Timing and volume of transfusion for adult major trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock: a registry-based cohort study.

Introduction: Transfusion of blood components is vital for the resuscitation of injured patients in hemorrhagic shock. Delays in initiating transfusion have been associated with harm, as has excess transfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate variables associated with hospital mortality, with a focus on the two modifiable risk factors- time to initiate transfusion and volume of blood components-with hospital mortality. Methods: This was a registry-based cohort study, including all consecutive adult patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock (systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤90 mm Hg and transfusion of blood components) to a level 1 adult trauma center during a 5-year period (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2021). Associations with hospital mortality were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis, with final models developed using backward elimination. Results: There were 195 patients included and there were 49 (25.1%) in-hospital deaths. The median time to first transfusion was 10 (IQR 6-16) minutes. Age (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.08), initial SBP (aOR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.98), intracranial bleeding or diffuse axonal injury (aOR 2.63; 95% CI: 1.11 to 6.23), and the volume of blood components in the first 4 hours (aOR 1.08; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.13) were associated with mortality. Time to transfusion was not associated with in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.03). Among the 90 patients who underwent urgent transfer to the operating room or angiography suite, the median time to transfer was 2.38 hours (IQR 1.5-3.7). In this subgroup, age (aOR 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.18) and volume of blood components (aOR 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.34) were associated with mortality. Discussion: In this setting where times to transfusion are short, further reductions in the time to transfusion are unlikely to improve outcome. In our population, for every unit of blood component transfused, the adjusted odds of death increased by 8%. These findings suggest investigation into strategies to achieve earlier control of hemorrhage. Level of evidence: III.

Prevalence of alcohol and other drug detections in non-transport injury events.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the prevalence of alcohol and/or other drug (AOD) detections in suspected major trauma patients with non-transport injuries who presented to an adult major trauma centre. METHODS: This registry-based cohort study examined the prevalence of AOD detections in patients aged ≥18 years who: (i) sustained non-transport injuries; and (ii) met predefined trauma call-out criteria and were therefore managed by an interdisciplinary trauma team between 1 July 2021 and 31 December 2022. Prevalence was measured using routine in-hospital blood alcohol and urine drug screens. RESULTS: A total of 1469 cases met the inclusion criteria. Of cases with a valid blood test (n = 1248, 85.0%), alcohol was detected in 313 (25.1%) patients. Of the 733 (49.9%) cases with urine drug screen results, cannabinoids were most commonly detected (n = 103, 14.1%), followed by benzodiazepines (n = 98, 13.4%), amphetamine-type substances (n = 80, 10.9%), opioids (n = 28, 3.8%) and cocaine (n = 17, 2.3%). Alcohol and/or at least one other drug was detected in 37.4% (n = 472) of cases with either a blood alcohol or urine drug test completed (n = 1263, 86.0%). Multiple substances were detected in 16.6% (n = 119) of cases with both blood alcohol and urine drug screens (n = 718, 48.9%). Detections were prevalent in cases of interpersonal violence (n = 123/179, 68.7%) and intentional self-harm (n = 50/106, 47.2%), and in those occurring on Friday and Saturday nights (n = 118/191, 61.8%). CONCLUSION: AOD detections were common in trauma patients with non-transport injury causes. Population-level surveillance is needed to inform prevention strategies that address AOD use as a significant risk factor for serious injury.

Giving Voice to Medicaid: Waivers, Public Comments and Kentucky's "Secret Sauce".

In the 21st century the opportunity for the public to comment to an administrative agency typically means an invitation to go to a website, type words into a box, and hit send. Many advocacy groups provide templates for people to submit a statement in support or opposition to specific proposals. However, standardized comments do not capture the voice of Medicaid. They do not share people's personal experiences and insights. This article describes how consumer advocates in Kentucky devised a strategy, their Secret Sauce, to help consumers participate in the public comment process that is now required for Section 1115 Medicaid demonstration waiver applications. It shows how advocates can help real people's voices be heard in the public comment process, not through templates but through a process that assists people to tell their own stories in their own words. This is Medicaid's voice, the stories of real people who rely on Medicaid. Medicaid's voice can help policy makers understand the real-life impact of policy choices they make. It can also provide relevant evidence for courts reviewing the Secretary's grant of a Section 1115 waiver. Medicaid's voice can also help build political momentum, bringing those who rely on Medicaid to the polls and into the political conversation about the future of Medicaid.

Victim service and justice system representative responses about partner stalking: what do professionals recommend?

Research suggests that partner stalking is associated with reassault and lethality as well as increased psychological distress for victims. However, there is a significant gap in information about stalking interventions and the responses of health, mental health, law enforcement, social services, and criminal justice professionals to women experiencing partner stalking. The purpose of this study is to examine the ideas about appropriate and effective responses to stalking victims from professionals in victim services and the justice system. The study also examined differences among rural and urban representatives because prior studies have shown significant differences between rural and urban areas on experiences and responses to partner violence. A total of 152 key informants (38 urban and 114 rural) were interviewed. Study results suggest a need for more training for victim services and justice system professionals on stalking and service needs of women who experience stalking in the context of partner violence.