Submacular and Intraretinal Fluid Associated with Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy.

Introduction: Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) is an ischemic disorder of the optic nerve and a common cause of acute, painless, permanent vision loss. It is divided into two types: arteritic AION (AAION) and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION). Although subretinal fluid associated with optic disc edema has been reported in cases of NAION, it is rarely described in AAION. Case Presentation: An 86-year-old female with a history of polymyalgia rheumatica presented with sudden vision loss in the left eye. Initial examination revealed left pallid optic disc edema with peripapillary hemorrhages. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the left macula showed intraretinal and submacular fluid. The patient was started on 50 mg of oral prednisone daily. The diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) was later confirmed with a positive temporal artery biopsy. Three weeks after presentation, an OCT was completed which demonstrated complete resolution of the intraretinal and submacular fluid. Although the presence of both intraretinal and subretinal fluid has been previously documented in cases of NAION, it is rarely reported in a patient with GCA. Conclusion: This is a newly described case of subretinal and intraretinal fluid in a patient with AAION. We postulate that the pathophysiology behind this is mediated by associated choroidal ischemia leading to altered permeability. OCT is an important imaging modality allowing for signs of GCA to be better characterized.

Sex or Gender Reporting in Ophthalmology Clinical Trials Among US Food and Drug Administration Approvals, 1995 to 2022.

Importance: As critical determinants of scientific rigor, reproducibility, and equity, sex and gender should be considered in clinical trial design and reporting. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of sex and gender reporting and extent of sex- and gender-based analysis in clinical trials associated with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug approvals between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2022. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study of participants enrolled in FDA ophthalmology trials, the following trial documents were reviewed by pairs of independent reviewers in decreasing order of priority: peer-reviewed publication, ClinicalTrials.gov report, and FDA medical and statistical reviews. Trial protocols and supplementary materials were also reviewed. Main Outcome and Measures: The proportion of trials that correctly applied sex and gender terminology, reported the method of assessing sex or gender, and conducted sex- or gender-based data analysis; incorrect application of sex and gender terminology was defined as interchangeable use of sex- and gender-related terms without a clear justification. Results: Between 1995 and 2022, 34 ophthalmic drugs corresponding to 85 trials (34 740 participants) received FDA approval, of which 16 drugs (47.1%) corresponding to 32 trials (18 535 participants [37.6%]) were associated with peer-reviewed publications. Sixteen trials used sex and gender terminology correctly (19.5%). No trial reported how sex and gender were collected nor enrolled participants from sexual and gender identity minority populations. Most trials reported sex- and gender-disaggregated demographic data (96.5%), but few conducted sex- or gender-based analysis for data on dropout (1.2%), primary outcomes (28.2%), secondary outcomes (2.4%), and adverse events (9.4%). Erroneous sex and gender reporting was associated with later publication year (2008.5 vs 2001.0; median difference, 7.5; 95% CI, -6.0 to 11.0; P < .001) and higher journal influence metrics, including 2022 journal impact factor (13.7 vs 5.9; median difference, 7.8; 95% CI, -1.4 to 152.4, P < .001) and 2022 journal citation indicator (4.9 vs 2.1; median difference, 2.9; 95% CI, 0-20.0, P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this observational study, over three-quarters of ophthalmology trials associated with FDA drug approvals conflated sex and gender and over two-thirds lacked sex- and gender-based analyses. More rigorous integration of sex and gender appears warranted for FDA, and presumably other trials, to improve their validity, reproducibility, and equity.

Sex Disparities in Operating Room use Among Cataract Surgeons: A 10-Year Retrospective Population-Based Analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate sex differences in operating room (OR) time and case volumes among comprehensive cataract surgeons in Ontario, Canada's most populated province. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. METHODS: Physician billing data of active comprehensive cataract surgeons between 2010 and 2019 were analyzed to identify all cataract surgeries in this timeframe. The number of OR days and case volume were the primary outcomes. Data were stratified by surgeon sex and career stage. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, approximately 1.05 million cataract surgeries were performed in Ontario. There were an average of 195 ± 3 comprehensive cataract surgeons per year, of which 39 ± 5 were female. The proportion of female surgeons increased from 16.8% of all surgeons in 2010 to 24.4% in 2019. The greatest proportion of male surgeons were in the late phase of their career, whereas the greatest proportion of female surgeons were in the early stage of their career. On average, male surgeons had 44.9 ± 1.90 OR days per year and females had 32 ± 1.90 OR days per year, resulting in female surgeons averaging 12.45 ± 1.90 fewer OR days per year. This OR distribution remained consistent across career stages. Average case volumes per OR day were similar across sexes, but male surgeons performed on average 172.7 ± 30.6 more surgeries per year. CONCLUSIONS: Despite performing similar average case volumes per OR day, female surgeons had less OR time compared to their male counterparts per year, and this remained consistent across career stages and over the 10-year period. Metrics for OR allocation and use should be well defined and transparent.

Refractive surgery as a treatment tool for strabismus: systematic review.

The impact refractive surgery has on preoperative horizontal strabismus is rapidly evolving, and this knowledge can provide valuable clinical context when considering refractive surgery as a treatment for strabismus. 515 studies were identified, of which 26 met the inclusion criteria. Analysis indicated that refractive surgery resulted in an overall decrease in the mean uncorrected postoperative angle of deviation caused partially or fully due to refractive error and highlighted the varied outcome of refractive surgery on nonaccommodative horizontal strabismus with limited evidence to suggest refractive surgery for this type of strabismus. Efficacy of refractive surgery in reducing concomitant horizontal strabismus depends on several factors: type of horizontal ocular deviation, patient age, and extent of refractive error. Refractive surgery can be an effective treatment for refractive accommodative horizontal strabismus in patients with stable, mild to moderate myopia or hyperopia and should be considered with careful patient selection for optimum outcome.

Surface Anatomy of the Nail for the Dermatologist.

Expert diagnosis of cutaneous pathology requires precise anatomic description. In this brief report the authors review the clinically relevant surface anatomy of the nail and relate it to a case of squamous cell carcinoma.