Case formulation-A vehicle for change? Exploring the impact of cognitive behavioural therapy formulation in first episode psychosis: A reflexive thematic analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Formulation is considered a fundamental process of cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp). However, an exploration into the personal impact of different levels of case formulation (CF) from a service user (SU) perspective is lacking, particularly for those experiencing a first episode of psychosis. DESIGN: This Big Q qualitative design used semi-structured interviews. METHODS: Reflexive thematic analysis (TA) was used to analyse 10 participant interviews. NVivo 12 computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software aided data organisation and analysis. RESULTS: One overarching theme 'CF - A vehicle for change?' was developed as a pattern of shared meaning across the data set. Three main themes related to the overarching theme: (1) Vicious cycles: 'I never really thought about it being me maintaining the problems' (including one subtheme - Self-empowerment: 'Only you can make the changes for yourself'); (2) Early life experiences: 'My experiences have shaped the person that I am, therefore, it's not my fault' (including one subtheme - Disempowerment: '[My] core beliefs have been damaged'); and (3) Keep it simple: 'Don't push it too far over the top in case it becomes like spaghetti'. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance formulations may be experienced as self-blaming, but also self-empowering, which may help to facilitate change. Longitudinal formulations may be experienced as non-blaming, but also disempowering, which may inhibit change. Simple CF diagrams may also facilitate change, whereas overly complex CFs may inhibit change. How CBTp therapists might look to improve the impact of different levels of CF for service users (SUs) in first episode psychosis (FEP) are described.

What are the essential ingredients of a CBT case conceptualization for voices and delusions in schizophrenia spectrum disorders? A study of expert consensus.

Evidence supports the use of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for the treatment of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A case conceptualization (CC) (or case formulation) is seen as the keystone of CBT in terms of making sense of a patient's difficulties, to guide and inform such treatment. Despite the importance placed on CC there is no known consensus amongst experts as to the essential ingredients involved in this fundamental process. This study used the Delphi method to establish expert consensus for the essential components of a CC when working to treat auditory hallucinations (voices), and persecutory delusions. An international panel of 78 CBT for psychosis (CBTp) experts from 12 different countries participated in the main stage of this study. This 3-stage process involved producing and rating statements that addressed key areas of CC in terms of: presenting issues, predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating and protective factors. One presenting issue and 6 perpetuating factors were endorsed as essential by >80% of the expert panel. The exact same items were endorsed for both voices, and persecutory delusions. The findings are unique in that a large panel of international experts reached consensus that case conceptualizations (CCs) should be parsimonious and focused on the perpetuating (maintaining) factors to facilitate change. Overall, the proposed recommendations should lead to core guidance for the process of developing CCs, and improvements in training for clinicians that conceptualize voices, and persecutory delusions in CBT for schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for antipsychotic-free schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Does therapy dose influence outcome?

This study investigated the effect of "dose" and the components of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on treatment effects. It is a secondary analysis of the ACTION (Assessment of Cognitive Therapy Instead of Neuroleptics) trial which investigated CBT for people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders that chose not to take antipsychotic medication. Using instrumental variable methods, we found a "dose-response" such that each CBT session attended, reduced the primary outcome measure (the PANSS total score) by approximately 0.6 points (95% CI -1.20 to -0.06, p = 0.031). This suggests that length of therapy is important for those that receive CBT in the absence of antipsychotic medication. Secondly, using principal stratification we examined the process variables that modified treatment effects. Findings revealed that those who received a longitudinal formulation in the first 4 sessions of CBT had poorer treatment effects than those who did not, however this finding was not statistically significant (95% CI -37.244, 6.677, p = 0.173). However, it is important to note that these findings were evident in an exploratory analysis with a small sample. Future larger scale studies are needed to help understand components of effective treatment.