Bleeding assessment tools to predict von Willebrand disease: Utility of individual bleeding symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding assessment is part of the diagnostic workup of von Willebrand disease (VWD). Bleeding assessment tools (BATs) have standardized obtaining this information but have been criticized because they are time consuming. OBJECTIVE: To use our legacy data to determine which questions from BATs are the strongest predictors of a VWD diagnosis. PATIENTS/METHODS: Bleeding score data from 3 different BATs were used. Patients aged <12 years were excluded. Questions on BATs relate to different bleeding symptoms, and each symptom is scored by severity. Scores for each symptom were sorted based on whether they indicated clinically significant bleeding, and nonsignificant scores were set as the reference category. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the symptoms that were the strongest predictors of a laboratory-confirmed VWD diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 927 participants were included; 144 (16%) were patients with VWD, and 783 (84%) were healthy controls. The top 3 symptoms for which a clinically significant positive response increased the likelihood of VWD were hemarthrosis (odds ratio [OR], 19.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-100.4), postsurgical bleeding (OR, 15.2; 95% CI, 5.9-38.9), and menorrhagia (OR, 10.3; 95% CI, 4.9-21.9). With each increase in number of bleeding symptom categories with clinically significant scores, subjects had a stepwise increase in odds of a VWD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that most of the bleeding symptoms on BATs are significant predictors of VWD, and there is value in assessing multiple bleeding symptoms when eliciting a bleeding history. Certain bleeding symptoms are more useful predictors than others. Future BAT revisions may consider adding a relative weighting to each symptom.

A 14-Year Audit and Analysis of Human Skin Allograft Discards.

The objective of this study was to review the incidence of skin allograft discard and bacterial contamination due to donor bioburden at the Ontario Professional Firefighters Skin Bank over a 14-year period. We sought to determine whether modifications to our prerecovery donor preparation process have been effective in reducing skin bioburden and identify other potential risk factors of allograft contamination. A retrospective review of all skin donors (n = 259) processed from 2002 to 2015 was performed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine whether donor-related factors and procurement-related factors were significantly associated with microbial contamination predisinfection and discard secondary to contamination. Eighty-one donor recoveries were discarded (81/259; 31%) or 694 grafts (694/2636; 26%), with bacterial contamination being the most common reason for discard (29/81; 36%) followed by positive viral serology (21/81; 26%) primarily for hepatitis B core antibodies. Bacterial contamination predisinfection was detected in 46% of donors (49% of grafts). Analysis of risk factors showed that only donor preparation using a 70% alcohol spray significantly reduced odds of both bacterial contamination predisinfection (P < .0001) and discard secondary to bacterial contamination (P = .0233). Our results suggest that selective screening of donors to reduce risk of microbial contamination is unlikely to alter the rate of allograft contamination. However, use of a 70% alcohol spray during donor preparation may minimize bacterial contamination and subsequent bacterial-related discards. Given that detailed guidelines for donor preparation do not exist, use of an alcohol spray may be of value for tissue banks experiencing allograft loss due to bacterial contamination.

Iron deficiency anemia in the emergency department: over-utilization of red blood cell transfusion and infrequent use of iron supplementation.

OBJECTIVES: Three are no clinical practice guidelines that specifically address the management of patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in the emergency department (ED). The goal of this study was to describe the characteristics of IDA patients who present to the ED, documentation of IDA by emergency physicians, utilization of iron supplementation, and the appropriateness of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions ordered in the ED. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review was performed of IDA patients who visited the ED of a large tertiary center over a three-month period. Appropriateness of RBC transfusion was determined using a novel algorithm developed by our institution. RESULTS: Over the study period, there was a 0.3% (49/14,394) prevalence of IDA in the ED. In thirty (30/49; 61%) patients, IDA was documented by an emergency physician. RBC transfusions were administered to 19 patients; 10 transfusions (53%) were appropriate, 3 (16%) were appropriate for indication, but more than the required number of units were ordered, and 6 (32%) were inappropriate. Of the patients discharged, one (1/25; 4%) patient received intravenous iron in the ED and 6 of the 11 patients (55%) that were not already taking oral iron received a prescription at discharge from the ED. CONCLUSIONS: This assessment demonstrated that management of IDA patients presenting to the ED may represent an important knowledge-to-practice gap. It revealed that RBC transfusion may be over-utilized and could be replaced by safer, lower-cost alternatives such as intravenous and oral iron. Guidelines for management of IDA in the ED may be necessary to achieve consistent IDA management and avoid inappropriate use of RBC transfusion.

Evaluating appropriate red blood cell transfusions: a quality audit at 10 Ontario hospitals to determine the optimal measure for assessing appropriateness.

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the appropriateness of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requires labor-intensive medical chart audits and expert adjudication. We sought to determine the appropriateness of RBC transfusions at 10 hospitals using retrospective chart review and to determine whether simple metrics (proportion of single-unit transfusions, RBCs/100 acute inpatient days, proportion of transfusions with pretransfusion hemoglobin <80 g/L or posttransfusion hemoglobin <90 g/L) could be used as surrogate markers of appropriateness by comparing their values with the results from the audit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An initial block of 30 RBC units was dually adjudicated for appropriateness followed by additional blocks of 10 units until the difference between the cumulative percentage of appropriate RBC units in the preceding block and final block was <3%. Pearson correlation tests were used to evaluate associations between the metrics and percentages of appropriate transfusions per hospital. Two-by-two tables were used to assess the utility of the metrics to classify transfusions for appropriateness. RESULTS: Of the 498 units audited, 78% were adjudicated as appropriate (κ = 0.9603), with significant variability between institutions (p < 0.0001). Fifty audits or less were required at nine of the institutions. The values of the metrics were not found to have significant correlations with appropriateness, and the metric that misclassified the smallest proportion of transfusions for appropriateness was pretransfusion hemoglobin <80 g/L, at 24%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a chart audit of 50 RBC transfusions with adjudication using robust criteria is the optimal means of evaluating RBC transfusion appropriateness at an institution for benchmarking and quality-improvement initiatives.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in neonates at a tertiary academic hospital: a retrospective 11-year study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is used to treat a variety of diseases in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Although audits have reported on the spectrum of IVIG use in adults, the indications and utilization in neonates has not been investigated. The objectives of this study were to describe the usage pattern of and indications for IVIG in a tertiary care NICU. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all neonates who received IVIG in the NICU from January 2003 to December 2013. Data collected included patient demographic features, antenatal maternal details, neonatal laboratory results, treatment details, adverse events, and patient outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-seven neonates received IVIG over the 11-year period. Twenty-three (67%) were treated for hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN); 13 treatments were ABO related, six were anti-D related, and four were for clinically significant antibodies. Fourteen (33%) were treated for non-HDN causes, including eight for septic neonates, two for neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis, two for neonates with a clinically significant antibody but without evidence of hemolysis, and two for neonates with glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. A complete hemolytic workup was not performed consistently before the receipt of IVIG. CONCLUSIONS: This novel assessment of IVIG use in the NICU revealed the spectrum of disease for which IVIG is ordered. This study also found that key diagnostic tests needed to confirm an immune etiology for idiopathic jaundice are not performed routinely before IVIG receipt. Neonatal transfusion-related databases are needed to carry out pragmatic clinical trials to establish better evidence-based guidelines for IVIG therapy in the NICU.