Incident peptic ulcers and concomitant treatment of direct oral anticoagulants and oral bisphosphonates-a real-world cohort study.

Oral bisphosphonates and direct oral anticoagulants are related to upper gastrointestinal ulcers. The present study investigated whether concomitant use of these drugs increase the risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcers and report no increased risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcers compared to the use of either drug alone, when individuals with previous upper gastrointestinal ulcers are excluded. INTRODUCTION: This study examines whether concomitant use of oral bisphosphonates (oBP) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) increases the risk of peptic ulcers more than any drug alone. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was performed. We sampled a cohort of oBP and DOAC users from a sample of 2,622,742 individuals, consisting of diabetes patients and age- and gender-matched controls, obtained from the Danish National Patient Register. The exposures were concomitant use of oBP and DOAC and single use of DOAC and single use of oBP. The primary endpoint was the first incident peptic ulcer. Information on exposure and outcome were collected from national registries. The period of observation was from 01.01.2008 until 31.12.2018. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regressions were performed. RESULTS: 8077 individuals received concomitant treatment with DOAC and oBP; 96,451 individuals used DOAC and no oBP; and 118,675 used oBP and no DOAC. The mean duration of follow-up was 1.9 years for concomitant users, 2.5 years for DOAC users, and 4.5 years for oBP users. A total of 4742 individuals with incident peptic ulcers were collected. We observed an increased risk of incident ulcer in users of DOAC and oBP compared to single DOAC treatment in the adjusted analysis (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03; 1.48). However, the effects were abolished when excluding individuals with a previous ulcer. We observed an increased risk of incident ulcer in users of DOAC and oBP compared to users of oBP in the adjusted model (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11; 1.63). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, concomitant use of oBP and DOAC is associated with a slight increase in the risk of peptic ulcers compared to either drug alone. The prescribing physician should weigh the slight increased risk of ulcer in concomitant users of oBP and DOAC with beneficial reductions in stroke and fractures.

The Impact of Exercise on Bone Health in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus-a Systematic Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased fracture risk. Weight loss in T2DM management may result in lowering of bone mass. In this systematic literature review, we aimed to investigate how exercise affects bone health in people with T2DM. Furthermore, we examined the types of exercise with the potential to prevent and treat bone fragility in people with T2DM. RECENT FINDINGS: Exercise differs in type, mechanical load, and intensity, as does the osteogenic response to exercise. Aerobic exercise improves metabolic health in people with T2DM. However, the weight-bearing component of exercise is essential to bone health. Weight loss interventions in T2DM induce a loss of bone mass that may be attenuated if accompanied by resistance or weight-bearing exercise. Combination of weight-bearing aerobic and resistance exercise seems to be preventive against excessive bone loss in people with T2DM. However, evidence is sparse and clinical trials investigating the effects of exercise on bone health in people with T2DM are warranted.

Can LDL cholesterol be too low? Possible risks of extremely low levels.

Following the continuous accumulation of evidence supporting the beneficial role of reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in the treatment and prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its complications, therapeutic possibilities now exist to lower LDL-C to very low levels, similar to or even lower than those seen in newborns and nonhuman species. In addition to the important task of evaluating potential side effects of such treatments, the question arises whether extremely low LDL-C levels per se may provoke adverse effects in humans. In this review, we summarize information from studies of human cellular and organ physiology, phenotypic characterization of rare genetic diseases of lipid metabolism, and experience from clinical trials. Specifically, we emphasize the importance of the robustness of the regulatory systems that maintain balanced fluxes and levels of cholesterol at both cellular and organismal levels. Even at extremely low LDL-C levels, critical capacities of steroid hormone and bile acid production are preserved, and the presence of a cholesterol blood-brain barrier protects cells in the central nervous system. Apparent relationships sometimes reported between less pronounced low LDL-C levels and disease states such as cancer, depression, infectious disease and others can generally be explained as secondary phenomena. Drug-related side effects including an increased propensity for development of type 2 diabetes occur during statin treatment, whilst further evaluation of more potent LDL-lowering treatments such as PCSK9 inhibitors is needed. Experience from the recently reported and ongoing large event-driven trials are of great interest, and further evaluation including careful analysis of cognitive functions will be important.

Biochemical markers of bone turnover in diabetes patients--a meta-analysis, and a methodological study on the effects of glucose on bone markers.

UNLABELLED: This study examined whether markers of bone turnover differ between individuals with and without diabetes. Bone markers showed heterogeneity between studies and were discrepant for markers of bone creation and markers of bone degradation. Bone markers may be of lesser value in diabetes due to heterogeneity. INTRODUCTION: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare existing literature regarding changes in bone markers among diabetics compared to healthy controls. To exclude that blood glucose levels among diabetes patients could influence the assays used for determining bone turnover markers, a methodological study was performed. METHODS: Medline at Pubmed Embase, Cinahl, Svemed+, Cochrane library, and Bibliotek.dk was searched in August 2012. The studies should examine biochemical bone turnover among diabetes patients in comparison to controls in an observational design. In the methodological study, fasting blood samples were drawn from two individuals. Glucose was added to the blood samples in different concentrations and OC, CTX, and procollagen type 1 amino terminal propeptide were measured after 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. RESULTS: Twenty-two papers fulfilled the criteria for the meta-analysis. From the pooled data in the meta-analysis, the bone markers osteocalcin (OC) (-1.15 ng/ml [-1.78,-0.52]) and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide (CTX) (-0.14 ng/ml [-0.22, -0.05]) were significantly lower among diabetes patients than non-diabetes patients, however other markers did not differ. All markers displayed very high heterogeneity by I2 statistics. In the methodological study, the addition of glucose did not significantly change the bone markers neither by level of glucose nor with increasing incubation time. CONCLUSION: The dissociative pattern of biochemical bone markers of bone formation and bone resorption present in diabetes patients is thus not caused by glucose per se but may be modulated by unknown factors associated with diabetes mellitus.