The COVID-19 Army Rapid Assessment Tool (CARAT) for Management of COVID-19 in the Deployed Setting.

The COVID-19 pandemic poses unique challenges within the austere clinical setting, and the time between patient presentation and deterioration is a critical opportunity for intervention. In some cases, this may be a life-saving transfer to a higher level of care. US Central Command (CENTCOM) has provided valuable guidance for COVID-19 management in the operational environment,1 and has proposed the National Early Warning System 2 (NEWS2) scoring tool as a useful adjunct to gauging illness severity. NEWS2, however, does not consider co-morbidities, such as diabetes or chronic cardiac disease, which could worsen the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 patients. Thus, NEWS2 fails to address such factors during the risk stratification of patients to a higher level of care. To address this concern, June 2020, 3rd Medical Brigade, Operation Spartan Shield (OSS) developed the COVID-19 Army Rapid Assessment Tool (CARAT) with inputs from clinicians and researchers (The Team). The CARAT is a clinical scoring system, modified from the NEWS2, which combines the effects of co-morbid disease with the current physiological condition of a COVID-19 patient. The Team obtained clinical data for 105 patients from the CENTCOM area of responsibility (AOR), who presented to a military treatment facility (MTF) symptomatic for, and testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, during the time period of June to mid-August 2020. Each patient was retrospectively assigned a CARAT score based on his or her initial presentation. Preliminary review of data suggested a CARAT value of 4 or greater was an indicator for risk of further deterioration. Patients were then grouped into two categories: patients who received transfer to a higher level of care, versus "stay-in-place" supportive care. Results showed that 100% of patients with a score ≥4 had been transferred to a higher echelon of care, compared to 2% of patients with scores less than 4. A Fisher's exact test demonstrated a statistically significant difference between these two groups (p is less than 0.001). Interestingly, when compared with the NEWS2 score, the CARAT identified 9 individuals for transfer to a higher level of care, of whom only one patient was identified by the NEWS2, clearly underscoring the significance of CARAT despite small sample size. We therefore recommend that CARAT be further validated in predicting disease severity and need for emergent evacuation in larger patient settings.

Does Timing of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Planning Impact Retrieval Rates? A Comparison of Planning Before or After Hospital Discharge.

INTRODUCTION: Indwelling inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are associated with complications, and the US Food and Drug Administration recommends their prompt removal when no longer indicated. Therefore, assessing strategies for increasing retrieval rates is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the variability of IVC filter retrieval rates within our institution based on 2 separate, pre-existing processes in which IVC retrieval is planned for before or after hospital discharge. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was completed for all IVC filters placed in adults between January 2005 and March 2015. Demographics and clinical data related to filter placement and retrieval were abstracted. Patients were classified into 2 groups: patients who had a trauma consultation trauma and nontrauma medical and surgical patients medical. The trauma group patients were subject to a 2-layer tracking process, in which retrieval planning was done before discharge, versus the medical group with a single-layer tracking process and retrieval planning done after discharge. RESULTS: Of the 588 filter placements analyzed, 236 were placed in trauma patients and 352 were placed for medical reasons. The retrieval rate of the entire cohort was 45% (262/588), with the rate among trauma patients more than double that of medical patients (155/236, 66% and 107/352, 30%; respectively, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: IVC filter retrieval rate was increased when filter removal was included in discharge planning versus postdischarge tracking. A systematic, multidisciplinary strategic approach to IVC filter management has great potential to improve filter utilization, resource allocation, patient safety, and filter retrieval.

