When Perfect Is the Enemy of Good: Results of a RAND Appropriateness Panel on Treat to Target in Asymptomatic Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: A treat-to-target strategy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) recommends iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical and endoscopic remission. In asymptomatic patients with ongoing endoscopic activity, the risk/benefit balance of this approach is unclear, particularly with prior exposure to advanced therapies. METHODS: Using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, 9 IBD specialists rated appropriateness of changing therapy in 126 scenarios of asymptomatic patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease and active endoscopic disease. Disease extent and behavior, prior treatment, prior complications, and recent disease progression were considered, as were factors that might influence decision-making, including age and pregnancy. Ratings were collected through anonymous survey, discussed at an in-person meeting, and finalized in a second anonymous survey. RESULTS: Panelists rated change in therapy as appropriate (i.e., expected benefit sufficiently outweighs potential harms from continuing therapy) in 96/126 scenarios, generally in patients with progressive, complicated, and/or extensive disease, while changing therapy was rated uncertain in 27 scenarios of mild and/or stable disease. Changing therapy was rated inappropriate in ulcerative colitis patients with mild and stable disease previously exposed to ≥3 therapies or with improved endoscopic activity, and in Crohn's disease patients with only scattered aphthous ulcers. The validated threshold for disagreement was not crossed for any scenario. Patient age older than 65 years and a plan for pregnancy in the next year might influence decision-making in some settings. DISCUSSION: Appropriateness ratings can help guide clinical decision-making about changing therapy to achieve endoscopic remission in asymptomatic patients with IBD until data from ongoing randomized studies are available.

Switching from Dose-Intensified intravenous to SubCutaneoUS infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DISCUS-IBD): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: A substantial proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on intravenous infliximab require dose intensification. Accessing additional intravenous infliximab is labour-intensive and expensive, depending on insurance and pharmaceutical reimbursement. Observational data suggest that subcutaneous infliximab may offer a convenient and safe alternative to maintain disease remission in patients requiring dose-intensified infliximab. A prospective, controlled trial is required to confirm that subcutaneous infliximab is as effective as dose-intensified intravenous infliximab, to identify predictors of disease flare and to establish the role of subcutaneous infliximab therapeutic drug monitoring. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DISCUS-IBD trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label non-inferiority study comparing the rate of disease flares in participants randomised to continue dose-intensified intravenous infliximab to those switched to subcutaneous infliximab after 48 weeks. Participants are adult patients with IBD in sustained corticosteroid-free remission on any regimen of dose-intensified infliximab up to a maximum of 10 mg/kg 4-weekly intravenously. Participants allocated to intravenous infliximab will continue infliximab at the same dose-intensified regimen they were receiving at study enrolment. Subcutaneous infliximab dosing will be stratified by prior intravenous infliximab dosing. Clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw Index, partial Mayo score), biochemical (C reactive protein, faecal calprotectin), pharmacokinetic (drug-level±antidrug antibodies) and qualitative data are collected 12-weekly until study conclusion at week 48. 13 sites across Australia will participate in recruitment to reach a calculated sample size of 120 participants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Multisite ethics approval was obtained from the Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) at The Alfred Hospital under a National Mutual Acceptance (NMA) agreement (HREC/90559/Alfred-2022; Local Reference: Project 618/22, version 1.6, 2 March 2023). Findings will be reported at national and international gastroenterology meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. DISCUS-IBD was prospectively registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) prior to commencing recruitment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12622001458729.

