Flow Limitation Is Associated with Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Individuals without Moderate or Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI], >15 events/h) disturbs sleep through frequent bouts of apnea and is associated with daytime sleepiness. However, many individuals without moderate-severe OSA (i.e., AHI <15 events/h) also report sleepiness. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that sleepiness in the AHI <15 events/h group is a consequence of substantial flow limitation in the absence of overt reductions in airflow (i.e., apnea/hypopnea). Methods: A total of 1,886 participants from the MESA sleep cohort were analyzed for frequency of flow limitation from polysomnogram-recorded nasal airflow signal. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) was defined by an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score ⩾11. Covariate-adjusted logistic regression assessed the association between EDS (binary dependent variable) and frequency of flow limitation (continuous) in individuals with an AHI <15 events/h. Results: A total of 772 individuals with an AHI <15 events/h were included in the primary analysis. Flow limitation was associated with EDS (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.54; per 2-standard deviation increase in flow limitation frequency) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, race/ethnicity, and sleep duration. This effect size did not appreciably change after also adjusting for AHI. Conclusions: In individuals with an AHI <15 events/h, increasing flow limitation frequency by 2 standard deviations is associated with a twofold increase in the risk of EDS. Future studies should investigate addressing flow limitation in low-AHI individuals as a potential mechanism for ameliorating sleepiness.

Increased Flow Limitation During Sleep Is Associated With Increased Psychomotor Vigilance Task Lapses in Individuals With Suspected OSA.

BACKGROUND: Impaired daytime vigilance is an important consequence of OSA, but several studies have reported no association between objective measurements of vigilance and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Notably, the AHI does not quantify the degree of flow limitation, that is, the extent to which ventilation fails to meet intended ventilation (ventilatory drive). RESEARCH QUESTION: Is flow limitation during sleep associated with daytime vigilance in OSA? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nine hundred ninety-eight participants with suspected OSA completed a 10-min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) before same-night in-laboratory polysomnography. Flow limitation frequency (percent of flow-limited breaths) during sleep was quantified using airflow shapes (eg, fluttering and scooping) from nasal pressure airflow. Multivariable regression assessed the association between flow limitation frequency and the number of lapses (response times > 500 ms, primary outcome), adjusting for age, sex, BMI, total sleep time, depression, and smoking status. RESULTS: Increased flow limitation frequency was associated with decreased vigilance: a 1-SD (35.3%) increase was associated with 2.1 additional PVT lapses (95% CI, 0.7-3.7; P = .003). This magnitude was similar to that for age, where a 1-SD increase (13.5 years) was associated with 1.9 additional lapses. Results were similar after adjusting for AHI, hypoxemia severity, and arousal severity. The AHI was not associated with PVT lapses (P = .20). In secondary exploratory analysis, flow limitation frequency was associated with mean response speed (P = .012), median response time (P = .029), fastest 10% response time (P = .041), slowest 10% response time (P = .018), and slowest 10% response speed (P = .005). INTERPRETATION: Increased flow limitation during sleep was associated with decreased daytime vigilance in individuals with suspected OSA, independent of the AHI. Flow limitation may complement standard clinical metrics in identifying individuals whose vigilance impairment most likely is explained by OSA.

Nasal Pressure Derived Airflow Limitation and Ventilation Measurements are Resilient to Reduced Signal Quality.

Obstructive sleep apnea is a disorder characterized by partial or complete airway obstructions during sleep. Our previously published algorithms use the minimally invasive nasal pressure signal routinely collected during diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) to segment breaths and estimate airflow limitation (using flow:drive) and minute ventilation for each breath. The first aim of this study was to investigate the effect of airflow signal quality on these algorithms, which can be influenced by oronasal breathing and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). It was hypothesized that these algorithms would make inaccurate estimates when the expiratory portion of breaths is attenuated to simulate oronasal breathing, and pink noise is added to the airflow signal to reduce SNR. At maximum SNR and 0% expiratory amplitude, the average error was 2.7% for flow:drive, -0.5% eupnea for ventilation, and 19.7 milliseconds for breath duration (n = 257,131 breaths). At 20 dB and 0% expiratory amplitude, the average error was -15.1% for flow:drive, 0.1% eupnea for ventilation, and 28.4 milliseconds for breath duration (n = 247,160 breaths). Unexpectedly, simulated oronasal breathing had a negligible effect on flow:drive, ventilation, and breath segmentation algorithms across all SNRs. Airflow SNR ≥ 20 dB had a negligible effect on ventilation and breath segmentation, whereas airflow SNR ≥ 30 dB had a negligible effect on flow:drive. The second aim of this study was to explore the possibility of correcting these algorithms to compensate for airflow signal asymmetry and low SNR. An offset based on estimated SNR applied to individual breath flow:drive estimates reduced the average error to ≤ 1.3% across all SNRs at patient and breath levels, thereby facilitating for flow:drive to be more accurately estimated from PSGs with low airflow SNR.Clinical Relevance- This study demonstrates that our airflow limitation, ventilation, and breath segmentation algorithms are robust to reduced airflow signal quality.

Zebrafish as an appealing model for optogenetic studies.

Optogenetics, the use of light-based protein tools, has begun to revolutionize biological research. The approach has proven especially useful in the nervous system, where light has been used both to detect and to manipulate activity in targeted neurons. Optogenetic tools have been deployed in systems ranging from cultured cells to primates, with each offering a particular combination of advantages and drawbacks. In this chapter, we provide an overview of optogenetics in zebrafish. Two of the greatest attributes of the zebrafish model system are external fertilization and transparency in early life stages. Combined, these allow researchers to observe the internal structures of developing zebrafish embryos and larvae without dissections or other interference. This transparency, combined with the animals' small size, simple husbandry, and similarity to mammals in many structures and processes, has made zebrafish a particularly popular model system in developmental biology. The easy optical access also dovetails with optogenetic tools, allowing their use in intact, developing, and behaving animals. This means that optogenetic studies in embryonic and larval zebrafish can be carried out in a high-throughput fashion with relatively simple equipment. As a consequence, zebrafish have been an important proving ground for optogenetic tools and approaches and have already yielded important new knowledge about the neural circuits underlying behavior. Here, we provide a general introduction to zebrafish as a model system for optogenetics. Through descriptions and analyses of important optogenetic studies that have been done in zebrafish, we highlight the advantages and liabilities that the system brings to optogenetic experiments.