Participants with restricted dominant shoulder internal rotation range of motion demonstrate no side-to-side difference in humeral head translation; and no difference before and after joint mobilization: a pilot study.

[Purpose] To compare humeral head translation (HHT) during shoulder elevation between dominant and non-dominant shoulders in participants with limited dominant shoulder internal rotation range of motion (ROM). To determine if joint mobilization alters HHT, and if relationships exist between the bicipital forearm angle and HHT. [Participants and Methods] Fifteen (9 female) participants (age 25.7 ± 6.8 years) with a minimum 15-degree dominant shoulder internal rotation ROM deficit compared to the opposite shoulder participated. All participants underwent bicipital forearm angle (BFA) measurements and ultrasound imaging to measure acromiohumeral and posterior glenohumeral distances in 3 positions: Resting, 90 degrees of shoulder flexion, and 60 degrees of shoulder abduction with full external rotation. Ultrasound images were used to calculate HHT. Participants' dominant shoulders underwent posterior glide mobilization, followed immediately by repeated ultrasound images and ROM measures. [Results] There was no dominant to non-dominant shoulder, or before and after mobilization HHT differences. No correlations existed between bicipital forearm angles and HHT or ROM gains after mobilization. [Conclusion] Participants with internal rotation ROM loss demonstrated symmetrical HHT. Joint mobilization increased ROM, but HHT was unchanged. No relationships existed between BFA and HHT.

Assessing adverse events associated with chiropractic care in preschool pediatric population: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Manual therapies are commonly used by healthcare professionals when caring for children. However, few prospective studies have evaluated their adverse events (AEs). This study aims to assess the feasibility of a pragmatic prospective study aiming to report the immediate and delayed (48-hours post-treatment) AEs associated with manual therapies in children aged 5 or younger. Preliminary data on AEs frequency are also reported. METHODS: Between July 2021 and March 2022, chiropractors were recruited through purposive sampling and via a dedicated Facebook group for Quebec chiropractors interested in pediatrics. Legal guardians of patients aged 5 or younger were invited to fill out an online information and consent form. AEs were collected using the SafetyNET reporting system, which had been previously translated by the research team. Immediate AEs were collected through a questionnaire filled out by the legal guardian immediately after the treatment, while delayed AEs were collected through a questionnaire sent by email to the legal guardian 48 h after the treatment. Feasibility was assessed qualitatively through feedback from chiropractors and quantitatively through recruitment data. RESULTS: Overall, a total of 28 chiropractors expressed interest following the Facebook publication, and 5 participated. An additional two chiropractors were enrolled through purposive sampling. In total, 80 legal guardians consented to their child's participation, and data from 73 children were included for the analysis of AEs. At least one AE was reported in 30% of children (22/73), and AEs were mainly observed immediately following the treatment (16/22). The most common AEs were irritability/crying (11 children) or fatigue/tiredness (11 children). Feasibility analysis demonstrated that regular communication between the research team and clinicians, as well as targeting clinicians who showed great interest in pediatrics, were key factors for successful research. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that it is feasible to conduct a prospective pragmatic study evaluating AEs associated with manual therapies in private practices. Direct communication with the clinicians, a strategic clinicians' recruitment plan, and the resulting administrative burden should be considered in future studies. A larger study is required to confirm the frequency of AEs reported in the current study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov., NCT05409859, Registered on June 3 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05409859 .

