AROME-ESO Oncology Consensus Conference: access to cancer care innovations in countries with limited resources. Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the Mediterranean Area (AROME-Paris) and European School of Oncology (ESO - Milan).

PURPOSE: Cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Its incidence is still increasing, particularly in developing countries. Recent progresses further strengthen the differences between low/middle and high-income countries. This situation calls for joint action to reduce inequities in cancer outcomes among the patients. The Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the Mediterranean Area (AROME) and the European School of Oncology (ESO), have initiated joint conferences devoted to access to innovations in oncology in the Mediterranean area. The heterogeneity of the economic, political and cultural situations of the different participating countries, offers the opportunity to develop consensus conference. METHODS: Cancer prevention and treatment strategies were discussed according to existing international guidelines. The Scientific committee prepared 111 questions with an objective to prioritize the access to treatments and innovations in low/middle-income Mediterranean countries. The results from the votes of 65 oncology experts, coming from 16 countries and 33 institutions have been analysed and access priorities classified accordingly. RESULTS: Ninety six percent of the proposed general recommendations concerning national health care strategies, oncology education, and treatment organization were considered to be high priorities. Regarding access to systemic treatments, 41% of the drugs without validated predictive markers and 53% of those with validated predictive markers were considered to be 1st level priority. Only 4 biological tests were considered to be 1st level priority to access to innovation. CONCLUSIONS: AROME-ESO consensus offers to cancer specialists from developing countries a basis for discussion with health authorities and payers on the prioritization of access to innovations in cancer care.

Depression and Resilience in Breast Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVE: A significant number of breast cancer patients, during their life with the diagnosis, experience emotional distress in the form of depression and anxiety. Psychological resilience is the ability of a person to protect his/her mental health when faced with adverse circumstances such as the cancer diagnosis. This study aims to assess the resilience in breast cancer patients and to explore whether depression affects the resilience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred eighteen (218) women, treated for early breast cancer responded to Connor - Davidson Resilience Scale and Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale, in order to assess the level of psychological resilience and the level of depression. RESULTS: There is a significant negative correlation between depression and resilience in our sample (r = - 0.562, p < 0.001). Individuals with higher levels of depression have lower levels of psychological resilience. There is no statistically significant correlation between the ages of the participants; time passed since diagnosis, cancer stage and resilience levels. CONCLUSION: This study shows that patients who are less depressed have higher levels of resilience and that psychological resilience may independently contribute to lower levels of depression among breast cancer patients. The level of psychological resilience may be a protective factor for depression and psychological distress.

Resilience and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that a relationship exists between quality of life (QoL) and resilience in breast cancer patients, but few studies present information on the nature of this relationship of resilience on QoL. Our aim was to examine the relationship between resilience and quality of life in breast cancer patients. METHODS: QoL was measured in 218 consequent breast cancer patients, with EORTC - QLQ Core 30 questionnaire, and EORTC QLQ-BR23. The resilience was measured with Connor Davidson Resilience Scale. RESULTS: The global quality of life was positively correlated with the levels of resilience (R = 0.39 p < 0.001). All functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning was in a positive correlation with resilience. The symptoms severity (fatigue, nausea and vomitus, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties) was in negative correlation with resilience. Less resilient breast cancer patients reported worse body image and future perspective and suffered from more severe adverse effects of systemic therapy, and arm/breast symptoms. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that psychological resilience affects different aspects of health-related quality of life. More resilient patients have significantly better quality of life in almost all aspects of QoL.

Long-term survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with continuous intravenous infusion of recombinant interleukin-2: the experience of a single institution.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is one of the few tumors for which a clear benefit of immunotherapy has been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, along with response rate and other prognostic and predictive factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and May 1995, 56 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated in a single institution with high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 in continuous infusion. Survival was measured by the Kaplan and Meier method. Prognostic factors were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses of survival (Cox proportional hazard ratio model). RESULTS: Of 56 patients, 15 had objective responses (26.8%), 16 stable disease (28.6%), 18 disease progressions (32.1%), and 7 (12.5%) were not valuable for response. Median overall survival was 20 months, and probability of 2- and 5-year survival was 41% and 21%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, the increased risk of death for: performance status > or = 2 vs 0 (HR = 6.20), stable disease (HR = 1.87), disease progression (HR = 10.61) vs partial or complete remission, and for hypotension and oliguria toxicity, G3 + G4 vs G1 + G2 (HR = 2.19). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the activity of IL-2 based immunotherapy in renal cell carcinoma. Moreover, ECOG performance status, clinical response, hypotension and oliguria toxicity resulted as independent survival prognostic factors.