Colorectal resection in nonagenarians: effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The number and proportion of elderly persons in the general population have been increasing. Inevitably, the incidence of colorectal carcinoma has also increased. Although substantial evidence indicates that surgery is well tolerated in patients 80 years or older, studies in nonagenarians are not well documented. METHODS: Consecutive nonagenarians and octogenarians who underwent elective laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) from September 2009 through October 2011 were studied. Data on medical history, ASA score, details of operations, and postoperative events were collected. RESULTS: LAC was performed in nine nonagenarians and seven octogenarians. There were no complications related to laparoscopy. No patient required conversion from LAC to an open procedure or died postoperatively. Peristalsis was confirmed and oral intake was initiated on postoperative days 2.6 and 2.7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery is considered an extremely useful treatment for very old patients because it has a low risk of postoperative complications, even in the presence of pre-existing diseases. We conclude that LAC may be indicated in nonagenarians.

Chenodeoxycholic acid stimulates the progression of human esophageal cancer cells: A possible mechanism of angiogenesis in patients with esophageal cancer.

Bile acids are known to promote the growth of gastrointestinal cancer. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We examined whether bile acids induce tumor growth via the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 angiogenic pathway. In vitro, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cells and esophageal adenocarcinoma cells were studied. Production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in response to treatment with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). COX-2 protein and VEGF protein were measured by immunoblot analysis, and COX-2 activity was measured by ELISA. In vivo, CDCA was administered to ESCC cell-bearing mice. Tumor tissues were analyzed immunohistochemically, and microvessel density was evaluated. Clinically, 134 patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy were studied. In vitro, CDCA induced the production of PGE2 and VEGF in dose- and time-dependent manners, and these effects were attenuated by a selective COX-2 inhibitor, mitogen-activated protein kinases inhibitor, or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor. CDCA-induced COX-2 in the cell lysate increased the secretion of VEGF into the culture medium. In vivo, CDCA markedly enhanced tumor growth and increased vascularization. Clinically, patients whose tumors expressed both COX-2 and VEGF had poor outcomes. Our results suggest that bile acids, important constituents of duodenal fluid, stimulate the development of human esophageal cancer by promoting angiogenesis via the COX-2 pathway.

Nicotine induces the fragile histidine triad methylation in human esophageal squamous epithelial cells.

The fragile histidine triad (FHIT) gene has been proposed to have an important role in very early carcinogenesis. Methylation of the FHIT gene is associated with transcriptional inactivation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and FHIT inactivation has been linked to smoking-related carcinogenesis. In this study, we confirmed methylation of the FHIT gene in human esophageal squamous epithelial cells (HEECs) and examined whether nicotine induced alteration of FHIT. Methylation status in the promoter region of the FHIT gene and p16(INK4A) gene was determined by methylation-specific PCR in HEECs exposed to nicotine under various conditions. Methylation status of the FHIT gene was confirmed by DNA-sequencing analysis. Protein expression of Fhit and the DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) DNMT1 and DNMT3a were assessed by immunoblot analysis. In the absence of nicotine, methylation of the FHIT gene and attenuation of Fhit protein were not detected in HEECs. Nicotine induced the methylation of FHIT gene and attenuated Fhit protein in association with increased expression of DNMT3a. Reexpression of Fhit protein in HEECs was found after cessation of moderate- to long-term exposure to nicotine. Our results show that nicotine induces methylation of the FHIT gene followed by loss of Fhit protein expression in HEECs. Continuous smoking may thus increase the risk of esophageal cancer.

Clinical significance of osteopontin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison with common tumor markers.

OBJECTIVE: Osteopontin (OPN) is a secreted integrin-binding glycophosphoprotein that may have a role in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). To evaluate the clinical significance of OPN in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), we compared plasma OPN levels with those of common tumor markers. METHODS: Preoperative plasma OPN levels were measured by enzyme immunoassay in 103 ESCC patients. Serum SCC antigen, Cyfra 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were also measured routinely at admission by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Plasma OPN levels ranged from 82.8 to 1,980 ng/ml. High OPN level was associated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.05), but not with tumor histology or depth of invasion. The overall survival of the patients with high OPN levels was worse than that of those with low OPN levels (p = 0.02). SCC antigen and Cyfra 21-1 levels were associated with the depth of tumor invasion, the tumor diameter, lymph node metastasis, and the overall survival, but CEA was not associated with these clinicopathological factors. Combined evaluation of OPN plus Cyfra 21-1 or OPN plus SCC antigen was useful as an independent prognostic indicator. CONCLUSION: Measurement of the plasma OPN level, as well as serum SCC antigen and Cyfra 21-1, may help to predict the progression of ESCC.