Sustained versus repetitive standing trunk extension results in greater spinal growth and pain improvement in back pain:A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: McKenzie standing trunk extension exercises have been used for the management of low back pain (LBP). However, no study to date has investigated the effect of standing trunk extension postures on spinal height and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in subjects with LBP following a period of trunk loading how spinal height, pain, symptoms' centralization and function outcome measures respond to two standing postures interventions: (1) repetitive trunk extension (RTE) and (2) sustained trunk extension (STE). METHODS: A consecutive sample of convenience of people with LBP were recruited to participate in 2-session physical therapy using either RTE or STE in standing. RESULTS: Thirty participants (18 women) with a mean age of 53 ± 17.5 years completed the study. The first session resulted in spinal height increase (spinal growth) of 2.07 ± 1.32 mm for the RTE intervention and 4.54 ± 1.61 mm for the STE group (p< 0.001; ES = 1.67), while the second session (2-week following the first session) resulted in spinal growth of 2.39 ± 1.46 mm for the RTE group and 3.91 ± 2.06 mm for the STE group (p= 0.027; ES = 0.85). The STE group presented with the larger reduction in most pain from 6 to 2 as compared to the RTE group from 6 to 4 between Session 1 and Session 2 (p< 0.001). There was no difference between the groups in Modified Oswestry score and symptoms centralization (p= 0.88 and p= 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSION: People with LBP experienced greater spine growth and improvements of pain during standing STE as compared to RTE. People with LBP could use such postures and movements to alleviate their LBP and improve spine height while in a weight bearing position.

Upper limb neurodynamic mobilization disperses intraneural fluid in cervical nerve roots: A human cadaveric investigation.

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is a common cause of neck pain with resultant intraneural edema and impaired nerve function. One strategy to treat radiculopathy is neurodynamic mobilization (NDM); however, little is known about the effect of this treatment on nerve tissue fluid dynamics. OBJECTIVE: Investigate the impact of upper limb, median nerve-biased NDM on longitudinal intraneural fluid dispersion in the C5,C6,C7 nerve roots in un-embalmed cadavers. DESIGN: In situ repeated measures. METHODS: Human cadavers (n = 8) were dissected to expose and inject C5,C6,C7 cervical nerve roots with a dying agent. Initial longitudinal dye spread was recorded after dye spread stabilization. Cadavers were taken through 150 repetitions of upper limb, median nerve-biased NDM followed by dye spread re-measurement. Paired-samples t-tests with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.017) were used to compare pre-vs post-NDM dye spread measurements at C5,C6,C7 nerve roots; a one-way repeated measures ANOVA (α = 0.05) was used to examine differences between change scores for C5,C6,C7 nerve roots. RESULTS: Median nerve-biased NDM resulted in significant intraneural longitudinal dye spread at C5 and C6 nerve roots of 0.6 ± 0.6 mm and 3.4 ± 3.9 mm, respectively (p < 0.014). Dye spread was not significant at C7 nerve root (0.4 ± 0.7 mm). There was no between root difference in change of longitudinal dye spread between C5, C6, and C7 nerve roots. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show median nerve-biased NDM produced internal fluid movement within C5 and C6 cervical nerve roots. Results provide insight regarding possible mechanism of action and feasibility of NDM in treatment of patients with cervical radiculopathy.

The trapeziometacarpal screw home torque mechanism as a clinical indicator of the posterior joint ligament complex integrity: A cadaveric investigation.

BACKGROUND: To date, no clinical test provides specific objective information on the integrity of key ligamentous support of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint. PURPOSE: To examine the potential of the TMC joint screw home torque mechanism (SHTM) in estimating the integrity of the posterior ligament complex in older adult population. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional laboratory-based study. METHODS: Twenty cadaver hands presenting with various degrees of TMC joint degradation ranging from none to severe osteoarthritis (OA) were radiographed in multiple positions to establish their degeneration status, joint mobility, and amount of dorsal subluxation at rest and with the application of the SHTM. Comparisons and correlations between degeneration status, joint mobility, subluxation reduction and ligament status obtained from dissection were calculated. RESULTS: No significant statistical correlation was demonstrated with the subluxation reduction ratio of the SHTM and the combined ligament complex value however, a moderate negative correlation was found with dorsal central ligament injury at 21 Nm (τb = -0.46, p < 0.05) and 34 Nm (τb = -0.45, p < 0.05). A statistically significant reduction of radial subluxation of the TMC joint was observed between the subluxation at rest (M = 5.2, SD = 1.9) and subluxation with SHTM of 21 Nm (M = 4.4, SD = 2.4), t (19) = 3.2, p = 0.01, 95% CI [0.3, 1.4] and subluxation with SHTM of 34 Nm (M = 4.3, SD = 2.6), t (19) = 2.6, p = 0.02, 95% CI [0.2, 1.5]. CONCLUSION: Our results did not support the SHTM as indicator of the TMC posterior ligament complex integrity however, it demonstrated 100% stabilization effect with non-arthritic TMC population.

Investigation of the factors influencing spinal manipulative therapy force transmission through the thorax: a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) clinical effects are believed to be linked to its force-time profile characteristics. Previous studies have revealed that the force measured at the patient-table interface is most commonly greater than the one applied at the clinician-patient interface. The factors explaining this force amplification remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the difference between the force applied to a cadaveric specimen's thoracic spine and the resulting force measured by a force-sensing table, as well as to evaluate the relationship between this difference and both the SMT force-time characteristics and the specimens' characteristics. METHODS: Twenty-five SMTs with different force-time profiles were delivered by an apparatus at the T7 vertebra of nine human cadaveric specimens lying prone on a treatment table equipped with a force plate. The difference between the force applied by the apparatus and the resulting force measured by the force plate was calculated in absolute force (Fdiff) and as the percentage of the applied force (Fdiff%). Kinematics markers were inserted into T6 to T8 spinous and transverse processes to evaluate vertebral displacements during the SMT thrusts. Mixed-effects linear models were run to evaluate the variance in Fdiff and Fdiff% explained by SMT characteristics (peak force, thrust duration and force application rate), T6 to T8 relative and total displacements, and specimens' characteristics (BMI, height, weight, kyphosis angle, thoracic thickness). RESULTS: Sixty percent of the trials showed lower force measured at the force plate than the one applied at T7. Fdiff¸ was significantly predicted (R2marginal = 0.54) by peak force, thrust duration, thoracic thickness and T6-T7 relative displacement in the z-axis (postero-anterior). Fdiff% was significantly predicted (R2marginal = 0.56) by force application rate, thoracic thickness and total T6 displacements. For both dependant variables, thoracic thickness showed the highest R2marginal out of all predictors. CONCLUSION: Difference in force between the clinician-patient and the patient-table interfaces is influenced by SMT force-time characteristics and by thoracic thickness. How these differences in force are associated with vertebral displacements remains unclear. Although further studies are needed, clinicians should consider thorax thickness as a possible modulator of forces being transmitted through it during prone SMT procedures.

Differentiation of strains in the lateral and medial bands of the iliofemoral ligament: A segmental approach.

Iliofemoral ligament strains have been assessed in a circumscribed portion, limiting the information regarding the strains in the proximal, mid and distal portions. The purpose of this study is to describe the longitudinal and transversal strain within the proximal, mid and distal portions of the lateral and medial bands of the iliofemoral ligament. Ten fresh cadaveric specimens were assessed. The iliofemoral ligaments were divided into medial and lateral bands. Hemispherical beads (2.6 mm) were placed on the lateral and medial borders of each band. Four positions were assessed: abduction, extension, internal and external rotations combined with extension. The hemispherical beads were scanned at the end range of motion using a laser scanner. The three-dimensional position of each bead was used to estimate longitudinal and transversal strains. A three-factor ANOVA was used to compare movements, borders, and portions within each ligament for longitudinal strains. A one-way ANOVA was used to compare transversal strains between portions. This technique showed mean reliability (ICC: 2, 1) of 0.90 ± 0.06. The external rotation showed the highest strains in both ligaments (p < 0.05). Abduction showed a significant difference between the lateral and medial borders in both bands (p = 0.001). Eight movement-border combinations showed a significant difference between proximal, medial, and lateral portions (p < 0.005). According to our results, there is a clear effect of portions (proximal, mid and distal) within the ligament and movements. Abduction shows the lowest strains longitudinally but the largest strains transversally. Although we do not know the impact of this phenomenon, future studies should assess the strains following hip arthroscopies. The latter might improve the impact of this procedure on hip biomechanics. Lastly, the iliofemoral ligament should be assessed using a segmental approach rather than as a complete unit.

Ilio-femoral ligament strains during the flexion-abduction-external rotation test: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Flexion-abduction-external-rotation (FABER) test is one of the most used tests during the clinical assessment of the hip joint. The limited range of motions reached could be due to iliofemoral ligament tightness, but no study has assessed capsular ligament strain during this test. The main objective of this study is to report strains within the iliofemoral ligament during the FABER test using a segmental approach. METHODS: 9 hips were harvested, and all muscles were removed. Hemispherical markers (∅ 2.6 mm) were glued on the lateral and medial borders of both the medial and lateral iliofemoral bands, separating each border into proximal, mid, and distal portions. The lower limb was placed in a FABER test position. A laser scanner allowed to digitize the 3D surface of the capsule. A Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to assess the effect of ligaments, borders, and portions. FINDINGS: The lateral band of the iliofemoral ligament showed greater strains (14.6 ± 11.4%) compared to the medial band (-8.7 ± 14.2%) (p < 0.001). The greatest strains were observed in the distal portion of the lateral border of the lateral band (51.1 ± 21.5%). A decrease in strain was observed in the mid-portion of the medial border of the medial iliofemoral ligament (-27.9 ± 8.9%). INTERPRETATION: The FABER test is used to assess pain at the hip. Our results show that the limited range of motion at the hip during this test might be caused by increased strains in the lateral band. These results demonstrate that a limitation of joint range of motion during the FABER could be due to an excessive tension of the lateral band of the iliofemoral ligament.

Effect of lacertus fibrosus release on perineural pressure of the median nerve at the elbow: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: The lacertus fibrosus (or bicipital aponeurosis) is a potential site of proximal median neuropathy at the elbow. Lacertus syndrome with motor and/or sensory symptoms has been addressed with a minimally invasive surgical lacertus release. This study evaluates if a lacertus release alters the maximal perineural pressure (Pmax) of the median nerve at the level of the lacertus fibrosus during elbow flexion. METHODS: Seven upper limbs from four fresh cadavers were included. Perineural pressure of the median nerve at the level of the lacertus fibrosus was measured continuously during automated elbow flexions by the biceps brachii muscle. RESULTS: The mean Pmax before the lacertus release was significantly different than the mean Pmax after the lacertus release (669.15 mmHg vs 77.01 mmHg, p = 0.0180). The mean Pmax after the lacertus release decreased with an average 81.41%. CONCLUSION: A simple surgical release of the lacertus fibrosus significantly decreases the maximal perineural pressure of the median nerve at the level of the lacertus fibrosus during elbow flexion.

Mechanical Effects of a Specific Neurodynamic Mobilization of the Superficial Fibular Nerve: A Cadaveric Study.

CONTEXT: A specific neurodynamic mobilization for the superficial fibular nerve (SFN) has been suggested in the reference literature for manual therapists to evaluate nerve mechanosensitivity in patients. However, no authors of biomechanical studies have examined the ability of this technique to produce nerve strain. Therefore, the mechanical specificity of this technique is not yet established. OBJECTIVES: To test whether this examination and treatment technique produced nerve strain in the fresh frozen cadaver and the contribution of each motion to total longitudinal strain. DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. SETTING: Laboratory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): A differential variable reluctance transducer was inserted in 10 SFNs from 6 fresh cadavers to measure strain during the mobilization. A specific sequence of plantar flexion, ankle inversion, straight-leg raise position, and 30° of hip adduction was applied to the lower limb. The mobilization was repeated at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of the straight-leg raise position to measure the effect of hip-flexion position. RESULTS: Compared with a resting position, this neurodynamic mobilization produced a significant amount of strain in the SFN (7.93% ± 0.51%, P < .001). Plantar flexion (59.34% ± 25.82%) and ankle inversion (32.80% ± 21.41%) accounted for the biggest proportions of total strain during the mobilization. No difference was noted among different hip-flexion positions. Hip adduction did not significantly contribute to final strain (0.39% ± 10.42%, P > .05), although high variability among limbs existed. CONCLUSIONS: Ankle motion should be considered the most important factor during neurodynamic assessment of the SFN for distal entrapment. These results suggest that this technique produces sufficient strain in the SFN and could therefore be evaluated in vivo for correlation with mechanosensitivity.

Variability of Intradiscal Pressure During Cervical Spine Posterior-Anterior Mobilization: A Cadaveric Investigation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate in cadaveric specimens the reliability of measuring cervical intradiscal pressure (CIDP) and if posterior-anterior (PA) mobilizations targeting the cervical spine were associated with CIDP changes. METHODS: Cervical PA mobilizations were performed on the spinous processes of 7 (3 men, 4 women) cadaveric specimens using a servo-controlled linear actuator to provide 25N and 45N forces. CIDP measurements were performed at C4-5, C5-6, C6-7, and C7-T1 intervertebral discs (IVDs) using a fiberoptic catheter system that recorded CIDP for each IVD cervical segment. To assess CIDP measurement reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC [3,k]) was calculated. Repeated measures Friedman analysis of variance assessed effect of cervical mobilizations on CIDP for before, during, and immediately after mobilization at 25N and 45N forces for each cervical IVD segment. RESULTS: All CIDP measurements demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC >0.98). During the 25N mobilizations, the median CIDP varied from -0.12 to 0.91 (interquartile range, 5.22-5.36), while for 45N mobilizations the median ranged from -0.94 to 1.21 (interquartile range, -7.74 to 43.49). These changes were not statistically significant (P > .40) during 25N and 45N PA mobilizations, with the exception of C5-6 CIDP at 25N and 45N (P = .05 and .018, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was high CIDP variability between cadavers during and after mobilization. Mobilizations of 1 cervical vertebra resulted in both CIDP increase or decrease at adjacent and remote cervical IVD segments that were not consistent. Cervical PA mobilizations produced variable CIDP changes at adjacent and remote cervical segments in cadavers.

Impact of plantar fasciitis on postural control and walking in young middle-aged adults.

PURPOSE: To assess if plantar fasciitis has an impact on postural control and walking pattern from gait analysis across different experimental conditions. METHODS: Thirty participants (n = 15 with plantar fasciitis) performed 5 different balance tasks on a force platform, and the center of pressure (COP) was computed for postural control analysis. Participants were also asked to walk at 3 different speeds on a gait analysis system to compute the spatial-temporal parameters. Clinical foot measurements (pain, mobility) were also collected through all participants. RESULTS: Clinical foot measurements showed no significant difference between the two groups; except for pain palpation in plantar fasciitis group. Significant differences were observed between the two groups for COP area displacement sway (p < 0.01; d = 0.08) and velocity (p = 0.022; d = 0.04), where the fasciitis group reported poorer postural control than control mainly during more challenging balance tasks (semi-tandem, unipodal). Plantar fasciitis group reported a decrease of gait velocity (p < 0.01; d = 0.12), step length (p < 0.01; d = 0.16) and step width (p < 0.01; d = 0.18) when compared to the healthy group across walking speed tests. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with plantar fasciitis report poor postural control and changes in walking pattern across three speeds performance.