A US Registry-Based Assessment of Use and Impact of Chemotherapy in Stage I HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Background: Despite the paucity of evidence supporting chemotherapy in the treatment of node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer measuring <2 cm, use of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy has increased over the past decade. Therefore, we used the National Cancer Database to evaluate the use and impact of chemotherapy on survival in this population. Methods: We identified female patients aged 18 to 70 years with node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer measuring <2 cm. A propensity-matched cohort model was used to control for risk factors known to influence survival. Primary end points assessed were receipt of chemotherapy and overall survival (OS). Results: In our propensity-matched cohort model (n=8,222), adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) was associated with a lower 5-year OS rate in T1mi breast cancer (n=626; 89.1% [95% CI, 81.8%-93.5%] vs 99.1% [96.6%-99.8%]), no significant effect in T1a disease (n=2,901; 95.4% [93.2%-96.9%] vs 96.9% [94.1%-98.3%]), and improved 5-year OS in T1b (n=2,340; 97.1% [95.1%-98.4%] vs 92.3% [88.5%-94.9%]) and T1c tumors (n=2,355; 95.9% [93.5%-97.5%] vs 91.5% [88.4%-93.9%]). In the entire cohort of 21,148 patients who met the inclusion criteria, ACT was associated with lower 5-year OS in T1mi (89.6% [83.7%-93.4%] vs 98.1% [96.6%-98.9%]) and T1a tumors (94.9% [92.9%-96.3%] vs 96.5% [94.6%-97.7%]), and improved 5-year OS in T1b (96.8% [95.6%-97.7%] vs 92.3% [88.7%-94.8%]) and T1c tumors (95.8% [94.9%-96.5%] vs 91.6% [88.5%-93.9%]). Increased use of ACT was observed over the study period. From 2010 to 2013, annual treatment rates were 71.5%, 72.4%, 73.3%, and 74.4%, respectively (trend test, P<.0001). Conclusions: Our data support the use of ACT for HER2-positive, node-negative T1b and T1c breast cancer, whereas no benefit was observed for ACT in T1mi and T1a HER2-positive, node-negative breast cancer. Although use of ACT is increasing in node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer <2 cm, our findings caution against its use in the smallest of these tumors (T1mi and T1a) due to lack of survival benefit.

Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Elderly Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Targeted Therapy Era.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) is not clearly understood after the approval of targeted therapies, particularly in the elderly population. The aim of this study was to compare survivals between patients who did and did not receive CN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The SEER-18 database was utilized in order to identify elderly patients with mRCC to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients who did or did not receive CN between February 2006 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test were used to compare OS and CSS between these two arms. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis and statistical significance was defined as p≤0.05. RESULTS: There was a significant survival benefit for those who received CN compared to those who did not receive CN (median OS: 18 months vs. 4 months, p<0.001; median CSS: 21 months vs. 5 months, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: CN offered significant survival benefit, even in elderly patients with metastatic renal cell cancer.

Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Nonsurgically Managed Patients: Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Purpose Data that guide selection of optimal local ablative therapy for the management localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. Because there are limited prospective comparative data for these treatment modalities, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) by using the National Cancer Database. Methods We conducted an observational study to compare the effectiveness of RFA versus SBRT in nonsurgically managed patients with stage I or II HCC. Overall survival was compared by using propensity score-weighted and propensity score-matched analyses based on patient-, facility-, and tumor-level characteristics. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of severe fibrosis/cirrhosis. In addition, we performed exploratory analyses to determine the effectiveness of RFA and SBRT in clinically relevant patient subsets. Results Overall, 3,684 (92.6%) and 296 (7.4%) nonsurgically managed patients with stage I or II HCC received RFA or SBRT, respectively. After propensity matching, 5-year overall survival was 29.8% (95% CI, 24.5% to 35.3%) in the RFA group versus 19.3% (95% CI, 13.5% to 25.9%) in the SBRT group ( P < .001). Inverse probability-weighted analysis yielded similar results. The benefit of RFA was consistent across all subgroups examined and was robust to the effects of severe fibrosis/cirrhosis. Conclusion Our study suggests that treatment with RFA yields superior survival compared with SBRT for nonsurgically managed patients with stage I or II HCC. Even though our results are limited by the biases related to the retrospective study design, we believe that, in the absence of a randomized clinical trial, our findings should be considered when recommending local ablative therapy for localized unresectable HCC.

Are We on the Same Page? Patient and Provider Perceptions About Exercise in Cancer Care: A Focus Group Study.

Background: Physical activity (PA) during and after cancer treatment can help with symptom management and reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. However, it is unclear what constitutes an optimal exercise program. In addition, provider and patient barriers exist to the recommendation and adoption of exercise as part of a cancer treatment plan. The goal of this study was to determine how providers and patients feel about exercise during cancer treatment and explore what the barriers to implementing such a program might be. Patients and Methods: Focus groups and interviews were held with patients with malignancy, both metastatic and nonmetastatic, and oncology providers. In total, 20 patients participated in either a focus group or an individual interview and 9 providers contributed to the focus group. An equal number of patients (n=10) were interviewed as attended a focus group. Audiotaped sessions were transcribed verbatim. Theme identification was independently coded by 4 coders and synthesized as a group. Results: Neither patient group recalled PA instruction from oncology providers during their cancer treatment. Most participants (95%) felt exercise is important during cancer treatment, citing overall well-being benefits versus improved disease outcome. Most patients (80%) preferred a home-based exercise program provided by the oncologist. Fatigue was the most cited barrier to regular exercise during treatment (50%). All providers acknowledged benefits of PA to patients, but not universally for all. More than half of providers (55%) preferred a referral system for exercise programs. Clinic visit time constraints and a perceived lack of expertise in the area of PA were common barriers to making exercise recommendations a routine part of the treatment plan. Conclusions: Patients with cancer and oncologists recognize the benefits of PA during treatment. Disagreement exists between to whom, how, and where exercise plans should be disseminated and implemented.

