A multi-biomarker panel for predicting Tocilizumab response in Rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation in the synovial lining of the joints. Key inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), TNF-α, and others play a critical role in the activation of local synovial leukocytes and the induction of chronic inflammation. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a humanized anti-IL-6 receptor monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in treating RA patients. However, similar to other inflammatory cytokine blockers, such as TNF-alpha inhibitors, Interleukin-1 inhibitors, or CD20 inhibitors, some patients do not respond to treatment. To address this challenge, our study employed a high-precision proteomics approach to identify protein biomarkers capable of predicting clinical responses to Tocilizumab in RA patients. Through the use of data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry, we analyzed serum samples from both TCZ responders and non-responders to discover potential biomarker candidates. These candidates were subsequently validated using individual serum samples from two independent cohorts: a training set (N = 70) and a test set (N = 18), allowing for the development of a robust multi-biomarker panel. The constructed multi-biomarker panel demonstrated an average discriminative power of 86 % between response and non-response groups, with a high area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.84. Additionally, the panel exhibited 100 % sensitivity and 60 % specificity. Collectively, our multi-biomarker panel holds promise as a diagnostic tool to predict non-responders to TCZ treatment in RA patients.

Seronegative patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome and non-pSS sicca test positive for anti-SSA/Ro52 and -Ro60 in saliva.

OBJECTIVES: Testing for anti-SSA/Ro antibodies in serum is essential in the diagnostic work-up for primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). In this study, we aimed to validate our previous assay for detection of salivary anti-SSA/Ro52, and to develop assays for detection of salivary anti-SSA/Ro60 and for detection of anti-Ro52 and -Ro60 in plasma using the electric field-induced release and measurement (EFIRM) platform. METHODS: Whole saliva samples from two independent Danish cohorts (DN1 and DN2) including 49 patients with pSS, 73 patients with sicca symptoms, but not fulfilling the classification criteria for pSS (non-pSS sicca), and 51 healthy controls (HC), as well as plasma samples from the DN1 cohort were analyzed using EFIRM to detect anti-SSA/Ro52 and -Ro60. RESULTS: In the DN1 cohort, 100 % in the pSS group and 16 % in the non-pSS sicca group were serum anti-SSA/Ro positive by ELISA. EFIRM detected anti-SSA (Ro52 and/or -Ro60) in plasma and saliva in 100 % and 96 % patients with pSS, and 16 % and 29 % with non-pSS sicca. In the DN2 cohort, 80 % patients with pSS and 26 % with non-pSS sicca were serum anti-SSA/Ro positive. Salivary anti-SSA discriminated patients with pSS from HC and non-pSS sicca with an AUC range of 0.74-0.96 in the DN1 and DN2 cohorts. EFIRM discriminated pSS from non-pSS sicca with an AUC of 0.98 in plasma. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that salivary anti-SSA/Ro antibodies are potential discriminatory biomarkers for pSS, which may also identify seronegative patients, addressing the unmet clinical need of early detection and stratification of pSS.

Distinctive profile of monomeric and polymeric anti-SSA/Ro52 immunoglobulin A1 isoforms in saliva of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome and Sicca.

OBJECTIVE: Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is the second most common chronic autoimmune connective tissue disease. Autoantibodies, immunoglobulin (IgG) anti-SSA/Ro, in serum is a key diagnostic feature of pSS. Since pSS is a disease of the salivary gland, we investigated anti-SSA/Ro52 in saliva. METHODS: Using a novel electrochemical detection platform, Electric Field-Induced Release and Measurement, we measured IgG/M/A, IgG, IgA, IgA isotypes (IgA1 and IgA2) and IgA1 subclasses (polymeric and monomeric IgA1) to anti-SSA/Ro52 in saliva supernatant of 34 pSS, 35 dry eyes and dry mouth (patients with Sicca) and 41 health controls. RESULTS: Saliva IgG/M/A, IgG, IgA, IgA isotypes and IgA1 subclasses to anti-SSA/Ro52 differed significantly between pSS, non-pSS Sicca and healthy subjects. Elevated monomeric IgA1 was observed in patients with non-pSS Sicca while elevated polymeric IgA1 (pIgA1) was observed in patients with pSS. Salivary polymeric but not monomeric IgA1 (mIgA1) isoform correlated with focus score (r2=0.467, p=0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Salivary anti-Ro52 polymeric IgA1 isoform is associated with glandular inflammation in pSS, while salivary monomeric IgA1 is associated with Sicca. Whether IgA1 isotope switching plays a role in the progression of the Sicca to pSS warrants further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous belimumab in a subgroup of South Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus enrolled into a Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in North East Asia.

AIM: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous belimumab 10 mg/kg in the South Korean subgroup of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) enrolled in the North East Asia (NEA) study (GSK Study BEL113750; NCT01345253). METHODS: NEA was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 3 trial. Patients with active, autoantibody-positive SLE were randomized 2:1 to belimumab or placebo plus standard therapy administered on Days 0, 14, and 28, and then every 28 days up to Week 48. The primary efficacy endpoint in this analysis was SLE Responder Index 4 (SRI-4) response rate at Week 52, defined as the proportion of patients achieving a ≥4-point reduction in Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score, no worsening (<0.3 increase from baseline) in Physician Global Assessment, no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) A domain and <2 new BILAG B domain scores. RESULTS: Among 100 South Korean patients enrolled in NEA, 54/66 (81.8%) belimumab- and 24/34 (70.6%) placebo-treated patients completed the double-blind phase. Significantly more belimumab- than placebo-treated patients achieved SRI-4 response at Week 52 (n = 35/66, 53.0% vs. n = 8/34, 23.5%; odds ratio [OR; 95% confidence interval (CI)]: 3.67 [1.45, 9.28]; p = .0061). The proportion of patients experiencing ≥1 adverse event was similar between groups (belimumab: n = 60/66, 90.9% vs. placebo: n = 31/34, 91.2%). No new safety signals emerged in this subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: Belimumab was efficacious for the treatment of SLE and well tolerated among the South Korean subgroup of patients from the NEA study.