Revascularization Outcomes Stratified by Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has increased alongside rising rates of diabetes mellitus (DM). While diabetic patients with CLTI have worse outcomes compared to patients without diabetes, conflicting data exist on the relationship between the severity of DM and CLTI outcomes. Close inspection of the relationship between DM severity and outcomes in CLTI may benefit surgical decision-making and patient education. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received endovascular intervention or surgical bypass for CLTI at our multidisciplinary Limb Preservation Program from 2013 to 2019 to collect patient characteristics using Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) reporting standards, arterial lesion characteristics from recorded angiograms, and outcomes, including survival, amputation, wound healing, and revascularization patency. Controlled DM was defined as SVS Grade 1 (controlled, not requiring insulin) and Grade 2 (controlled, requiring insulin), while uncontrolled DM was defined as SVS Grade 3 (uncontrolled), and DM severity was assessed using preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) values. Product-limit Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate survival functions. Univariable Cox proportional hazards analyses guided variable selection for multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Our Limb Preservation Program treated 177 limbs from 141 patients with DM. Patients with uncontrolled DM were younger (60.44 ± 10.67 vs. 65.93 ± 10.89 years old, P = 0.0009) and had higher HgbA1c values (8.97 ± 1.85% vs. 6.79 ± 1.10%, P < 0.0001). Fewer patients with uncontrolled DM were on dialysis compared to patients with controlled DM (15.6% vs. 30.9%, P = 0.0278). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, DM control did not affect time to mortality, limb salvage, wound healing, or loss of patency. However, multivariable proportional hazards analysis demonstrated increased risk of limb loss in patients with increasing HgbA1C (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96 [1.42-2.80], P < 0.0001) or dialysis dependence (HR = 15.37 [3.44-68.73], P = 0.0003), increased risk of death in patients with worsening pulmonary status (HR = 1.70 [1.20-2.39], P = 0.0026), and increased risk of delayed wound healing in patients who are male (HR = 0.48 [0.29-0.79], P = 0.0495). No independent association existed between loss of patency with any of the variables we collected. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with uncontrolled DM, as defined by SVS reporting standards, do not have worse outcomes following revascularization for CLTI compared to patients with controlled DM. However, increasing HgbA1c is associated with a greater risk for early amputation. Before revascularization, specific attention to the level of glycemic control in patients with DM is important, even if DM is "controlled." In addition to aggressive attempts at improved glycemic control, those with elevated HgbA1c should receive careful education regarding their increased risk of amputation despite revascularization. Future work is necessary to incorporate the severity of DM into risk models of revascularization for the CLTI population.

The natural history of chronic limb-threatening ischemia after technical failure of endovascular intervention.

OBJECTIVES: The treatment for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has changed dramatically in the last few decades with a shift toward an endovascular-first approach and aggressive revascularization to achieve limb salvage. As the size of the CLTI population and intervention rates increase, patients will continue to experience technical failure (TF). Here, we describe the natural history of patients after TF of endovascular intervention for CLTI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with CLTI who attempted endovascular intervention or bypass at our multidisciplinary limb salvage center from 2013 to 2019. Patient characteristics were collected according to the Society for Vascular Surgery's reporting standards. Primary outcomes included survival, limb salvage, wound healing, and revascularization patency. Product-limit Kaplan-Meier estimated survival functions for these outcomes, and between-group comparisons were made using Mantel-Cox log-rank nonparametric tests. RESULTS: We identified 242 limbs from 220 unique patients who underwent primary bypass (n = 30) or attempted endovascular intervention (n = 212) at our limb salvage center. Endovascular intervention was a TF in 31 (14.6%) limbs. After TF, 13 limbs underwent secondary bypass and 18 limbs were managed medically. Patients who experienced TF tended to be older (P < .001), male (P = .003), current tobacco users (P = .014), have longer lesions (P = .001), and have chronic total occlusions of target arteries (P < .001) as compared with those who experienced technical success. Furthermore, the TF group had worse limb salvage (P = .047) and slower wound healing (P = .028), but their survival was not different. Survival, limb salvage, and wound healing were not different in patients who received secondary bypass or medical management after TF. The secondary bypass group was older (P = .012) and had a lower prevalence of tibial disease (P = .049) than the primary bypass group and trended toward decreased survival, limb salvage, and wound healing (P = .059, P = .083, and P = .051, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Increased age, male sex, current tobacco use, longer arterial lesions, and occluded target arteries are associated with TF of endovascular intervention. Limb salvage and wound healing are relatively poor after TF of endovascular intervention, but survival appears comparable with patients who experience technical success. Secondary bypass may not always rescue patients after TF, though our sample size limits statistical power. Interestingly, patients who received a secondary bypass after TF trended toward decreased survival, limb salvage, and wound healing compared with primary bypass.

