Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs ; 19(10): 853-9, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22296565

RESUMO

This paper reports on a collaborative research project initiated by service user representatives and led by clinicians from the mental health service in Derbyshire. The study explored the experiences of mental health service users when they either changed or terminated their use of mental health-related medications. Three focus groups were conducted with mental health service users from across the county. An inductive thematic analysis identified six key themes, three of which are reported here: the 'two faces' of service provision, describing the positive and negative experiences of services; the general practice/mental health divide, relating to the lack of continuity between the two services; and becoming an informed service user, where participants discussed the importance of seeking information. It is important that mental health professionals always consider presenting their 'best face' to service users, and facilitate the prescribing process with general practitioners. The findings also highlight the potential for supporting service users in using different sources of information to become more informed about medication.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Adesão à Medicação , Serviços de Saúde Mental/normas , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto , Grupos Focais/métodos , Humanos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa Qualitativa
2.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 16(5): 513-7, 2001 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11376468

RESUMO

AIMS: It is now well established that there are abnormalities in the sense of smell in patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease (AD). They have both raised olfactory thresholds and impaired odour identification. The situation in vascular dementia is unclear. We used the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), a 40-item, forced choice, cued, 'scratch-and- sniff' test, to examine olfactory identification in vascular dementia and to determine whether it would differentiate the disorder from AD and normal elderly. METHODS: We investigated three matched subject groups: 13 people having a Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders in the Elderly (CAMDEX) diagnosis of definite senile dementia of Alzheimer type, 13 having a CAMDEX diagnosis of definite vascular dementia and 13 non-cognitively impaired controls. The subjects were then tested with the UPSIT in their own home by an independent blind researcher to see if the test could distinguish the different diagnostic groups in this setting. RESULTS: The median UPSIT score was 30 (out of a maximum of 40) for controls, 12 for the vascular group and 15 for the AD group. The difference was significant (p = 0.05) between both demented groups and the normal controls. Similarly there was a significant difference in the UPSIT score between the AD group and controls (p = 0.001) and between the vascular dementia group and controls (p = 0.001), but there was no significant difference between the AD group and the vascular dementia group. The UPSIT score correlated strongly with the degree of cognitive impairment as measured by the CAMCOG (r(s) = 0.683, p = 0.01) CONCLUSIONS: Patients with vascular dementia had a similar degree of olfactory impairment to those with AD. The UPSIT successfully differentiated between dementia patients and normal elderly British subjects tested in their own homes. The UPSIT did not differentiate between those with AD and vascular dementia.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Cognição , Demência Vascular/diagnóstico , Transtornos do Olfato/diagnóstico , Olfato , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/psicologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Demência Vascular/psicologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-Cego
3.
Lancet ; 353(9164): 1626, 1999 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10334292
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA