Ureterorenoscopic Stone Removal without Antibiotic Prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients without preoperative urinary tract infection undergoing ureterorenoscopy (URS) for stone removal. METHODS: A retrospective, monocentric study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of a modified perioperative antibiotic management strategy according to the principles of antibiotic stewardship. Patients with preoperative unremarkable urine culture received no antibiotic prophylaxis for URS stone removal (NoPAP). The NoPAP group was compared to a historic URS cohort, when antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) was standard of care. Analysis focused on postoperative complications. RESULTS: Postoperative fever occurred in 1% of the NoPAP and 2% of the PAP patients (p = 0.589). Clavien 1-3 complications did not differ between groups with 9% in the NoPAP and 6.2% in the PAP (p = 0.159). No Clavien 4-5 complications were seen. We identified a residual stone (p = 0.033) and an ASA score 3-4 (p = 0.004) as significant risk factors for postoperative fever. By sparing routine antibiotic prophylaxis, the overall antibiotic usage was reduced from 100% (PAP) to 8.3% (NoPAP). CONCLUSION: Sparing a routine antibiotic prophylaxis during URS for stone removal seems feasible in patients with unremarkable preoperative urine culture for most of the patients. A prospective validation is warranted.

Impact of Male Patient Information on Quality of Urine Examination (PIQUE Study).

BACKGROUND: Urine examination has relevance for treatment, and reliability of positive urine culture (UC) is of importance. The technique of urine sampling (US), storage, and transportation is important. The objective of this study was to investigate if detailed patient information for the technique of US and hygiene reduces rates of contaminated UC in screened male patients, as this group was not investigated yet. METHODS: All patients independently of complaints were enrolled prospectively and consecutively in an outpatient setting in 2 groups - the first group did not receive detailed information and the second group did. We examined 372 consecutive patients in 2017, 190 not receiving (median age 69 years) and 182 receiving information (median age 70 years), with comparable numbers of patients and age. The result of UC and age was imposed. RESULTS: In all,74.2% of preclarification UC showed a contamination (n = 95) and 75.5% after clarification (n = 83), without significant differences (p = 0.827). This study is limited by the fact that adherence could not be checked. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to studies with females, no difference occurred in rates of contaminated UC, so detailed information regarding the US technique does not decrease rates of contaminated UC and vice versa does not increase the quality of midstream-sampled UC in male patients.

Geriatric Patients and Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections: Analysis of Bacterial Range and Resistance Rates at a 3rd Level of Care Hospital in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Increasing life expectancy and demographic change result in a rising number of geriatric patients, but knowledge about geriatric treatment options and adapted diagnostic pathways is low. Simultaneously, urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in older people and often difficult to treat. METHODS: Patients with a UTI at a urological outpatient department between January 01, 2016, and December 31, 2017, were retrospectively identified in the data system. One thousand one hundred fifteen patients with "N30" and "N39" diagnosis were included in this study, 965 of which were under the age of 75 (group 1) and 150 of which 75 years or older (group 2). RESULTS: Of 150 patients in group 2, 41.6% had nitrite-positive urine (vs. 20.9% in group 1, p < 0.05 in χ2 testing). Patients in group 2 often had indwelling devices (30.3 vs. 6.0%, p < 0.05) and presented a sterile urine culture in only 20.7% (vs. 40.1% in group 1). Regarding calculated antibiotic therapy, there were significant differences concerning prescription of ciprofloxacin (34.9 vs. 25%, p < 0.05) and fosfomycin (12.7 vs. 40.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: UTI in geriatric patients should be treated differently than in younger patients because antibiotic resistance is high. The group with indwelling devices is complex. Individual strategies for geriatric patients should be considered.

Increased Severe Adverse Outcomes and Decreased Emergency Room Visits for Pyelonephritis: First Report of Collateral Damage during COVID-19 Pandemic in Urology.

PURPOSE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is disrupting urology health-care worldwide. Reduced emergency room visits resulting in adverse outcomes have most recently been reported in pediatrics and cardiology. We aimed to compare patients with emergency room visits for pyelonephritis in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 era) and within the first wave of pandemic in 2020 (COVID-19 era) with regard to the number of visits and severe adverse disease outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentre study comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients with pyelonephritis, excluding patients with hydronephrosis due to stone disease, in 10 urology departments in Germany during a 1-month time frame in March and April in each 2019 and 2020. RESULTS: The number of emergency room visits for pyelonephritis in the COVID-19 era was lower (44 patients, 37.0%) than in the pre-COVID-19 era (76 patients, 63.0%), reduction rate: 42.1% (p = 0.003). Severe adverse disease outcome was more frequent in the COVID-19 era (9/44 patients, 20.5%) than in the pre-COVID-19 era (5/76 patients, 6.6%, p = 0.046). In detail, 7 versus 3 patients needed monitoring (15.9 vs. 3.9%), 2 versus no patients needed intensive-care treatment (4.5 vs. 0%), 2 versus no patients needed drain placement (4.5 vs. 0%), 2 versus no patients had a nephrectomy (4.5 vs. 0%), and 2 versus 1 patient died (4.5 vs. 1.3%). CONCLUSION: This report of collateral damage during CO-VID-19 showed that emergency room visits were decreased, and severe adverse disease outcomes were increased for patients with pyelonephritis in the COVID-19 era. Health authorities should set up information campaign programs actively encouraging patients to utilize emergency room services in case of severe symptoms specifically during the actual second wave of pandemic.

Loss of CHEK2 Predicts Progression in Stage pT1 Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC).

Downregulation of checkpoint protein kinase 2 (CHEK2), which is involved in DNA repair, is associated with poorer outcome in various tumors. Little is known about the role of CHEK2 in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB). In the present study, we investigated the prognostic impact of CHEK2 protein expression in stage pT1 UCB. This retrospective, single-center analysis was carried out in a cohort of patients initially diagnosed with a pT1 UCB between 2007 and 2015. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CHEK2 was performed. CHEK2 expression was correlated with recurrence-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression analysis. The analysis included 126 patients (86% male, median age 71 years). Loss of immunohistochemical protein expression of CHEK2 (<10%) was associated with significantly worse PFS (p = 0.041). Likewise, CHEK2 loss identified a subgroup of patients with worse PFS in the high-risk groups with concomitant CIS (p = 0.044), multifocal tumors (p < 0.001) and tumor grading G3 according to WHO1973 (p = 0.009). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed both loss of CHEK2 expression (HR: 4.18, 95%-CI: 1.35-12.93; p = 0.013) and multifocal tumors (HR: 4.53, 95%-CI:1.29-15.92; p = 0.018) as the only predictive factors for progression. Loss of IHC expression of CHEK2 in pT1 UCB is an independent predictor for progression to muscle-invasive disease and is also associated with worse PFS. This could help to identify high-risk patients who would benefit from early cystectomy.

Awareness and perception of multidrug-resistant organisms and antimicrobial therapy among internists vs. surgeons of different specialties: Results from the German MR2 Survey.

BACKGROUND: Recently, antibiotic resistance rates have risen substantially and care for patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) has become a common problem in most in - and outpatient settings. The objectives of the study were to compare the awareness, perception, and knowledge of MDRO and rational antibiotic use between physicians from different medical specialties in German hospitals. METHODS: A 35-item questionnaire was sent to specialists in internal medicine (internists), gynecologists, urologists, and general surgeons (non-internists) in 18 German hospitals. Likert-scales were used to evaluate awareness and perception of personal performance regarding care for patients infected with MDRO and rational use of antibiotics. Additionally, two items assessing specific knowledge in antibiotic therapy were included. The impact of medical specialty on four predetermined endpoints was assessed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: 43.0% (456/1061) of recipients responded. Both internists and non-internists had low rates of training in antibiotic stewardship. 50.8% of internists and 58.6% of non-internists had attended special training in rational antibiotic use or care for patients infected with MDRO in the 12 months prior to the study. Internists deemed themselves more confidently to choose the indications for screening patients for colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (P=0.004) and to initiate adequate infection control measures (P=0.002) than other specialties. However, there was no significant difference between internists and other specialists regarding the two items assessing specific knowledge in antibiotic therapy and infection control. CONCLUSION: Among the study participants, a considerable need for advanced training in the study subjects was seen, regardless of the medical specialty.

Impact of E-Cadherin and ß-Catenin as Prognostic Factor in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus of the Vena Cava.

PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) forming tumor thrombus (TT) of vena cava (VC) is characterized by poor prognosis. Nevertheless, the outcome of patients after radical surgery varies. To date only limited data concerning prognostic biomarkers in this RCC subgroup are available. METHODS: Out of 159 patients with pT3b/c RCC, 95 patients without synchronous distant metastases at time of diagnosis were included in the study cohort. After immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of E-cadherin and ß-Catenin expression, association with clinical, histopathological and survival was assessed by univariate analysis, multivariate analysis, and Kaplan-Meier-analysis. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using Log rank test. RESULTS: We found a significant correlation between E-cadherin overexpression and initial lymph node metastasis (ρ = 0.300, p = 0.003), positive surgical margins (ρ = 0.210, p = 0.043), and the development of distant metastases (ρ = 0.258, p = 0.012). Furthermore, we observed a significant correlation of ß-Catenin overexpression with higher tumor stage pT3c (ρ = 0.230, p = 0.028) and initial lymph node metastases (ρ = 0.236, p = 0.025). Survival analysis revealed a statistically significant association of both E-cadherin and ß-Catenin overexpression with worse CSS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.041, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed initial lymph node metastasis as the only predictive factor for worse OS (HR 4.54, 95% CI 2.30-8.93; p < 0.001). E-Cadherin and ß-Catenin expression failed to be significant in multivariable analysis for OS and CSS. CONCLUSIONS: In a large series of RCC with TT of VC high IHC expression of E-cadherin and ß-Catenin was associated with initial lymph node metastasis and with both worse OS and worse CSS. This might help to identify patients at risk for recurrence who might benefit from adjuvant therapy or stricter follow-up.

Influence of Gender and Age on the Willingness to Reduce Nicotine Consumption-Results of a Survey in Urological Cancer Patients (KRAUT Study).

PURPOSE: Our objective was to investigate whether patients with urologic tumors were aware of smoking as a risk factor for the development and progression of several urologic cancers and the extent of the medical education they had received. Another aim was to investigate whether gender or age influenced patients' willingness to change their smoking habits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically malignant urologic tumors were enrolled in our questionnaire-based study from September 2013 to December 2014 in 2 urology departments. Patients were asked about their smoking habits and their general understanding of the relationship between smoking and the onset of cancer (urologic cancer and lung cancer). Also, the extent of information they had acquired from a physician was assessed. The descriptive and oncologic data of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: Of 258 enrolled patients, 186 (72.1%) had never had an informational discussion with a doctor about smoking and their urologic tumor disease. Of the 160 active and former smokers, only 45 (28.1%) were planning to stop or reduce smoking because of their tumor disease. The willingness to change smoking habits was greater for women, with a statistically significant difference (odds ratio, 5.59; P = .002). Younger patients aged <58 years were also more willing to reduce or stop smoking. CONCLUSION: In our study, most patients with urologic cancer were unaware of smoking as the most probable cause of tumor development. The patients had not received proper counseling from doctors on smoking and the risk it poses for tumor progression. Efforts to balance compliance among the genders and age groups through risk-adapted counseling should be undertaken.

Prospective Evaluation of Predictive Parameters for Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Acute Renal Colic.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal colic (ARC) is an emergency that can mostly be treated conservatively, but can be life threatening in combination with urinary tract infection (UTI). Assessment for infection includes white blood cell (WBC) count and C-reactive protein (CRP), but these parameters are often unspecifically elevated and might lead to antibiotic over-therapy. In times of increasing antibiotic resistance, however, unnecessary antibiotic therapy should be avoided. OBJECTIVES: The goal of the study was to investigate the prevalence of UTI proven by urine culture (UC) in patients with ARC and to identify predictive factors in the emergency setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 200 consecutive patients with ARC and evaluated blood test results, urinalysis, UC, symptoms suspicious for UTI, and time between symptom onset and admission, as well as body temperature. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors. RESULTS: There were 196 patients eligible for statistical analysis. UTI proven by positive UC was detected in 26 patients (13%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, suspicious urinalysis (positive nitrite or bacteria > 20/high-power field [hpf] or WBC > 20/hpf), patient age ≥ 54 years and CRP ≥ 1.5 mg/dL (fivefold increase) were significant predictors for the presence of UTI. Neither elevated WBC count nor typical UTI symptoms were associated with UTI. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, a routine antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with ARC does not seem to be appropriate. Patient age and CRP can help to decide if antibiotic treatment might be indicated, even in case of a not clearly suspicious urinalysis.

What do patients with urothelial cancer know about the association of their tumor disease with smoking habits? Results of a German survey study.