Prognostic significance of dysadherin expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Dysadherin is a cancer-associated cell membrane glycoprotein that has been reported to downregulate E-cadherin expression and promote metastasis. To evaluate the role of dysadherin in metastasis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), we examined dysadherin and E-cadherin expression in patients with this cancer. METHODS: Dysadherin and E-cadherin expression was evaluated in 117 ESCC patients (pT1, 31; pT2, 30; pT3, 39; pT4, 17) by immunohistochemistry. The findings were compared with the clinicopathological data of the patients. RESULTS: Both dysadherin and E-cadherin were localized to the cell membrane. Thirty patients (29.1%) had tumors positive for dysadherin and 41 patients (35.0%) had tumors positive for E-cadherin. Tumors showing dysadherin positivity and negative E-cadherin expression had a significantly worse prognosis than other tumors. When the patients with dysadherin- positive tumors were combined with E-cadherin-negative patients, this group had a worse prognosis (p < 0.0001). Cox multivariate analysis revealed that dysadherin expression was an independent prognostic factor for ESCC (p = 0.003), but E-cadherin expression was not. CONCLUSION: Combined analysis of dysadherin and E-cadherin expression may help to predict the prognosis of patients with ESCC. Our results suggested that expression of dysadherin by this cancer may partly explain the poor prognosis of patients with preservation of E-cadherin expression.

Production of prostaglandinE2 via bile acid is enhanced by trypsin and acid in normal human esophageal epithelial cells.

Several reports suggest that duodenogastroesophageal reflux may produce esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal carcinoma. And it is well known that the incidence of adenocarcinoma arising from Barrett's esophagus has been increasing during the past decade. On the other hand, cyclooxygenase-2 and prostaglandins, produced by the catalytic reaction of cyclooxygenase-2, are considered to relate to carcinogenesis of the digestive tract and other malignant tumors. Recent reports suggest that cyclooxygenase-2 is induced in Barrett's esophagus and esophageal carcinoma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reaction of cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandinE2 production on normal human esophageal epithelial cells cultured with gastroduodenal components. Normal human esophageal epithelial cells were cultured with chenodeoxycholic acid, trypsin and in acidic condition, individually and with different combinations of these three factors. After culturing, cyclooxygenase-2 expression in the cells and amount of prostglandinE2 in culture media was evaluated by immunoblotting and enzyme-immunoassay, respectively after culturing the cells. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression was up-regulated by bile acid and prostaglandinE2 production was enhanced by bile acid with trypsin, acidic condition or both of these components, without a synergistic effect on cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Production of prostaglandinE2 via these factors was suppressed by the cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor JTE-522. The results suggest that duodenogastroesophageal reflux may induce cyclooxygenase-2 expression and prostaglandinE2 production in esophageal epithelial cells, cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitors may have a chemopreventive effect on esophageal carcinoma.

Clinical significance of dysadherin expression in gastric cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Dysadherin, a cancer-associated cell membrane glycoprotein, has been reported to down-regulate E-cadherin expression and promote metastasis. To evaluate the role of dysadherin in gastric cancer, we examined dysadherin and E-cadherin expression in gastric cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Dysadherin and E-cadherin expression were evaluated in 276 gastric cancer patients by immunohistochemistry, and the results were compared with the clinicopathological findings of the subjects. RESULTS: Dysadherin was not expressed in normal gastric epithelium. Both dysadherin and E-cadherin were localized to the cell membrane. Dysadherin expression was sometimes largely localized to infiltrating tumor cells or cells dissociating. Ninety gastric cancer patients (32.6%) were positive for dysadherin, and 151 patients (54.7%) showed preservation of E-cadherin expression. Expression of dysadherin was associated with moderately differentiated carcinoma and hematogenous metastasis, whereas reduced expression of E-cadherin showed an association with poorly differentiated carcinoma and peritoneal dissemination. As a result, dysadherin positivity and reduced E-cadherin expression were associated with a poor prognosis. In addition, patients with both dysadherin positivity and reduced E-cadherin had the worst prognosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that reduced E-cadherin expression was an independent prognostic factor, but dysadherin expression was not. CONCLUSION: Combined analysis of dysadherin and E-cadherin expression may help to predict the prognosis and the mode of metastasis in gastric cancer patients. Patients with dysadherin positivity have a higher risk of hematogenous metastasis, whereas patients with reduced E-cadherin expression have an increased risk of peritoneal dissemination.