Clinical utility of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Background and Aim: C-reactive protein (CRP)-to-albumin ratio (CAR) is a novel score with prognostic value in inflammatory conditions. This study assessed the performance of CAR as an objective marker of disease activity and prediction of subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on three different patient cohorts with IBD: patients who had (i) fecal calprotectin (FC) measurements; (ii) Mayo Endoscopic Scores; and (iii) infliximab trough levels available. The relative performances of CAR, albumin, and CRP were compared in predicting disease activity (based on FC or Mayo Endoscopic Score) and infliximab trough levels. Results: In both the FC (n = 289) and endoscopy (n = 65) cohorts, albumin and CAR correlated with objective disease activity. CAR (area under the curve [AUC] 0.70) was only marginally better at detecting active disease, measured by FC, compared to CRP (AUC 0.68). A CAR >0.15 was able to detect Mayo 3 disease (AUC 0.83, sensitivity 81%, specificity 89%). Albumin (r = 0.38) and CAR (r = -0.42) correlated with infliximab trough levels (n = 204). The optimal CAR for detecting subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels was >0.08 (AUC 0.70, sensitivity 66%, specificity 64%). Both albumin and CAR were independent predictors of subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels but correlated poorly with infliximab trough levels longitudinally in the same patient. Conclusion: CAR was only a modest discriminator of subtherapeutic infliximab levels and offers little more than CRP in detecting active disease. CAR has potential to detect severe Mayo 3 disease and could be calculated in patients admitted with suspected acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Intestinal barrier biomarkers in clinical evaluation of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with chronic intestinal barrier dysfunction, though its non-invasive assessment remains challenging. This study aimed to determine how four putative circulating markers vary across differing states of intestinal inflammation and with therapy in patients with IBD. METHODS: Plasma samples from one prospective cross-sectional and four longitudinal studies, including healthy controls, were analysed for markers of lipopolysaccharide translocation, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and soluble-CD14 (sCD14), and markers of epithelial injury, syndecan-1 and intestinal-type fatty acid-binding protein (IFABP). Inflammatory activity was determined using objective measures. RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects, concentrations of LBP and sCD14 were higher in patients with active (P < 0.001) and severe ulcerative colitis (UC) (P < 0.0001) and active Crohn's disease (CD) (P < 0.001). In UC in remission, LBP was less than in active disease (P = 0.011) LBP levels decreased longitudinally before and after induction of medical therapy in patients with IBD (P = 0.030) and as severe UC was brought into remission at weeks 2 and 12 (P ≤ 0.022). Response to treatment was associated with higher baseline levels of LBP (P = 0.019) and soluble-CD14 (P = 0.014). Concentrations of syndecan-1 and IFABP were or tended to be lower in UC and CD in active disease and did not change with successful therapy. CONCLUSION: While markers of epithelial injury were subnormal with active disease and did not change with therapy, markers of lipopolysaccharide translocation directly reflected intestinal inflammation, reduced with successful therapy and predicted treatment response.

Application of a Precision-Dosing Model to a Real-World Cohort of Patients on Infliximab Maintenance Therapy: Drug Usage and Cost Analysis.

Precision-dosing models forecast infliximab doses to achieve targeted trough concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). These models have shown to reduce nonresponse and improve patient outcomes. We compared infliximab doses determined by iDOSE precision dosing with standard dosing, and the associated drug costs, in patients with IBD. In this retrospective study, patients with IBD treated with infliximab every 8 weeks at 5 mg/kg were included. An infliximab dose was named dose X if 3 previous infliximab doses, laboratory values including trough infliximab concentrations, and the patient's weight were recorded. The actual dose X was compared to an iDOSE-predicted dose X. Net drug use and costs were evaluated. A total of 174 patients-56% men; median age, 36 (interquartile range, 29-47) years; 135 with Crohn disease; and 31 with ulcerative colitis-were included, with 417 dose X recordings. Median prior infliximab therapy was 2 (0-4) years. Comparing actual dose X with predicted dose X, 52% and 32% of doses were subtherapeutic when aiming for trough concentrations of 5-10 and 3-7 µg/mL, respectively. Treatment costs increased by 102% and 29% for the 2 trough ranges, respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, subtherapeutic infliximab concentrations were associated with ulcerative colitis compared with Crohn disease (odds ratio, 9.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-75.40; P = .028) and predose X infliximab trough concentration [odds ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.15; P < .001]. Over half of maintenance infliximab drug doses were too low to achieve infliximab blood concentrations of 5 µg/mL or greater. While applying precision dosing may improve patient outcomes, drug costs could be considerably greater.

Clinical trial: Combination allopurinol-thiopurine versus standard thiopurine in patients with IBD escalating to immunomodulators (the DECIDER study).

BACKGROUND: Thiopurines are established treatments for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), yet concerns remain regarding their safety. AIM: To evaluate the use of thiopurine-allopurinol combination therapy compared to standard thiopurine therapy in IBD. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of thiopurine-allopurinol versus thiopurine with placebo for adults commencing a thiopurine for IBD. Patients had active disease at baseline; dosing of therapy was based on a pre-specified regimen and subsequent metabolites. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a composite of symptomatic disease activity remission (Harvey Bradshaw Index <5 for Crohn's disease, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index <4 for ulcerative colitis) and a faecal calprotectin <150 µg/g after 26 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The trial was terminated early due to slow recruitment. We randomised 102 participants (54 thiopurine-allopurinol, 48 thiopurine with placebo) with similar age (median 42 vs 48 years) and sex distribution (46% women per group). A higher proportion achieved the primary outcome in the thiopurine-allopurinol group (50% vs 35%, p = 0.14) and fewer participants stopped their allocated therapy due to adverse events (11% vs 29%, p = 0.02). Also, within the thiopurine-allopurinol group, thiopurine dose adjustments were less frequent (69% vs 92%, p = 0.03), a higher proportion achieved an early therapeutic 6-TGN level at week 6 (71% vs 53%, p = 0.19), and adverse events attributed to therapy were less frequent (15% vs 44%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Thiopurine-allopurinol therapy is safe and mitigates thiopurine adverse effects, thus enhancing tolerability without compromising efficacy (ACTRN12613001347752).

Infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients on immunomodulator and biologic therapy are not associated with high serum drug levels.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies now utilise higher doses of immunomodulatory and biologic therapies, predisposing patients to an increased risk of infections. AIMS: We aimed to determine whether infections were associated with high anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug levels in IBD and to quantify the risk and consequences of infections. METHODS: Two retrospective studies were performed, a descriptive cohort study and a matched case-control study. For the matched case-control study, cases of infection occurring on anti-TNF agents were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls of anti-TNF treated patients without infections. RESULTS: In the descriptive study, 76 infections occurred in 60 patients, including 49 bacterial, 24 viral, four fungal and four parasitic. Of these, 61 (80.3%) were on biologics, 49 (64.5%) on immunomodulators and 11 (14.5%) on corticosteroids. Thirty-four (44.7%) were on combination therapy, 27 (35.5%) on biologic monotherapy and 15 (19.7%) on immunomodulator monotherapy. Median anti-TNF drug levels in infection cases were 3.9 µg/mL for infliximab and 6.0 µg/mL for adalimumab. In the case-control study, 32 cases of infection in 27 anti-TNF treated patients were matched with 64 anti-TNF treated controls without infections. Among infection cases, 59.5% were on combination therapy versus 40.6% on biologic monotherapy (P = 0.59). Median drug levels for cases and controls respectively were 3.9 µg/mL versus 5.5 µg/mL for infliximab (P = 0.72) and 6.0 µg/mL versus 9.9 µg/mL for adalimumab (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Infections in patients with IBD were common, and the risk was highest with combination therapy. Infections were not associated with high serum anti-TNF levels.

Adalimumab Drug Levels at Secondary Loss of Response Do Not Predict Response to Dose-intensification in Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective, International Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The exposure-response relationship is less established for adalimumab (ADA) compared with infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Evidence supporting therapeutic drug monitoring post dose-intensification of ADA is limited. We aimed to explore the association between ADA drug levels and Crohn's disease (CD) activity at loss of response, and at 6 and 12 months post dose-intensification. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of adult patients with CD receiving dose-intensified weekly ADA following secondary loss of response at 3 tertiary centers across 5 years. ADA trough levels were analyzed using a drug-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at loss of response, and 6 and 12 months after dose-intensification. Rates of clinical remission, objective remission (C-reactive protein <5 mg/L, fecal calprotectin <150 µg/g, or absence of inflammation at endoscopy or imaging), and ADA failure were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 131 CD patients were included, with a median disease duration of 9 (interquartile range, 4-17) years. 51% were biologic exposed prior to ADA and 50% received concomitant immunomodulators. Baseline drug levels measured at secondary loss of response did not discriminate between subsequent responders and non-responders at either 6 or 12 months post dose-intensification. However, both higher drug levels at 6 and 12 months and a higher increment from baseline were associated with improved outcomes. On receiver-operating characteristic analyses, post-escalation ADA drug levels >10.7 µg/mL (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.66; P = .013) and >10.9 µg/mL (AUROC, 0.67; P = .032) were associated with objective remission at 6 and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Drug levels following dose-intensification rather than at the time of secondary loss of response were associated with subsequent CD remission.

Literature supporting therapeutic drug monitoring at secondary loss of response and post dose-intensification of adalimumab is limited. Adalimumab drug levels following dose-intensification rather than at the time of secondary loss of response are associated with subsequent Crohn's disease remission.

Perceived dietary intolerances, habitual intake and diet quality of patients with an ileoanal pouch: Associations with pouch phenotype (and behaviour).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ileoanal pouch patients frequently attribute pouch-related symptoms and pouchitis with diet. We aimed to assess perceived food intolerance and habitual dietary intake and their relationship with pouch indication, symptoms and current or history of pouchitis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients with an ileoanal pouch completed a dietary intolerance and a food frequency questionnaire, that specifically quantifies habitual intake of FODMAPs. Perceived dietary intolerance rates, nutrient intake and diet quality, and their differences based on pouch indication, symptom, and current or history of pouchitis were assessed. Associations between intolerances and intake, and between dietary intake with pouchitis risk were analysed using univariable and multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 58 (10 FAP and 48 UC) patients with complete data, 81% of UC and 80% of FAP patients reported dietary intolerances. Overall diet quality was good. Differences in dietary intake were limited to a few food groups. Patients with a history of pouchitis had a lower intake of fruits (p = 0.03) and nuts (p = 0.004). Patients with current pouchitis had a lower intake of nuts (p = 0.02). On multivariable logistic regression, intake of dietary fibre was associated negatively [OR 0.68(95%CI:0.51-0.92)] and of non-digestible oligosaccharides positively with pouchitis history [OR 5.5(95% CI:1.04-29.1)]. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an ileoanal pouch, perceived dietary intolerances are common but had minimal impact on nutritional adequacy and diet quality. Negative associations of the intakes of fruits, nuts and dietary fibre and positive association with non-digestible oligosaccharides with a history of pouchitis require further study to inform dietary recommendations.

The Role of Low-Dose Oral Methotrexate in Increasing Anti-TNF Drug Levels and Reducing Immunogenicity in IBD.

