Acute upper limb infections in a regional Scottish plastic surgery unit during COVID-19: Lessons learned.

Acute upper limb infections represent a large proportion of on-call referrals and emergency theatre time in plastic surgery. To enable us to maintain effective service provision despite reallocation of hospital resources as a result of COVID-19, and to minimise patient exposure in a hospital setting during the pandemic, we introduced a walk-in clinic and dedicated local anaesthetic (LA) operating theatre for these infections. In this work, we sought to analyse our service changes and resulting patient outcomes. Using electronic records, data from patients presenting with upper extremity infections was collected before the pandemic from 1st January to 30th March 2020, then for a period of three months from 30th March until 30th June 2020, after our changes were implemented. Seventy-two patients were included before 30th March 2020, and 49 patients after. Prior to our changes, most patients underwent surgery (n = 58, 80.6%), requiring overnight admission (n = 64, 88.9%), following mainly general anaesthetic procedures (n = 56, 96.6%). After our service changes, a similar percentage of patients were treated operatively (n = 41, 83.7%), but these procedures mostly utilised LA (n = 37, 90.2%) in the outpatient setting (n = 25, 51.0%). Despite this shift in management approach, no statistically significant difference in readmission rates was calculated between the two groups (p = 0.556) and post-operative complications were fewer in absolute terms. Our results suggest that in many instances, these infections can be managed in an outpatient setting without the need for inpatient care. Selective admission with strict follow-up of patients may be feasible, improving patient experience and reducing resource burden.

Comparison of long-term outcomes of breast conservation and reconstruction after mastectomy using BREAST-Q.

AIMS: Patients' post-operative wellbeing determines the impact and effectiveness of breast reshaping and reconstruction procedures. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare four different types of breast reconstruction: bilateral therapeutic mammaplasty, DIEP flap, ELD with immediate lipomodelling and implant-based reconstruction using BREAST-Q. METHODS: Patients who underwent breast reconstruction by one of the above-mentioned methods were identified from a retrospective register and sent BREAST-Q questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate analysis of BREAST-Q scores and clinical characteristics were performed for identifying trends between and within groups. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were identified with a response rate of 57%. Patients receiving implants were statistically less satisfied with breast reconstruction (mean 57%) and tended to be younger with lower BMI in comparison to other groups. There were no statistical differences in psychosocial wellbeing or patient experience between groups. Despite the fact that clinically these groups were heterogeneous, satisfaction with breast was similar in the remaining three autologous groups (range 70-75%). Detailed analysis and interpretation of quality-of-life scores, clinical differences and trends identified in the multivariate analysis along with nuances between surgical techniques used in our unit for breast reshaping and reconstruction, have been performed. CONCLUSIONS: The most important goal of breast reconstruction is to restore patients' quality of life and satisfaction with breast. Identifying factors which can potentially predict poor outcomes will improve the informed consent process and patient selection.

New technique of immediate nipple reconstruction during immediate autologous DIEP or MS-TRAM breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex is the final step in surgical restoration of the breast. Usually considered a secondary complement to breast reconstruction, nipple-areola creation is ordinarily done after an interval of several months using different techniques involving local flaps or composite graft from the opposite nipple. METHODS: Because the position of the nipple-areola complex is well defined from the outset in skin-sparing mastectomy, the authors propose a new technique of immediate nipple reconstruction using the skin envelope after skin-sparing mastectomy. A modified wise pattern design of skin-sparing mastectomy with 3 local flaps is used. The dermal-fat flaps are lifted and sutured together to form the new nipple. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (average age, 47 years; range, 33-58 years) underwent immediate nipple reconstruction between March 2010 and January 2012 (11 bilateral and 6 unilateral cases). Average follow-up was 13 months (range, 2-25 months). Aesthetic results were evaluated retrospectively from photographic documentation. A minimum average score of 7.2 points was achieved in all evaluated criteria using a 10-point scale. Patient satisfaction with nipple reconstruction was studied by means of a questionnaire. The shape of the nipple received an average of 9.7 points and the position of the nipple 9.9 points on the 10-point scale; 77% of patients were also very satisfied with nipple sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: One-stage nipple reconstruction with immediate breast reconstruction using our technique of 3 local flaps on skin envelope flap is possible. This simple, reliable, and rapid technique gives stable aesthetic results over time. Reconstruction may be completed sooner and with fewer procedures. Nipple reconstruction should no longer be considered as a secondary complement to immediate breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Our technique is suitable for patients with ptotic or hypertrophic breasts.