Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the omicron period: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the performances of three commonly used antigen rapid diagnostic tests used as self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the Omicron period. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study in the Omicron period in three public health service COVID-19 test sites in the Netherlands, including 3600 asymptomatic individuals aged ≥ 16 years presenting for SARS-CoV-2 testing for any reason except confirmatory testing after a positive self-test. Participants were sampled for RT-PCR (reference test) and received one self-test (either Acon Flowflex [Flowflex], MP Biomedicals (MPBio), or Siemens-Healthineers CLINITEST [CLINITEST]) to perform unsupervised at home. Diagnostic accuracies of each self-test were calculated. RESULTS: Overall sensitivities were 27.5% (95% CI, 21.3-34.3%) for Flowflex, 20.9% (13.9-29.4%) for MPBio, and 25.6% (19.1-33.1%) for CLINITEST. After applying a viral load cut-off (≥5.2 log10 SARS-CoV-2 E-gene copies/mL), sensitivities increased to 48.3% (37.6-59.2%), 37.8% (22.5-55.2%), and 40.0% (29.5-51.2%), respectively. Specificities were >99% for all tests in most analyses. DISCUSSION: The sensitivities of three commonly used SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests when used as self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the Omicron period were very low. Antigen rapid diagnostic test self-testing in asymptomatic individuals may only detect a minority of infections at that point in time. Repeated self-testing in case of a negative self-test is advocated to improve the diagnostic yield, and individuals should be advised to re-test when symptoms develop.

Diagnostic accuracy of covid-19 rapid antigen tests with unsupervised self-sampling in people with symptoms in the omicron period: cross sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of rapid antigen tests with unsupervised nasal and combined oropharyngeal and nasal self-sampling during the omicron period. DESIGN: Prospective cross sectional diagnostic test accuracy study. SETTING: Three public health service covid-19 test sites in the Netherlands, 21 December 2021 to 10 February 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 6497 people with covid-19 symptoms aged ≥16 years presenting for testing. INTERVENTIONS: Participants had a swab sample taken for reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, reference test) and received one rapid antigen test to perform unsupervised using either nasal self-sampling (during the emergence of omicron, and when omicron accounted for >90% of infections, phase 1) or with combined oropharyngeal and nasal self-sampling in a subsequent (phase 2; when omicron accounted for >99% of infections). The evaluated tests were Flowflex (Acon Laboratories; phase 1 only), MPBio (MP Biomedicals), and Clinitest (Siemens-Healthineers). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of each self-test, with RT-PCR testing as the reference standard. RESULTS: During phase 1, 45.0% (n=279) of participants in the Flowflex group, 29.1% (n=239) in the MPBio group, and 35.4% ((n=257) in the Clinitest group were confirmatory testers (previously tested positive by a self-test at own initiative). Overall sensitivities with nasal self-sampling were 79.0% (95% confidence interval 74.7% to 82.8%) for Flowflex, 69.9% (65.1% to 74.4%) for MPBio, and 70.2% (65.6% to 74.5%) for Clinitest. Sensitivities were substantially higher in confirmatory testers (93.6%, 83.6%, and 85.7%, respectively) than in those who tested for other reasons (52.4%, 51.5%, and 49.5%, respectively). Sensitivities decreased from 87.0% to 80.9% (P=0.16 by χ2 test), 80.0% to 73.0% (P=0.60), and 83.1% to 70.3% (P=0.03), respectively, when transitioning from omicron accounting for 29% of infections to >95% of infections. During phase 2, 53.0% (n=288) of participants in the MPBio group and 44.4% (n=290) in the Clinitest group were confirmatory testers. Overall sensitivities with combined oropharyngeal and nasal self-sampling were 83.0% (78.8% to 86.7%) for MPBio and 77.3% (72.9% to 81.2%) for Clinitest. When combined oropharyngeal and nasal self-sampling was compared with nasal self-sampling, sensitivities were found to be slightly higher in confirmatory testers (87.4% and 86.1%, respectively) and substantially higher in those testing for other reasons (69.3% and 59.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivities of three rapid antigen tests with nasal self-sampling decreased during the emergence of omicron but was only statistically significant for Clinitest. Sensitivities appeared to be substantially influenced by the proportion of confirmatory testers. Sensitivities of MPBio and Clinitest improved after the addition of oropharyngeal to nasal self-sampling. A positive self-test result justifies prompt self-isolation without the need for confirmatory testing. Individuals with a negative self-test result should adhere to general preventive measures because a false negative result cannot be ruled out. Manufacturers of MPBio and Clinitest may consider extending their instructions for use to include combined oropharyngeal and nasal self-sampling, and other manufacturers of rapid antigen tests should consider evaluating this as well.

Detection of intrathecal antibodies to diagnose enterovirus infections of the central nervous system.

BACKGROUND: Enterovirus-D68 (EV-D68) predominantly causes respiratory disease. However, EV-D68 infections also have been associated with central nervous system (CNS) complications, most specifically acute flaccid myelitis (AFM). Diagnosing EV-D68-associated CNS disease is challenging since viral RNA is rarely detected in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). OBJECTIVE: In order to determine an EV antibody index (AI), we evaluated the value of a commercially available quantitative ELISA to detect EV-specific antibodies in paired CSF and blood. STUDY DESIGN: Nine paired CSF and blood samples were obtained from patients with EV-D68-associated AFM or from patients with a confirmed EV-associated CNS disease. EV-specific antibodies were detected using a quantitative ELISA. A Reiber diagram analysis was performed, by which the AI was calculated. Subsequently, EV ELISA results were compared with an EV-D68 virus neutralization test. RESULTS: ELISA detected EV-specific antibodies in 1 out of the 3 patients with EV-D68-associated AFM and in 3 out of the 6 patients with confirmed EV-associated CNS disease. In these patients, the AI was indicative for intrathecal antibody production against enterovirus. Assay comparison showed that EV-D68 neutralizing antibody detection increased the sensitivity of EV-D68 antibody detection. CONCLUSIONS: A quantitative EV IgG ELISA in combination with Reiber diagram analysis and AI-calculation can be used as a diagnostic tool for EV-associated CNS disease, including EV-D68. An EV-D68 specific ELISA will improve the sensitivity of the tool. With the growing awareness that the detection of non-polio enteroviruses needs to be improved, diagnostic laboratories should consider implementation of EV serology.

Functional characterization of the competence protein DprA/Smf in Escherichia coli.

In several bacterial species that show natural transformation, dprA has been described as a competence gene. The DprA protein has been suggested to be involved in the protection of incoming DNA. However, members of the dprA gene family (also called smf) can be detected in virtually all bacterial species, which suggests that their gene products have a more general function. We examined the function of the DprA/Smf homologue of Escherichia coli. Escherichia coli dprA/smf is able to partially restore transformation in a Haemophilus influenzae dprA mutant, which shows that dprA/smf genes from competent and noncompetent species are interchangeable with respect to their involvement in natural transformation. From this, we conclude that natural transformation is probably an additional function of these genes. Subsequently, the dprA/smf gene was deleted in various recombination mutants of E. coli, and the resultant phenotype was tested. All the resultant E. coli dprA/smf mutants did not differ from their parent strains with respect to transformation, Hfr-conjugation, recombination and DNA repair. Therefore, a role of DprA/Smf in DNA recombination could not be established and the basic function of dprA/smf remains unclear.

Molecular patchwork: Chromosomal recombination between two Helicobacter pylori strains during natural colonization.

Genetic analysis of two Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from a single gastric biopsy showed evidence of extensive horizontal gene transfer. Several large recombinations were identified in the rdxA gene, which is involved in metronidazole resistance.

Natural transformation in Helicobacter pylori: DNA transport in an unexpected way.

Like other bacterial species with a high frequency of inter-strain recombination, the human gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori is competent for natural transformation. Recent data, however, indicate that its DNA-uptake system differs significantly from that in other species that contain DNA-uptake systems related to type IV pili. Instead, in H. pylori it has been suggested that the five proteins that form the transmembrane channel of the transformation system are closely related to subunits of type IV secretion systems.