Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 17275, 2023 10 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828107

RESUMO

Post-COVID-19 pulmonary sequalae are well-recognized early in the pandemic. Survivorship clinics are crucial for managing at-risk patients. However, it is unclear who requires pulmonary function test (PFT) and when PFTs should be performed. We aim to investigate for whom and how these interval PFTs should be performed. We performed a single-centre, prospective cohort study on COVID-19 survivors between 1st May 2020 and 31st April 2022. These patients were followed up at 6, 9 and 12 months with interval PFT and Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey. Those with PFT defects were offered a computed tomography scan of the thorax. Of the 46 patients recruited, 17 (37%) had severe/critical illness. Compared to those with mild/moderate disease, these patients were more likely to experience DLCO defects (59% versus 17%, p = 0.005) and had lower SF-36 scores (mean physical component summary score of 45 ± 12 versus 52 ± 8, p = 0.046). These differences were most notable at 6 months, compared to the 9- and 12-months intervals. DLCO defects were also associated with older age, raised inflammatory markers and extensive CXR infiltrates. Besides interstitial-like abnormalities, obesity and undiagnosed lung conditions accounted for 39% of the PFT abnormalities. Interval PFTs can be performed earliest 6 months post-COVID-19. Patients with normal tests were unlikely to develop new abnormalities and would not require repeat PFTs. Abnormal PFTs can be followed-up with repeat PFTs 6 monthly until resolution. Non-COVID-19 differentials should be considered for persistent PFT abnormalities.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Testes de Função Respiratória
2.
Sleep Breath ; 25(1): 281-288, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32524337

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The current gold standard for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is overnight in laboratory polysomnography (PSG). However, PSGs are expensive, labor-intensive, and have long wait times. An ambulatory sleep study device, the WatchPAT, has been shown to have high correlation for sleep indices measured compared with PSG (AASM, 2016). Use of the WatchPAT could potentially lead to shorter waiting times and earlier diagnosis of OSA (Lancet Resp Med 3:310-8, 2015). Our study aimed to investigate if WatchPAT reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of OSA in a tertiary healthcare setting. A secondary aim was to investigate the cost-benefit of an ambulatory sleep study. METHODS: All patients who underwent diagnostic sleep studies in a single tertiary institution from 2014 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics and time from ordering of sleep study to prescription of continuous positive airway pressure were recorded. Data were categorized into two groups by type of diagnostic sleep study, PSG, and WatchPAT. The time to treatment and cost for diagnosis of OSA were compared between groups with the Paired T test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Of 1898 patients who had diagnostic sleep studies over a 4-year period, 1660 patients (88%) underwent PSG and 238 patients (12%) underwent WatchPAT. Patients in the WatchPAT group had a shorter time to diagnosis (21 days versus 79.8 days, p < 0.001) and treatment (46.3 days versus 118.4 days, p < 0.001) compared to the PSG group. Cost-benefit calculation showed that this earlier treatment led to cost-saving of US $1179.50 per patient. CONCLUSION: An ambulatory sleep study is an option for earlier access to diagnosis and treatment of OSA with the potential of considerable cost savings.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Monitorização Ambulatorial , Polissonografia , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/diagnóstico , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Ambulatorial/economia , Monitorização Ambulatorial/normas , Monitorização Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Polissonografia/economia , Polissonografia/normas , Polissonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
4.
Respirology ; 24(3): 278-285, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30189465

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A major challenge with the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Mask tolerability is an important determinant of adherence, however evidence to guide selection of mask interfaces is lacking. METHODS: We conducted a randomized crossover trial of mask interfaces in CPAP therapy for moderate-to-severe OSA to assess adherence and efficacy of CPAP therapy with nasal mask, nasal pillow and oronasal masks. Demographic data, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores and craniofacial measurements were also analysed for associations with adherence with oronasal masks. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included in the study (mean ± SD age: 46 ± 12 years; body mass index: 29.9 ± 5.6 kg/m2 ; apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI): 53.6 ± 24.0 events/h). Patients had better adherence with nasal masks (average night use: 3.96 ± 2.26 h/night) compared to oronasal masks (3.26 ± 2.18 h/night, P < 0.001) and nasal pillows (3.48 ± 2.20 h/night, P = 0.007). Residual AHI was higher with oronasal masks (7.2 ± 5.2) compared to nasal masks (4.0 ± 4.2, P < 0.001) and nasal pillows (4.1 ± 3.3, P < 0.001). Twenty-two (25.9%) patients had the best adherence with oronasal masks (4.22 ± 2.14 vs 2.93 ± 2.12 h/night, P = 0.016). These patients had lower NOSE scores (15 (0-35) vs 40 (10-55), P = 0.024) and larger menton-labrale inferioris/biocular width ratios (31 ± 3% vs 28 ± 4%, P = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Nasal masks are the preferred interface during CPAP initiation. Patients with less nasal obstruction and a proportionally increased chin-lower lip distance to mid-face width may have better CPAP adherence with an oronasal mask interface.


Assuntos
Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/instrumentação , Face/anatomia & histologia , Máscaras , Cooperação do Paciente , Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono/terapia , Adulto , Povo Asiático , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obstrução Nasal/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
5.
Cureus ; 10(6): e2819, 2018 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131913

RESUMO

We report a rare case of a lung adenocarcinoma presenting with chylothorax and metastases to the common bile duct and the rectum. From the radiological and endoscopic appearance of the tumors, the main differential diagnoses were metastatic lung cancer to multiple rare extra-thoracic sites and multiple synchronous primary oncological malignancies. Pathological examination of the biopsies with positive immunohistochemical staining for thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) played an important role in confirming metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA