Practice Patterns of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Practice Survey.

Purpose: Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is increasingly used for bulky advanced tumors, but specifics of clinical SFRT practice remain elusive. This study aimed to determine practice patterns of GRID and Lattice radiation therapy (LRT)-based SFRT. Methods and Materials: A survey was designed to identify radiation oncologists' practice patterns of patient selection for SFRT, dosing/planning, dosimetric parameter use, SFRT platforms/techniques, combinations of SFRT with conventional external beam radiation therapy (cERT) and multimodality therapies, and physicists' technical implementation, delivery, and quality procedures. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Group comparisons were analyzed with permutation tests. Results: The majority of practicing radiation oncologists (United States, 100%; global, 72.7%) considered SFRT an accepted standard-of-care radiation therapy option for bulky/advanced tumors. Treatment of metastases/recurrences and nonmetastatic primary tumors, predominantly head and neck, lung cancer and sarcoma, was commonly practiced. In palliative SFRT, regimens of 15 to 18 Gy/1 fraction predominated (51.3%), and in curative-intent treatment of nonmetastatic tumors, 15 Gy/1 fraction (28.0%) and fractionated SFRT (24.0%) were most common. SFRT was combined with cERT commonly but not always in palliative (78.6%) and curative-intent (85.7%) treatment. SFRT-cERT time sequencing and cERT dose adjustments were variable. In curative-intent treatment, concurrent chemotherapy and immunotherapy were found acceptable by 54.5% and 28.6%, respectively. Use of SFRT dosimetric parameters was highly variable and differed between GRID and LRT. SFRT heterogeneity dosimetric parameters were more commonly used (P = .008) and more commonly thought to influence local control (peak dose, P = .008) in LRT than in GRID therapy. Conclusions: SFRT has already evolved as a clinical practice pattern for advanced/bulky tumors. Major treatment approaches are consistent and follow the literature, but SFRT-cERT combination/sequencing and clinical utilization of dosimetric parameters are variable. These areas may benefit from targeted education and standardization, and knowledge gaps may be filled by incorporating identified inconsistencies into future clinical research.

Characterization of Photon Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Robustness in Patients With Prostate Cancer as a Proposed Benchmark for Proton Therapy Robustness Evaluation.

PURPOSE: Robustness evaluation is increasingly used in particle therapy planning to assess clinical target volume (CTV) coverage in the setting of setup and range uncertainty. However, no clear standard exists as to an acceptable degree of plan robustness. The aim of this study is to quantify x-ray robustness parameters, as this could inform proton planning when held to a similar standard. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Consecutive patients with prostate adenocarcinoma treated with definitive x-irradiation to the prostate alone at a single institution in 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. CTV to planned target volume (PTV) margins of 7 mm in all directions, except 4 mm posteriorly, were used in the main cohort. Plans were normalized to PTV V100% ≥ 95%. Patient setup errors were simulated by shifting the isocenter relative to the patient in each of the cardinal directions. The magnitude of each shift equaled the magnitude of the CTV to PTV expansion in that direction. Range uncertainty was set to 0%. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were evaluated. The mean (SD) nominal plan CTV V100% was 99.6% (1.1%). The mean (SD) worst-case shift CTV V100% was 97.2% (2.8%). The mean (SD) nominal and worst-case CTV V95% were 100% (0%) and 99.7% (0.5%), respectively. A worst-case CTV V100% > 90% and a worst-case CTV V95% > 99% were achieved in over 95% of plans. The mean (SD) nominal and worst-case rectal V70 Gy were 2.37 cc (1.00 cc) and 11.60 cc (3.16 cc), respectively. The mean (SD) nominal and worst-case bladder V60 Gy were 7.8% (4.8%) and 14.5% (9.3%), respectively. Paired 2-tailed t tests comparing the nominal to worst-case dose-volume histograms were significant for each dosimetric parameter (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: X-ray planning uses PTV margins to inherently provide robustness to patient setup errors. Although the prostate remains well covered in various setup uncertainty scenarios, organs at risk routinely exceeded nominal treatment plan institutional constraints in the worst-case scenarios. Robustness metrics obtained from x-ray plans could serve as a benchmark for proton therapy robust optimization and evaluation.

Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.

PURPOSE: The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials. RESULTS: Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.

An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical-Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Advanced Gynecologic Cancer.

Despite the unexpectedly high tumor responses and limited treatment-related toxicities observed with SFRT, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. High variability of SFRT technologies and methods, unfamiliar complex dose and prescription concepts for heterogeneous dose and uncertainty regarding systemic therapies present major obstacles towards clinical trial development. To address these challenges, the consensus guideline reported here aimed at facilitating trial development and feasibility through a priori harmonization of treatment approach and the full range of clinical trial design parameters for SFRT trials in gynecologic cancer. Gynecologic cancers were evaluated for the status of SFRT pilot experience. A multi-disciplinary SFRT expert panel for gynecologic cancer was established to develop the consensus through formal panel review/discussions, appropriateness rank voting and public comment solicitation/review. The trial design parameters included eligibility/exclusions, endpoints, SFRT technology/technique, dose/dosimetric parameters, systemic therapies, patient evaluations, and embedded translational science. Cervical cancer was determined as the most suitable gynecologic tumor for an SFRT trial. Consensus emphasized standardization of SFRT dosimetry/physics parameters, biologic dose modeling, and specimen collection for translational/biological endpoints, which may be uniquely feasible in cervical cancer. Incorporation of brachytherapy into the SFRT regimen requires additional pre-trial pilot investigations. Specific consensus recommendations are presented and discussed.

An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical-Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), which delivers highly nonuniform dose distributions instead of conventionally practiced homogeneous tumor dose, has shown high rates of clinical response with minimal toxicities in large-volume primary or metastatic malignancies. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials in SFRT are lacking, and SFRT techniques and dose parameters remain variable. Agreement on dose prescription, technical administration, and clinical and translational design parameters for SFRT trials is essential to enable broad participation and successful accrual to rigorously test the SFRT approach. We aimed to develop a consensus for the design of multi-institutional clinical trials in SFRT, tailored to specific primary tumor sites, to help facilitate development and enhance the feasibility of such trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Primary tumor sites with sufficient pilot experience in SFRT were identified, and fundamental trial design questions were determined. For each tumor site, a comprehensive consensus effort was established through disease-specific expert panels. Clinical trial design criteria included eligibility, SFRT technology and technique, dose and fractionation, target- and normal-tissue dose parameters, systemic therapies, clinical trial endpoints, and translational science considerations. Iterative appropriateness rank voting, expert panel consensus reviews and discussions, and public comment posting were used for consensus development. RESULTS: Clinical trial criteria were developed for head and neck cancer and soft-tissue sarcoma. Final consensus among the 22 trial design categories each (a total of 163 criteria) was high to moderate overall. Uniform patient cohorts of advanced bulky disease, standardization of SFRT technologies and dosimetry and physics parameters, and collection of translational correlates were considered essential to trial design. Final guideline recommendations and the degree of agreement are presented and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus provides design guidelines for the development of prospective multi-institutional clinical trials testing SFRT in advanced head and neck cancer and soft-tissue sarcoma through in-advance harmonization of the fundamental clinical trial design among SFRT experts, potential investigators, and the SFRT community.

Factors associated with loss to follow-up after radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are at high risk for late occurring radiation-related morbidity and recurrence, necessitating close long-term medical surveillance. This study identified factors associated with becoming lost to follow-up (LTFU) at a comprehensive cancer center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were drawn from survivors who received radiation for HNC at a single institution between 2001 and 2018. LTFU was defined as living patients without a clinical encounter within 2 years of the data query. RESULTS: In total, 537 patients met the inclusion criteria and 57 (10.6%) were identified as LTFU. Individual comparisons identified time since completing radiation, non-White race and being unmarried as associated with LTFU. Multiple regression identified time since treatment and being unmarried as factors associated with LTFU. A decision tree correctly sorted 89.4% using time, distance, and marital status. CONCLUSION: Time since radiation, distance to clinic, and being unmarried were factors associated with becoming LTFU.

Prospective Evaluation of Swallowing Symptoms in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharynx Cancer.

