RESUMO
Background: Robotic-assisted, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (RE-TLIF) is a promising, minimally invasive surgical option for degenerative lumbar spondylosis/spondylolisthesis; however, outcomes data and efficacy are limited, especially in multilevel disease. Here, we present the first reported series of patients that underwent either single or multilevel RE-TLIF. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 23 consecutive patients who underwent a single level or multilevel RE-TLIF by a single surgeon. Variables included demographics, perioperative results, pain scores, and functional outcome scores. Results: Eighteen patients (78.3 %) underwent single level RE-TLIF and 5 patients (21.7 %) underwent multilevel RE-TLIF. The median reduction of visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) of all subjects was 6 (IQR = 4.5, 6.5) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (p = 0.565). The median reduction of VAS for leg pain of all subjects 7 (IQR = 6, 8) with no significant difference between single level and multilevel RE-TLIF (p = 0.702). Median blood loss was 25 cc (IQR = 25, 25) and 50 cc (IQR = 25, 100) for single and multilevel RE-TLIF, respectively (p = 0.025), whereas median length of stay was 1 (IQR = 1, 1; mean = 1.0 ± 00.18) days and 1 (IQR = 1, 2; mean = 1.4 ± 00.54) days, respectively (p = 0.042). One major complication was observed requiring reoperation for demineralized bone matrix migration resulting in an L5 radiculopathy. Conclusions: Single and multi-level RE-TLIF appears to be a safe and efficacious approach with comparable outcomes to open and other minimally invasive approaches. Additionally, we observed favorable accuracy in robot-assisted pedicle screw, endoscope, and interbody device placement.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coiling of small superior cerebellar artery aneurysms (sSCAAs) is challenging. We aimed to describe anatomic considerations in the vertebral and basilar artery (VA and BA) morphology for decision making in the coiling of sSCAAs. METHODS: Eleven patients with sSCAAs (<5 mm) treated at our institution between April 2015 and February 2022 were included to show our concept of deciding access routes in the coiling of sSCAAs. The access route was decided on the basis of VA characteristics, BA curvature, and aneurysm laterality. Adequate aneurysm occlusion on angiography (Raymond-Roy grading scale I and II), good outcome (modified Rankin Score 0-2) at the last follow-up, and adverse outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Simple coiling (n = 2), a balloon-assisted technique (n = 3), and stent-assisted technique (n = 6) were selected. At the last follow-up (median 13.0 months), adequate aneurysm occlusion and good outcome were obtained in all 9 patients (n = 10). Adverse outcomes were not observed. When VA dominance was equal, in the straight BA, the microcatheter insertion into the ipsilateral VA to the aneurysm was favorable to form a "fulcrum" on the contralateral side and obtain microcatheter stability. When an aneurysm was on the concave aspect of the curved BA, microcatheter insertion into the ipsilateral VA was favorable. As for the convex aspect's aneurysm location, the microcatheter insertion into the contralateral VA can be favored. Further, we described the VA origin classification as it relates to ease of access from a transradial approach. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebrobasilar morphology may be important in deciding access routes in the coiling of sSCAAs.