A mutation in Themis contributes to anaphylaxis severity following oral peanut challenge in CC027 mice.

BACKGROUND: The development of peanut allergy is due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors, although specific genes have proven difficult to identify. Previously, we reported that peanut-sensitized Collaborative Cross strain CC027/GeniUnc (CC027) mice develop anaphylaxis upon oral challenge to peanut, in contrast to C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the genetic basis of orally induced anaphylaxis to peanut in CC027 mice. METHODS: A genetic mapping population between CC027 and C3H mice was designed to identify the genetic factors that drive oral anaphylaxis. A total of 356 CC027xC3H backcrossed mice were generated, sensitized to peanut, then challenged to peanut by oral gavage. Anaphylaxis and peanut-specific IgE were quantified for all mice. T-cell phenotyping was conducted on CC027 mice and 5 additional Collaborative Cross strains. RESULTS: Anaphylaxis to peanut was absent in 77% of backcrossed mice, with 19% showing moderate anaphylaxis and 4% having severe anaphylaxis. There were 8 genetic loci associated with variation in response to peanut challenge-6 associated with anaphylaxis (temperature decrease) and 2 associated with peanut-specific IgE levels. There were 2 major loci that impacted multiple aspects of the severity of acute anaphylaxis, at which the CC027 allele was associated with worse outcome. At one of these loci, CC027 has a private genetic variant in the Themis gene. Consistent with described functions of Themis, we found that CC027 mice have more immature T cells with fewer CD8+, CD4+, and CD4+CD25+CD127- regulatory T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a key role for Themis in the orally reactive CC027 mouse model of peanut allergy.

Desensitization and remission after peanut sublingual immunotherapy in 1- to 4-year-old peanut-allergic children: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) have suggested a potential advantage with younger age at treatment initiation. OBJECTIVE: We studied the safety and efficacy of SLIT for peanut allergy in 1- to 4-year-old children. METHODS: Peanut-allergic 1- to 4-year-old children were randomized to receive 4 mg peanut SLIT versus placebo. Desensitization was assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) after 36 months of treatment. Participants desensitized to at least 443 mg peanut protein discontinued therapy for 3 months and then underwent DBPCFC to assess for remission. Biomarkers were measured at baseline and longitudinally during treatment. RESULTS: Fifty participants (25 peanut SLIT, 25 placebo) with a median age of 2.4 years were enrolled across 2 sites. The primary end point of desensitization was met with actively treated versus placebo participants having a significantly greater median cumulative tolerated dose (4443 mg vs 143 mg), higher likelihood of passing the month 36 DBPCFC (60% vs 0), and higher likelihood of demonstrating remission (48% vs 0). The highest rate of desensitization and remission was seen in 1- to 2-year-olds, followed by 2- to 3-year-olds and 3- to 4-year-olds. Longitudinal changes in peanut skin prick testing, peanut-specific IgG4, and peanut-specific IgG4/IgE ratio were seen in peanut SLIT but not placebo participants. Oropharyngeal itching was more commonly reported by peanut SLIT than placebo participants. Skin, gastrointestinal, upper respiratory, lower respiratory, and multisystem adverse events were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Peanut SLIT safely induces desensitization and remission in 1- to 4-year-old children, with improved outcomes seen with younger age at initiation.

Different airborne particulates trigger distinct immune pathways leading to peanut allergy in a mouse model.

BACKGROUND: Environmental exposure to peanut through non-oral routes is a risk factor for peanut allergy. Early-life exposure to air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), is associated with sensitization to foods through unknown mechanisms. We investigated whether PM promotes sensitization to environmental peanut and the development of peanut allergy in a mouse model. METHODS: C57BL/6J mice were co-exposed to peanut and either urban particulate matter (UPM) or diesel exhaust particles (DEP) via the airways and assessed for peanut sensitization and development of anaphylaxis following peanut challenge. Peanut-specific CD4+ T helper (Th) cell responses were characterized by flow cytometry and Th cytokine production. Mice lacking select innate immune signaling genes were used to study mechanisms of PM-induced peanut allergy. RESULTS: Airway co-exposure to peanut and either UPM- or DEP-induced systemic sensitization to peanut and anaphylaxis following peanut challenge. Exposure to UPM or DEP triggered activation and migration of lung dendritic cells to draining lymph nodes and induction of peanut-specific CD4+ Th cells. UPM- and DEP-induced distinct Th responses, but both stimulated expansion of T follicular helper (Tfh) cells essential for peanut allergy development. MyD88 signaling was critical for UPM- and DEP-induced peanut allergy, whereas TLR4 signaling was dispensable. DEP-induced peanut allergy and Tfh-cell differentiation depended on IL-1 but not IL-33 signaling, whereas neither cytokine alone was necessary for UPM-mediated sensitization. CONCLUSION: Environmental co-exposure to peanut and PM induces peanut-specific Tfh cells and peanut allergy in mice.

A mutation in Themis contributes to peanut-induced oral anaphylaxis in CC027 mice.

Background: The development of peanut allergy is due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors, although specific genes have proven difficult to identify. Previously, we reported that peanut-sensitized CC027/GeniUnc (CC027) mice develop anaphylaxis upon oral challenge to peanut, unlike C3H/HeJ (C3H) mice. Objective: To determine the genetic basis of orally-induced anaphylaxis to peanut in CC027 mice. Methods: A genetic mapping population between CC027 and C3H mice was designed to identify the genetic factors that drive oral anaphylaxis. A total of 356 CC027xC3H backcrossed mice were generated, sensitized to peanut, then challenged to peanut by oral gavage. Anaphylaxis and peanut-specific IgE were quantified for all mice. T-cell phenotyping was conducted on CC027 and five additional CC strains. Results: Anaphylaxis to peanut was absent in 77% of backcrossed mice, with 19% showing moderate anaphylaxis, and 4% having severe anaphylaxis. A total of eight genetic loci were associated with variation in response to peanut challenge, six associated with anaphylaxis (temperature decrease) and two associated with peanut-specific IgE levels. There were two major loci that impacted multiple aspects of the severity of acute anaphylaxis, at which the CC027 allele was associated with worse outcome. At one of these loci, CC027 has a private genetic variant in the Themis (thymocyte-expressed molecule involved in selection) gene. Consistent with Themis' described functions, we found that CC027 have more immature T cells with fewer CD8+, CD4+, and CD4+CD25+CD127- regulatory T cells. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate a key role for Themis in the orally-reactive CC027 mouse model of peanut allergy.

Food-specific IgA levels in esophageal biopsies are not sufficiently high to predict food triggers in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated disease, characterized by Th2-type inflammation linked to specific foods. No currently available allergy tests reliably identify food triggers in EoE, leading to empiric dietary elimination strategies. Recently, milk- and wheat-specific IgA in esophageal brushings were linked to clinical food triggers. In this study, we aimed to determine whether food-specific IgA from esophageal biopsies is associated with known food triggers. METHODS: A prior cohort of 21 patients (median age 39 years) with confirmed EoE underwent empirical elimination diets and subsequent reintroduction of foods to determine triggers. Archived baseline biopsies were used to quantify levels of peanut-, milk-, soy-, egg-, wheat-specific and total IgA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Overall, 13 patients (62%) responded to the dietary elimination as determined by histology (<15 eos/hpf), with milk and egg being the most common triggers. Biopsies had varying amounts of total IgA, while food-specific IgA was only detectable in 48 of 105 (46%) samples. Food-specific IgA was normalized to total IgA for each sample and stratified by whether a food was a known trigger. For all foods tested, there were no significant differences in IgA between positive and negative triggers. CONCLUSIONS: Food-specific IgA in esophageal biopsies was not associated with previously identified food triggers in this cohort. Future studies comparing food-specific IgA in esophageal brushings, mucous scrapings, and biopsies from patients with known triggers will be critical to determining whether food-specific IgA may serve as a biomarker for identification of EoE triggers.

Peanut butter feeding induces oral tolerance in genetically diverse collaborative cross mice.