To demonstrate that the lack of significant swallowing-related symptoms in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma is attributable to smaller mucosal primaries. A validated dysphagia symptom questionnaire and eating assessment tool was prospectively provided to patients presenting with untreated human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer at the University of Maryland from July 2017 to December 2018. A 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was completed by each patient prior to intervention. All EAT-10 data were collected prospectively. Patient demographic and oncologic characteristics were also obtained. Seventy consecutive patients were enrolled and included in the study. This study cohort included 66 (94%) male patients. Sixty (86%) of patients were Caucasian. The mean EAT-10 score was 3.77 (95% CI 2.04, 5.50). Fifty-two (74.3%) patients presented with normal swallowing (EAT-10 scores less than 3). Spearman correlation indicated there was a significant positive association between tumor size and EAT-10 score (r(68) = 0.429, p < 0.005), with larger tumors associated with increased swallowing-related symptoms. The majority of patients presenting with HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma do not report any swallowing difficulties. Dysphagia-related symptoms are associated with large size tumors when they do occur.

Work Outcomes after Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) versus Intensity-Modulated Photon Therapy (IMRT) for Oropharyngeal Cancer.

PURPOSE: We compared work outcomes in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), randomized to intensity-modulated proton (IMPT) versus intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT) for chemoradiation therapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 147 patients with stage II-IVB squamous cell OPC participating in patient-reported outcomes assessments, a prespecified secondary aim of a randomized phase II/III trial of IMPT (n = 69) versus IMRT (n = 78), we compared absenteeism, presenteeism (i.e., the extent to which an employee is not fully functional at work), and work productivity losses. We used the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire at baseline (pre-CRT), at the end of CRT, and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. A one-sided Cochran-Armitage test was used to analyze within-arm temporal trends, and a χ2 test was used to compare between-arm differences. Among working patients, at each follow-up point, a 1-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare work-productivity scores. RESULTS: Patient characteristics in IMPT versus IMRT arms were similar. In the IMPT arm, within-arm analysis demonstrated that an increasing proportion of patients resumed working after IMPT, from 60% (40 of 67) pre-CRT and 71% (30 of 42) at 1 year to 78% (18 of 23) at 2 years (P = 0.025). In the IMRT arm, the proportion remained stable, with 57% (43 of 76) pre-CRT, 54% (21 of 39) at 1 year, and 52% (13 of 25) working at 2 years (P = 0.47). By 2 years after CRT, the between-arm difference between patients who had IMPT and those who had IMRT trended toward significance (P = 0.06). Regardless of treatment arm, among working patients, the most severe work impairments occurred from treatment initiation to the end of CRT, with significant recovery from absenteeism, presenteeism, and productivity impairments by the 2-year follow-up (P < 0.001 for all). Higher magnitudes of recovery from absenteeism (at 1 year, P = 0.05; and at 2 years, P = 0.04) and composite work impairment scores (at 1 year, P = 0.04; and at 2 years, P = 0.04) were seen in patients treated with IMPT versus those treated with IMRT. CONCLUSION: In patients with OPC receiving curative CRT, patients randomized to IMPT demonstrated increasing work and productivity recovery trends. Studies are needed to identify mechanisms underlying head and neck CRT treatment causing work disability and impairment.

Reproducibility of a novel, vacuum-assisted immobilization for breast stereotactic radiotherapy.

A novel, breast-specific stereotactic radiotherapy device has been developed for delivery of highly conformal, accelerated partial breast irradiation. This device employs a unique, vacuum-assisted, breast cup immobilization system that applies a gentle, negative pressure to the target breast with the patient in the prone position. A device-specific patient loader is utilized for simulation scanning and device docking. Prior to clinical activation, a prospective protocol enrolled 25 patients who had been or were to be treated with breast conservation surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy for localized breast cancer. The patients underwent breast cup placement and two separate CT simulation scans. Surgical clips within the breast were mapped and positions measured against the device's integrated stereotactic fiducial/coordinate system to confirm reproducible and durable immobilization during the simulation, treatment planning, and delivery process for the device. Of the enrolled 25 patients, 16 were deemed eligible for analysis. Seventy-three clips (median, 4; mean, 4.6; range, 1-8 per patient) were mapped in these selected patients on both the first and second CT scans. X, Y, and Z coordinates were determined for the center point of each clip. Length of vector change in position was determined for each clip between the two scans. The mean displacement of implanted clips was 1.90 mm (median, 1.47 mm; range, 0.44-6.52 mm) (95% CI, 1.6-2.20 mm). Additional analyses stratified clips by position within the breast and depth into the immobilization cup. Overall, this effort validated the clinically utilized 3-mm planning target volume margin for accurate, reliable, and precise employment of the device.

Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (GRID) Prior to Standard Neoadjuvant Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Bulky, High-Risk Soft Tissue and Osteosarcomas: Feasibility, Safety, and Promising Pathologic Response Rates.

Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (GRID) has been utilized primarily in the palliative and definitive treatment of bulky tumors. Delivered in the modern era primarily with megavoltage photon therapy, this technique offers the promise of safe dose escalation with potential immunogenic, bystander and microvasculature effects that can augment a conventionally fractionated course of radiotherapy. At the University of Maryland, an institutional standard has arisen to incorporate a single fraction of GRID radiation in large (>8 cm), high-risk soft tissue and osteosarcomas prior to a standard fractionated course. Herein, we report on the excellent pathologic responses and apparent safety of this regimen in 26 consecutive patients.

Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate, and Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy.

The National Cancer Institute's Radiation Research Program, in collaboration with the Radiosurgery Society, hosted a workshop called Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate and Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy on August 20 and 21, 2018 to bring together experts in experimental and clinical experience in these and related fields. Critically, the overall aims were to understand the biological underpinning of these emerging techniques and the technical/physical parameters that must be further defined to drive clinical practice through innovative biologically based clinical trials.

Prognostic factors for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas treated with postoperative pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: a large, single-institution experience.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the prognostic factors in surgical and adjuvant care for spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas after surgery followed by high-dose pencil-beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). METHODS: From 1997 to 2016, 155 patients (61 female patients; median age 55 years) with spinal (cervical, n = 61; thoracic, n = 29; lumbar, n = 13; sacral, n = 46; pelvic, n = 6) classic chordomas (n = 116) and chondrosarcomas (n = 39; most were low grade) were treated with maximal safe resection followed by PBS-PT (median dose prescribed: 74 Gy [relative biological effectiveness], range 48.6-77 Gy). The majority of patients (n = 153, 98.7%) had undergone at least 1 resection prior to PBS-PT (median 1, range 0-5; biopsy only, n = 2). Fewer than half (45.1%) of the surgeries were rated as gross-total resections (GTRs) prior to PBS-PT. Surgical stabilization (SS) was present in 39% of all patients (n = 60). Ninety-one patients (59%) presented with macroscopic tumor at the start of PBS-PT. The median follow-up duration was 64.7 months (range 12.2-204.8 months). RESULTS: The 5-year local tumor control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival were 64.9% (95% CI 56.3%-73.5%), 59.4% (95% CI 50.6%-68.2%), and 77.9% (95% CI 70.6%-85.2%), respectively. In total, 63 patients (40.6%) experienced failure during the follow-up period: local only in 32 (20.6%), distal only in 7 (4.5%), local + distal in 19 (12.3%), surgical pathway failure (SPF) only in 2 (1.3%), local + SPF in 2 (1.3%), and distal + SPF in 1 (< 1%). Univariate analysis identified gross residual disease, the presence of SS, and treatment era prior to 2008 as highly significant for worse outcome, with all 3 remaining significant on multivariate analysis. The type of surgery (GTR or subtotal resection/biopsy) and whether GTR was achieved by en bloc or curettage did not show a significant prognostic effect. Surgical complications prior to PBS-PT were present in 42.5% of all surgically treated patients and were seen more commonly in patients with multiple surgical interventions (p = 0.005) and those operated on with the intent of en bloc resection (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The extent of resection and metallic stabilization substantially influenced clinical outcomes for patients with spinal chordoma or chondrosarcoma despite high-dose adjuvant PBS-PT. Optimal upfront surgical management of these tumors continues to include GTR, as possible, with prompt adjuvant proton therapy.

Multicriteria optimization: Site-specific class solutions for VMAT plans.

