Physicians' perspectives on using a patient decision aid in female stress urinary incontinence.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: A treatment choice for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is preference sensitive for both patients and physicians. Multiple treatment options are available, with none being superior to any other. The decision-making process can be supported by a patient decision aid (PDA). We aimed to assess physicians' perceptions concerning the use of a PDA. METHODS: In a mixed methods study, urologists, gynecologists and general practitioners in the Netherlands were asked to fill out a web-based questionnaire. Questions were based on the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases checklist using the following domains: guideline factors, individual health professional factors, professional interactions, incentives and resources, and capacity for organizational change. Participants were asked to grade statements using a five-point Likert scale and to answer open questions on facilitators of and barriers to implementation of a PDA. Outcomes of statement rating were quantitatively analyzed and thematic analysis was performed on the outcomes regarding facilitators and barriers. RESULTS: The response rate was 11%, with a total of 120 participants completing the questionnaire. Ninety-two of the physicians (77%) would use a PDA in female SUI. Evidence-based and unbiased content, the ability to support shared decision making, and patient empowerment are identified as main facilitators. Barriers are the expected prolonged time investment and the possible difficulty using the PDA in less health-literate patient populations. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of physicians would use a PDA for female SUI. We identified facilitators and barriers that can be used when developing and implementing such a PDA.

Association between levator ani avulsion and urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Urinary incontinence is a bothersome symptom. Although the relationship between stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and vaginal delivery is established, the pathology underlying SUI after vaginal birth remains to be elucidated. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether levator ani muscle avulsion predisposes for SUI in women. SEARCH STRATEGY: Pubmed and Embase were searched for terms and their variations "levator ani muscle avulsion" and "urinary incontinence", from inception until 5 November 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA: Inclusion criterion: studies describing the relationship between urinary incontinence and levator ani muscle avulsion in women at least 1 year after delivery. Exclusion criterion: studies only analyzing the urethral sphincter or hiatus dimensions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Odds ratios were used and if not available, were calculated as means of data synthesis, adjusted odds ratios if presented by the study, random-effects model to compute a pooled estimate. RESULTS: Seven studies were included, accounting for 2388 women. Comparing women with and without levator ani muscle avulsion, the overall odds ratio for SUI is 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.56-1.34), and after adjustment for possible confounders was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.40-1.30). CONCLUSION: There is no relationship between levator ani muscle avulsion and SUI in women.

Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?

We aim to provide an overview of the various digital three-dimensional visualizations used for learning anatomy and to assess whether these improve medical students' understanding of anatomy compared to traditional learning methods. Furthermore, we evaluate the attitudes of the users of three-dimensional visualizations. We included articles that compared advanced newer three-dimensional anatomy visualization methods (i.e., virtual reality, augmented reality, and computer-based three-dimensional visualizations) to traditional methods that have been used for a long time (i.e., cadaver and textbooks) with regard to users' understanding of anatomy. Of the 1,148 articles identified, 21 articles reported data on the effectiveness of using three-dimensional visualization methods compared to two-dimensional methods. Twelve articles found that three-dimensional visualization is a significantly more effective learning method compared to traditional methods, whereas nine articles did not find that three-dimensional visualization was a significantly more effective method. In general, based on these articles, medical students prefer to use three-dimensional visualizations to learn anatomy. In most of the articles, using three-dimensional visualization was shown to be a more effective method to gain anatomical knowledge compared to traditional methods. Besides that, students are motivated and interested in using these new visualization methods for learning anatomical structures. Clin. Anat. 32:25-33, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.