Evaluation of absenteeism and presenteeism status of factory employees.

BACKGROUND: While absenteeism refers to not attending work, presenteeism is defined as not being present at work. These two conditions, which negatively affect employee health, can be indicators of work efficiency, work peace, work safety and work engagement. OBJECTIVE: Several factors were evaluated in this study concerning absenteeism and presenteeism among factory workers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among workers in a factory operating in a heavy industry in southern Turkey in 2021. A survey consisting of 57 questions was applied to 152 factory workers by face-to-face interview method. The participants' behaviour over the last month was evaluated regarding absenteeism and presenteeism. RESULTS: It was reported that 24 (15.8%) of all employees were absent from work in the last month (absenteeism), excluding holidays and sick leave, and that 20 (13.2%) employees engaged in presenteeism, working when they should not have been at the workplace. There was a high absenteeism rate among employees who had an acute illness and were dissatisfied with their jobs. Several factors have been associated with presenteeism, including poor economic conditions, family health problems, previous unemployment, working overtime, job dissatisfaction, poor relationships with colleagues and difficulty finding a replacement, acute illness, sleep problems and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: To increase the productivity and commitment of employees, it may be useful to identify the reasons for absenteeism and present behaviours, to facilitate effective interpersonal communication skills by examining the organisational climate of employees, and to regulate workload based on a comprehensive assessment of the health status of employees.

Characteristics of adverse reactions due to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy applied between 2011-2021: Single center experience.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence of local, large local and systemic reactions after subcutaneus immunotherapy (SCIT) injections in our clinic and to determine the characteristic features of these adverse reactions. Materials and Methods: A total of 6000 SCIT injections administered to 163 patients between January 2011 and December 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. The study population consisted of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis who underwent SCIT due to pollen, house dust mite or cat allergy, or patients who underwent SCIT due to venom allergy. Demographic characteristics of the patients, diagnoses, allergen sensitivities, immunotherapy protocol applied, adverse reactions, and the characteristics of these reactions were recorded. Result: Totally, 163 patients with a mean age of 36.8 ± 12.7 years were enrolled in this research. Sex distribution was as follows: 55.2% (n= 90) were females. During the study, 218 allergic reactions were detected in 83 patients. The incidence of adverse reactions per injection was 3.6%. The probability of developing an adverse reaction in a patient during the entire subcutaneous immunotherapy was 53.9%. Of the adverse reactions that developed, 94 (43.1%, n= 47) were observed locally while 56 (25.7%, n= 40) were large local reactions, and 68 (31.2%, n= 30) were systemic. Incidence of adverse reactions per injection were 1.5%, 0.9%, and 1.1% for local reaction, large local reaction, and systemic reaction, respectively. Conclusions: The results of this analysis elaborated that subcutaneous immunotherapy is a safe and tolerable treatment modality. However, before initiating treatment, the benefits and risks should be evaluated. The risk of systemic reactions is quite low, but fatal anaphylaxis can occur, so physicians need to be aware of the potential risks.

Predictors of mortality in patients with geriatric trauma in the emergency service.

OBJECTIVE: In our study, it was aimed to compare the power of trauma scores (Glasgow Coma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Injury Severity Score, and Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score) in order to predict mortality in patients with geriatric trauma and to determine the predictive values of these scores in mortality. METHODS: Demographic data, clinical features, etiological causes, laboratory results, and trauma scores of the patients were statistically analyzed. SPSS 20 for Windows was used for this evaluation. RESULTS: It was determined that as the Glasgow Coma Score value of the patients increased, the Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score scores decreased and the Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score score increased. Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score values increased and Revised Trauma Score and Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score values decreased as the lactate levels of the patients increased. It was determined that the Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score scores of the patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit were significantly higher, while their Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score scores were lower. CONCLUSION: Glasgow Coma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale, and Injury Severity Score scores and blood lactate levels are important parameters that can be used in the emergency department for the early detection of high-risk patients in geriatric trauma and the evaluation of the prognosis of geriatric trauma patients.

Evaluation of YouTube Videos on Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: As in every field, online information has become increasingly used in health. However, it is well known that some information online containing health advice is incorrect and may even include false statements. For this reason, it is crucial for public health that individuals reach reliable, high-quality resources when they are trying to obtain health information. Studies have been conducted on the quality and reliability of online information about many diseases, but no similar study has been found in the literature on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: In this descriptive study, videos on YouTube (www.youtube.com) about HCC were evaluated using the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and the modified DISCERN tool. RESULTS: While 129 (89.58%) of the videos examined within the study were considered useful, 15 (10.42%) were misleading. The GQS scores of the videos considered useful were significantly higher than the scores of the misleading videos, with a median (min-max) score of 4 (2-5) (P < 0.001). When we compared the DISCERN scores, the scores of the useful videos were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the scores of the misleading videos. CONCLUSION: YouTube should be considered a complex structure where accurate and reliable health information can be presented, as well as erroneous and misleading information. Users should understand the importance of video sources and focus their research on videos from doctors, academics, and universities.

Evaluation of patients of vaccine side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: Postvaccine side effects were evaluated in patients presenting to our emergency department with complaints of vaccine side effects after taking COVID-19 vaccine, and new unknown side effects ranging from mild complaints to life-threatening risks, and frequency of all side effects were investigated. This study aimed to establish a scientific resource to identify the potential side effects of the vaccine. METHODS: Patients' demographic information, clinical characteristics, epicrisis reports, COVID-19 disease and vaccination histories, vital values, and blood values were examined. The SPSS 20.0 package program was used for statistical evaluation. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Notably, 13.1% of patients presenting to the emergency department started to have complaints after taking Sinovac vaccine, whereas 86.9% of them had complaints after taking BioNTech vaccine. Also, 36.9% of patients stated that they had COVID-19. All patients had a Glasgow coma scale score of 15 during admission. No patient was hospitalized, ventilator was not needed, and all patients were discharged. While the most common presenting complaint to the emergency department after vaccination was fatigue in 29.7%, the most common diagnoses after examination in the emergency department were myalgia in 32.1% and upper respiratory tract infection in 28.6%. CONCLUSION: Results and conclusions of our study will guide healthcare workers and patients on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccine.

Evaluation of patients of vaccine side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: Postvaccine side effects were evaluated in patients presenting to our emergency department with complaints of vaccine side effects after taking COVID-19 vaccine, and new unknown side effects ranging from mild complaints to life-threatening risks, and frequency of all side effects were investigated. This study aimed to establish a scientific resource to identify the potential side effects of the vaccine. METHODS: Patients' demographic information, clinical characteristics, epicrisis reports, COVID-19 disease and vaccination histories, vital values, and blood values were examined. The SPSS 20.0 package program was used for statistical evaluation. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Notably, 13.1% of patients presenting to the emergency department started to have complaints after taking Sinovac vaccine, whereas 86.9% of them had complaints after taking BioNTech vaccine. Also, 36.9% of patients stated that they had COVID-19. All patients had a Glasgow coma scale score of 15 during admission. No patient was hospitalized, ventilator was not needed, and all patients were discharged. While the most common presenting complaint to the emergency department after vaccination was fatigue in 29.7%, the most common diagnoses after examination in the emergency department were myalgia in 32.1% and upper respiratory tract infection in 28.6%. CONCLUSION: Results and conclusions of our study will guide healthcare workers and patients on the side effects of COVID-19 vaccine.

Is YouTube useful as a source of information for approaches to reducing blood pressure and hypertension treatment?

Hypertension is an important public health problem due to its high prevalence and common complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of videos on YouTube related to reducing blood pressure and hypertension treatment. Using the six search terms "hypertension treatment", "cure hypertension", "hypertension medication", "control high blood pressure", "lower high blood pressure", and "reduce high blood pressure", a total of 360 relevant videos on YouTube were evaluated. Some parameters, i.e., the length of the video, number of days on YouTube, number of view counts, and number of likes, dislikes, and comments, were noted for all videos. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) was used to evaluate the quality of the videos. We categorized the video content as useful or misleading using the evidence-based medical literature. After exclusions, 104 videos were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Out of all the videos, 51% were useful, and 49% were misleading. Videos mentioned lifestyle changes (LCs) more (65 videos, 62.5%), and only 39.4% (41 videos) of all the videos contained information about pharmacological treatment (PT). Videos about alternative treatment (AT) had high numbers of views, and videos about PT had low numbers of views, and this difference was statistically significant. Videos that did not include PT but did include LCs and AT had more likes, similar to the number of views. YouTube, which is an important source of information, can guide individuals to in reducing high blood pressure with nonpharmacological and pharmacological methods. Uploaders; doctors (31.7%), herbalists/nutritionists (18.3%), independent users (10.6%), chiropractors (6.7%), yoga teachers (4.8%), and others (27.9%). (B) Country of origin; United States of America (58.7%), India (16.3%), Australia (5.8%), United Kingdom (3.8%), others (4.8%), and unknown (10.6%). (C) Usefulness rate by content (%). PT, pharmacological treatment; LC, lifestyle change; AT, alternative treatment.

Predictors of mortality in patients with geriatric trauma in the emergency service

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: In our study, it was aimed to compare the power of trauma scores (Glasgow Coma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Injury Severity Score, and Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score) in order to predict mortality in patients with geriatric trauma and to determine the predictive values of these scores in mortality. METHODS: Demographic data, clinical features, etiological causes, laboratory results, and trauma scores of the patients were statistically analyzed. SPSS 20 for Windows was used for this evaluation. RESULTS: It was determined that as the Glasgow Coma Score value of the patients increased, the Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score scores decreased and the Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score score increased. Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score values increased and Revised Trauma Score and Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score values decreased as the lactate levels of the patients increased. It was determined that the Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score scores of the patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit were significantly higher, while their Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score scores were lower. CONCLUSION: Glasgow Coma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Trauma Score-Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Scale, and Injury Severity Score scores and blood lactate levels are important parameters that can be used in the emergency department for the early detection of high-risk patients in geriatric trauma and the evaluation of the prognosis of geriatric trauma patients.

Regional variability of modified Ferriman-Gallwey scorring in premenopausal healthy women in Southern Turkey.

ObjectiveAlthough modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mF-G) scorring has been the gold standard for assessing hirsutism, also known that this scorring could show variability according to ethnicity. Hence, false positive hirsutism diagnosis and unnecessary anti-androgen therapy can prescribed. It was aimed to disclose the regional characteristics of this scorring in healthy women living in Southern Turkey.Methods360 women between 18 and 50 years of age were randomly screened. Their medical history, including ovulation periods, gestation(s), family history, known drug use was obtained. Physical examination with mF-G scoring and serum hormone measurements were performed. Women with hirsutism who scored ≥ 8 were further investigated for any underlying disease or cause of hirsutism. After these investigations, the women were divided into three groups according to the mF-G ≥ 8 score and evaluated. Group A (n = 59) had an mF-G ≥ 8 and, revealed an underlying disease causing hirsutism; group B (n = 42) had an mF-G ≥ 8, but no underlying disease responsible for hirsutism; and the third group (Group C, n = 259) had an mF-G ≤ 8 and thus, no signs of hirsutism.ResultsThe mean mF-G scores of three groups were 12.78 ± 4.4, 11.48 ± 4.6, and 5.53 ± 3.4, respectively. Of the 59 (16.1%) women in Group A, 46 (44.2%) were diagnosed as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), 8 (7.7%) had idiopathic hyperandrogenism, 7 (6.7%) had nonclassic congenital adrenal hyperplasia, and 1 (1%) had a prolactinoma. When compared to group B, group A women had significantly decreased fertility (p = .001) and menstrual irregularities (p = .001).ConclusionsIn this study, results revealed a significant rate of healthy women (11.6%) who had an mF-G ≥ 8, but no underlying disease causing hirsutism yet were considered hirsute according to their mF-G cutoff. Also, the majority of the studied women (71.9%) living in Southern Turkey were found to have a hair-pattern similar to the European Women. Therefore, we suggest that regional and ethnical body-hair patterns should be considered before prescribing anti-androgen therapy.