Effectiveness of tixagevimab/cilgavimab in patients with hematological malignancies as a pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent severe COVID-19: a Czech retrospective multicenter study.

Despite lower virulence, the omicron variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) still poses a relevant threat for immunocompromised patients. A retrospective multicentric study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (Evusheld) with a 6-month follow-up for preventing severe COVID-19 in adult patients with hematology malignancy. Among the 606 patients in the cohort, 96 (16%) contracted COVID-19 with a median of 98.5 days after Evusheld administration. A total of 75% of patients had asymptomatic or mild severity of COVID-19, while just 25% of patients with SARS-CoV-2 positivity had to be hospitalized. Two patients (2%) died directly, and one patient (1%) in association with COVID-19. Eight patients (1.3%) of every cohort experienced adverse events related to Evusheld, mostly grade 1 and of reversible character. It was found that complete vaccination status or positive seroconversion was not associated with lower risk of COVID-19 infection. Previous treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody was associated with higher rates of COVID-19, while previous treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody was not, as was the case for recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or CAR-T cell therapy. Presence of other comorbidities was not associated with more severe COVID-19. The results support the growing evidence for Evusheld's efficacy against severe COVID-19 in patients with hematology malignancies.

Determinants of refined GvHD-free, relapse-free survival after reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with myeloid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with AML/MDS have a poor prognosis with alloHCT as the only curative option. However alloHCT is challenging given its high TRM. Recently, a composite endpoint of GRFS was proposed to define transplant success. A single centre retrospective analysis was performed to determine the main variables influencing GRFS. PATIENTS AND METHODSMETHODS: 91 consecutive patients≥ 60 years (median 64 years, range 60-74) with AML/MDS who received reduced-intensity alloHCT during 2001-2017 analysed. Disease risk index (DRI) at HCT was low/intermediate in 47pts (52%) and high in 44 pts (48%). RESULTS: After median follow-up for survivors of 56 months (range 7-144), 37 (40.6%) patients were alive. The OS, LFS and GRFS were 61.4%, 58.1%, 49.1% at 1 year and 35.5%, 32.3% and 23.1% at 5 years, respectively. The 1-year and 5-year incidences of NRM and relapse were 26.9%, 21.3% and 47.9% and 35.4%, respectively. In univariate analysis, high DRI was the strongest factor for worse OS (HR 2.121; p = 0.049), LFS (HR 1.924; p = 0.0123) and GRFS (HR 2.319; p = 0.0005). The donor age ≥ 62 years had a negative impact on OS (HR 2.110; p = 0.0345) and GRFS (HR 2.014; p = 0.0341). High DRI (HR 2.652; p = 0.0003) and donor age (HR 2.304; p = 0.0257) retained its significance in multivariate analysis for GRFS. CONCLUSION: A significant portion of older patients with myeloid malignancies survive alloHCT without experiencing GRFS event with DRI as the main determinant of outcome. Negative impact of donor age≥ 62 years suggests preference of a young donor, regardless of being related or unrelated.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma-single center experience.

The standard of care in multiple myeloma (MM) consists of induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT), but this setting doesn't present curative potential. Despite advances in new, efficient, and targeted drugs, allogeneic transplant (aloSCT) remains the modality with curative potential in MM. With the knowledge of high mortality and morbidity related to the treatment in comparison to treatment with novel drugs, there is no consensus in the indication of aloSCT in MM, also the choice of ideal patients profiting from this method is difficult. Therefore, we performed a retrospective unicentric study of 36 unselected consecutive patients transplanted for MM in the University Hospital in Pilsen between the years 2000-2020 in order to define possible variables influencing survival. The median age of the patients was 52 years (38-63) and the distribution of MM subtypes was standard. The majority of the patients were transplanted in the relapse setting, 3 (8.3%) patients in the 1st line setting, and in 7 (19%) patients elective auto-alo tandem transplant was performed. 18 patients (60% of patients with available cytogenetics (CG) had high-risk disease. 12 (33.3%) patients were transplanted with chemoresistant disease (at least PR not reached). With a median follow-up of 85 months, we observed median overall survival (OS) of 30 months (range 10-60) and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 15 months (11-175). 1- and 5-year Kaplan Meier survival probabilities for OS were 55% and 30.5% respectively. During the follow-up, 27 (75%) patients died, 11 (35%) due to treatment-related mortality (TRM), and 16 patients (44%) due to a relapse. 9 (25%) patients were still alive, 3 (8.3%) of them with complete remission (CR), and 6 (16.7%) patients with relapse/progression. Altogether 21 (58%) of the patients relapsed/progressed with a median of 11 months (3-175). Incidence of clinically significant acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD gr. >II) was low (8.3%) and extensive chronic GvHD (cGvHD) developed in 4 patients (11.1%). Univariant analysis proved marginal statistical significance in disease status before aloSCT (chemosensitive × chemoresistant) for OS, favoring patients with the chemosensitive disease (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-1.01, p=0.05), there was no significant impact of high-risk cytogenetics (CG) on survival. No other analyzed parameter was found to be significant. Our findings support the conclusion that aloSCT is able to overcome high-risk CG and that aloSCT still remains a valid treatment choice with acceptable toxicity in well-selected high-risk patients with curative potential, even though often with active disease, but not derogating the quality of life significantly.

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in MICA and MICB Genes Could Play a Role in the Outcome in AML Patients after HSCT.

NKG2D and its ligands, MICA and MICB, are known as the key regulators of NK cells. NK cells are the first reconstituted cells after the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); therefore, it is crucial to understand their role in HSCT outcome. In the presented study, we investigated the single amino acid changes across the exons 2-4 of MICA and MICB genes, and point mutations within the NKG2D gene, which defines the type of NKG2D haploblock (HNK/LNK) in the donors (n = 124), as well as in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (n = 78). In our cohort, we found that graft from a donor with at least one MICA allele containing glycine at position 14 (MICA-14Gly) is significantly associated with deterioration of a patient's overall survival (OS) (p < 0.05). We also observed a negative effect of MICB-58 (Lys → Glu) polymorphism on relapse-free survival (RFS), although it was not statistically significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.069). To our knowledge, this is the first work describing the role of MICA-14 and MICB-58 polymorphisms on HSCT outcome.

Use of letermovir in off-label indications: Infectious Diseases Working Party of European Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation retrospective study.

Letermovir (LMV) is licensed for prophylaxis of CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant adult CMV-seropositive patients. Due to its favorable safety profile, LMV brings potential for use in other clinical situations, outside the approved indication. The objective of the study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of the use of LMV in off-label indications in EBMT centers. A total of 49 patients were reported including 44 adults and 5 children. LMV was administered for: secondary prophylaxis (37 adults, 3 children), primary prophylaxis (2 children), pre-emptive treatment (5 adults), and therapy of CMV disease (2 adults; pneumonia, colitis). Cyclosporine was concomitantly used in 26 patients. Overall, LMV was used for a median 112 days (range: 10-473). Cumulative incidence of breakthrough infections during secondary prophylaxis was 10.1% (95% CI = 3.1-21.9). Prophylactic treatment with LMV resulted in 94.9% (95% CI = 81.0-98.7), and 81.9% (95% CI = 65.7-90.9) probability of, respectively, 60 and 120-day survival without CMV infection in patients receiving secondary prophylaxis. During therapy of CMV infection/disease, probability of 60 and 120-day overall survival was 100% and 71.4% (95% CI = 25.8-92.0), respectively. No breakthrough infection occurred in children on LMV prophylaxis. Adverse events were reported in 15/49 (30.4%) patients: the most common being nausea/vomiting (22.4%). In conclusion, the efficacy of the use of LMV as secondary prophylaxis was high, and the preliminary experience with the use of LMV for the treatment of patients with refractory CMV infection/disease was positive. Our data showed that higher dose or prolonged therapy did not result in increased rate of adverse events.

[Hemophagocytic lymfohistiocytosis in adults: review and case report]. / Hemofagocytární lymfohistiocytóza u dospelých: review a kazuistika.

Hemophagocytic lymfohistiocytosis (HLH) is rare, life-threatening condition, characterized by excessive activation of immune system with subsequent proinflammatory state resulting in multiorgan failure. Most frequently, it appears in infancy as a primary disorder caused by mutation of immune-regulatory genes. Increasingly, HLH is being diagnosed as a secondary - adult - form, which occurs as a result of aberrant immune response. Viral or bacterial systemic infections, malignancy with a predominance of lymphoproliferative disorders and autoimmune diseases are the most common triggers. Early diagnosis and initiation of therapy is crucial and increase the chance for recovery. HLH is usually presented as multisystem febrile illness, where an extensive differential diagnosis is needed. Diagnosis of HLH is defined by a combination of clinical and laboratory findings, eventually by a proof of specific mutation. The basic mechanism of therapy is an interruption of aberrant immune response by destruction and suppression of T-lymphocytes function. This is mostly achieved by corticosteroid and etoposide therapy. This review summarizes pathophysiology, diagnostics and therapy of HLH. Furthermore, a case-report of 22-years old patient with secondary HLH being manifested predominantly with acute respiratory failure is presented.Key words: acute respiratory failure - hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis - HLH-94 - macrophage activation syndrome - MODS.

Pre-transplant Quantitative Determination of NPM1 Mutation Significantly Predicts Outcome of AIlogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Normal Karyotype AML in Complete Remission.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) can influence the results of therapy. With the aim of evaluating the potential role of pre-transplant MRD, we studied the impact of pre-transplant MRD level on the outcome of alloHSCT in patients with AML in complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2/2005 to 9/2014, 60 patients with a median age of 54 years (range=30-66 years) with normal karyotype-AML harboring nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutation [53% Fms-related tyrosine kinase receptor 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3/ITD)-positive] in first (n=45) or second (n=15) CR underwent myeloablative (n=16) or reduced-intensity (n=44) alloHSCT (27% related, 73% unrelated). The MRD level was determined from bone marrow samples using real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection of NPM1 mutations before starting the conditioning regimen. RESULTS: The estimated probabilities of 3-year relapse, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort were 28%, 54%, and 59%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that only age over 63 years and high MRD level affected alloHSCT outcome. Pre-transplant MRD level of 10 mutant copies of NPM1 per 10,000 Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (ABL) copies had the strongest statistical significance, and detection of higher MRD level (>10 NPM1-mutant copies) before alloHSCT was associated with increased overall mortality (hazard ratio=3.71; 95% confidence interval=1.55-9.06; p=0.004). The estimated probabilities of 3-year relapse, EFS, and OS were 6%, 72%, and 75% for patients with a low level of MRD and 48%, 35%, and 40% for patients with a higher level. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that the pre-transplant level of MRD in patients with normal karyotype AML harboring NPM1 mutation in CR provides important prognostic information, which as an independent prognostic factor predicts transplant results.

On line UV-adsorbance measurements. Summary of the EDTNA/ERCA journal club discussion. Summer 2006.

The discussion was initiated by a paper comparing the measurement of dialysis dose (Kt/V) and solute clearance using on-line ultra-violet absorbance, blood and dialysate urea and ionic dialysance by Uhlin et al (NDT 2006). Participants from 14 countries discussed the theory behind the UV absorbance technique and the potential for its use in routine practice, the correlation between Kt/V measured using different methods, the use of ionic dialysance and the optimisation of dose monitoring. The 'take-home' messages from the discussion were that UV-absorbance could help ensure the delivery of dialysis dose as it provides real time feedback on the effect interventions such as repositioning of needles. The technology is relatively inexpensive and requires no consumables but changes in the dialysis machine settings could lead to misleading measurements if not communicated to the UV monitor. Session-to-session variation in dialysis dose can be measured using on-line clearance monitoring. If it is already on the machine and costs nothing, why not use it? Alternatively, regular access recirculation checks and a record of the total blood volume processed at each session allow problems with delivered dialysis dose to be picked up between routine blood tests.