Background: Early dietary introduction of peanut has shown efficacy in clinical trials and driven pediatric recommendations for early introduction of peanut to children with heightened allergy risk worldwide. Unfortunately, tolerance is not induced in every case, and a subset of patients are allergic prior to introduction. Here we assess peanut allergic sensitization and oral tolerance in genetically diverse mouse strains. Objective: We aimed to determine whether environmental adjuvant-driven airway sensitization and oral tolerance to peanut could be induced in various genetically diverse mouse strains. Methods: C57BL/6J and 12 Collaborative Cross (CC) mouse strains were fed regular chow or ad libitum peanut butter to induce tolerance. Tolerance was tested by attempting to sensitize mice via intratracheal exposure to peanut and lipopolysaccharide (LPS), followed by intraperitoneal peanut challenge. Peanut-specific immunoglobulins and peanut-induced anaphylaxis were assessed. Results: Without oral peanut feeding, most CC strains (11/12) and C57BL/6J induced peanut-specific IgE and IgG1 following airway exposure to peanut and LPS. With oral peanut feeding none of the CC strains nor C57BL/6J mice became sensitized to peanut or experienced anaphylaxis following peanut challenge. Conclusion: Allergic sensitization and oral tolerance to peanut can be achieved across a range of genetically diverse mice. Notably, the same strains that became allergic via airway sensitization were tolerized by feeding high doses of peanut butter before sensitization, suggesting that the order and route of peanut exposure are critical for determining the allergic fate.

A single priming event prevents oral tolerance to peanut.

BACKGROUND: Indoor dust (ID) is a source of peanut proteins and immunostimulatory adjuvants (e.g. LPS) that can promote airway sensitization to peanut. We aimed to determine whether a single airway exposure to peanut plus adjuvant is sufficient to prevent oral tolerance. METHODS: To determine the effect of a single priming event, C57BL/6J mice were exposed once to peanut plus adjuvant through the airway, followed by either airway or low-dose oral exposure to peanut, and assessed for peanut allergy. Oral tolerance was investigated by feeding high-dose peanut followed by airway sensitization. To determine whether a single priming could prevent oral tolerance, the high-dose peanut regimen was applied after a single airway exposure to peanut plus adjuvant. Peanut-specific IgE and IgG1 were quantified, and mice were challenged to peanut to assess allergy. Peanut-specific CD4+ memory T cells (CD4+ TCRß+ CD44hi CD154+ ) were quantified in mediastinal lymph nodes following airway priming. RESULTS: Mice co-exposed to peanut with LPS or ID through the airway were primed to develop peanut allergy after subsequent low-dose oral or airway exposures to peanut. Oral tolerance was induced in mice fed high-dose peanut prior to airway sensitization. In contrast, mice fed high-dose peanut following a single airway exposure to peanut plus adjuvant led to allergy. Peanut-specific CD4+ memory T cells were detected as early as 7 days after the single airway priming with peanut plus adjuvant, however, delaying peanut feeding even 1 day following priming led to allergy, whereas peanut feeding the same day as priming led to tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: A single airway exposure to peanut plus adjuvant is sufficient to prime the immune system to develop allergy following subsequent high-dose oral exposure. These results highlight the importance of introducing peanut as early as possible to prevent sensitization through a non-oral priming event.

Environmental Exposure to Foods as a Risk Factor for Food Allergy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Many factors have been reported to contribute to the development of food allergy. Here, we summarize the role of environmental exposure to foods as a major risk factor for developing food allergy. RECENT FINDINGS: Peanut proteins are detectable and biologically active in household environments, where infants spend a majority of their time, providing an environmental source of allergen exposure. Recent evidence from clinical studies and mouse models suggests both the airway and skin are routes of exposure that lead to peanut sensitization. Environmental exposure to peanut has been clearly associated with the development of peanut allergy, although other factors such as genetic predisposition, microbial exposures, and timing of oral feeding of allergens also likely contribute. Future studies should more comprehensively assess the contributions of each of these factors for a variety of food allergens to provide more clear targets for prevention of food allergy.

Open-label study of the efficacy, safety, and durability of peanut sublingual immunotherapy in peanut-allergic children.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the efficacy of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are limited. The durability of desensitization after SLIT has not been well described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4-mg peanut SLIT and persistence of desensitization after SLIT discontinuation. METHODS: Challenge-proven peanut-allergic 1- to 11-year-old children were treated with open-label 4-mg peanut SLIT for 48 months. Desensitization after peanut SLIT was assessed by a 5000-mg double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). A novel randomly assigned avoidance period of 1 to 17 weeks was followed by the DBPCFC. Skin prick test results immunoglobulin levels, basophil activation test results, TH1, TH2, and IL-10 cytokines were measured longitudinally. Safety was assessed through patient-reported home diaries. RESULTS: Fifty-four participants were enrolled and 47 (87%) completed peanut SLIT and the 48-month DBPCFC per protocol. The mean successfully consumed dose (SCD) during the DBPCFC increased from 48 to 2723 mg of peanut protein after SLIT (P < .0001), with 70% achieving clinically significant desensitization (SCD > 800 mg) and 36% achieving full desensitization (SCD = 5000 mg). Modeled median time to loss of clinically significant desensitization was 22 weeks. Peanut skin prick test; peanut-specific IgE, IgG4, and IgG4/IgE ratio; and peanut-stimulated basophil activation test, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IFN-γ, and IL-10 changed significantly compared with baseline, with changes seen as early as 6 months. Median rate of reaction per dose was 0.5%, with transient oropharyngeal itching being the most common, and there were no dosing symptoms requiring epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label, prospective study, peanut SLIT was safe and induced clinically significant desensitization in most of the children, lasting more than 17 weeks after discontinuation of therapy.

Induction of food-specific IgG by Gene Gun-delivered DNA vaccines.

Background: Shellfish and tree nut allergies are among the most prevalent food allergies, now affecting 2%-3% and 1% of the US population, respectively. Currently, there are no approved therapies for shellfish or tree nut allergies, with strict avoidance being the standard of care. However, oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy and subcutaneous immunotherapy for environmental allergens are efficacious and lead to the production of allergen-specific IgG, which causes suppression of allergen effector cell degranulation. Since allergen-specific IgG is a desired response to alleviate IgE-mediated allergies, we tested transcutaneously-delivered DNA vaccines targeting shellfish and tree nut allergens for their ability to induce antigen-specific IgG, which would have therapeutic potential for food allergies. Methods: We assessed Gene Gun-delivered DNA vaccines targeting either crustacean shellfish or walnut/pecan allergens, with or without IL-12, in naïve mice. Three strains of mice, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ and CC027/GeniUnc, were evaluated for IgG production following vaccination. Vaccines were administered twice via Gene Gun, three weeks apart and then blood was collected three weeks following the final vaccination. Results: Vaccination with shellfish allergen DNA led to increased shrimp-specific IgG in all three strains, with the highest production in C3H/HeJ from the vaccine alone, whereas the vaccine with IL-12 led to the highest IgG production in BALB/cJ and CC027/GeniUnc mice. Similar IgG production was also induced against lobster and crab allergens. For walnut/pecan vaccines, BALB/cJ and C3H/HeJ mice produced significantly higher walnut- and pecan-specific IgG with the vaccine alone compared to the vaccine with IL-12, while the CC027 mice made significantly higher IgG with the addition of IL-12. Notably, intramuscular administration of the vaccines did not lead to increased antigen-specific IgG production, indicating that Gene Gun administration is a superior delivery modality. Conclusions: Overall, these data demonstrate the utility of DNA vaccines against two lifelong food allergies, shellfish and tree nuts, suggesting their potential as a food allergy therapy in the future.

Peanut-Specific IgG4 and IgA in Saliva Are Modulated by Peanut Oral Immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Antigen-specific immunoglobulin responses have yet to be studied at the oral mucosal surface during peanut oral immunotherapy (PnOIT). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify salivary peanut-specific IgG4 (PNsIgG4) and IgA (PNsIgA) and total IgG4 and IgA in participants from the Immune Tolerance Network's IMPACT study, a phase 2 PnOIT trial. METHODS: Peanut-allergic children, aged 12 months to younger than 48 months at screening, were enrolled and randomized to PnOIT or placebo oral immunotherapy (OIT) for 134 weeks. Per-protocol analysis included 69 PnOIT and 23 placebo participants. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges were conducted at weeks 134 and 160 to assess desensitization and remission, respectively. Saliva samples were collected at baseline and 30, 82, 134, and 160 weeks to quantify PNsIgG4, PNsIgA, and total IgG4 and IgA. RESULTS: Participants who received PnOIT experienced significant increases in PNsIgG4 in saliva, whereas participants on placebo did not (P < .01 at all time points). The PNsIgA/total IgA ratio was also significantly increased in participants treated with PnOIT when compared with those receiving placebo at 30 and 82 weeks (P < .05). During PnOIT, desensitized participants had increased PNsIgA that plateaued, whereas the not desensitized/no remission group did not change over time. Interestingly, when the PnOIT group was evaluated by clinical outcome, PNsIgA was higher at baseline in the not desensitized/no remission group than in the desensitized/remission group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: PnOIT induces substantial increases in allergen-specific IgG4 and IgA in saliva. These data provide insight into OIT-induced mucosal responses and suggest the utility of these easily obtained samples for biomarker development.

