Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has been widely used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. Here we evaluate rates of revision and explant related to HGNS implantation and assess types of adverse events contributing to revision and explant. METHODS: Post-market surveillance data for HGNS implanted between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022, were collected. Event rates and risk were calculated using the post-market surveillance event counts and sales volume over the same period. Indications were categorized for analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported and freedom from explant or revision curves were grouped by year of implantation. RESULTS: Of the 20,881 HGNS implants assessed, rates of explant and revision within the first year were 0.723% and 1.542%, respectively. The most common indication for explant was infection (0.378%) and for revision was surgical correction (0.680%). Of the 5,820 devices with three-year post-implantation data, the rate of explant was 2.680% and of revision was 3.557%. During this same interval, elective removal (1.478%) was the most common indication, and for revisions, surgical correction (1.134%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of HGNS is comparable in the real world setting to published clinical trial data. Rates of explant and revision are low, supporting a satisfactory safety profile for this technology.

Defining the Shape of the Mylohyoid Muscle: A Morphometric Imaging Study.

OBJECTIVES: Implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy is an evolving therapeutic alternative for patients with refractory obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The muscular anatomy of this region has implications for surgical access through this zone as well as positioning and anchoring of hardware in this area. The purpose of this study was to radiologically describe the topography of the mylohyoid muscle and adjacent structures across a wide age spectrum. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated computed tomography scans of the neck in 102 patients who were imaged for reasons unrelated to the floor of mouth or submental space. Patients with prior surgery or pathology in the area of interest were excluded. Fourteen relevant muscle measurements were made on a midline sagittal image and a coronal image positioned at the midpoint between the hyoid bone and the mandible. RESULTS: We included 49 men and 53 women with an average age of 44 years (range 19-70). The average mylohyoid length was 42 mm; the average distance between the anterior digastric bellies was 17 mm. The average angle of the central mylohyoid was 174° in the sagittal plane and 164° in the coronal plane. Several measurements were significantly correlated with patient age, including the angle measurements and the distance between the digastric muscles. Aberrant digastric anatomy was common. CONCLUSIONS: The mylohyoid muscle has multiple radiologically distinct segments with predictable curvatures. An understanding of submental muscular anatomy, along with its variability between patients, may be beneficial to the development of bilateral implantable neurostimulation technology for the treatment of refractory OSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 134:2970-2975, 2024.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive episodes of disrupted breathing during sleep. The most effective treatment for OSA is positive pressure ventilation; however, this treatment can be complicated by adherence difficulties. An array of alternative OSA therapies have emerged, including positional therapy, nasal exhalation devices, oral appliances, and various nasal, pharyngeal, and skeletal surgical treatments. One of the newest options, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy, represents a hybrid medical and surgical treatment. This therapy involves an FDA-approved surgically implanted neuromodulation system that is activated by the patient each night to augment upper airway dilator muscle activity and improve airflow. The implanted components comprise a pulse generator, an electrode on the distal portion of the hypoglossal nerve, and a respiratory sensing lead that allows for synchronization of electrical impulses with the patient's respiratory cycle. Using a representative patient case, the authors describe HNS therapy, including its indications, patient selection, surgical procedure, long-term outpatient management, and outcomes data.

Long-Term Generator Replacement Experience in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Therapy Recipients With CPAP-Intolerant Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

OBJECTIVE: In the last decade, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has emerged as a therapeutic alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The original clinical trial cohorts are entering the phase of expected battery depletion (8-12 years). This study aimed to examine the surgical experience with implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacements and the associated long-term therapy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients from the original clinical trial databases (STAR, German post-market) who were followed in the ongoing ADHERE registry. SETTING: International multicenter HNS registry. METHODS: The ADHERE registry and clinical trial databases were cross-referenced to identify the serial numbers of IPGs that were replaced. Data collection included demographics, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), therapy use, operative times, and adverse events. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent IPG replacement 8.3 ± 1.1 years after their initial implantation. Body mass index was unchanged between the original implant and IPG replacement (29 ± 4 vs 28 ± 2 kg/m2 , p = .50). The mean IPG replacement operative time was shorter than the original implant (63 ± 50 vs 154 ± 58 minutes, p < .002); however, 2 patients required stimulation lead replacement which significantly increased operative time. For patients with available AHI and adherence data, the mean change in AHI from baseline to latest follow-up (8.7 ± 1.1 years after de novo implant) was -50.06%, and the mean therapy use was 7.2 hours/night. CONCLUSION: IPG replacement surgery was associated with low complications and shorter operative time. For patients with available outcomes data, adherence and efficacy remained stable after 9 years of follow-up.

Association of Plasma Biomarkers with Sleep Outcomes and Treatment Response After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Sleep disturbances occur in up to 70% of patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Modern mTBI management recommends targeted treatment for the patient's unique clinical manifestations (i.e., obstructive sleep apnea, insomnia). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of plasma biomarkers with symptom reports, overnight sleep evaluations, and response to treatment for sleep disturbances secondary to mTBI. This study is a secondary analysis of a prospective multiple interventional trial of patients with chronic issues related to mTBI. Pre- and post-intervention assessments were conducted, including overnight sleep apnea evaluation, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and blinded analysis of blood biomarkers. Bivariate Spearman correlations were conducted for pre-intervention plasma biomarker concentrations and 1) PSQI change scores and 2) pre-intervention sleep apnea outcomes (i.e., oxygen saturation measures). A backward logistic regression model was built to evaluate the association of pre-intervention plasma biomarkers with improvement in PSQI over the treatment period (p < 0.05). Participants were 36.3 ± 8.6 years old and 6.1 ± 3.8 years from their index mTBI. Participants reported subjective improvements (PSQI = -3.7 ± 3.8), whereas 39.3% (n = 11) had improved PSQI scores beyond the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). PSQI change scores correlated with von Willebrand factor (vWF; ρ = -0.50; p = 0.02) and tau (ρ = -0.53; p = 0.01). Hyperphosphorylated tau correlated with average saturation (ρ = -0.29; p = 0.03), lowest desaturation (ρ = -0.27; p = 0.048), and baseline saturation (ρ = -0.31; p = 0.02). The multi-variate model (R 2 = 0.33; p = 0.001) retained only pre-intervention vWF as a predictor (odds ratio = 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-8.08; p = 0.005) of improving PSQI scores beyond the MCID. vWF had good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.83; p = 0.01), with an overall accuracy of 77%, sensitivity of 46.2%, and specificity of 90.0%. Validation of vWF as a potential predictive biomarker of sleep improvement post-mTBI could optimize personalized management and healthcare utilization.

Will nasal airway surgery improve my sense of smell? A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of nasal airway surgery on olfaction has not been well established. The goal of this study is to assess changes in olfaction after septoplasty with inferior turbinate reduction through both objective and patient-reported measures. METHODS: Prospective, observational study was conducted of patients with nasal airway obstruction presenting between July 2017 and October 2019 who underwent septoplasty with inferior turbinate reduction. Nasal airflow was characterized with the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and an 11-point ease-of-breathing (EOB) Likert scale, and olfaction with an 11-point olfactory Likert scale and the 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), pre- and postoperatively. Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationship between measures of nasal obstruction and olfaction. RESULTS: Among 80 patients, mean NOSE scores improved from 67.4 preoperatively to 19.6 postoperatively (p < 0.001). EOB Likert scores improved from a mean of 3.9/10 to 8.1/10 after surgery (p < 0.001). Olfactory Likert scores improved from a baseline of 6.1/10 preoperatively to 7.9/10 after surgery (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was noted in UPSIT testing pre- versus postoperatively. A moderate correlation was noted between the degree of change in NOSE scores and improved olfactory Likert scores (r = 0.51, p < 0.001), and similarly between the degree of change in EOB Likert scores and improved olfactory Likert scores (r = 0.55, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data, subjective tests of olfaction may improve with nasal airway surgery in some patients. Changes in olfaction best correlate with the extent to which surgery can improve subjective nasal obstructive symptoms.

Does race-ethnicity affect upper airway stimulation adherence and treatment outcome of obstructive sleep apnea?

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with excessive daytime sleepiness, decreased quality of life, and cardiovascular disease. Positive airway pressure is the first-line therapy for OSA; however, adherence is difficult. Upper airway stimulation is a Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment of OSA. The objective of this study was to evaluate for a difference in treatment efficacy and adherence of upper airway stimulation therapy for OSA between individuals who are White and non-White using data from the ADHERE registry. METHODS: ADHERE registry is a multicenter prospective study of real-world experience of upper airway stimulation for treatment of OSA in the United States and Europe. Propensity score matching was used to create a balanced dataset between the White and non-White groups. t-Tests at a significance level of 5% were used to compare numeric values between groups. RESULTS: There were 2,755 participants of the ADHERE registry: 27 were excluded due to not having a race identified, 125 participants identified as non-White, 2,603 identify as White, and 27 did not provide race information. Propensity score matching was used to select 110 participants, with 55 White and 55 non-White for the noninferiority analysis. We did not find a difference in adherence, treatment apnea-hypopnea index, changes in Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, or clinical global impression after intervention score between White and non-White individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that there was no statistically significant difference in adherence or efficacy with upper airway stimulation therapy between White and non-White individuals. However, the percent of non-White people implanted is low, which suggests a need to expand access to this therapy for non-White populations with OSA who cannot tolerate positive airway pressure therapy. CITATION: Khan M, Stone A, Soose RJ, et al. Does race-ethnicity affect upper airway stimulation adherence and treatment outcome of obstructive sleep apnea? J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2167-2172.

Factors affecting obstructive sleep apnea patients' use of upper airway stimulation treatment.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an alternative treatment for obstructive sleep apnea that must be activated nightly. Although the implanted device offsets the mask- or pressure-related side effects often associated with continuous positive airway pressure therapy, some UAS recipients do not use the therapy consistently. This study qualitatively explored factors associated with UAS usage in obstructive sleep apnea patients. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 24 obstructive sleep apnea patients who received UAS treatment. Twelve patients were categorized as high users with mean usage of ≥ 4 hours/night and 12 were categorized as low users with < 4 hours/night or nonuse. Interviews explored patients' experiences regarding barriers and facilitators to UAS use and their advice for new UAS recipients. Demographic and clinical data including the Insomnia Severity Index and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale were collected. RESULTS: Compared to high users, low users had higher levels of insomnia (mean Insomnia Severity Index: 3.6 vs 15.2, respectively) and anxiety (mean Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale: 3.4 vs 6.9). High users reported more positive experiences with UAS treatment, such as improvements in symptoms and convenience of treatment, as facilitators of use. Low users tended to focus on the negative aspects of treatment, particularly stimulation-related discomfort and associated sleep disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: Insomnia with or without anxiety contributes to differing patient-reported experiences in high vs low user groups, with increased insomnia symptoms among low users. Improved understanding of the specific barrier and facilitators of UAS adherence may drive better long-term use and more personalized management strategies, including concomitant insomnia treatment. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Stimulation Therapy for Apnea: Reporting Thoughts (START); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04768543; Identifier: NCT04768543. CITATION: Luyster FS, Ni Q, Lee K, et al. Factors affecting obstructive sleep apnea patients' use of upper airway stimulation treatment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(9):2207-2215.

Evaluation of Upper Airway Stimulation for Adolescents With Down Syndrome and Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Importance: Patients with Down syndrome have a high incidence of persistent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and limited treatment options. Upper airway hypoglossal stimulation has been shown to be effective for adults with OSA but has not yet been evaluated for pediatric populations. Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of upper airway stimulation for adolescent patients with Down syndrome and severe OSA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective single-group multicenter cohort study with 1-year follow-up was conducted between April 1, 2015, and July 31, 2021, among a referred sample of 42 consecutive adolescent patients with Down syndrome and persistent severe OSA after adenotonsillectomy. Intervention: Upper airway stimulation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The prespecified primary outcomes were safety and the change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from baseline to 12 months postoperatively. Polysomnographic and quality of life outcomes were assessed at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Among the 42 patients (28 male patients [66.7%]; mean [SD] age, 15.1 [3.0] years), there was a mean (SD) decrease in AHI of 12.9 (13.2) events/h (95% CI, -17.0 to -8.7 events/h). With the use of a therapy response definition of a 50% decrease in AHI, the 12-month response rate was 65.9% (27 of 41), and 73.2% of patients (30 of 41) had a 12-month AHI of less than 10 events/h. The most common complication was temporary tongue or oral discomfort, which occurred in 5 patients (11.9%). The reoperation rate was 4.8% (n = 2). The mean (SD) improvement in the OSA-18 total score was 34.8 (20.3) (95% CI, -42.1 to -27.5), and the mean (SD) improvement in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale score was 5.1 (6.9) (95% CI, -7.4 to -2.8). The mean (SD) duration of nightly therapy was 9.0 (1.8) hours, with 40 patients (95.2%) using the device at least 4 hours a night. Conclusions and Relevance: Upper airway stimulation was able to be safely performed for 42 adolescents who had Down syndrome and persistent severe OSA after adenotonsillectomy with positive airway pressure intolerance. There was an acceptable adverse event profile with high rates of therapy response and quality of life improvement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02344108.

