Load analysis of hands and feet while using different types of crutches with various leg's weight bearing.

The study aimed to define the load on hands using various commonly used types of crutches while walking with a full load on both legs (FL), with 20 kg partial load (PL), or with the left leg wholly unloaded (UL). Twenty-six healthy subjects used crutches with ergonomic handles, with anatomic handles (wider and softer bearing surface), and arthritis crutches (horizontal supporting area for the forearm). Sensor mats between hand and handles continuously measured the load transmitted, while sensor soles in the shoes recorded the ground reaction forces simultaneously. The load on the palm and separately the radial and ulnar halves of the palm were analyzed. With arthritis crutches, significantly lower load was transferred to the hands compared to forearm crutches (FL 3% vs. 25% of body weight, PL 8% vs. 87%, UL 12% vs. 103%). The load on hands increased significantly from FL to PL and UL for both types of crutches. The ipsilateral left hand had to bear significantly more load than the right hand. However, the feet's time-ground reaction curves showed more irregularities, and PL on the left leg was significantly higher with arthritis crutches. Anatomic handles reduced the load on the ulnar half of the palm (FL 3% vs. 5%, PL 13% vs. 18%, UL 17% vs. 23%); the radial half of the palm had a similar load to bear with both types of handles (11/11%, 31/32%, 34/35%). Arthritis crutches allow unburdening hands at the expense of gait stability. Anatomic handles reduce the load on the Guyon's canal.

Impact of diabetes on clinical outcome in severely burned patients.

INTRODUCTION: According to the International Diabetes Federation, approximately 425 million people worldwide suffer from diabetes mellitus, a figure that will double in the next 20 years. Data on the ratio of treated diabetics in burn intensive care units remain scarce and the effects on the mortality rate are poorly defined. METHODS: Our retrospective, single-centre study aimed to evaluate differences in the risk factors due to diabetes mellitus, the clinical outcome and the patient population of diabetic patients after severe burn injuries over a time period of 21 years. RESULTS: Despite increasing numbers of diabetic patients, the ratio of burn patients suffering from diabetes remained stable during the study period. The risk factors for mortality were higher age (OR 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.04, p < 0.0001), female sex (OR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.06-2.29, p = 0.025), higher % total body surface area (TBSA) (OR 3.88, 95% CI, 2.81-5.46, p < 0.0001), full thickness burns (OR 8.58, 95% CI, 3.84 - 23.60, p < 0.0001) and the presence of inhalation injuries (OR 4.68, 95% CI, 3.15-7.02, p < 0.0001) Patients with diabetes had a smaller extent of burned areas with a median TBSA of 30% (quartiles: 22-50%, p = 0.036) compared to non-diabetic patients (35% (25-55%)) but had a similar length of stay with a median of 29 (quartiles: 13-44) days vs. 23 (10-48) days. Outcome analysis showed an overall mortality of 35.6%. Diabetes was not associated with higher mortality rate after burn injury in a univariate model (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.92-3.51). After correction for %TBSA, the effect of diabetes on mortality was significant (OR 2.80, 95% CI, 1.33-5.90). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate higher mortality rates (50-100%) of diabetic patients with TBSA greater than 40% in severely burned patients compared to non-diabetic patients without a significant outcome due to the low number of cases in the subgroup analyses.

[Infections of the Proximal and Distal Interphalangeal Joint: 4 weeks of Immobilisation between initial Surgery with Joint Resection and secondary Joint Fusion is sufficient]. / Fingerend- und Fingermittelgelenksinfektionen: 4-wöchige Ruhigstellung zwischen Primäreingriff mit Gelenkresektion und sekundärer Arthrodese ausreichend.

BACKGROUND: In 2011 we published our treatment regime for infections of the interphalangeal joints of the hand with infection-related macroscopic cartilage damage. We recommended the resection of the infected joint followed by 6 weeks of immobilisation by external fixation before secondary arthrodesis. In 2013 we reduced the period of immobilisation to 4 weeks within a prospective study. PURPOSE: This paper analyses the effect of a shortened immobilisation time of 4 instead of 6 weeks between joint resection and secondary joint fusion in bacterial infection of the proximal and distal interphalangeal joint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2013 and July 2014, 20 patients with an infection of an interphalangeal joint of the hand were treated by joint resection and secondary arthrodesis after a reduced time of immobilisation of 4 weeks. The patients were clinically and radiologically evaluated at median of 5,8 (4,7-10,5) months. The results were statistically analysed and compared with the previous study published 2011. RESULTS: The reduced immobilisation period from 6 to 4 weeks did not result in a significant difference of revisions (p = 0.148). In 18 of 20 patients, the joint infection was reliably cured and the following arthrodesis consolidated. One patient required a revision surgery due to a persistent joint infection, a second patient got a revision surgery after arthrodesis because of a displaced implant. The range of motion of the infected finger was median 147.5 (30-220)°. Achieving a grip strength of 26 (4-64) kg, the affected hand reached 88.5 (47,8-223,1) % of the strength of the opposite side. The subjective functioning of the hand was good (DASH 37.9 (3.3-71.7), Krimmer-Score 2 (1-4)). We did not observe any persistent pain at rest (VAS 0 (0-3)) or under daily activities (VAS 1.3 (0-7)). 50 % of patients stated a sensitivity to cold. Our study of 2011 revealed similar results (ROM of the infected finger 142.5 (30-220)°, grip strength 95 (33-127)%, DASH-Score 23.3 (0-130), Krimmer Score 2 (1-4), VAS at rest 0 (0-7), VAS under stress 4.5 (0-9), sensitivity to cold in 41 % of 27 patients). CONCLUSION: A decreased immobilisation period from 6 to 4 weeks between joint resection and secondary arthrosis for infections of the interphalangeal joints of the hand do not lead to a negative outcome. The described therapeutical regime results in reliable cure of the bacterial joint infection with a good function of the finger and only minor subjective discomfort.

Does obesity impact the outcome of severely burned patients?

Although obesity appears to be an important predictor of mortality and morbidity, little data about the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the outcome of severely burned patients are available. Patients admitted to the General Hospital Vienna between 1994 and 2014, who underwent surgery because of burn injuries, were enrolled in this study. BMI was used to divide patients into five groups: BMI 18.5 to 24.9, 25 to 29.9, 30 to 34.9, 35 to 39.9, and > 40. The groups were compared in terms of difference of mortality and morbidity. Of 460 patients, 34.3% (n = 158) died. Mortality rates were the lowest in patients with obesity class III and the highest in patients with BMI 35 to 39.9 (BMI 18.5-24.9: 30.5%, BMI 25-29.9: 31.5%, BMI 30-34.9: 41.3%, BMI 35-39.9: 55.5%, BMI > 40: 30%; P = .031). BMI was not found to be an independent risk factor when corrected with age, percent total body surface area burned, full-thickness burns, and inhalation injury. No significant differences in length of stay, inhalation trauma, pneumonia, wound infection, sepsis, and invasive ventilation were observed. BMI as an independent risk factor for severely burned patients could not be confirmed via multivariate analysis.