Multicriteria optimization (MCO), a novel commercially available optimization method for IMRT and VMAT has the potential to improve treatment planning techniques and workflows. MCO allows planners and physicians to assess in real time the impact and tradeoffs between all clinical goals and organ constraints. We investigate the feasibility of a universal set of objectives and constraints for VMAT plans in different anatomical sites and the impact of involving the Physician in the navigation of the generated Pareto plans. We randomly selected 20 prostate only, 14 whole pelvis, 10 advanced lung, 15 pancreas, and 7 head and neck plans planned with a VMAT technique. Using the clinically delivered isocenter and beam set-up, we retrospectively generated MCO plans with a universal set of constraints and objectives for each anatomical site. The MCO plan scores were compared with clinical plans or an independent plan generated with DMPO. For prostate only plans the TCP values for the clinical and MCO plans were similar and the rectum NTCP values and overall P+ were slightly better for the MCO plans. For whole pelvis, the resulting MCO plans were comparable in all the dosimetric measures to the clinical plans. For lung, the MCO dosimetric comparison also yielded comparable plans but when evaluating individual patients, there were 5 patients for which MCO plans had a clear advantage in reducing dose to lung and/or esophagus while improving/maintaining target coverage, 4 patients with comparable plans and 1 patient where MCO was worse. Allowing the physician to navigate independently produced a different selection of dosimetric trade-offs. Comparable MCO plans were also obtained for pancreas and head and neck. Based on our experience with many anatomical sites and a large number of patient plans, we have found that VMAT MCO plans are comparable to the clinical plans and can be produced with a universal set of objectives and constraints, even for a wide range of geometries and anatomies.

Optimal Target Delineation and Treatment Techniques in the Era of Conformal Photon and Proton Breast and Regional Nodal Irradiation.

PURPOSE: Regional nodal irradiation improves disease-free and distant disease-free survival in patients with high-risk breast cancer (BC). Trials demonstrating this used 2- or 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (2-dimensional or 3-dimensional [3D] conformal radiotherapy [CRT]) fields based on bony anatomy. Modern volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT) may underdose regional nodes (RNs) not contoured but covered by 3D CRT. Multiple atlases guide modern treatment planning. This study addresses the risk of underdosing when relying on published atlases and treating with 3D CRT, VMAT, and PBSPT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Targets per the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness Consortium (RADCOMP) atlases were contoured on a representative patient CT scan. 3D CRT plans based on anatomic borders and VMAT and PBSPT plans for each set of target volumes were generated. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans were reviewed. CT-positive and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG)-avid RNs (n = 389) were mapped from 102 patients with locally advanced (n = 51; median 2; range, 1-8 nodes) and metastatic (n = 51; median 4; range, 1-19 nodes) BC: axillary (AX; n = 284), supraclavicular (SCV; n = 60), and internal mammary nodal (IMN; n = 45). 18F-FDG-avid RNs falling within the 95% isodose line were considered adequately covered. RESULTS: 3D CRT plans provided excellent RN coverage. Low AX nodes were covered (≥99%) in all plans. Underdosing of 18F-FDG-avid RNs falling in the high AX (78%-92%), SCV (52%-75%), and IMN (84%-89%) volumes was observed following the RTOG and ESTRO atlases for VMAT and PBSPT plans. Use of the RADCOMP atlas provided coverage of these areas (89%-100%) with slightly increased heart and lung doses. Atlas guided VMAT/PBSPT plans provided cumulative nodal coverage as follows: ESTRO (89%/88%), RTOG (93%/91%), and RADCOMP (98%/96%). CONCLUSIONS: VMAT and PBSPT for regional nodal irradiation in patients with high-risk BC risks underdosage in the high AX, SCV, and IMN nodal regions unless comprehensive target delineation is performed.

Optimizing immobilization, margins, and imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy.

The simultaneous advancement of technologies for the delivery of precisely targeted radiation therapy and the paradigm shift to substantial hypofractionation have led to significant improvements in the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become a well-established option for the treatment of ES-NSCLC and is now becoming widely available within the radiation oncology community. Implementation of this technique, however, requires highly accurate target delineation, thorough evaluation of tumor motion, and improved on-board imaging at the time of treatment for patient alignment, each of which is critical for successful tumor control and mitigation of risks to normal tissues. In this article, we review updates and issues related to immobilization and image guidance for SBRT in the treatment of ES-NSCLC.

Advances in the use of motion management and image guidance in radiation therapy treatment for lung cancer.