Cluster analysis of upper airway stimulation adherence patterns and implications on clinical care.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Upper airway stimulation (UAS) therapy is effective for a subset of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) intolerance. While overall adherence is high, some patients have suboptimal adherence, which limits efficacy. Our goal was to identify therapy usage patterns during the first 3 months of therapy to enable targeted strategies for improved adherence. METHODS: Therapy data was retrieved from 2098 patients for three months after device activation. Data included mean and standard deviation (SD) of hours of use, therapy pauses, hours from midnight the therapy was turned ON and OFF, percentage of missing days, and stimulation amplitude. Cluster analysis was performed using Gaussian mixture models that categorized patients into six main groups. RESULTS: The six groups and their prevalence can be summarized as Cluster 1A: Excellent Use (34%); Cluster 1B: Excellent Use with variable timing (23%); Cluster 2A: Good Use with missing days and late therapy ON (16%), Cluster 2B: Good Use with missing days, late therapy ON, and early therapy OFF (12%); Cluster 3A: Variable Use with frequent missing days (8%); Cluster 3B: Variable Use with frequent pauses (7%). Most patients (85%) are excellent or good users with mean therapy use >6 hours per night. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis of early UAS usage patterns identified six distinct groups that may enable personalized interventions for improved long-term management. Differentiation of the patient clusters may have clinical implications with regard to sleep hygiene education, therapy discomfort, comorbid insomnia, and other conditions that impact adherence.

Impulse Configuration in Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: The Effect of Modifying Pulse Width and Frequency.

OBJECTIVES: Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is an effective treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure therapy failure. Nonetheless, data regarding the functional effect of modifying stimulation parameters within each electrode configuration are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study of 76 patients with 12 months or more follow-up, functional tongue protrusion thresholds were compared for pulse width and frequency configurations of 90 µsec 33 Hz vs 120 µsec 40 Hz. The number of tolerated voltage amplitude steps between sensation, functional, and subdiscomfort thresholds were assessed for both settings as well as impedances. RESULTS: The overall cohort showed improvement in OSA metrics: median apnea-hypopnea index from 30.0/hour to 18.6/hour and Epworth Sleepiness Scale from 13.5 to 7.6. For both bipolar and unipolar electrode configurations, the stimulation amplitude required for functional tongue protrusion was significantly reduced when the pulse width and frequency were converted from 90 µsec 33 Hz to 120 µsec 40 Hz (p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the number of voltage amplitude steps from sensation, functional, to subdiscomfort thresholds did not differ between the two settings. The ratio of automatically derived impedances between bipolar and unipolar electrode configurations was relevantly correlated with the ratio of functional thresholds at these parameters. CONCLUSION: Changing the stimulation parameters may lower the voltage requirements while maintaining the same effect on tongue protrusion. Changing these stimulation parameters does not affect the range of tolerated impulse steps between functional and subdiscomfort thresholds. Future technical appliances could help estimate functional thresholds at different electrode configurations for each patient by automatically measuring impedances.

Model-based analysis of implanted hypoglossal nerve stimulation for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Individuals with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), characterized by frequent sleep disruptions from tongue muscle relaxation and airway blockage, are known to benefit from on-demand electrical stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy, which activates the protrusor muscles of the tongue during inspiration, has been established in multiple clinical studies as safe and effective, but the mechanistic understanding for why some stimulation parameters work better than others has not been thoroughly investigated. METHODS: In this study, we developed a detailed biophysical model that can predict the spatial recruitment of hypoglossal nerve fascicles and axons within these fascicles during stimulation through nerve cuff electrodes. Using this model, three HNS programming scenarios were investigated including grouped cathode (---), single cathode (o-o), and guarded cathode bipolar (+-+) electrode configurations. RESULTS: Regardless of electrode configuration, nearly all hypoglossal nerve axons circumscribed by the nerve cuff were recruited for stimulation amplitudes <3 V. Within this range, monopolar configurations required lower stimulation amplitudes than the guarded bipolar configuration to elicit action potentials within hypoglossal nerve axons. Further, the spatial distribution of the activated axons was more uniform for monopolar versus guarded bipolar configurations. CONCLUSIONS: The computational models predicted that monopolar HNS provided the lowest threshold and the least sensitivity to rotational angle of the nerve cuff around the hypoglossal nerve; however, this setting also increased the likelihood for current leakage outside the nerve cuff, which could potentially activate axons in unintended branches of the hypoglossal nerve. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01161420.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 343 adults who underwent treatment of OSA with HNS from 10 academic medical centers was performed. Preoperative DISE videos were scored by four blinded reviewers using the VOTE Classification and evaluation of a possible primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. Consensus DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes based on therapy titration polysomnogram (tPSG). Treatment response was defined by a decrease of ≥50% in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to <15 events/hour. RESULTS: Study participants (76% male, 60.4 ± 11.0 years old) had a body mass index of 29.2 ± 3.6 kg/m2 . AHI decreased (35.6 ± 15.2 to 11.0 ± 14.1 events/hour; P < .001) on the tPSG, with a 72.6% response rate. Complete palate obstruction (vs. none) was associated with the greatest difference in AHI improvement (-26.8 ± 14.9 vs. -19.2 ± 12.8, P = .02). Complete (vs. partial/none) tongue-related obstruction was associated with increased odds of treatment response (78% vs. 68%, P = .043). Complete (vs. partial/none) oropharyngeal lateral wall-related obstruction was associated with lower odds of surgical response (58% vs. 74%, P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: The DISE finding of primary tongue contribution to airway obstruction was associated with better outcomes, whereas the opposite was true for the oropharyngeal lateral walls. This study suggests that the role for DISE in counseling candidates for HNS extends beyond solely for excluding complete concentric collapse related to the velum. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:1676-1682, 2021.

Post-implant care pathway: lessons learned and recommendations after 5 years of clinical implementation of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy is now an established and widely-available obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment alternative for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-intolerant patients. Additionally, the HNS body of literature is robust with strong data on safety, efficacy, and durability-from the 5-year STAR Trial outcomes, to post-approval studies of independent institutions, to the multicenter ADHERE registry which recently reported outcomes on over 1,000 patients and is poised to enroll 5,000 HNS patients total. Nevertheless, now with thousands of implanted patients across hundreds of certified centers, and that number growing rapidly, the post-implant management of the HNS patient represents the next critical frontier. Post-implant patient management (therapy titration, troubleshooting, adjustments, and adherence monitoring) across a longitudinal care model is key to ensuring long-term therapy success and optimizing patient outcomes and health benefits. As with CPAP, patient education and close clinical monitoring are often essential to successful long-term management. Although many HNS patients are clear responders with excellent comfort and adherence as well as effective improvement in symptomatic and objective outcome measures, and even a smaller subset is clear non-responders, there is a growing body of patients somewhere in the middle: good outcomes but not great; partial but incomplete response. These are the patients in whom a standardized best-practice approach to treatment monitoring and targeted therapy modifications is likely critical to optimizing long-term outcomes.

Evaluation of Surgical Learning Curve Effect on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Outcomes in Upper Airway Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: An increasing number of facilities offer Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) with varying levels of experience. The goal was to quantify whether a surgical learning curve exists in operative or sleep outcomes in UAS. METHODS: International multi-center retrospective review of the ADHERE registry, a prospective international multi-center study collecting UAS outcomes. ADHERE registry centers with at least 20 implants and outcomes data through at least 6-month follow-up were reviewed. Cases were divided into two groups based on implant order (the first 10 or second 10 consecutive implants at a given site). Group differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney U-tests, Chi-squared tests, or Fisher's Exact tests, as appropriate. A Mann-Kendall trend test was used to detect if there was a monotonic trend in operative time. Sleep outcome equivalence between experience groups was assessed using the two one-sided tests approach. RESULTS: Thirteen facilities met inclusion criteria, contributing 260 patients. Complication rates did not significantly differ between groups (P = .808). Operative time exhibited a significant downward trend (P < .001), with the median operative time dropping from 150 minutes for the first 10 implants to 134 minutes for the subsequent 10 implants. The decrease in AHI from baseline to 12-month follow-up was equivalent between the first and second ten (22.8 vs 21.2 events/hour, respectively, P < .001). Similarly, the first and second ten groups had equivalent ESS decreases at 6 months (2.0 vs 2.0, respectively, P < .001). ESS outcomes remained equivalent for those with data through 12-months. CONCLUSIONS: Across the centers' first 20 implants, an approximately 11% reduction operative time was identified, however, no learning curve effect was seen for 6-month or 12-month AHI or ESS over the first twenty implants. Ongoing monitoring through the ADHERE registry will help measure the impact of evolving provider and patient specific characteristics as the number of implant centers increases.