Moment arms of the deltoid, infraspinatus and teres minor muscles for movements with high range of motion: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Moment arms are an indicator of the role of the muscles in joint actuation. An excursion method is often used to calculate them, even though it provides 1D results. As shoulder movement occurs in three dimensions (combination of flexion, abduction and axial rotation), moment arms should be given in 3D. Our objective was to assess the 3D moment arms of the rotator cuff (infraspinatus and teres minor) and deltoid muscles for movements with high arm elevation. METHODS: The 3D moment arms (components in plane of elevation, elevation and axial rotation) were assessed using a geometric method, enabling to calculate the moment arms in 3D, on five fresh post-mortem human shoulders. Movement with high range of motion were performed (including overhead movement). The humerus was elevated until it reaches its maximal posture in different elevation plane (flexion, scaption, abduction and elevation in a plane 30° posterior to frontal plane). FINDINGS: We found that the anterior deltoid was a depressor and contributes to move the elevation plane anteriorly. The median deltoid was a great elevator and the posterior deltoid mostly acted in moving the elevation plane posteriorly. The infraspinatus and teres minor were the greatest external rotator of the shoulder. The position of the glenohumeral joint induces changes in the muscular moment arms. The maximal shoulder elevation was 144° (performed in the scapular plane). INTERPRETATION: The knowledge of 3D moment arms for different arm elevations might help surgeons in planning tendon reconstructive surgery and help validate musculoskeletal models.

Application of Ultrasound in Spine Kinematic Determination: A Systemic Review.

Spine kinematic determination is required to diagnose or rehabilitate back pain due to spinal instability. Ultrasound imaging, as a less harmful and cost-effective method, has been recently applied to kinematic analysis. This study reviews all available published articles to see how much progress has been made in spine kinematic measurement by ultrasound. In this regard, we searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar among all available studies until 2021, using keywords such as ultrasound, spine, kinematics, rotation, twist, flexion, and bending. Finally, after identifying and scanning 183 articles, only nine articles were included, which analyzed spine kinematics by ultrasound. Among these nine articles, three reported axial displacements, three reported flexion/extension, and three reported axial rotation. Although ultrasound is a suitable alternative to other kinematic measurement methods, very little research and progress have been made in this area. Today, this method is still not used practically for spine kinematic measurement because the bone scans via ultrasound imaging are challenging to understand, and no three-dimensional kinematic measurement technique has been reported. However, recent advances in converting ultrasound images into three-dimensional images can pave the way for further improvements.

Normal range of motion at the hip show different pressure behavior in the lateral and acetabular compartments: a cadaveric investigation.

PURPOSE: The techniques used previously to assess intracapsular pressures did not allow the assessment of pressure variations in both compartments throughout the entire range of motion without puncturing the capsular tissue. Our hypothesis was that the intra-capsular pressure would be different in the lateral and acetabular compartment depending on the movement assessed. METHODS: Eight hip joints from four cadaveric specimens (78.5 ± 7.9 years) were assessed using intra-osseous tunnels reaching the lateral and acetabular compartments. Using injector adaptors, 2.7 ml of liquid were inserted in both compartments to simulate synovial liquid. Optic pressure transducers were used to measure pressure variations. We manually performed hip adduction, abduction, extension, flexion and internal rotation at 90° of flexion. RESULTS: Hip extension and internal rotation show the highest intra-capsular pressures in the lateral compartment with increases of 20.56 ± 19.29 and 19.27 ± 18.96 mmHg, respectively. Hip abduction and hip internal rotation showed depressurisations of - 16.86 ± 18.01 and - 31.88 ± 30.71 mmHg in the acetabular compartment, respectively. The pressures measured in the lateral compartment and in the acetabular compartment were significantly (P < 0.05) different for the hip abduction, 90° of flexion and internal rotation. Pressure variations showed that maximum intracapsular fluid pressures in the lateral compartment occur at maximum range of motion for all movements. CONCLUSION: As an increase in pressure may produce hip pain, clinician should assess pain at maximum range of motion in the lateral compartment. The pressure measured in the acetabular compartment vary depending on the hip position. The movements assessed are used in clinical practice to evaluate hip integrity and might bring pain. The pressure variations throughout the entire range of motion are a relevant information during hip clinical assessment and might help clinicians to better understand the manifestations of pain.