The development of advanced radiation technologies, including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and proton therapy, has resulted in increasingly conformal radiation treatments. Recent evidence for the importance of minimizing dose to normal critical structures including the heart and lungs has led to incorporation of these advanced treatment modalities into radiation therapy (RT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While such technologies have allowed for improved dose delivery, implementation requires improved target accuracy with treatments, placing increasing importance on evaluating tumor motion at the time of planning and verifying tumor position at the time of treatment. In this review article, we describe issues and updates related both to motion management and image guidance in the treatment of NSCLC.

Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Radiation Therapy for Spinal Chordomas: A Large, Single-Institution Cohort.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose pencil-beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) in the adjuvant treatment of spinal chordomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1997 and 2015, 100 patients with spinal chordomas (median age, 56 years; range, 25-81 years) were treated with adjuvant PBS-PT at the Paul Scherrer Institute: cervical (n = 46), thoracic (n = 4), lumbar (n = 12), and sacral (n = 38). The majority (88%) received PBS-PT alone rather than combined photon-proton therapy. The median radiation therapy dose prescribed was 74 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) (range, 59.4-77 Gy [RBE]). Thirty-nine patients (39%) had undergone surgical stabilization, primarily with titanium hardware, before radiation therapy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 65 months (range, 13-175 months), 5-year local control, disease control, and overall survival rates were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 57.7-68.7%; median, 103 months), 57% (95% CI 50.9-62.1%; median, 82 months), and 81% (95% CI 76.8-85.6%; median, 157 months), respectively. On univariate and multivariate analyses, the presence of surgical stabilization was highly prognostic for worsened outcomes. Multivariate analysis also revealed the extent of treatment volumes and presence of gross residual disease to be important in predicting outcomes. High-grade (grade ≥3) toxicities were rare in both the acute (8%) and late (6%) settings. CONCLUSION: For spinal chordomas, PBS-PT remains a highly effective and safe method for delivery of dose-escalated adjuvant radiation therapy. The presence of metallic surgical stabilization prognosticates for worsened outcomes. Further investigation is warranted to characterize ideal treatment volumes and effect of surgical stabilization on therapy for these challenging tumors.

Long-Term Clinical Safety of High-Dose Proton Radiation Therapy Delivered With Pencil Beam Scanning Technique for Extracranial Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas in Adult Patients: Clinical Evidence of Spinal Cord Tolerance.

PURPOSE: To assess the radiation dose tolerance of the spinal cord by reviewing our institutional experience regarding the incidence of radiation-induced spinal cord toxicity after high-dose pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-six patients (median age 53 years; range, 23-79 years) treated for spinal chordoma (n=55) or chondrosarcoma (n=21) met the following criteria and were retrospectively analyzed: PBSPT only, no reirradiation or concomitant chemotherapy, maximum dose (Dmax) to the spinal cord of ≥45 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]), ≥18 years of age, and follow-up of ≥12 months. The delivered dose was 59.4 to 75.2 Gy(RBE) [median 73.9 Gy(RBE)] delivered with conventional fractionation between 2000 and 2014. The Dmax, D2%, and V40-V60 of the surface (sSC) and center (cSC) of the spinal cord were recorded. Toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 65.5 months (range, 13-173 months). Patients received a mean Dmax and D2% to the sSC of 59.0 (median 58.7; range, 48.3-75.9) and 55.3 (median 52.7; range, 43.1-73.8) Gy(RBE), respectively. The corresponding values for the cSC were 52.3 (median 52.7; range, 32.3-73.3) and 51.1 (median 52.0; range, 25.3-73.1) Gy(RBE), respectively. Four patients (5%) developed acute radiation-induced neurotoxicity (grade [G] 1, n=1; G2, n=3). Twelve patients (16%) experienced late neurologic toxicities (G1, n=7; G2, n=4; G4, n=1). One patient with a history of pre-PBSPT symptomatic spinal cord compression redeveloped tetraplegia (G4) after receiving a Dmax of 57.8 Gy(RBE) to the sSC and 54.1 Gy(RBE) to the cSC. No significant correlation was found between sSC Dmax and D2%, cSC Dmax and D2%, or the length of CTV and toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose conformal PBSPT may be delivered safely in close proximity to the spinal cord with minimal neurotoxicity. Dose constraints of 64 Gy(RBE) as D2% for the sSC and 54 Gy(RBE) for the cSC seem appropriate for clinical use.