Stop Flying the Patients! Evaluation of the Overutilization of Helicopter Transport of Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Helicopter transport is a resource intensive and expensive method for transportation of patients by helicopter. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of helicopter transport determined by procedural care within 1-h of transfer at an urban level I trauma center. METHODS: All trauma patients transported by helicopter from January 2015-December 2017 to an urban level I trauma center from referring hospitals or the scene were retrospectively analyzed. A subgroup analysis was performed evaluating patients that required a procedure or operation within 1-h of transport compared with the remainder of the patient cohort who were transported via helicopter. RESULTS: A total of 1590 patients were transported by helicopter. Thirty-nine percent of patients (n = 612) were admitted directly to the floor from the trauma bay and 16% (n = 249) of patients required only observation or were discharged home after helicopter transfer. Approximately one-third of the entire study cohort (36%, n = 572) required any procedure, with a median time to procedure of 31.5 h (interquartile range 54.4). Only 13% (n = 74) required a procedure within 1-h of helicopter transport. The average distance (in miles) if the patient had been driven by ground transport rather than helicopter was 67.0 miles (SD ± 27.9) and would take an estimated 71.5 min (±28.4) for patients who required a procedure within 1-h compared with 61.6 miles (SD ± 30.9) with an estimated 66.1 min (SD ± 30.8) for the remainder of the cohort (P value 0.899 and 0.680, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that helicopter transport was not necessary for the vast majority of trauma patients transported via helicopter.

The Influence of Microglial Elimination and Repopulation on Stress Sensitization Induced by Repeated Social Defeat.

BACKGROUND: Stress is associated with an increased prevalence of anxiety and depression. Repeated social defeat (RSD) stress in mice increases the release of monocytes from the bone marrow that are recruited to the brain by microglia. These monocytes enhance inflammatory signaling and augment anxiety. Moreover, RSD promotes stress sensitization, in which exposure to acute stress 24 days after cessation of RSD causes anxiety recurrence. The purpose of this study was to determine whether microglia were critical to stress sensitization and exhibited increased reactivity to subsequent acute stress or immune challenge. METHODS: Mice were exposed to RSD, microglia were eliminated by colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor antagonism (PLX5622) and allowed to repopulate, and responses to acute stress or immune challenge (lipopolysaccharide) were determined 24 days after RSD sensitization. RESULTS: Microglia maintained a unique messenger RNA signature 24 days after RSD. Moreover, elimination of RSD-sensitized microglia prevented monocyte accumulation in the brain and blocked anxiety recurrence following acute stress (24 days). When microglia were eliminated prior to RSD and repopulated and mice were subjected to acute stress, there was monocyte accumulation in the brain and anxiety in RSD-sensitized mice. These responses were unaffected by microglial elimination/repopulation. This may be related to neuronal sensitization that persisted 24 days after RSD. Following immune challenge, there was robust microglial reactivity in RSD-sensitized mice associated with prolonged sickness behavior. Here, microglial elimination/repopulation prevented the amplified immune reactivity ex vivo and in vivo in RSD-sensitized mice. CONCLUSIONS: Microglia and neurons remain sensitized weeks after RSD, and only the immune reactivity component of RSD-sensitized microglia was prevented by elimination/repopulation.