High inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of HER2-low breast cancer: a national registry study on 50,714 Danish patients.

BACKGROUND: Considering the recent advancements in the treatment of breast cancer with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), we aimed to examine inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of HER2-low breast cancer across all Danish pathology departments. METHODS: From the Danish Breast Cancer Group, we obtained data on all women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer in 2007-2019 who were subsequently assigned for curatively intended treatment. RESULTS: Of 50,714 patients, HER2 score and status were recorded for 48,382, among whom 59.2% belonged to the HER2-low group (score 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification), 26.8% had a HER2 score of 0, and 14.0% were HER2 positive. The proportion of HER2-low cases ranged from 46.3 to 71.8% among pathology departments (P < 0.0001) and from 49.3 to 65.6% over the years (P < 0.0001). In comparison, HER2 positivity rates ranged from 11.8 to 17.2% among departments (P < 0.0001) and from 12.6 to 15.7% over the years (P = 0.005). In the eight departments with the highest number of patients, variability in HER2-low cases increased from 2011 to 2019, although the same immunohistochemical assay was used. By multivariable logistic regression, the examining department was significantly related to both HER2 score 0 and HER2 positivity (P < 0.0001) but showed greater dispersion in odds ratios in the former case (range 0.25-1.41 vs. 0.84-1.27). CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed high inter-laboratory variability in the assessment of HER2-low breast cancer. The findings cast doubt on whether the current test method for HER2 is robust and reliable enough to select HER2-low patients for HER2-targeted treatment in daily clinical practice.

Digital image analysis and assisted reading of the HER2 score display reduced concordance: pitfalls in the categorisation of HER2-low breast cancer.

AIMS: Digital image analysis (DIA) is used increasingly as an assisting tool to evaluate biomarkers, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in invasive breast cancer (BC). DIA can assist pathologists in HER2 evaluation by presenting quantitative information about the HER2 staining in APP assisted reading (AR). Concurrently, the HER2-low category (HER2-1+/2+ without HER2 gene amplification) has gained prominence due to newly developed antibody-drug conjugates. However, major inter- and intraobserver variability have been observed for the entity. The present quality assurance study investigated the concordance between DIA and AR in clinical use, especially concerning the HER2-low category. METHODS AND RESULTS: HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 761 tumours from 727 patients was evaluated in tissue microarray (TMA) cores by DIA (Visiopharm HER2-CONNECT) and AR. Overall concordance between HER2-scores were 73% (n = 552, weighted-κ: 0.66), and 88% (n = 669, weighted-κ: 0.70), when combining HER2-0/1+. A total of 205 scores were discordant by one category, while four were discordant by two categories. A heterogeneous HER2 pattern was relatively common in the discordant cases and a pitfall in the categorisation of HER2-low BC. AR more commonly reassigned a lower HER2 score (from HER2-1+ to HER2-0) within the HER2-low subgroup (n = 624) compared with DIA. CONCLUSION: DIA and AR display moderate agreement with heterogeneous and aberrant staining, representing a source of discordance and a pitfall in the evaluation of HER2.