Growth Rate Distribution and Potential Non-Linear Relationship between Body Weight and Walking Ability in Turkeys.

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential non-linear relationship between growth and walking ability (WA). The phenotypic data included body weights at 12 and 20 weeks and WA at 20 weeks of age measured on 276,059 male turkeys. The growth rate at three age periods (0 to 12, 12 to 20 and 0 to 20 weeks) was calculated. Each bird was assigned to one of the quartiles of the growth rate distribution for each age period. Between the first and fourth quartiles, the incidence of score 1 (bad WA) increased by 31, 18, and 33% for the first, second, and third age periods, respectively. For good WA (scores 4, 5, and 6), the incidence decreased by 55, 66, and 72% between the first and fourth quartiles for the first, second, and third age periods, respectively. Estimates of heritability of WA ranged between 0.18 and 0.26. The genetic correlations between adjacent growth rate quartiles were high and decayed as the interval between quartiles increased. The magnitude of the variation in the incidence of walking scores and genetic correlations across the growth rate quartiles point towards a non-linear relationship between growth and mobility suggesting other factors may affect walking ability.

Research Note: Analysis of body weight and walking ability in turkeys and the prediction of categorical responses across systematic effect classes using a linear threshold model.

Heavy selection for growth in turkeys has led to a decay in leg soundness and walking ability. In this study, different models and traits were used to investigate the genetic relationships between body weight (BW) and walking ability (WA) in a turkey population. The data consisted of BW and WA traits collected on 276,059 male birds. Body weight was measured at 12 and 20 wk and WA at 20 wk of age. For WA, birds were scored based on a 1 (bad) to 6 (good) grading system. Due to the small number of records with scores 5 and 6, birds with WA scores of 4, 5, and 6 were grouped together resulting in only 4 classes. Additionally, a binary classification of WA (scores 1 and 2 = Similarly, an estimate of the genetic correlation between WA and BW at 20 wk was -0.45, indicating a more pronounced class 1; scores 3, 4, 5, and 6 = class 2) was evaluated. The inheritability estimates of WA ranged between 0.25 and 0.27 depending on the number of classes. The Heritability of BW at 12 and 20 wk was 0.44 and 0.51, respectively. The genetic correlation between WA and BW at 12 wk was around -0.35, indicating that heavy birds tend to have poor WA. antagonistic relationship between BW and WA. The genetic correlation between BW at 12 and 20 wk was positive and high (0.80). The residual correlation between WA and BW at 12 and 20 wk of age was -0.07 and -0.02, respectively. The residual correlation between body weight traits was 0.57. Similar results were observed when a binary classification was adopted for WA. The probability of an individual with a given genetic merit expressing a certain class of WA was determined for different fixed effect designations. Predictive probabilities clearly showed that birds when hatched in the winter would have a small chance to exhibit good WA phenotypes.