RESUMO
Invasive candidiasis (IC) contributes to the morbidity and mortality of hospitalized patients and represents a significant burden to the healthcare system. Previous Brazilian studies have reported the presence of endemic Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto genotypes causing candidemia and clonal transmission involving fluconazole-resistant isolates. We performed a 5-year retrospective analysis of IC cases in a Brazilian tertiary pediatric hospital and conducted a molecular investigation of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto. Non-duplicate C. parapsilosis sensu stricto genotyping was performed by microsatellite analysis. Antifungal susceptibility and biofilm formation were also evaluated. A total of 123 IC episodes were identified, with an IC incidence of 1.24 cases per 1000 hospital admissions and an overall mortality of 34%. The main species were the C. parapsilosis complex (35.8%), Candida albicans (29.2%), and Candida tropicalis (21.9%). All C. parapsilosis sensu stricto were recovered from blood cultures, and 97.5% were biofilm producers. Microsatellite typing identified high genotypic diversity among the isolates. We observed that all isolates were sensitive to amphotericin B, and although one isolate was non-sensitive to fluconazole, only a silent mutation on ERG11 gene was identified. No clear evidence of clonal outbreak or emergence of fluconazole-resistant isolates was found, suggesting that multiple sources may be involved in the epidemiology of IC in children.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of lateral flow immunochromatographic assays (LFAs) of 4 different manufacturers to identify SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgM, IgG, or total), comparing them with the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) or the clinical defined test (definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection, respectively). METHODS: One hundred nineteen serum samples were randomly selected by convenience and distributed in the following groups: (1) group with SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 82; RT-qPCR positive [definite, n = 70] and probable [n = 12]); (2) other diseases (n = 27; other viruses identified [n = 8] and SARS of other etiologies [n = 19]); and (3) healthy control group (n = 10). LFAs of 4 manufacturers were compared: MedTest Coronavirus (COVID-19) IgG/IgM (MedLevensohn, Brazil); COVID-19 IgG/IgM ECO Test (Ecodiagnóstica, Brazil); Camtech COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test Kit (Camtech Diagnostics Pte Ltd, Singapore); and 1-Step COVID-19 Test for total antibodies (Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co., China). RESULTS: The 4 tests studied showed high diagnostic performance characteristics for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. The best measures were for the Wondfo test: sensitivity (86.59%; 95% CI: 77.26-93.11%), specificity (100%; 90.51-100%), DOR (257; 60-1,008), LR+ (33.43; 4.82-231.85), LR- (0.13; 0.08-0.23), accuracy (90.76%; 84.06-95.29%), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.82. Although considering only the probable SARS-CoV-2 infection (PCR-) cases, all the kits studied showed limited values. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the excellent performance of LFA for the diagnoses of definite or probable SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was substantial heterogeneity in sensitivities of IgM and IgG antibodies among the different kits. LFA tests cannot replace molecular diagnostics but should be used as an additional screening tool.