Maintaining Joint Line Obliquity Optimizes Outcomes of Functional Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Constitutionally Varus Knees.

BACKGROUND: Functional alignment (FA) strives to balance the knee soft-tissue envelope during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using implant alignment adjustments rather than soft-tissue releases. There is a debate on how best to achieve FA. We compared minimum two-year outcomes between FA with a mechanical alignment plan [FA(m)] and FA with a kinematic alignment plan [FA(k)]. The null hypothesis was that there would be no difference in outcomes between FA(m) and FA(k). METHODS: Prospective data was collected from 300 consecutive robotic-assisted FA TKAs [135 FA(m) and 165 FA(k)]. Patient reported outcomes were obtained preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. The coronal plane alignment of the knee classification was used to classify knee alignment phenotypes. RESULTS: Overall limb alignment was equivalent between groups. Final implant alignment was different between FA(m) and FA(k) groups, with FA(k) TKAs having higher tibial varus (P < .01), higher femoral valgus (P < .01), and higher joint line obliquity (P < .01). Patients reported higher Forgotten Joint Score-12 scores with FA(k) TKAs (79.4 versus 71.6, P = .018) and greater range of motion (125 versus 121°; P = .003). Patients who had constitutional varus reported the greatest improvement with FA(k) technique (Forgotten Joint Score at minimum 2 years of 89 versus 65; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Utilizing an individualized alignment plan [FA(k)] led to a final implant position with greater joint line obliquity, yet the same overall limb alignment. This was associated with improved outcomes at 2 years post-TKA in patients who had constitutional varus. Three-dimensional component position and joint line obliquity affect the outcomes following TKA independently of coronal limb alignment.

Arthroscopic reduction and percutaneous fixation of selected calcaneus fractures: surgical technique and early results.

OBJECTIVES: To highlight a technique combining fluoroscopy and arthroscopy to aid percutaneous reduction and internal fixation of selected displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, assess outcome scores, and compare this method with other previously reported percutaneous methods. DESIGN: Retrospective review of all patients treated by this technique between June 2009 and June 2012. SETTING: A tertiary care center located in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. PATIENTS: Thirteen consecutive patients were treated by this method during this period. All patients had a minimum of 13 months follow-up and were available for radiological checks and assessment of complications; functional outcome scores were available for 9 patients. INTERVENTION: The patient was placed in a lateral decubitus position. Reduction was achieved with the aid of both intraoperative fluoroscopy and subtalar arthroscopy and held with cannulated screws in orthogonal planes. The patient was mobilized non-weight bearing for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Outcomes measured were improvement in Bohler angle, postoperative complications, and 3 functional outcome scores (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, Foot Function Index, and Calcaneal Fracture Scoring System). RESULTS: Mean postoperative improvement in Bohler angle was 18.3 degrees, with subsidence of 1.7 degrees. Functional outcome scores compared favorably with the prior literature. Based on available postoperative computed tomography scans (8/13), maximal residual articular incongruity measured 2 mm or less in 87.5% of our cases. CONCLUSIONS: Early results indicate that this technique, when combined with careful patient selection, offers a valid therapeutic option for the treatment of a distinct subset of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures, with diminished risk of wound complications. Large, prospective multicenter studies will be necessary to better evaluate the potential benefits of this technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Therapeutic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.