in FGF1 is not required for its anti-apoptotic activity. All NLS variants tested were able to act as wild type FGF1, increasing the cell viability and mitochondrial membrane potential and reducing the caspase 3/7 activity and PARP cleavage in cells undergoing apoptosis, both transiently and stably transfected. Our results indicate that the nuclear localization of FGF1 is not required for its intracellular anti-apoptotic activity in differentiated cells and suggest that the mechanism of the stress response differs according to the level of cell differentiation.

FGF/FGFR-Dependent Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Anti-Cancer Drug Resistance.

Increased expression of both FGF proteins and their receptors observed in many cancers is often associated with the development of chemoresistance, limiting the effectiveness of currently used anti-cancer therapies. Malfunctioning of the FGF/FGFR axis in cancer cells generates a number of molecular mechanisms that may affect the sensitivity of tumors to the applied drugs. Of key importance is the deregulation of cell signaling, which can lead to increased cell proliferation, survival, and motility, and ultimately to malignancy. Signaling pathways activated by FGFRs inhibit apoptosis, reducing the cytotoxic effect of some anti-cancer drugs. FGFRs-dependent signaling may also initiate angiogenesis and EMT, which facilitates metastasis and also correlates with drug resistance. Therefore, treatment strategies based on FGF/FGFR inhibition (using receptor inhibitors, ligand traps, monoclonal antibodies, or microRNAs) appear to be extremely promising. However, this approach may lead to further development of resistance through acquisition of specific mutations, metabolism switching, and molecular cross-talks. This review brings together information on the mechanisms underlying the involvement of the FGF/FGFR axis in the generation of drug resistance in cancer and highlights the need for further research to overcome this serious problem with novel therapeutic strategies.

Intracellular partners of fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 - implications for functions.

Fibroblast growth factors 1 and 2 (FGF1 and FGF2) are mainly considered as ligands of surface receptors through which they regulate a broad spectrum of biological processes. They are secreted in non-canonical way and, unlike other growth factors, they are able to translocate from the endosome to the cell interior. These unique features, as well as the role of the intracellular pool of FGF1 and FGF2, are far from being fully understood. An increasing number of reports address this problem, focusing on the intracellular interactions of FGF1 and 2. Here, we summarize the current state of knowledge of the FGF1 and FGF2 binding partners inside the cell and the possible role of these interactions. The partner proteins are grouped according to their function, including proteins involved in secretion, cell signaling, nucleocytoplasmic transport, binding and processing of nucleic acids, ATP binding, and cytoskeleton assembly. An in-depth analysis of the network of these binding partners could indicate novel, non-classical functions of FGF1 and FGF2 and uncover an additional level of a fine control of the well-known FGF-regulated cellular processes.