Immunogenicity and safety of Fluzone(®) intradermal and high-dose influenza vaccines in older adults ≥65 years of age: a randomized, controlled, phase II trial.

We conducted a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of an investigational intradermal (ID) trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) and a high-dose (HD) intramuscular (IM) TIV in older adults (≥65 years of age). Older adult subjects were immunized with ID vaccine containing either 15µg hemagglutinin (HA)/strain (n=636) or 21µg HA/strain (n=634), with HD IM vaccine containing 60µg HA/strain (n=320), or with standard-dose (SD) IM vaccine (Fluzone(®); 15µg HA/strain; n=319). For comparison, younger adults (18-49 years of age) were immunized with SD IM vaccine. In older adults, post-vaccination geometric mean titers induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine for the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains and non-inferior for the B strain. Seroconversion rates induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine in older adults for the A/H1N1 and B strains and non-inferior for the A/H3N2 strain. Results did not differ significantly for the two ID vaccine dosages. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers, seroconversion rates, and most seroprotection rates were significantly higher in HD vaccine recipients than in older adult recipients of the SD IM or ID vaccines and, for most measures, were comparable to those of younger adult SD IM vaccine recipients. Injection-site reactions, but not systemic reactions or unsolicited adverse events, were more common with the ID vaccines than with the IM vaccines. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. This study demonstrated that: (1) the ID and HD vaccines were well-tolerated and more immunogenic than the SD IM vaccine in older adults; (2) the HD vaccine was more immunogenic than the ID vaccines in older adults; and (3) the HD vaccine in older adults and the SD IM vaccine in younger adults elicited comparable antibody responses (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no.: NCT00551031).

13-Valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in older children and adolescents either previously immunized with or naïve to 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

BACKGROUND: The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) has been demonstrated to be immunogenic and safe for administration to infants and children aged <5 years. PCV13 recently was approved for children and adolescents aged up to 17 years as the vaccine may be of benefit to some in this older age group. METHODS: In this open-label study, healthy children aged ≥5 to <10 years (ie, the younger age group) previously vaccinated (≥1 dose) with 7-valent PCV (PCV7) and pneumococcal vaccine-naïve children aged ≥10 to <18 years (ie, the older age group) received 1 dose of PCV13. For the younger group, antipneumococcal immunoglobulin (Ig) G geometric mean concentrations 1 month postvaccination were compared with posttoddler dose (PCV13 or PCV7) levels from a historical control study. Opsonophagocytic activity geometric mean titers 1 month postvaccination for the older group were compared with the younger age group. Safety data were collected. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-eight children were enrolled, 299 in each age group. For PCV7 serotypes, IgG geometric mean concentrations in the younger group were 8.23-53.56 µg/mL, ≥2.5-fold greater than historical posttoddler dose values. For the 6 additional serotypes, IgG geometric mean concentrations in the younger group were 2.38-21.51 µg/mL, ≥1.2-fold greater than historical posttoddler dose values. Opsonophagocytic activity geometric mean titers were similar in the older and younger age groups, except for serotype 3 which was lower in the older group. Safety was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCV13 was immunogenic and safe when administered to older children and adolescents, regardless of prior PCV7 vaccination.

Maintenance fluconazole therapy for recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis.

BACKGROUND: No safe and convenient regimen has proved to be effective for the management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. METHODS: After inducing clinical remission with open-label fluconazole given in three 150-mg doses at 72-hour intervals, we randomly assigned 387 women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis to receive treatment with fluconazole (150 mg) or placebo weekly for six months, followed by six months of observation without therapy. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of women in clinical remission at the end of the first six-month period. Secondary efficacy measures were the clinical outcome at 12 months, vaginal mycologic status, and time to recurrence on the basis of Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Weekly treatment with fluconazole was effective in preventing symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. The proportions of women who remained disease-free at 6, 9, and 12 months in the fluconazole group were 90.8 percent, 73.2 percent, and 42.9 percent, as compared with 35.9 percent, 27.8 percent, and 21.9 percent, respectively, in the placebo group (P< 0.001). The median time to clinical recurrence in the fluconazole group was 10.2 months, as compared with 4.0 months in the placebo group (P<0.001). There was no evidence of fluconazole resistance in isolates of Candida albicans or of superinfection with C. glabrata. Fluconazole was discontinued in one patient because of headache. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term weekly treatment with fluconazole can reduce the rate of recurrence of symptomatic vulvovaginal candidiasis. However, a long-term cure remains difficult to achieve.