Concomitant immunomodulation is utilised in combination with anti-TNF therapy for IBD primarily to increase drug levels and prevent anti-drug antibody formation. Whilst thiopurines have traditionally been the immunomodulator of choice in IBD populations, there are concerns regarding the long-term safety of the prolonged use of these agents: particularly an association with lymphoproliferative disorders. Given this, we have explored the existing literature on the use of low-dose oral methotrexate as an alternative immunomodulator for this indication. Although there is a lack of data directly comparing the efficacies of methotrexate and thiopurines as concomitant immunomodulators, the available literature supports the use of methotrexate in improving the pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF agents. Furthermore, low-dose oral methotrexate regimens appear to have comparable efficacies to higher-dose parenteral administration and are better tolerated. We suggest that clinicians should consider the use of low-dose oral methotrexate as an alternative to thiopurines when the primary purpose of concomitant immunomodulation is to improve anti-TNF pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacist-Driven Therapeutic Infliximab Monitoring at the Point of Care Using Rapidly Assessed Drug Levels in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic monitoring of infliximab is limited by the time lag between drug-level measurement and dose adjustment, along with the cost of dose escalation. Strategies for dose reduction in stable patients on maintenance infliximab at supratherapeutic levels are uncertain. This study determined the feasibility of a pharmacist-driven strategy for immediate dose adjustment using a sliding scale at the point of care in stable patients with inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance therapy. METHODS: Adult patients with stable disease undergoing maintenance therapy with infliximab infusions, 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, were prospectively studied. Trough drug levels were assessed by a rapid assay (and later by ELISA) at all infusions for up to 12 months with immediate but quantitatively small dose adjustment according to a sliding scale targeting a therapeutic range of 3-7 mcg/mL. Disease activity was assessed both clinically and biochemically. RESULTS: The rapid assay and ELISA detected similar infliximab levels, and the strategy added approximately 30 minutes to the duration of infusion events. Only 20% of 48 patients (77% with Crohn disease) had baseline trough infliximab concentrations within the therapeutic range. This value increased 3-fold after 24 and 48 weeks of interventions. One in 2 patients had baseline supratherapeutic levels, and most were brought into the therapeutic range without a discernible impact on disease activity by 1 dose adjustment, but 2 or 3 adjustments were generally needed for 29% of patients with subtherapeutic levels. Overall, drug costs were reduced by 4%. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dose adjustment after infliximab rapid assay performed by a pharmacist using a sliding scale is a feasible strategy. Supratherapeutic infliximab levels can be safely and quickly brought into the therapeutic range using small dose adjustments without affecting disease activity, offsetting (at least partly) costs associated with dose escalation.

An Extremes of Phenotype Approach Confirms Significant Genetic Heterogeneity in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ulcerative colitis [UC] is a major form of inflammatory bowel disease globally. Phenotypic heterogeneity is defined by several variables including age of onset and disease extent. The genetics of disease severity remains poorly understood. To further investigate this, we performed a genome wide association [GWA] study using an extremes of phenotype strategy. METHODS: We conducted GWA analyses in 311 patients with medically refractory UC [MRUC], 287 with non-medically refractory UC [non-MRUC] and 583 controls. Odds ratios [ORs] were calculated for known risk variants comparing MRUC and non-MRUC, and controls. RESULTS: MRUC-control analysis had the greatest yield of genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] [2018], including lead SNP = rs111838972 [OR = 1.82, p = 6.28 × 10-9] near MMEL1 and a locus in the human leukocyte antigen [HLA] region [lead SNP = rs144717024, OR = 12.23, p = 1.7 × 10-19]. ORs for the lead SNPs were significantly higher in MRUC compared to non-MRUC [p < 9.0 × 10-6]. No SNPs reached significance in the non-MRUC-control analysis (top SNP, rs7680780 [OR 2.70, p = 5.56 × 10-8). We replicate findings for rs4151651 in the Complement Factor B [CFB] gene and demonstrate significant changes in CFB gene expression in active UC. Detailed HLA analyses support the strong associations with MHC II genes, particularly HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1 and HLA-DRB1 in MRUC. CONCLUSIONS: Our MRUC subgroup replicates multiple known UC risk variants in contrast to non-MRUC and demonstrates significant differences in effect sizes compared to those published. Non-MRUC cases demonstrate lower ORs similar to those published. Additional risk and prognostic loci may be identified by targeted recruitment of individuals with severe disease.

A novel Monash Pouch diet in patients with an ileoanal pouch is tolerable and has favorable metabolic luminal effects.

Aims: To evaluate a whole-food diet strategy (the Monash Pouch diet [MPD]) designed based on the interacting roles dietary factors play with pouch health. Specifically, its tolerability and acceptability, whether it achieved its dietary and metabolic goals, and the effects on symptoms and inflammation were examined. Methods: In a 6-week open-label trial, patients with ileoanal pouches educated on the MPD were assessed regarding diet tolerability and acceptance, food intake (7-day food diaries), pouch-related symptoms (clinical pouchitis disease activity index), and, in 24-h fecal samples, calprotectin, fermentative biomarkers, and volatile organic compounds (VOC). Results: Of 12 patients, 6 male, mean (SD) age 55 (5) and pouch age 13 (2) years, one withdrew with partial small bowel obstruction. Tolerability was excellent in 9 (75%) and acceptance was high (81%). Targeted changes in dietary intake were achieved. Fecal branched- to short-chain fatty acid ratio increased by median 60 [IQR: 11-80]% (P = 0.02). Fecal VOCs for 3 compounds were also increased, 2-methyl-5-propan-2-ylcyclohexa-1,3-diene (Fold-change [FC] 2.08), 1,3,3-trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (FC 3.86), propan-2-ol (FC 2.10). All six symptomatic patients achieved symptomatic remission (P = 0.03). Fecal calprotectin at baseline was 292 [176-527] µg/g and at week 5 was 205 [148-310] µg/g (P = 0.72). Conclusion: Well tolerated and accepted, the MPD achieved targeted changes in intakes and fermentation of carbohydrates relative to that of protein. There were signals of improvement in symptoms. These results indicate the need for a randomized-controlled trial. (Trial registration: ACTRN12621000374864; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12621000374864.aspx).

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Subcutaneous Infliximab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Understanding Pharmacokinetics and Exposure Response Relationships in a New Era of Subcutaneous Biologics.

CT-P13 is the first subcutaneous infliximab molecule approved for the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Compared to intravenous therapy, SC infliximab offers a range of practical, micro- and macroeconomic advantages. Data from the rheumatological literature suggest that subcutaneous CT-P13 may lead to superior disease outcomes in comparison to intravenous infliximab. Existing studies in IBD have focussed on pharmacokinetic comparisons and are inadequately powered to evaluate efficacy and safety differences between the two modes of administration. However, emerging clinical trial and real-world data support comparable clinical, biochemical, endoscopic and safety outcomes between subcutaneous and intravenous infliximab in both luminal Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. Across the available data, subcutaneous CT-P13 provides relative pharmacokinetic stability and higher trough drug levels when compared to intravenous administration. The clinical impact of this observation on immunogenicity and treatment persistence is yet to be determined. Trough levels between the two methods of administration should not be compared in isolation as any subcutaneous advantage must be considered in the context of comparable total drug exposure and the theoretical disadvantage of lower peak concentrations compared to intravenous therapy. Furthermore, target drug levels for subcutaneous CT-P13 associated with remission are not known. In this review, we present the available literature surrounding the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous CT-P13 in the context of therapeutic drug monitoring and highlight the potential significance of these observations on the clinical management of patients with IBD.

Appropriateness of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Chronic Pouchitis Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The treatment of chronic pouchitis remains a challenge due to the paucity of high-quality studies. We aimed to provide guidance for clinicians on the appropriateness of medical and surgical treatments in chronic pouchitis. METHODS: Appropriateness of medical and surgical treatments in patients with chronic pouchitis was considered in 16 scenarios incorporating presence/absence of four variables: pouchitis symptoms, response to antibiotics, significant prepouch ileitis, and Crohn's disease (CD)-like complications (i.e., stricture or fistula). Appropriateness of permanent ileostomy in patients refractory to medical treatments was considered in eight additional scenarios. Using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, international IBD expert panelists rated appropriateness of treatments in each scenario on a 1-9 scale. RESULTS: Chronic antibiotic therapy was rated appropriate only in asymptomatic antibiotic-dependent patients with no CD-like complications and inappropriate in all other scenarios. Ileal-release budesonide was rated appropriate in 6/16 scenarios including patients with significant prepouch ileitis but no CD-like complications. Probiotics were considered either inappropriate (14/16) or uncertain (2/16). Biologic therapy was considered appropriate in most scenarios (14/16) and uncertain in situations where significant prepouch ileitis or CD-like complications were absent (2/16). In patients who are refractory to all medications, permanent ileostomy was considered appropriate in all scenarios (7/8) except in asymptomatic patients with no CD-like complications. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of significant prepouch ileitis or CD-like complications, chronic antibiotics and probiotics are inappropriate. Biologics are appropriate in all patients except in asymptomatic patients with no evidence of complications. Permanent ileostomy is appropriate in most medically refractory patients.

Ustekinumab levels in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease and infants exposed in utero.

BACKGROUND: Ustekinumab is increasingly used in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Existing safety data are reassuring, but the stability of ustekinumab levels in pregnancy, degree of transfer to the infant and time to infant clearance are unknown. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, ustekinumab-exposed women with IBD had trough levels measured in each trimester of pregnancy and at delivery. Infant ustekinumab levels were measured at delivery and ongoing until clearance was achieved. Trough ustekinumab level stability in individuals across pregnancy was compared by Skillings-Mack test. Spearman coefficients were used to correlate maternal and infant delivery levels, and median time to infant ustekinumab clearance was defined. RESULTS: 19 pregnant women receiving ustekinumab were included. There was no difference in ustekinumab levels across pregnancy in those with two or more representative trough levels (P = 0.83, n = 11). Infant delivery ustekinumab levels were higher than maternal levels, with a median infant:maternal ratio of 1.79 (IQR 1.26-3.1). There was a positive correlation between maternal and infant delivery ustekinumab levels (r = 0.75, P = 0.001) and an inverse correlation between the number of days from final antenatal dose and delivery infant ustekinumab level (r = -0.65, P = 0.006). Median time of infant ustekinumab clearance was 9 (range 6-19) weeks (n = 9). CONCLUSION: Ustekinumab drug levels appear stable in pregnancy, with a delivery infant:maternal ratio similar to that of anti-TNFs. Infant ustekinumab clearance was complete by 20 weeks post-partum, however, infants exposed in utero should avoid live vaccination before 12 months of age until further clearance data are obtained.

Higher Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-α Levels Correlate With Improved Radiologic Outcomes in Crohn's Perianal Fistulas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Higher anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) drug levels are associated with improved clinical healing of Crohn's perianal fistulas. It is unclear whether this leads to improved healing on radiologic assessment. We aimed to evaluate the association between anti-TNF drug levels and radiologic outcomes in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective multicenter study was undertaken. Patients with perianal fistulising Crohn's disease on maintenance infliximab or adalimumab, with drug levels within 6 months of perianal magnetic resonance imaging were included. Patients receiving dose changes or fistula surgery between drug level and imaging were excluded. Radiologic disease activity was scored using the Van Assche Index, with an inflammatory subscore calculated using indices: T2-weighted imaging hyperintensity, collections >3 mm diameter, rectal wall involvement. Primary endpoint was radiologic healing (inflammatory subscore ≤6). Secondary endpoint was radiologic remission (inflammatory subscore = 0). RESULTS: Of 193 patients (infliximab, n = 117; adalimumab, n = 76), patients with radiologic healing had higher median drug levels compared with those with active disease (infliximab 6.0 vs 3.9 µg/mL; adalimumab 9.1 vs 6.2 µg/mL; both P < .05). Patients with radiologic remission also had higher median drug levels compared with those with active disease (infliximab 7.4 vs 3.9 µg/mL; P < .05; adalimumab 9.8 vs 6.2 µg/mL; P = .07). There was a significant incremental reduction in median inflammatory subscores with higher anti-TNF drug level tertiles. CONCLUSIONS: Higher anti-TNF drug levels were associated with improved radiologic outcomes on magnetic resonance imaging in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, with an incremental improvement at higher drug level tertiles for both infliximab and adalimumab.