Resection of an Intradural Intramedullary C7-T1 Tumor: Technical Nuances and Complication Management.

Primary spinal cord tumors are relatively rare, comprising approximately 4%-16% of all tumors originating from the central nervous system. These tumors are anatomically separable into 2 broad categories: intradural intramedullary and intradural extramedullary. Intramedullary tumors are composed predominantly of gliomas (infiltrative astrocytoma) and ependymomas.1-4 The primary treatment approach for these tumors is surgical resection, aiming to preserve neurologic function.5-9 In Video 1, the authors showcase a step-by-step approach for microsurgical resection of a primary spinal ependymoma, with emphasis on microsurgical technique and utility of adjunct equipment, such as intraoperative ultrasound and neuromonitoring.10,11 The patient consented to the procedure.

Trends in Spinal Orthosis Utilization Among Patients Insured through Medicare Part B.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective population-based database analysis from the Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary Medicare/Medicaid Dataset. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive analysis of trends in spinal orthosis utilization over a 12-year period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Widespread prescription of spinal orthosis persists, despite evidence suggesting equivocal efficacy in many spinal conditions. The utilization of spinal orthosis on a national level, including prescribing specialty data, has not been previously analyzed. METHODS: Healthcare common procedure coding system (HCPCS) codes for cervical (CO), thoracic-lumbar-sacral (TLSO), lumbar (LO), lumbar-sacral (LSO), and cervical-thoracic-lumbar-sacral (CTLSO) orthosis were used to determine spinal orthosis utilization from 2010 to 2021. Provider specialty codes were utilized to compare trends between select specialties. Additionally, a neurosurgical CO analysis, based on subclassifications of cervical bracing, was performed. Linear trendlines were implemented to elucidate and present trends by slope (ß). RESULTS: Among 332,241 claims, decreases in CO (ß=-0.3387), TLSO (ß=-0.0942), LO (ß=-0.3485), and LSO (ß=-0.1545) per 100,000 Medicare Part B enrollees and CTLSO (ß=-0.052) per 1,000,000 Medicare Part B enrollees were observed. Decreases among neurosurgery (ß=-7.9208), family medicine (ß=-1.0097), emergency medicine (ß=-2.1958), internal medicine (ß=-1.1151), interventional pain management (ß=-5.0945), and chiropractic medicine (ß=-49.012), and increases among orthopedic surgery (ß=5.5891), pain management (ß=30.416), physical medicine and rehabilitation (ß=4.6524), general practice (ß=79.111), and osteopathic manipulative medicine (ß=45.303) in total spinal orthosis use per 100,000 specialty claims were observed. Analysis on subclassifications of cervical orthosis among neurosurgeons revealed decreases in flexible (ß=-1.7641), semi-rigid (ß=-0.6157), and collar bracing (ß=-2.7603), and an increase in multi-post collar bracing (ß=2.2032) per 100 neurosurgical cervical orthosis claims. CONCLUSIONS: While utilization of spinal orthosis decreased between 2010-2021, increased utilization was observed among a subset of specialties. Identifying these specialties allows for focused research and educational efforts to minimize unnecessary durable medical equipment use for effective healthcare spending.

Microsurgical and illustrative anatomy of the cavernous sinus, middle fossa, and paraclival triangles: a straightforward, comprehensive review.

The middle fossa, cavernous sinus, and paraclival triangles consist of ten triangles. Their use in a surgical approach is vast; most are used as landmarks to access and identify other structures of surgical interest. Multiple labels, borders, and contents mentioned by different authors make understanding and reproduction challenging and confusing. This study aims to organize and clarify recent or most relevant publications and disclose our portrayal of the ten triangles using cadaveric dissection and simple and practical figures. Four middle fossa triangles, four cavernous sinus triangles, and two paraclival triangles were dissected and delineated in a cadaveric specimen. Drawings were simplified to eliminate confusion and evaluate the triangles effortlessly. Similarities and differences in triangle names, border limits, and contents are described in a precise form. The recognition of triangle landmarks allows for treating pathologies in a frequently distorted anatomy or challenging to access structure. That is why an accurate knowledge of the surgical anatomy should be mastered, and a safe approach should be accomplished.