Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 22(7): 743-752, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21198893

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate soft tissue development at concave circular macro-grooved titanium abutments in healed sites. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a split-mouth pilot study 10 patients received two implants each at healed posterior sites in contralateral maxillary or mandibular jaw quadrants. Either circular macro-grooved concave study abutments or conventional convex control abutments were immediately provisionalized and received permanent crowns 3 months postimplantation. Marginal bone level, papilla index, modified plaque and bleeding index were recorded. The esthetic outcome was evaluated with standardized perpendicular pictures according to the Pink Esthetic Score (PES). Statistical analysis included the description of all variables by mean value, standard deviation and range. PES values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired data. RESULTS: Cumulative survival rate for all 20 implants was 100%. At the 1-year follow-up, there was no statistical significant difference of marginal bone levels between sites restored with the study (-0.11 ± 0.77 mm) vs. the control (-0.34 ± 0.53 mm) abutments (P>0.05). Esthetic evaluation (PES) revealed statistically significant differences in scores between the study group [study abutment group] (7.2 ± 2.82, 8 ± 1.89) and the control group [control abutment group] (9.5 ± 1.58, 10.5 ± 1.72) at the time of prosthetic delivery and the 1-year follow-up. Whereas PES scores for mesial papilla at control sites at the 1-year follow-up demonstrated statistically significant higher values, both soft tissue level and soft tissue contour at control sites revealed statistically significantly higher PES values (P<0.05) at time of prosthetic delivery and at 1-year follow-up when compared with study sites. CONCLUSIONS: Concave macro-grooved abutments in healed posterior maxillary and mandibular sites did not exhibit a superior soft tissue development compared with standard convex abutments.


Assuntos
Dente Suporte , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente , Gengiva/fisiologia , Arcada Parcialmente Edêntula/cirurgia , Cicatrização/fisiologia , Adulto , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Planejamento de Prótese Dentária , Estética Dentária , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Maxila/cirurgia , Projetos Piloto , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 20(5): 526-30, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19522978

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A new method is introduced for the esthetic evaluation of the periimplant mucogingival complex through collection of standardized oral photographs and computer-assisted measurement of reproducible data. Using this method, different soft tissue and crown parameters in the dentogingival complex can be measured and the esthetic outcome monitored. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A photographic device for standardized oral photography and a standard protocol for the esthetic evaluation of the crown-mucogingival complex is presented, comprising six soft tissue parameters: (1) mesial and (2) distal papilla areas, (3) mesial and (4) distal papilla heights, (5) soft tissue-crown perimeter, and (6) gingival recession. In order to demonstrate the reproducibility of standardized oral photographs and the accuracy of the measurement of the six parameters, the data obtained in each of two such standardized clinical photographs, taken at 10-14 days intervals, of the anterior maxillary region from 10 patients with no apparent dental disease were compared. For the statistical analysis of the reproducibility of these dependent data the 95% confidence interval and the coefficients of variation were calculated from measurement means and ranges of each of the above parameters, pooled from all 10 patients. RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed high reproducibility with no significant differences between the range of mean values of all six parameter measurements on the first and second standardized oral photograph of the same patient, respectively. CONCLUSION: Gingivomorphometry on standardized oral photographs can be considered to be an accurate and reproducible method for the evaluation and measurement of different dentogingival and periimplant parameters.


Assuntos
Coroas/normas , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/normas , Gengiva/anatomia & histologia , Odontometria/métodos , Fotografia Dentária/normas , Coroa do Dente/anatomia & histologia , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/métodos , Implantes Dentários/normas , Restauração Dentária Permanente/métodos , Restauração Dentária Permanente/normas , Estética Dentária/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Odontometria/normas , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA