The relevance of Short-Term Variation (STV) value measured within 1 hour before delivery in predicting adverse neonatal outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Computer CTG analysis (cCTG) included short-term variation (STV) is one of the methods of monitoring fetal condition during delivery. The aim of our study was to define appropriability of STV measured within 1 hour before delivery in prediction of neonatal outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective study included 1014 pregnant women, who gave birth in the Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology. Participants were divided into two groups: group 1 - term pregnancies (37-41 weeks) and group 2 - preterm pregnancies (lower than 37 weeks). In each of them, two subgroups have been separated: control (STV ≥ 3 ms) and study group (STV < 3 ms). RESULTS: In both groups 1 and 2, there were no statistically significant differences related to Apgar scores in 1st, 3rd and 5th minute between group with STV < 3 ms and group with STV > 3 ms Moreover, for 37-41 weeks the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were: 22.7%, 83.9%, 3.3% and 97.8% and for lower than 37: 45.7%, 65.4%, 47.1%, 64.2% in 1st minute after delivery. In group 1 the area under curve (AUC) measurements were 0.45 (95% CI: 0.32-0.58) for 1st minute and 0.55 (95% CI: 0.35-0.74) for 5th minute and in group 2: 0.58 (95% CI: 0.45-0.71) for 1st minute and 0.57 (95% CI: 0.42-0.72) for 5th minute. CONCLUSIONS: High specificity and negative predictive value of STV indicates a good Apgar score of newborns in term pregnancies. Analysis of STV in preterm pregnancy is not clear. Fetal well-being in preterm pregnancy should include STV and other non-invasive and invasive tools.

Effect of oligohydramnios on the accuracy of sonographic foetal weight estimation in at term pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound estimation of foetal weight is a very important aspect of antenatal care. The role of amniotic fluid volume as a potential factor which may impede the relevance of ultrasonographic foetal weight estimation is still questionable. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of isolated oligohydramnios on the accuracy of ultrasound foetal weight estimation in at term pregnancies when examination was performed within 48 h before delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included 1831 women with low-risk, singleton, at term pregnancy. Estimated foetal weight (EFW) was calculated using Hadlock-4 formula. Exclusion criteria consisted of multiple pregnancies, active phase of labour, preeclampsia, foetal growth restriction, foetal anomalies, gestational diabetes mellitus and the evidence of intrauterine infection. Isolated oligohydramnios was defined as Amniotic Fluid Index (AFI) ≤50 mm without any other foetal anomalies. EFW and actual birth weight (ABW) were compared by calculation of: absolute error (AE), absolute percentage error (APE) and substantial error (SE) = APE >10%. RESULTS: Participants were divided into 2 groups: Group 1: patients with normal AFI (50 ≤ AFI ≤250 mm; n = 1602) and Group 2: (isolated oligohydramnios, n = 229). There were not observed statistically significant differences between mean ABW and mean EFW in both groups (Group 1: p = 0.525; Group 2: p = 0.317). Mean AE in Group 1 was 221.8 g and 223.1 g in Group 2 (p = 0.919). Mean APE was 6.54% and 6.64% in Group 1 and 2 respectively (p = 0.816). SE ratio was 21.9% in Group 1 and 19.2% in Group 2. Underestimation to overestimation ratio in Group 1 was 1.01 and 0.84 in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Amniotic fluid volume has limited impact on ultrasound foetal weight estimation. In oligohydramnios group there might be a tendency of overestimation of neonatal ABW.