Modified maxillomandibular advancement surgery for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea: a scoping review.

Modified maxillomandibular advancement (MMMA) has been proposed as an alternative to the classic maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) in East and Southeast Asian populations in which bimaxillary protrusion is a prevalent trait. The key difference between MMMA and MMA is the inclusion of anterior segmental osteotomies to reduce the protrusion of the perioral region. The aim of this scoping review was to identify the variations in MMMA and treatment outcomes. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases for articles published up to January 2023. Ten articles were included in this review. Three variations of MMMA have been reported in the literature. Treatment outcomes have mostly been favourable for all of these variations. Mandibular advancement of >10 mm and a greater than 50% reduction in the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) have been well reported. Improvements in other outcome measures, such as enlargement of the airway dimension on computed tomography and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, have also been shown. Despite additional surgical procedures, complications have been uncommon and mostly minor in nature. It is necessary to be cognizant of MMMA and its variations when providing sleep surgery for East and Southeast Asian patients, tailoring this to the patient's profile and needs.

The role of anterior segmental osteotomies in orthognathic surgery for protrusive faces in a Southeast Asian population: 10-year retrospective data of 51 patients treated in a single centre.

Bimaxillary protrusion is a dentofacial deformity common in the East Asian population. It is often difficult to decide between orthodontic and surgical retraction to treat patients with bimaxillary protrusion, especially if surgery to correct skeletal base discrepancies is also required. The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes of surgical versus orthodontic retraction in patients with bimaxillary protrusion undergoing orthognathic surgery. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, where the medical records and radiographs of 51 patients with bimaxillary protrusion who had an anterior segmental osteotomy concomitant with orthognathic surgery were examined. Patients who had bimaxillary anterior segmental osteotomies were more likely to achieve an inter-incisal angle of 135 ± 5° at the end of treatment, when compared to patients who had orthodontic retraction (P < 0.01). The total treatment duration of patients who had bimaxillary anterior segmental osteotomies was significantly shorter as compared to that of the patients who only had these osteotomies in the maxilla (P < 0.001) or mandible (P = 0.012). Complications and permanent long-term sequelae following anterior segmental osteotomies were uncommon. It is concluded that bimaxillary anterior segmental osteotomies are a viable alternative for patients with concomitant bimaxillary protrusion and skeletal base discrepancies. This allows for a significantly shorter treatment time and greater correction of inter-incisal angles, without a significant increase in complications.