Redefining Success by Focusing on Failures After Pediatric Hypoglossal Stimulation in Down Syndrome.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Patients with Down syndrome have a high incidence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and limited treatment options. Hypoglossal stimulation has shown efficacy but has not yet been approved for pediatric populations. Our objective is to characterize the therapy response of adolescent patients with down syndrome and severe OSA who underwent hypoglossal stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal trial. METHODS: We are conducting a multicenter single-arm trial of hypoglossal stimulation for adolescent patients with Down syndrome and severe OSA. Interim analysis was performed to compare objective sleep and quality of life outcomes at 12 months postoperatively for the first 20 patients. RESULTS: The mean age was 15.5 and baseline AHI 24.2. Of the 20 patients, two patients (10.0%) had an AHI under 1.5 at 12 months; nine patients of 20 (45.0%) under five; and 15 patients of 20 (75.0%) under 10. The mean decrease in AHI was 15.1 (P < .001). Patients with postoperative AHI over five had an average baseline OSA-18 survey score of 3.5 with an average improvement of 1.7 (P = .002); in addition, six of these patients had a relative decrease of apneas compared to hypopneas and seven had an improvement in percentage of time with oxygen saturation below 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistently elevated AHI 12 months after hypoglossal implantation experienced improvement in polysomnographic and quality of life outcomes. These results suggest the need for a closer look at physiologic markers for success beyond reporting AHI as the gold standard. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1663-1669, 2021.

Upper Airway Stimulation versus Untreated Comparators in Positive Airway Pressure Treatment-Refractory Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Understand the impact of insurance coverage on sleep apnea outcomes for patients awaiting upper airway stimulation.Objectives: Examine the natural history of impact of upper airway stimulation treatment versus insurance denial (comparators) on sleep apnea outcomes.Methods: A parallel-arm experimental study design was used to compare objective sleep apnea measures and patient-reported outcomes in those who received upper airway stimulation approval versus denial in a multinational prospective study (NCT02907398). Wilcoxon rank-sum test and logistic regression models were used to assess for differences of objective and subjective outcome changes in those who underwent upper airway stimulation versus no treatment comparators.Results: A greater reduction in apnea-hypopnea index was observed in those who underwent upper airway stimulation (n = 230, follow-up: 360 ± 171 d) versus no treatment (n = 100, follow-up: 272 ± 278 d), that is, -19.1 ± 15.8 versus -8.1 ± 20.9, respectively, P < 0.001, with consistent findings observed with nocturnal hypoxia measures. Concordantly, a greater improvement noted with subjective measures of dozing propensity was observed in patients undergoing upper airway stimulation versus comparators (Epworth Score, -5.1 ± 5.5 vs. 1.8 ± 3.7, respectively, P < 0.001) and overall sleep-related patient-reported outcomes. Women and those with previous oral appliance use had a lower odds of insurance approval (odds ratio [OR], 0.40; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.22-0.71 and OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.69, respectively).Conclusions: Objective and subjective sleep apnea burden was more improved in those receiving upper airway stimulation versus not. Results underscore the need to optimize clinical care pathways focused on effective treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea who are not upper airway stimulation-insurance eligible and prioritize public health policy initiatives to address insurance-based sex-specific disparities.

Implantable Neurostimulation for Treatment of Sleep Apnea: Present and Future.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) therapy represents a novel approach and a paradigm shift in the evolution of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment as a hybrid surgically implanted, medically titratable device. Unlike traditional sleep apnea surgical procedures, HNS augments the neuromuscular activity of the pharynx, preserves upper airway structure and function, and has the potential to provide multilevel upper airway improvement with one procedure. The early success of HNS sets the stage for new technology development, further investigation into optimal patient selection and therapy titration, and application to other subsets of the OSA population.

DISE-PAP: a method for troubleshooting residual AHI elevation despite positive pressure therapy.

None: Despite excellent positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence, a subset of patients with obstructive sleep apnea experience residual elevation of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Drug-induced sleep endoscopy during PAP application provides an opportunity to examine the anatomic effect of PAP therapy on the upper airway and to troubleshoot refractory residual AHI elevation. We present a patient who demonstrated persistent moderate-severe AHI elevation during titration polysomnogram and subsequent data download reports despite numerous mask refits, chin strap, positional modifications, and multiple pressure and mode adjustments in both the clinic and sleep laboratory settings. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy was performed with the flexible endoscope passed through the PAP circuit into the upper airway. Jaw laxity and associated mandibular retrusion at sleep onset was found to result in a complete fixed tongue base obstruction that PAP therapy, delivered via the patient's oronasal interface, was unable to overcome. Various strategies to overcome these obstacles are discussed.