Intracapsular pressures in the flexion-abduction-external rotation and flexion-adduction-internal rotation tests and their comparison with classic hip range of motion: A cadaveric assessment.

Background Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation and Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation tests are used to reproduce pain at the hip during clinical assessment. As pain can be elicited by high intracapsular pressure, no information has been provided regarding intracapsular pressure during these pain provocative tests. Methods Eight hip joints from four cadaveric specimens (78.5 ± 7.9 years) were assessed using intra-osseous tunnels reaching the lateral and acetabular compartments. To simulate synovial liquid, 2.7 ml of liquid were inserted in both compartments using adaptor injectors. Optic pressure transducers were used to measure pressure variations. Pressures were compared between compartments in each test and between tests for each compartment. Both tests were compared with uniplanar movements. Findings The Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation test showed a significant difference between pressure measured in the lateral (27.17 ± 42.63 mmHg) and acetabular compartment (-26.80 ± 29.26 mmHg) (P < 0.006). The pressure measured in the lateral compartment during the Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation test (27.17 ± 42.63 mmHg) was significantly higher than in the Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation test (-8.09 ± 15.09 mmHg) (P < 0.010). The pressure measured in the lateral compartment in the Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation test was significantly lower than during internal rotation (P = 0.011) and extension (P = 0.006). Interpretation High intracapsular pressure is correlated with greater pain at the hip. Clinicians should assess pain with caution during the Flexion-Adduction-Internal-Rotation test as this test showed high intracapsular pressures in the lateral compartment. The Flexion-Abduction-External-Rotation is not influenced by high intra-capsular pressures.

The vascular exploration of the proximal femoral artery perforator region, an ideal donor site to choose cutaneous flaps of thin, supple, and glabrous skin: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: The thigh region is a well-known area for harvesting cutaneous flaps for microsurgery replacement, given the characteristics of the skin: thin, flexible, and glabrous. We investigated the vascular pattern of 32 cadaveric anteroproximal thighs for the possibility of an extended harvesting area, which we call the proximal femoral artery perforator region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We injected colored, radio opaque latex in the external iliac artery and investigated the perforator branches from the superficial circumflex iliac, femoral common, superficial, and deep femoral (profunda femoris) arteries to the skin of the proximal femoral artery perforator region. This region was divided into 3 equal subregions (superior, medial, and lateral), and their perforators were counted and measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of arterial pedicles across the three subregions: 30 superior, 35 inferolateral, and 27 inferomedial. The perforators had a cutaneous path in 81% of the cases, while 6% were musculocutaneous and 5% septocutaneous, without a significant difference in their proportion in the three subregions. The mean length and diameter of the pedicles were 5.39 ±â€¯2.1 cm and 1.07 ±â€¯0.4 mm, respectively, without significant differences in the three subregions. CONCLUSIONS: The proximal femoral artery perforator region is a suitable area to generate flaps of various sizes and shapes, as needed by the surgeon. All perforators were constant and possessed a sufficient diameter and length for a successful anastomosis during the surgical procedure. The donor site retains all technical advantages to successfully replace areas of glabrous skin.

Upper limb neurodynamic testing with radial and ulnar nerve biases: An analysis of cervical spinal nerve mechanics.

BACKGROUND: Clinical research supports a combination of upper limb neurodynamic testing (ULNT) strategies to rule out upper limb and cervical neurogenic pathology; however, knowledge of the biomechanical response of spinal nerves during ULNT is lacking for radial and ulnar nerve biases. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether radial and ulnar nerve biased strategies of ULNT elicit significant displacement and strain of cervical spinal nerves. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. METHODS: Radiolucent markers were implanted into spinal nerves C5-C8 proximal and distal to the intervertebral foramen in nine unembalmed cadavers (six male; three female) age 80.1 ± 13.2 years. Fluoroscopic images were captured during ULNT with radial and ulnar nerve biases. Images at rest and maximum tension were digitized and displacement and strain were measured. All data were analyzed using one sample t-tests and a generalized linear mixed models approach. RESULTS: Upper limb neurodynamic testing with radial nerve bias resulted in displacement (2.44-3.04 mm) and strain (7.99-11.98%) and ULNT with ulnar nerve bias resulted in displacement (2.16-4.41 mm) and strain (7.12 and 12.95%). Significant extraforaminal displacement occurred during radial and ulnar nerve biases for all spinal nerves (all P < 0.05) whereas significant strain occurred during ulnar nerve biases for all spinal nerves but only in C6-C8 during radial nerve bias. CONCLUSION: Upper limb neurodynamic testing using both radial and ulnar nerve biases resulted in cervical spinal nerve displacement and strain. Such techniques could be used to tension load or mobilize or cervical spinal nerves to evaluate for pathology.

Influence of Standardized Procedures on the Reliability of Hip Clinical Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a standardized and personalized approach to verify the effects of conditions on intrarater and interrater reliability, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable difference for provocative tests and range-of-motion (ROM) tests used in hip pain assessment: flexion-adduction-internal rotation (FADIR), flexion-abduction-external rotation-extension (FABER), and hip internal rotation with 90° of hip flexion (hip IR). METHODS: Nineteen participants (mean [± SD] age = 24 ± 2 years; 10 women and 9 men) without lower limb or back pain were recruited. Three raters evaluated each participant during 2 testing sessions, 1 day apart. Raters performed the 3 tests in 4 conditions: classic (C), controlled pressure duration (CPD), subject-specific position (SSP), and mixed (M = CPD + SSP). RESULTS: For intrarater reliability, the CPD condition showed the highest intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; mean and 95% confidence interval [CI]) for hip IRROM (0.83; 95% CI, 0.53-0.94) and FADIRROM (0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89). The SSP condition showed the highest ICCs for FABERheight (0.71; 95% CI, 0.42-0.87) and FABERROM (0.62; 95% CI, 0.27-0.83). Concerning interrater reliability, the classic condition presented the highest ICCs for FABER variables (height: 0.54; 95% CI, 0.28-0.76; ROM: 0.58; 95% CI, 0.32-0.79) and hip IR ROM (0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87). The CPD condition showed the highest ICC for FADIRROM (0.57; 95% CI, 0.32-0.78). CONCLUSION: In the conditions of this study, CPD showed the highest ICCs for hip IRROM and FADIRROM, and SSP showed the highest ICCs for FABERheight and FABERROM.

Clinical evaluation of thumb base osteoarthritis: A scoping review.

Introduction: Thumb base osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent hand OA phenotype, associated with specific risk factors, treatment strategies, and requiring a distinct subset of evaluative approaches. This paper aimed at surveying our clinical evaluative methods and identifying gaps in our ability to capture the thumb's unique attributes and how they could impact our treatment recommendations. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology to gather relevant published and non-published articles regarding clinical tests currently available to assess the physical presentation of thumb base OA with special consideration of its specific multifactorial parameters namely architecture, ligaments, biomechanics, neuromuscular control, and proprioception. A full search strategy of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Clinical Trials.gov from their inception through May 2020 was performed. Results: Of 1936 citation identified, 54 met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-two clinical physical tests for the evaluation of thumb base OA were extracted, most of which well suited to address research questions regarding efficacy of clinical intervention, however providing limited information regarding the underlying impairments of ligaments, biomechanics, neuromuscular or proprioceptive components. Conclusions: The tests and measures specific to the basal thumb OA phenotype, and capable of isolating its multifactorial contributors are scarce. Our limited physical assessment repertoire impedes our ability to describe and answer explicative research questions. Without these we cannot evaluate the effect of conservative management and provide specific treatment recommendations. Further research is needed to develop and validate distinct clinical tools for this debilitating pathology.