Targeting CD22 on memory B cells to induce tolerance to peanut allergens.

BACKGROUND: Circulating IgE and subsequent severe allergic reactions to peanut are sustained and propagated by recall of peanut allergen-specific memory B cells. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether targeting mouse and human CD22 on peanut-specific memory B cells induces tolerance to peanut allergens. METHODS: Siglec-engaging tolerance-inducing antigenic liposomes (STALs) codisplaying peanut allergens (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, or Ara h 3) and high-affinity CD22 ligand (CD22L-STALs) were employed in various mouse models (BALB/cJ, C57BL/6, human CD22 transgenic, and NSG) of peanut allergy. To investigate memory B cells, a conferred memory model was used in which splenocytes from peanut-sensitized mice were transferred into naive animals. Reconstituted mice received either CD22L-STALs or an immunogenic liposome control, followed by a peanut allergen boost and later a challenge with individual peanut allergens. To assess the effects of CD22L-STALs on human B cells, PBMCs were injected into NSG mice, followed by administration of human CD22L-STALs (hCD22L-STALs) and later a whole peanut extract boost. Blood was collected to quantify WPE- and Ara h 1-, 2-, and 3-specific immunoglobulins. RESULTS: Mouse CD22L-STALs (mCD22L-STALs) significantly suppressed systemic memory to Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 3 in BALB/cJ and C57BL/6 mice, as demonstrated by reduced allergen-specific IgE, IgG1, and anaphylaxis on challenge. Importantly, 2 doses of mCD22L-STALs led to prolonged tolerance for at least 3 months. hCD22L-STALs displayed similar suppression in mice expressing human CD22 on B cells. Finally, human B cells were tolerized in vivo in NSG mice by hCD22L-STALs. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen-specific exploitation of CD22 on memory B cells can induce systemic immune tolerance.

Kinetics of basophil hyporesponsiveness during short-course peanut oral immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) leads to suppression of mast cell and basophil degranulation along with changes in the adaptive immune response. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine how rapidly these effects occur during OIT and more broadly, the kinetics of basophil and mast cell suppression throughout the course of therapy. METHODS: Twenty participants, age 4 to 12 years, were enrolled in a peanut OIT trial and assessed for desensitization and sustained unresponsiveness after 9 months of therapy. Blood was collected 5 times in the first month and then intermittently throughout to quantify immunoglobulins and assess basophil activation by CD63, CD203c, and phosphorylated SYK (pSYK). RESULTS: Twelve of 16 participants that completed the trial were desensitized after OIT, with 9 achieving sustained unresponsiveness after discontinuing OIT for 4 weeks. Basophil hyporesponsiveness, defined by lower CD63 expression, was detected as early as day 90. pSYK was correlated with CD63 expression, and there was a significant decrease in pSYK by day 250. CD203c expression remained unchanged throughout therapy. Interestingly, although basophil activation was decreased across the cohort during OIT, basophil activation did not correlate with individual clinical outcomes. Serum peanut-specific IgG4 and IgA increased throughout therapy, whereas IgE remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Suppression of basophil activation occurs within the first 90 days of peanut OIT, ultimately leading to suppression of signaling through pSYK.

The airway as a route of sensitization to peanut: An update to the dual allergen exposure hypothesis.

Food allergies have increased at an alarming rate over the past 2 decades, indicating that environmental factors are driving disease progression. It has been postulated that sensitization to foods, in particular, peanut, occurs through impaired skin. Peanut allergens have been quantified in household dust and may be the culprit source. Indeed, TH2 cell-skewing innate cytokines can be driven by application of food antigens on both intact and impaired skin of mice, resulting in antigen-specific IgE production and anaphylaxis following allergen exposure. However, allergy induction through the skin can be prevented by induction of oral tolerance before skin exposure. These observations led to the dual allergen exposure hypothesis, according to which oral exposure to food antigens leads to tolerance and antigen exposure on impaired skin leads to allergy. Here, we propose the airway as an alternative route of sensitization in the dual allergen exposure hypothesis that leads to food allergy. Specifically, we will provide evidence from mouse models and human cell-based studies that together implicate the airway as a plausible route of sensitization.

Mouse Models of Food Allergy in the Pursuit of Novel Treatment Modalities.

The prevalence of IgE-mediated food allergies has increased dramatically in the past three decades, now affecting up to 10% of the US population. IgE-mediated food allergy is an immunologic disease, involving a variety of cells, including B and T cells, mast cells, basophils, ILC2s, and epithelial cells. Mouse models of food allergy mimic the overall immunologic processes known to exist in humans. Due to the limitations of invasive sampling of human tissue and the similarities of the human and mouse immune systems, comprehensive pathogenesis studies of food allergy have been performed in mouse models. Mouse models have been effective in elucidating the roles of non-oral routes of sensitization and identifying key cells and molecules involved in allergic sensitization. Furthermore, the development of novel therapeutic approaches for food allergy has been accelerated through the use of pre-clinical mouse models. Despite the groundbreaking findings stemming from research in mice, there are continued efforts to improve the translational utility of these models. Here, we highlight the achievements in understanding food allergy development and efforts to bring novel treatment approaches into clinical trials.

Model of Walnut Allergy in CC027/GeniUnc Mice Recapitulates Key Features of Human Disease.

Tree nut allergies affect 1% of the United States population, are often severe in nature and rarely outgrown. Despite the severity and prevalence, there are no FDA-approved treatments for tree nut allergy. Development of a therapeutic would be expedited by having a mouse model that mimics the human disease. We utilized the CC027/GeniUnc mouse strain, which was previously identified as an orally reactive model of peanut allergy, to develop a model of walnut allergy. Mice were sensitized with walnut and cholera toxin for 4 weeks and subsequently challenged by oral gavage. Blood samples were collected to measure serum IgE. Walnut-sensitized mice produced high levels of walnut-IgE and were cross-sensitized to pecan. Oral challenges with walnut resulted in severe anaphylaxis and accompanying allergic symptoms. Importantly, pecan challenges also led to severe allergic reactions, indicating cross-reactivity to pecan. Overall, this novel mouse model reproduces key characteristics of human walnut allergy, which provides a platform to develop novel therapies and better understand sensitization mechanisms.

Peanut applied to the skin of nonhuman primates induces antigen-specific IgG but not IgE.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies in humans support the dual-allergen exposure hypothesis, and several studies in mouse models have demonstrated that cutaneous exposure to disrupted or intact skin can lead to sensitization to peanut. However, the field lacks definitive evidence that cutaneous exposure leads to peanut allergy in humans or other primates. METHODS: Peanut extract was applied to the shaved back of the neck of four male and four female African green monkeys three times per week for 4 weeks. An oral food challenge (OFC) was performed the following week by gavage of 200 mg of peanut protein, and vital signs were monitored for 30 minutes post-OFC. Blood was collected at baseline, day 11, day 32, and 30 minutes post-OFC. Total IgE, and peanut-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) were quantified in serum collected throughout the 4 weeks. Histamine was measured in serum collected 30 minutes post-OFC. RESULTS: Peanut-specific IgE was undetectable at any time points in any of the monkeys, and there was no consistent increase in total IgE. During the oral challenge, none of the monkeys experienced allergic symptoms and histamine levels did not change. However, seven of the eight monkeys produced increasing peanut-specific IgG by day 32, indicating that repeated skin exposure to peanut is immunogenic. CONCLUSIONS: Skin exposure to peanut did not lead to sensitization in this study, and monkeys did not experience anaphylaxis upon peanut challenge. However, monkeys produced increased peanut-specific IgG throughout peanut exposure, indicating that repeated skin exposure to peanut is immunogenic.

Systematic quantification of the dynamics of newly synthesized proteins unveiling their degradation pathways in human cells.

Proteins are continuously synthesized during cell growth and proliferation. At the same time, excessive and misfolded proteins have to be degraded, otherwise they are a burden to cells. Protein degradation is essential to maintain proteostasis in cells, and dysfunction of protein degradation systems results in numerous diseases such as cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the importance of protein degradation, the degradation pathways of many proteins remain to be explored. Here, we comprehensively investigated the degradation of newly synthesized proteins in human cells by integrating metabolic labeling, click chemistry, and multiplexed proteomics, and systematic and quantitative analysis of newly synthesized proteins first revealed the degradation pathways of many proteins. Bioinformatic analysis demonstrates that proteins degraded through two major pathways have distinct properties and functions. Proteins degraded through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway contain more disordered structures, whereas those through the autophagy-lysosome pathway have significantly higher hydrophobicity. Systematic and quantitative investigation of the dynamics of newly synthesized proteins provides unprecedented and valuable information about protein degradation, which leads to a better understanding of protein properties and cellular activities.