Case Report of an Ectopic Molar Pregnancy in the Presence of an Intrauterine Device.

BACKGROUND: Ectopic molar pregnancy is a rare phenomenon and has not been reported in the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD). Clinical diagnosis of molar pregnancy is challenging and requires careful follow-up. CASE: A 25-year-old woman (gravida 2, para 0) with a copper IUD in place presented with a positive pregnancy test. Diagnosis of the complete hydatidiform mole was pathologically confirmed after surgery following clinical and sonographic investigations that identified a left-sided ectopic pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) presenting as an ectopic pregnancy is a very rare occurrence. This patient recovered without event through a combined management and follow-up for ectopic pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic disease. Appropriate identification and management of this clinical problem is essential in order to prevent initial complications as well as subsequent malignant sequelae.

21-Gene recurrence score decreases receipt of chemotherapy in ER+ early-stage breast cancer: an analysis of the NCDB 2010-2013.

The purpose of this study was to determine if receipt of chemotherapy was associated with utilization of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (RS assay) or with recurrence score (RS) in eligible patients. Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we identified female patients eligible for RS assay based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines: age 18-70, ER-positive and HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer diagnosed during 2010-2013. We excluded patients not meeting testing guidelines. Inclusion required result of RS in patients who underwent RS assay and status for receipt of chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression models and propensity matched analysis were used to determine associations between RS assay and RS with receipt of chemotherapy. Among 129,765 patients who were eligible, 74,778 underwent RS assay and had results available. Of these, 59.5 % (44,505) had low-risk, 32.0 % (23,920) had intermediate-risk, and 8.5 % (6353) had high-risk RS. Patients with intermediate- and high-risk RS were more likely to receive chemotherapy [OR 12.9 (CI 12.2-13.6), p <0.001 and OR 87.2 (CI 79.6-95.6), p <0.0001], respectively. In both low- and intermediate-risk groups, increasing RS score was significantly associated with increasing odds of receiving chemotherapy [OR 1.10 (CI 1.09-1.12), p <0.0001 and OR 1.26 (CI 1.25-1.27), p <0.0001, respectively, for each point increase in RS]. Receipt of chemotherapy was more likely in patients who did not undergo RS assay compared to those who did, OR 1.21 (CI 1.175-1.249) p <0.0001. The utilization of RS assay and the RS were both strongly associated with chemotherapy receipt. Patients eligible for chemotherapy, based on NCCN criteria, were more likely to receive chemotherapy if they did not undergo RS assay or they had a high RS.

Effectiveness of a Survivorship Program: An Assessment of Patients With Breast Cancer in a Community Setting.

PURPOSE: This study assesses the effectiveness of a single institution's breast cancer survivorship program on patient perceptions, quality of life (QOL), and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for follow-up. METHODS: Sampled patients completed all their breast cancer treatment at a single tertiary center. Surveys designed to evaluate QOL were obtained, and retrospective medical record review was conducted to assess NCCN compliance. Survivorship clinic (SC) attendees and nonattendees were matched for age and disease stage for comparison of the outcomes (QOL, NCCN compliance, and overall effectiveness). RESULTS: SC patients (n = 63) tended to perceive their concerns in various categories to be addressed more adequately than did nonattendees (n = 54), with significant differences in the areas of practical concerns (P = .03) and late-term adverse effects (P = .03). There was a significant difference in compliance with three NCCN guidelines (history and physical every 3 to 6 months, annual mammography, and a pelvic examination if on tamoxifen) between survivorship attendees and nonattendees (P < .001, P = .02, and P < .001, respectively). Women who attended an SC used other survivorship support resources more often. CONCLUSION: Survivorship programs can be time and resource consuming, but our study is one of the first to show that a survivorship program effectively changes patient behavior in important ways. Patients who attended an SC were more likely to be compliant with NCCN-recommended follow-up and to use other survivorship resources and felt their concerns were better addressed. These measures can be used to help us improve our survivorship services and by other institutions to measure the quality and effectiveness of their programs.