RESUMO
Ankle fractures are a common intra-articular trauma. The gold standard treatment for unstable ankle fractures has been Open Reduction Internal Fixation with plating and lag screw(s). Advocates for intramedullary nailing of the fibula note decreased wound complications and greater biomechanical strength. We hypothesized that time to union and time to weight bearing would be decreased with a fibular intramedullary nail compared to prior ankle ORIF literature. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 65 consecutive ankle fracture patients treated with a fibular nail. The median follow-up time was 18.3 months (IQR: 55.4 - 97.6 days). All patients (100%) achieved clinical and radiographic union at a median of 9.6 (IQR: 54 - 78 days) and 10.8 weeks (IQR: 58 - 95 days), respectively. Post-operatively patients bore weight in walking boot and athletic shoe at a median 6.1 and 9.4 weeks, respectively. Fifteen patients suffered complications (23.1%). Patients with history of prior or active smoking were significantly correlated to longer time to union (p=0.016). Time to union also took 0.43 days longer for each additional year of age (t-value 2.13, p-value = 0.038). Nineteen out of 65 patients (29.2%) participated in the Olerud-Molander Ankle Scoring and the median functional outcome score was 71 (IQR: 56 - 93). While fibular nailing has advanced passive range of motion and weight bearing in our institution, time to weight bearing is clouded by surgeon comfort. Further study comparing fibular fracture healing and weight bearing status in regards to intramedullary and plate fixation in needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diabetes distress (DD) is a prevalent concern among people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and is linked to poor clinical outcomes. Instead of targeting the elimination of DD, we propose a novel approach that empowers individuals with strategies to manage their diabetes effectively in the context of DD: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT). The purpose of this in-progress trial is to compare an ACT group intervention (ACT1VATE) with usual care in improving HbA1c, DD, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness in adults with T1D. METHODS: This is a two-arm, parallel group, randomized controlled superiority trial enrolling N = 250 adults with T1D, elevated HbA1c, and significant DD in a real-world community-based health system. Participants are randomized to receive ACT1VATE (a five-week ACT group telehealth intervention) or diabetes self-management education and support (usual care as the first-line recommended intervention for DD). The trial will examine comparative effectiveness in improving HbA1c, DD, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness over 12 months. DISCUSSION: We predict that ACT1VATE will be superior given its (1) specific focus on DD, without any expectation that difficult diabetes-related thoughts and emotions must (or can) be completely eliminated; and (2) purposeful linkage of diabetes self-care behaviors to an individual's deeply held values, thus eliciting intrinsic, patient-centric motivation for meaningful and lasting health behavior changes. This trial will provide a valuable test of real-world effectiveness, drive sustainability and scalability, and inform the future of chronic disease care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04933851 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04933851). CLINICAL TRIAL: Clinicaltrials.govNCT04933851https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04933851.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This cluster (clinic-level) randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared medical assistant (MA) health coaching (MAC) with usual care (UC) among at-risk adults with type 2 diabetes in two diverse real-world primary care environments: a federally qualified health center (FQHC; Neighborhood Healthcare) and a large nonprofit private insurance-based health system (Scripps Health). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 600 adults with type 2 diabetes who met one or more of the following criteria in the last 90 days were enrolled: HbA1c ≥8% and/or LDL cholesterol ≥100 mg/dL and/or systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg. Participants at MAC clinics received in-person and telephone self-management support from a specially trained MA health coach for 12 months. Electronic medical records were used to examine clinical outcomes in the overall sample. Behavioral and psychosocial outcomes were evaluated in a subsample (n = 300). RESULTS: All clinical outcomes improved significantly over 1 year in the overall sample (P < 0.001). The reduction in HbA1c was significantly greater in the MAC versus UC group (unstandardized Binteraction = -0.06; P = 0.002). A significant time by group by site interaction also showed that MAC resulted in greater improvements in LDL cholesterol than UC at Neighborhood Healthcare relative to Scripps Health (Binteraction = -1.78 vs. 1.49; P < 0.05). No other statistically significant effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This was the first large-scale pragmatic RCT supporting the real-world effectiveness of MAC for type 2 diabetes in U.S. primary care settings. Findings suggest that this team-based approach may be particularly effective in improving diabetes outcomes in FQHC settings.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Tutoria , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tutoria/métodos , Idoso , Adulto , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/metabolismo , Pessoal Técnico de SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hispanic individuals have higher type 2 diabetes (T2D) prevalence, poorer outcomes, and are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Culturally-tailored, diabetes educational text messaging has previously improved HbA1c in this population. METHODS: During the pandemic, hospitalized Hispanic adults with T2D (N = 172) were randomized to receive Dulce Digital-COVID Aware ("DD-CA") texting platform upon discharge plus diabetes transition service (DTS) or DTS alone. DD-CA includes diabetes educational messaging with additional COVID-safe messaging (e.g., promoting masking; social distancing; vaccination). FINDINGS: Among adults with poorly-controlled diabetes (Mean HbA1c = 9.6 ± 2.2 %), DD-CA did not reduce 30- or 90-day readmissions compared to standard care (28 % vs 15 %, p = .06; 37 % vs 35 %, p = .9, respectively). However, the improvement in HbA1c was larger among those in the DD-CA compared to DTS at 3 months (n = 56; -2.69 % vs. -1.45 %, p = .0496) with reduced effect at 6 months (n = 64; -2.03 % vs -0.91 %, p = .07). Low follow-up completion rates and the addition of covariates (to control for baseline group differences that existed despite randomization) impacted statistical power. INTERPRETATION: During the pandemic, DD-CA offered an alternative digital approach to diabetes and COVID education and support for a high-risk Hispanic population and achieved trends toward improvement in glycemic control despite relatively low engagement and not reducing hospital readmissions.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Envio de Mensagens de Texto , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Hemoglobinas Glicadas , Hispânico ou Latino , México/epidemiologia , Alta do Paciente , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glycemic control in the hospital setting is imperative for improving outcomes among patients with diabetes. Bedside point-of-care (POC) glucose monitoring has remained the gold standard for decades, while only providing momentary glimpses into a patient's glycemic control. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to improve glycemic control in the ambulatory setting. However, a paucity of inpatient experience and data remains a barrier to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and expanded/non-research use in the hospital setting. METHOD: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA exercised its enforcement discretion to not object to the use of CGM systems for the treatment of patients in hospital settings to support COVID-19 health care-related efforts to reduce viral exposure of health care workers. Following this announcement, Scripps Health, a large not-for-profit health care system in San Diego, California, implemented CGM as the new "standard of care" (CGM as SOC) for glucose monitoring and management in the hospital. RESULTS: The present report serves to (1) detail the implementation procedures for employing this new SOC; (2) describe the patients receiving CGM as SOC, their glycemic control, and hospital outcomes; and (3) share lessons learned over two years and nearly 900 hospital encounters involving CGM. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we conclude that CGM is feasible in the hospital setting by using a dedicated diabetes care team and the CGM technology with remote monitoring.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Glicemia , Automonitorização da Glicemia/métodos , Pandemias , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Hospitais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Type 2 diabetes disproportionately impacts ethnic minorities and individuals from low socioeconomic status. Diabetes self-management education and support has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in these populations, and mobile health (mHealth) interventions can reduce barriers to access. Dulce Digital-Me (DD-Me) was developed to integrate adaptive mHealth technologies to enhance self-management and reduce disparities in the high-risk, underserved Hispanic population. The objective of the present study was to evaluate reach, adoption, and implementation of an mHealth diabetes self-management education and support intervention in this underrepresented population. The present analysis is a multimethod process evaluation using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. The study was effective in reaching a sample that was representative of the intended population; only modest but significant differences were observed in sex and age. The DD-Me health coach (HC) cited several important facilitators of intervention adoption, including outreach frequency and personalization, and the automated HC report. Implementation fidelity was high, with participants receiving >90% of intended interventions. Participants who received DD-Me with support from a HC were most engaged, suggesting utility and acceptability of integrating HCs with mHealth interventions. Perceptions of implementation among study participants were positive and consistent across study arms. This evaluation revealed the target population was successfully reached and engaged in the digital health interventions, which was implemented with high fidelity. Further studies should evaluate the efficacy and maintenance of the study following the RE-AIM model to determine whether this intervention warrants expansion to additional settings and populations.
Type 2 diabetes disproportionately impacts ethnic minorities, including Hispanic individuals; however, these populations are often underrepresented in clinical research, especially in studies using digital technologies. The Dulce Digital-Me study was developed to provide diabetes self-management education and support using mobile health technologies with the goal of improving clinical outcomes by reducing barriers to accessing support. This analysis revealed that the Dulce Digital-Me study was successful at reaching the target population and engaging them with the intervention, while also delivering the study intervention with high fidelity. This process evaluation provides critical context for understanding the study's clinical outcomes and the potential for further dissemination.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Telemedicina , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Pessoal de Saúde , Telemedicina/métodos , Hispânico ou Latino , Educação em SaúdeRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease often diagnosed with synchronous metastatic disease involving the liver. Tumors with extra-abdominal spread that bypass the liver are thought to represent a unique molecular subgroup and those with isolated pulmonary metastatic disease are thought to have a more favorable clinical phenotype. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with pathologically confirmed PDAC treated between the years 2007 and 2020 at a Scripps Health hospital. The final study sample (N = 205) included patients with isolated pulmonary metastasis (IL), isolated liver metastasis or synchronous liver and lung metastasis (LL), or metastasis to any site other than the liver or lung (NLL). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Each survival outcome was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards tests. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were seen between the three groups in OS, PFS, or RFS. Median OS for the IL group was 561 days, 341 days for the LL group, and 441 days for the NLL group. Median RFS was 748 days for the IL group, 574 days for the LL group, and 545 days for the NLL group. Median PFS was 307 for the IL group, 236 for the LL group, and 265 for the NLL group. When comparing only the IL and LL groups, a statistically significant difference in OS was seen favoring the IL group (HR1.59 LL vs IL [ref], CI 1.04-2.41, p = 0.031) CONCLUSION: Though statistically significant differences in survival outcomes were not seen in our population, there was a trend toward improved survival for patients with isolated lung metastases. When comparing only the IL to LL group, statistically significant overall survival favoring the IL group was seen. These findings highlight a potential prognostic indicator of metastatic PDAC.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Prognóstico , Pulmão/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity frequently co-occurs with behavioral health concerns and leads to increased healthcare costs and reduced quality and quantity of life. Unplanned readmissions are a primary driver of high healthcare costs. OBJECTIVE: We tested the effectiveness of a culturally appropriate care transitions program for Latino adults with multiple cardiometabolic conditions and behavioral health concerns in reducing hospital utilization and improving patient-reported outcomes. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blind parallel-groups. PARTICIPANTS: Hispanic/Latino adults (N=536; 75% of those screened and eligible; M=62.3 years (SD=13.9); 48% women; 73% born in Mexico) with multiple chronic cardiometabolic conditions and at least one behavioral health concern (e.g., depression symptoms, alcohol misuse) hospitalized at a hospital that serves a large, mostly Hispanic/Latino, low-income population. INTERVENTIONS: Usual care (UC) involved best-practice discharge processes (e.g., discharge instructions, assistance with appointments). Mi Puente ("My Bridge"; MP) was a culturally appropriate program of UC plus inpatient and telephone encounters with a behavioral health nurse and community mentor team who addressed participants' social, medical, and behavioral health needs. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was 30- and 180-day readmissions (inpatient, emergency, and observation visits). Patient-reported outcomes (quality of life, patient activation) and healthcare use were also examined. KEY RESULTS: In intention-to-treat models, the MP group evidenced a higher rate of recurrent hospitalization (15.9%) versus UC (9.4%) (OR=1.91 (95% CI 1.09, 3.33)), and a greater number of recurrent hospitalizations (M=0.20 (SD=0.49) MP versus 0.12 (SD=0.45) UC; P=0.02) at 30 days. Similar trends were observed at 180 days. Both groups showed improved patient-reported outcomes, with no advantage in the Mi Puente group. Results were similar in per protocol analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this at-risk population, the MP group experienced increased hospital utilization and did not demonstrate an advantage in improved patient-reported outcomes, relative to UC. Possible reasons for these unexpected findings are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02723019. Registered on 30 March 2016.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente , Transição do Hospital para o Domicílio , Transtornos Mentais , Doenças Metabólicas , Multimorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Hispânico ou Latino , Transferência de Pacientes/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Método Simples-Cego , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Fatores de Risco Cardiometabólico , Readmissão do Paciente , Avaliação das Necessidades , Assistência AmbulatorialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is no agreed upon standard of care for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) or locally-advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients regarding the benefit of chemotherapy or radiation alone or in combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We completed a retrospective cohort analysis of BRPC and LAPC patients at a cancer center with expertise in multi-disciplinary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment over a 5-year period from 03/01/2014 to 03/01/2019 (cut-off date). The total evaluable newly diagnosed, treatment naïve, BRPC, and LAPC patients with adequate organ function and ability to obtain treatment after multidisciplinary review was 52 patients. After analysis, patients were evaluated for rates of resection, extent of resection (R0 or R1), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS). RESULTS: Patients were treated with chemotherapy alone (gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel = 77% (20/26); FOLFIRINOX = 19% (5/26); single agent gemcitabine 3.8% (1/26)), or chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (gemcitabine +5 Gy × 5 weeks), or chemoradiation alone prior to re-staging and potential resection. Of the 29% (15/52) of patients who went on to surgical resection, 73% (11/15) achieved R0 resection. An R0 resection was achieved in 35% (9/26) of patients treated with chemotherapy alone, 7.6% (1/13) in a patient treated with chemotherapy followed by radiation, and 7.6% (1/13) with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Chemotherapy alone achieved a mPFS of 16.4 months (p < 0.0025) and mOS of 26.2 months (p < 0.0001), chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation was 13.0 months and 14.9 months respectively, while concurrent chemoradiotherapy was 6.9 months and 7.3 months. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: BRPC and LAPC patients capable of surgery after only receiving neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy had higher rates of R0 resection with prolonged median PFS and OS compared with any patient needing combination chemotherapy with radiotherapy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fluoruracila , Leucovorina , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In COVID-19, inpatient studies have demonstrated that lung ultrasound B-lines relate to disease severity and mortality and can occur in apical regions that can be imaged by patients themselves. However, as illness begins in an ambulatory setting, the aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of apical B-lines in early outpatient infection and then test the accuracy of their detection using telehealth and automated methods. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients (N = 201) with positive results for SARS-CoV-2, at least one clinical risk factor, and mild to moderate disease were prospectively enrolled at a monoclonal antibody infusion clinic. Physician imaging of the lung apices for three B-lines (ultrasound lung comet [ULC]) using 3-MHz ultrasound was performed on all patients for prevalence data and served as the standard for a nested subset (n = 50) to test the accuracy of telehealth methods, including patient self-imaging and automated B-line detection. Patient characteristics, vaccination data, and hospitalizations were analyzed for associations with the presence of ULC. RESULTS: Patients' mean age was 54 ± 15 years, and all lacked hypoxemia or fever. ULC was present in 55 of 201 patients (27%) at a median of 7 symptomatic days (interquartile range, 5-8 days) and in four of five patients who were later hospitalized (P = .03). Presence of ULC was associated with unvaccinated status (odds ratio [OR], 4.11; 95% CI, 1.85-9.33; P = .001), diabetes (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.08-6.05; P = .03), male sex (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.07-4.37; P = .03), and hypertension or cardiovascular disease (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.02-4.23; P = .04), while adjusting for body mass index > 25 kg/m2. Telehealth and automated B-line detection had 84% and 82% accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk outpatients, B-lines in the upper lungs were common in early SARS-CoV-2 infection, were related to subsequent hospitalization, and could be detected by telehealth and automated methods.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Telemedicina , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Aim: To delineate clinical correlates of COVID-19 infection severity in hospitalized patients with malignancy. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of all hospitalized patients with a hematologic and/or solid tumor malignancy presenting to the authors' institution between 1 March 2020 and 5 January 2021, with a laboratory confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine associations between specific severity outcomes and clinical characteristics. Results: Among 2771 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, 246 (8.88%) met inclusion criteria. Patients who were actively receiving treatment had an increased rate of death following admission (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7). After adjusting for significant covariates, the odds ratio increased to 4.4. Patients with cancer involvement of the lungs had a trend toward increased odds of death after adjusting for covariates (OR: 2.3). Conclusions: Among COVID-19 positive hospitalized cancer patients, systemic anti-cancer therapy was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality.
Plain language summary Though cancer is a biologically heterogenous disease with a wide spectrum of clinical features and behavior, accumulating evidence suggests that cancer patients are at greater susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and more likely to experience morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 infection than non-cancer patients. In this study, the authors reviewed the clinical characteristics of patients with a diagnosis of cancer hospitalized with COVID-19 to assess potential correlates of COVID-19 severity in this population. Notably, analysis of the hospital data revealed a statistically significant increased incidence of mortality in cancer patients who were receiving systemic anti-cancer treatment, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy or targeted therapy, than in those not on therapy. Likewise, there was a trend toward increased mortality in those with either primary or metastatic tumor involvement of the lung compared with those without lung involvement.
Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/mortalidade , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , California/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Gravidade do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Compulsive eating is an overlapping construct with binge eating that shares many characteristics with substance use disorders. Compulsive eating may impact millions of Americans; presenting in some cases of binge eating disorders, overweight/obesity, and among individuals who have not yet been diagnosed with a recognized eating disorder. To study the behavioral and neurobiological underpinnings of compulsive eating, we employ a published rodent model using cyclic intermittent access to a palatable diet to develop a self-imposed binge-withdrawal cycle. Here, we further validated this model of compulsive eating in female Wistar rats, through the lens of behavioral economic analyses and observed heightened demand intensity, inelasticity and essential value as well as increased food-seeking during extinction. Using electrophysiological recordings in the anterior insular cortex, a region previously implicated in modulating compulsive-like eating in intermittent access models, we observed functional adaptations of pyramidal neurons. Within the same neurons, application of leptin led to further functional adaptations, suggesting a previously understudied, extrahypothalamic role of leptin in modulating feeding-related cortical circuits. Collectively, the findings suggest that leptin may modulate food-related motivation or decision-making via a plastic cortical circuit that is influenced by intermittent access to a preferred diet. These findings warrant further study of whether behavioral economics analysis of compulsive eating can impact disordered eating outcomes in humans and of the translational relevance of a leptin-sensitive anterior insular circuit implicated in these behaviors.
Assuntos
Comportamento Alimentar , Leptina , Animais , Comportamento Compulsivo , Comportamento Alimentar/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Células Piramidais , Ratos , Ratos WistarAssuntos
Agendamento de Consultas , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Cirurgia de Mohs/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/radioterapia , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ambulatório Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pele/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/radioterapia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Tempo para o TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are no head-to-head studies for patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) comparing any of the 5 Food and Drug Administration-approved respiratory biologic therapies. OBJECTIVE: Explore outcomes in subjects with AERD using biologic therapies in a real-world clinic setting. METHODS: A retrospective pilot study was conducted for subjects with AERD who had been prescribed omalizumab (anti-IgE), mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), reslizumab (anti-IL-5), benralizumab (anti-IL-5 receptor alpha [anti-IL-5Rα]), or dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor alpha [anti-IL-4Rα]). Clinical outcomes pre- versus postinitiation of biologic therapy were explored including symptoms, 22-item sino-nasal outcome test scores, systemic corticosteroid and antibiotic prescriptions, and emergency room visits related to AERD. RESULTS: Of the 74 subjects, 58.1% (n = 43) had used 1 biologic, though many (41.9%, n = 31) trialed more than 1 biologic. Of the 50 subjects who had used anti-IL-4Rα therapy, 98% (49 of 50) still had this therapy prescribed at study completion compared with 48.6% (17 of 35) and 26.9% (7 of 26) of those who used anti-IgE and anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5 receptor alpha (anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα) therapy, respectively. Among those on anti-IL-4Rα therapy, there was a significant reduction in median total 22-item sino-nasal outcome test scores (51 to 19, P = .0002), corticosteroid bursts (2 to 0, P < .0001), and median number of antibiotic courses for respiratory disease (1 to 0, P = .0469) prebiologic versus postbiologic initiation. No statistically significant difference in those outcomes was observed for individuals on anti-IgE or anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-IL-4Rα therapy led to significantly higher rates of clinical improvement in AERD when compared with anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα and anti-IgE biologic therapies. Prospective studies would help clarify best practices for the use of biologic therapies in AERD.
Assuntos
Asma Induzida por Aspirina , Pólipos Nasais , Rinite , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Asma Induzida por Aspirina/terapia , Terapia Biológica , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Pólipos Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinite/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Lung ultrasound B-lines represent interstitial thickening or edema and relate to mortality in COVID-19. As B-lines can be detected with minimal training using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), we examined the frequency, clinical associations, and outcomes of B-lines when found using a simplified POCUS method in acutely ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, hospital data from COVID-19 patients who had undergone lung imaging during standard echocardiography or POCUS were reviewed for an ultrasound lung comet (ULC) sign, defined as the presence of ≥3 B-lines from images of only the antero-apex of either lung (ULC+). Clinical risk factors, oximetry and radiographic results, and disease severity were analyzed for associations with ULC+. Clinical risk factors and ULC+ were analyzed for associations with hospital mortality or the need for intensive care in multivariable models. RESULTS: Of N = 160 patients, age (mean ± standard deviation) was 64.8 ± 15.5 years, and 46 (29%) died. ULC+ was present in 100/160 (62%) of patients overall, in 81/103 (79%) of severe-or-greater disease versus 19/57 (33%) of moderate-or-less disease (P < .0001) and was associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-5.4], P = .02) and the need for intensive care (OR = 5.23 [95% CI: 2.42-12.40], P < .0001). In the multivariable models, symptom duration and severe-or-greater disease were associated with ULC+, and ULC+, diabetes, and symptom duration were associated with the need for intensive care. CONCLUSIONS: B-lines in the upper chest were common and related to disease severity, intensive care, and hospital mortality in COVID-19. Validation of a simplified lung POCUS exam could provide the evidence basis for a self-imaging application during the pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia/métodosRESUMO
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) and affective disorders are frequently comorbid and share underlying mechanisms that could be targets for comprehensive treatment. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has high comorbidity with AUD, but comprehensive models of this overlap are nascent. We recently characterized a model of comorbid AUD and PTSD-like symptoms, wherein stressed rats receive an inhibitory avoidance (IA)-related footshock on two occasions followed by two-bottle choice (2BC) voluntary alcohol drinking. Stressed rats received the second footshock in a familiar (FAM, same IA box as the first footshock) or novel context (NOV, single-chambered apparatus); the FAM paradigm more effectively increased alcohol drinking in males and the NOV paradigm in females. During abstinence, stressed males displayed avoidance-like PTSD symptoms, and females showed hyperarousal-like PTSD symptoms. Rats in the model had altered spontaneous action potential-independent GABAergic transmission in the central amygdala (CeA), a brain region key in alcohol dependence and stress-related signaling. However, PTSD sufferers may have alcohol experience prior to their trauma. Here, we therefore modified our AUD/PTSD comorbidity model to provide 3 weeks of intermittent extended alcohol access before footshock and then studied the effects of NOV and FAM stress on drinking and PTSD phenotypes. NOV stress suppressed the escalation of alcohol intake and preference seen in male controls, but no stress effects were seen on drinking in females. Additionally, NOV males had decreased action potential-independent presynaptic GABA release and delayed postsynaptic GABAA receptor kinetics in the CeA compared to control and FAM males. Despite these changes to alcohol intake and CeA GABA signaling, stressed rats showed broadly similar anxiogenic-like behaviors to our previous comorbid model, suggesting decoupling of the PTSD symptoms from the AUD vulnerability for some of these animals. The collective results show the importance of alcohol history and trauma context in vulnerability to comorbid AUD/PTSD-like symptoms.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/psicologia , Alcoolismo/terapia , Animais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Masculino , Fenótipo , Ratos , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a common recurrent glomerulopathy associated with graft loss and patient survival after kidney transplantation (KT). However, its natural history, clinical predictors, and treatment response are still poorly understood. Steroid withdrawal regimens in KT have been associated with improvements in cardiovascular risk and patient outcomes. The Scripps Center for Organ Transplantation (SCOT) uses a rapid low-dose steroid withdrawal immunosuppression (IS) protocol for KT maintenance. METHODS: We assessed the impact of our protocol on FSGS disease recurrence over a 10-y period to reassess our steroid and IS protocols and to evaluate if our patient outcomes diverge from published data. We compared 4 groups: steroids always, steroid free, steroid switch on, and steroid weaned off. We used IS and induction-matched retrospective data from United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to investigate patient and graft survival for FSGS at SCOT. RESULTS: Our analysis results differ from earlier studies showing that FSGS was associated with a higher risk of graft loss, perhaps because of selection of a UNOS data set filtered to match the SCOT IS protocol for making direct comparisons. Overall outcomes of graft failure and recipient death did not differ between SCOT patients and steroid-free transplant patient data from the UNOS data for FSGS. SCOT recurrence rate for FSGS was 7.5%, which was lower than in most published single-center studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we believe that it is safe to continue the steroid avoidance protocols at SCOT and the steroid-free protocol may not be detrimental when the adverse effects and toxicities associated with steroid use are considered.
RESUMO
AIM: This study investigates the association between ABO blood phenotype and COVID-19 severity, measured by intensive care unit admission, need for intubation, hospitalization length and death. It further explores clinical predictors of COVID-19 severity within a primarily Hispanic demographic in San Diego County. MATERIALS & METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 942 total patients, 473 with available blood type, hospitalized at five Scripps Health hospitals with COVID-19. RESULTS: No significant association was found between ABO phenotype and COVID-19 severity on multivariate analysis, while a diagnosis of anemia and male sex was associated with all severity outcomes on exploratory analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results provide relevant clinical correlates of COVID-19 severity and help better elucidate the association between ABO phenotype and COVID-19.