Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(16): 1735-1741, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35709743

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the positive predictive value (PPV) of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test (GCT) result ≥200 mg/dL for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) on a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test (GTT). STUDY DESIGN: Pregnancies between 2008 and 2016 with a GCT result ≥200 mg/dL were identified retrospectively. GCT and GTT dates and results, demographics, and working due date (EDD) were extracted. Gestational age at testing was calculated from test date and EDD. As some clinicians presumptively diagnose GDM in such cases, if a GTT result was not available, clinic notes were reviewed to determine whether a GTT was ordered. Positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated at GCT cut-offs at and beyond 200 mg/dL. Subgroups were compared including early GCT (<16 weeks) versus routine GCT (24-28 weeks), GTT result normal versus GTT diagnostic of GDM, and GTT ordered versus GTT not ordered. Rates of use of medication for glycemic control were assessed among these groups. RESULTS: Of 236 pregnant women with a GCT result ≥200 mg/dL, 115 (48%) GTT was ordered for 115 (49%), whereas 123 (52%) were managed as presumed GDM. Of 100 (87%) who completed the test, 81 (81%) were diagnosed with GDM with a median intertest interval of 14 days. No statistically significant differences were found between groups stratified by GTT result. Use of rates of metformin, glyburide, and insulin were similar between those diagnosed with GDM by GTT and those diagnosed with GDM by GCT alone. CONCLUSION: A GCT result of ≥200 mg/dL has a PPV of 81% for diagnosis of GDM by GTT in a contemporary U.S. population, with a median intertest interval of 14 days between GCT and GTT. However, those diagnosed by GCT alone were as likely as those diagnosed by GTT to require medication for glycemic control, including insulin, suggesting that requiring a GTT may result in underdiagnosis and delayed treatment of GDM. KEY POINTS: · A 50-g GCT result of 200 mg/dL or greater has a PPV of 81% for GDM on the 100 g GTT.. · Patients diagnosed with GDM by GCT alone were as likely to require insulin as those diagnosed by GTT.. · 81% of patients diagnosed with GDM on the GTT completed their GTT at least 1 week after the GCT, thus requiring GTT in this population may lead to unnecessary delays in care..


Assuntos
Diabetes Gestacional , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamento farmacológico , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Glucose , Glicemia
3.
Cancer ; 116(21): 5047-53, 2010 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20652951

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent wedge resection plus intraoperative brachytherapy versus patients who received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for single malignant lung nodules. METHODS: A retrospective chart review included 55 patients who were treated for single lung nodules, and 47 of those patients who had adequate information were chosen for the current analysis. Twenty-five patients with single malignant lung nodules received SBRT. Twenty-two patients underwent limited surgical resection plus radioactive seed implantation for solitary malignant lung nodules. RESULTS: Univariate statistical analysis demonstrated a significance difference only for age in the 2 groups: The mean age in the radioactive seed group (66.6 years) was statistically significantly different from the mean of the age in the SBRT group (75.9 years; 2-sided P=.04). No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of local control, distant metastasis, survival, or toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrated comparable efficacy in outcome and toxicity between surgical resection with radioactive seed implantation and SBRT for the treatment of single malignant lung nodules in patients who were not candidates for lobectomy/pneumonectomy.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cintilografia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA