A Multicenter Prospective Trial of Electronic Skin Surface Brachytherapy for Keratinocyte Carcinoma: Early Cosmesis, Quality of Life, and Adverse Events.

PURPOSE: Keratinocyte carcinomas are amenable to many treatments, including radiation therapy (RT). Electronic skin surface brachytherapy (ESSB) enables the precise delivery of radiation without radioisotopes. In this prospective multicenter clinical trial, we characterized early outcomes of ESSB prospectively through both patient- and clinician-reported measures. To corroborate the cosmesis observations, we also assessed patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and adverse events. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients ≥60 years old with stage T1N0M0 keratinocyte carcinoma were treated with ESSB. At 2-, 6-, and 12-weeks post-treatment, cosmesis from ESSB was assessed by both the patient and a clinician study investigator as either "good," "fair," or "bad." The Skindex-16 and the Skin Cancer Index (SCI) were used to assess patient QoL before and after treatment. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: Cosmesis and QoL were collected at 97% (99/102) of possible patient follow-up times. By 12 weeks post-treatment, 93.9% (31/33) of patient-reported and 96.9% (31/32) of clinician-reported cosmesis outcomes were "good." Compared with baseline, total Skindex-16 score significantly deteriorated at 2 weeks post-treatment (10.5 vs 24.5, P <.001), but significantly improved at 6 weeks (10.5 vs 4.7, P = .014) and 12 weeks (10.5 vs 2.1, P = .001) post-treatment. The total SCI score significantly improved from baseline to 6 weeks (78.4 vs 89.0, P = .001) post-treatment. The most frequent adverse events were radiation dermatitis, skin pain, and pruritus. All adverse events resolved to Grade ≤1 by 12 weeks post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, multicenter study demonstrated that ESSB is associated with a high rate of "good" early patient-reported cosmesis and increasing QoL and satisfaction with time. Validated assessments demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life and resolution of moderate early adverse events by 6 to 12 weeks after treatment and corroborate the observation of favorable cosmesis.

Randomized Phase II Trial of Proton Craniospinal Irradiation Versus Photon Involved-Field Radiotherapy for Patients With Solid Tumor Leptomeningeal Metastasis.

PURPOSE: Photon involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) is the standard-of-care radiotherapy for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) from solid tumors. We tested whether proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) encompassing the entire CNS would result in superior CNS progression-free survival (PFS) compared with IFRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized, phase II trial of pCSI versus IFRT in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and breast cancers with LM. We enrolled patients with other solid tumors to an exploratory pCSI group. For the randomized groups, patients were assigned (2:1), stratified by histology and systemic disease status, to pCSI or IFRT. The primary end point was CNS PFS. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TAEs). RESULTS: Between April 16, 2020, and October 11, 2021, 42 and 21 patients were randomly assigned to pCSI and IFRT, respectively. At planned interim analysis, a significant benefit in CNS PFS was observed with pCSI (median 7.5 months; 95% CI, 6.6 months to not reached) compared with IFRT (2.3 months; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.8 months; P < .001). We also observed OS benefit with pCSI (9.9 months; 95% CI, 7.5 months to not reached) versus IFRT (6.0 months; 95% CI, 3.9 months to not reached; P = .029). There was no difference in the rate of grade 3 and 4 TAEs (P = .19). In the exploratory pCSI group, 35 patients enrolled, the median CNS PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4 to 9.1 months) and OS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 11 months). CONCLUSION: Compared with photon IFRT, we found pCSI improved CNS PFS and OS for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and breast cancer with LM with no increase in serious TAEs.

Uveal melanoma metastatic at initial diagnosis: a case series.

Detectable metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis of uveal melanoma (UM) is rare. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes in patients with metastatic UM (MUM) at initial diagnosis. An institutional review board-approved retrospective case series analysis was performed in 21 patients that presented for management of MUM at initial diagnosis. Patient, tumor and treatment parameters were recorded, and ophthalmic symptoms, metastasis response and overall survival were assessed. Among 21 patients, median tumor diameter was 18 mm (range, 9.1-35 mm), with 76% classified as a Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) large size. Sites of metastasis included liver (95%), bone (29%) and lung (29%), among others, and were confirmed by biopsy in 95% of patients studied. Symptomatic primary tumors were present in 81%, causing pain (24%) or vision loss (57%). Primary tumor therapy (PTT) was provided upfront for 52% of patients with enucleation (24%) and brachytherapy (29%). Eye pain developed 3-6 months after diagnosis in four of 10 patients who did not receive upfront PTT, whereas it did not occur in any of the 11 patients who received upfront PTT (P = 0.04). PTT palliated pain in all cases. The median overall survival was 11.9 months (range, 2.5-21.1 months). Patients presenting with MUM at initial diagnosis have high-risk tumors and experience survival like patients who develop metastases metachronously. PTT is not associated with survival but may mitigate ophthalmic symptoms, especially in patients with large tumors at risk for causing symptoms.