Purpose: Smoking represents a primary risk factor for the development of urothelial carcinoma (UC) and a relevant factor impacting UC-specific prognosis. Data on the accordant knowledge of UC-patients in this regard and the significance of physicians in the education of UC-patients is limited. Materials and Methods: Eighty-eight UC-patients were enrolled in a 23-items-survey-study aimed to analyse patient knowledge and awareness of their tumor disease with smoking along with physician smoking cessation counselling. Results: The median age of the study patients was 69 years; 26.1% (n=23), 46.6% (n=41), and 27.3% (n=24), respectively, were non-smokers, previous, and active smokers. Exactly 50% of active smokers reported a previous communication with a physician about the association of smoking and their tumor disease; however, only 25.0% were aware of smoking as main risk factor for UC development. Merely 33% of the active smokers had been prompted directly by their physicians to quit smoking. About 42% of active smokers had received the information that maintaining smoking could result in a tumor-specific impairment of their prognosis. Closely 29% of active and about 5% of previous smokers (during the time-period of active smoking) had been offered support from physicians for smoking cessation. No association was found between smoking anamnesis (p=0.574) and pack-years (p=0.912), respectively, and tumor stage of UC. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the medical conversation of physicians with UC-patients about the adverse significance of smoking is limited. Implementation of structured educational programs for smoking cessation may be an opportunity to further enhance comprehensive cancer care.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Prostate Biopsies: Contemporary Practice Patterns in Germany.

PURPOSE: Prostate biopsy (pbx) is the most common outpatient procedure in urology. Complications are urinary tract infections, including hospitalization and sepsis. Recommendations on antibiotic prophylaxis (apx) are scarce, and healthcare data are not available. The study addressed the following endpoints: the duration and spectrum of antimicrobial prophylaxis in transrectal and transperineal pbx in the hospital and the practice setting. METHODS: A questionnaire compiled data about age, gender, board certification, and place of work. Information about the frequency of pbx, duration and type of apx, usage of disinfecting lubricant, and urine or rectal swab cultures was collected. The study refers to German urologists. RESULTS: Overall 478 urologists answered the questionnaire. 15.5% (74) of respondents were residents. 50.8% (243) of urologists work in a practice; the rest in a hospital. Only 4.8% do not perform pbx. Transrectal pbx are performed a median of two times a week. The majority (446, 98%) prescribe an apx, mostly fluoroquinolones (407, 89.5%). In total, 10.1% (46) of the participants use a single-shot-apx. apx has a median duration of 4 days. One-third uses a disinfecting lubricant. Urine and rectal swab cultures are analyzed by 45.5% (207) and 24.4% (111), respectively. CONCLUSION: Most urologists prescribe an extended apx for both transrectal and transperineal pbx. Perineal pbx is still a deviation from everyday practice and not an established alternative to transrectal pbx. Urologists are aware of the increasing fluoroquinolone-resistance and are adapting with rectal swab and urine cultures. Further studies need to evaluate alternatives to 5-day apx and results should be addressed in our guidelines. This is of importance in light of the increasing resistance rates and fluoroquinolone side effects.

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Arterioureteral Fistula: The Urologist's Perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Arterioureteral fistula (AUF) is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease that primarily arises as a long-term complication in oncological patients who have permanent ureteral stenting. The incidence is rising. The objective of this study was to outline the risk factors for management and outcome of AUF in a large individual case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six AUF cases in 24 patients from six German tertiary referral centers occurring between 2008 and 2016 were identified retrospectively and entered into a dedicated database by using patient notes and out-patient visits. RESULTS: Of 24 patients, 23 had a history of abdominopelvic surgery for oncological disease, 21/24 had undergone radiotherapy, and 23/24 had long-term ureteral stenting. All cases presented with visible hematuria, 11/26 at the time of a stent exchange. Blood transfusions were required in 92.3%, and intravenous inotropes were needed in 46.2%. Of 26 patients, 11 had flank pain. CT angiogram was positive in 35.7%. Angiography and endovascular fistula repair was performed in 88.5%, and the rest received open surgical repair. Mortality was 7.7%. Endovascular treatment was technically successful in 91.3%, and open surgery was successful in 3/4 cases. Recurrent AUF developed in 3/24 patients. Stent-related complications occurred in 15%. Vascular complications were common. Long-term survival was limited due to progression of the underlying malignant disease. CONCLUSION: AUF results in major hemorrhage and warrants time-efficient diagnosis and treatment. Awareness is key. When AUF is considered, interventional angiography should promptly be performed. Fistula detection can be improved by guidewire manipulation. Pre-interventional CT angiogram may be omitted due to low sensitivity. Endovascular repair with stenting and/or coiling is effective and safe.

[Do General Surgeons Feel Adequately Prepared for the Complex Questions Associated with the Handling of Multi-Resistant Pathogens? - Results of the MR2 Survey]. / Fühlen sich Chirurgen gerüstet für die komplexen Fragestellungen im Umgang mit multiresistenten Erregern? ­ Ergebnisse der Fragebogenstudie MR2.

Background At the present time, there is no evidence available as to the knowledge of general surgeons regarding multi-resistant pathogens (MRP) and the rational use of antibiotic medication (antibiotic stewardship/ABS) compared with physicians from other disciplines. Methods As part of the MR2 survey (Multiinstitutional Reconnaissance of practice with MultiResistant bacteria - a survey focussing on German hospitals), a questionnaire comprising 4 + 35 items was distributed to urologists, internists, gynaecologists and general surgeons in 18 hospitals. Multivariate regression models were applied to assess the impact of each discipline affiliation on predefined endpoints. Results 456 evaluable surveys were analysed. The response rate of surgeons (156/330; 47%) and physicians from other disciplines (300/731; 41%) did not differ significantly. Based on their self-assessment, surgeons indicated a significantly lower certainty regarding the correct choice of dose, frequency and duration of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.005), the decision between intravenous or oral application (p = 0.005), as well as the accurate interpretation of microbiological reports (p = 0.023). Both surgeons and doctors from other disciplines rated their knowledge of ABS as limited. An insignificant difference was found between surgeons and non-surgeons regarding the knowledge of E. coli resistance against Ciprofloxacin in their own hospital (27.6 vs. 35.3% estimated the correct category; p = 0.114), with 64% of surgeons underestimating the local resistance rates. Both physician groups assumed that the frequent use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is substantially responsible for the increase in MRP. However, in the given case study of a highly symptomatic female patient with uncomplicated urinary tract infection, both physician groups were almost equally likely to propose treatment with a broad-spectrum antibiotic (34.0 vs. 29.3%; p = 0.331). Based on the results of the multivariate models, there were no significant differences between surgeons and non-surgeons with regard to both the attendance of training courses related to MRP/ABS over the past 12 months and the quality of discharge summaries in their hospitals regarding the correct listing of MRP. Conclusion In due consideration of the results of the MR2 survey, mandatory ABS programs should be implemented in hospitals, including regular training of physicians regardless of their discipline.

Impact of the medical specialty on knowledge regarding multidrug-resistant organisms and strategies toward antimicrobial stewardship.

PURPOSE: Evidence is scarce on subject-specific knowledge of multidrug-resistant organisms and rational use of antibiotics. We aimed at evaluating attitude, perception, and knowledge about multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) and antibiotic prescribing among urologists versus other medical specialties. METHODS: Within the MR2-study (Multiinstitutional Reconnaissance of practice with MultiResistant bacteria), a questionnaire was conducted targeting general surgeons, internists, gynecologists, and urologists in 18 German hospitals. The influence of medical specialty on predetermined endpoints was assessed by multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: With 456 evaluable questionnaires, the response rate was 43% (456/1061). Within seven workdays prior to survey, urologists prescribed antibiotics to >5 patients more often than non-urologists (50.7 vs. 24.3%; p < 0.001). Urologists were more confident regarding dosage, frequency, and duration of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.038) as well as in interpreting antibiograms (p < 0.001). Both urologists and non-urologists had poor knowledge about antibiotic stewardship. Urologists were more confident regarding local resistance patterns (p < 0.001). However, local rates of ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli strains were correctly categorized by only 36.3 and 31.2% of urologists and non-urologists, respectively (p = 0.168). Compared to non-urologists, urologists more often acknowledged the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic agents as a problem, potentially resulting in increased resistance pattern (p = 0.036). Conversely, 31.5 and 30.7% of urologists and non-urologists (p = 0.424), respectively, would prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics to a female patient with an uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Urologists did not attend more training courses regarding multidrug-resistance or antibiotic prescribing and did not perceive a better quality of discharge letters regarding MDRO. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial need for advanced training regarding MDRO and antibiotic stewardship, regardless of medical specialty.