Clinical studies of detecting COVID-19 from exhaled breath with electronic nose.

The COVID-19 pandemic has attracted numerous research studies because of its impact on society and the economy. The pandemic has led to progress in the development of diagnostic methods, utilizing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard for coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 detection. Numerous tests can be used at home within 15 min or so but of with lower accuracy than PCR. There is still a need for point-of-care tests available for mass daily screening of large crowds in airports, schools, and stadiums. The same problem exists with fast and continuous monitoring of patients during their medical treatment. The rapid methods can use exhaled breath analysis which is non-invasive and delivers the result quite fast. Electronic nose can detect a cocktail of volatile organic com-pounds (VOCs) induced by virus infection and disturbed metabolism in the human body. In our exploratory studies, we present the results of COVID-19 detection in a local hospital by applying the developed electronic setup utilising commercial VOC gas sensors. We consider the technical problems noticed during the reported studies and affecting the detection results. We believe that our studies help to advance the proposed technique to limit the spread of COVID-19 and similar viral infections.

Anatomy of noise in quantitative biological Raman spectroscopy.

Raman spectroscopy is a fundamental form of molecular spectroscopy that is widely used to investigate structures and properties of molecules using their vibrational transitions. It relies on inelastic scattering of monochromatic laser light irradiating the specimen. After appropriate filtering the scattered light is dispersed onto a detector to determine the shift from the excitation wavelength, which appears in the form of characteristic spectral patterns. The technique can investigate biological samples and provide real-time diagnosis of diseases. However, despite its intrinsic advantages of specificity and minimal perturbation, the Raman scattered light is typically very weak and limits applications of Raman spectroscopy due to measurement (im)precision, driven by inherent noise in the acquired spectra. In this article, we review the principal noise sources that impact quantitative biological Raman spectroscopy. Further, we discuss how such noise effects can be reduced by innovative changes in the constructed Raman system and appropriate signal processing methods.

Investigation of noise-induced instabilities in quantitative biological spectroscopy and its implications for noninvasive glucose monitoring.

Over the past decade, optical spectroscopy has been employed in combination with multivariate chemometric models to investigate a wide variety of diseases and pathological conditions, primarily due to its excellent chemical specificity and lack of sample preparation requirements. Despite promising results in several proof-of-concept studies, its translation to the clinical setting has often been hindered by inadequate accuracy of the conventional spectroscopic models. To address this issue and the possibility of curved (nonlinear) effects in the relationship between the concentrations of the analyte of interest and the mixture spectra (due to fluctuations in sample and environmental conditions), support vector machine-based least-squares nonlinear regression (LS-SVR) has been recently proposed. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of this methodology to noise-induced instabilities and present an analytical formula for estimating modeling precision as a function of measurement noise and model parameters. This formalism can be readily used to evaluate uncertainty in information extracted from spectroscopic measurements, particularly important for rapid-acquisition biomedical applications. Subsequently, using field data (Raman spectra) acquired from a glucose clamping study on an animal model subject, we perform the first systematic investigation of the relative effect of additive interference components (namely, noise in prediction spectra, calibration spectra, and calibration concentrations) on the prediction error of nonlinear spectroscopic models. Our results show that the LS-SVR method gives more accurate results and is substantially more robust to additive noise when compared with conventional regression methods such as partial least-squares regression (PLS), when careful selection of the LS-SVR model parameters are performed. We anticipate that these results will be useful for uncertainty estimation in similar biomedical applications where the precision of measurements and its response to noise in the data set is as important, if not more so, than the generic accuracy level.