Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Vascular ; 26(3): 278-284, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28956729

RESUMO

Objectives Stent grafts for endovascular repair of infrarenal aneurysms are commercially available for aortic necks up to 32 mm in diameter. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endovascular repair with large thoracic stent grafts in the infrarenal position to obtain adequate proximal seal in wider necks. Methods All patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using thoracic stent grafts with diameters greater than 36 mm between 2012 and 2016 were included. Follow-up consisted of CT angiography after six weeks and annual duplex thereafter. Results Eleven patients with wide infrarenal aortic necks received endovascular repair with thoracic stent grafts. The median diameter of the aneurysms was 60 mm (range 52-78 mm) and the median aortic neck diameter was 37 mm (range 28-43 mm). Thoracic stent grafts were oversized by a median of 14% (range 2-43%). On completion angiography, one type I and two type II endoleaks were observed but did not require reintervention. One patient experienced graft migration with aneurysm sac expansion and needed conversion to open repair. Median follow-up time was 14 months (range 2-53 months), during which three patients died, including one aneurysm-related death. Conclusions Endovascular repair using thoracic stent grafts for patients with wide aortic necks is feasible. In these patients, the technique may be a reasonable alternative to complex endovascular repair with fenestrated, branched, or chimney grafts. However, more experience and longer follow-up are required to determine its position within the endovascular armamentarium.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Stents , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Endoleak/cirurgia , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Desenho de Prótese , Reoperação/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Vascular ; 24(6): 561-566, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26647420

RESUMO

Currently available conduits for in situ reconstruction after excision of infected aortic grafts have significant limitations. The Omniflow II vascular prosthesis is a biosynthetic graft associated with a low incidence of infection that has succesfully been used in the treatment of infected infrainguinal bypass. We report on the first use of the Omniflow II prosthesis for in situ reconstruction after aortic graft infection.A bifurcated biosynthetic bypass was created by spatulating and anastomosing two 8-mm tubular Omniflow II grafts. This bypass was used for in situ reconstruction after excision of infected aortic grafts in three cases. After a mean follow-up of 2.2 years, no occlusion, degeneration, or rupture of the Omniflow II grafts was observed. Although one patient suffered from graft reinfection, the bypass retained structural integrity and no anastomotic dehiscence was observed.Treatment of aortic graft infection by in situ reconstruction with the Omniflow II vascular prosthesis is feasible. Its resistance to infection and off-the-shelf availability make this graft a promising conduit for aortoiliac reconstruction.


Assuntos
Aorta/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Remoção de Dispositivo , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Idoso , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Desenho de Prótese , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico por imagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Recidiva , Reoperação , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Phlebology ; 31(2): 118-24, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25616874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Optimal duration of leg compression after venous ablation remains unclear. This randomised controlled trial evaluates 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression. METHODS: Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression after radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, complications and time to full recovery. RESULTS: Patients wearing compression stockings for 4 h after treatment had a 64 mL (95%CI: - 23 to + 193) reduction in leg volume, compared to an increase of 21 mL (95%CI: 8.33-34.5) in patients wearing compression stockings for 72 h (P = 0.12). Patients wearing compression stockings for 4 h experienced fewer complications (16% vs. 33%, P = 0.05). Postoperative pain and time to full recovery did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Wearing compression stockings for 4 h is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema as wearing compression stockings for 72 h.


Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Edema/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Veia Safena/cirurgia , Meias de Compressão , Insuficiência Venosa/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Edema/etiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA