Use of lipoglycopeptides for moderate to severe ABSSSI in the emergency department.

The burden of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) continue to plague the healthcare system. One approach to managing moderate-to-severe ABSSSI in low-risk patients involves use of a single dose lipoglycopeptide (LGP), dalbavancin or oritavancin, in the emergency department (ED) and discharge to home with follow-up care. Limited ED studies indicate decreased hospital stays, ED revisits, readmissions, and healthcare costs, as well as improved patient satisfaction with use of these antibiotics. However, existing literature has limitations and gaps, such as insufficient quantifiable data on patient selection criteria, outcome predictors, and risk factors leading to treatment failure. Moreover, there is lack of research on the impact of LGPs on organizational productivity, patient quality of life, and utility in indications beyond ABSSSI. This review focuses on the role of long-acting LGPs in the ED setting for select patients presenting with ABSSSI, aiming to avoid hospitalizations, expedite patient discharge, and prevent readmissions while acknowledging potential limitations of therapy. Additionally, it provides insights into strategies and considerations specifically relevant to implementing this therapeutic approach in the ED.

Implementation of a Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Platform for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections With Paired Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention: Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze?

BACKGROUND: Implementation of the Accelerate PhenoTM Gram-negative platform (RDT) paired with antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention projects to improve time to institutional-preferred antimicrobial therapy (IPT) for Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, few data describe the impact of discrepant RDT results from standard of care (SOC) methods on antimicrobial prescribing. METHODS: A single-center, pre-/post-intervention study of consecutive, nonduplicate blood cultures for adult inpatients with GNB BSI following combined RDT + ASP intervention was performed. The primary outcome was time to IPT. An a priori definition of IPT was utilized to limit bias and to allow for an assessment of the impact of discrepant RDT results with the SOC reference standard. RESULTS: Five hundred fourteen patients (PRE 264; POST 250) were included. Median time to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results decreased 29.4 hours (P < .001) post-intervention, and median time to IPT was reduced by 21.2 hours (P < .001). Utilization (days of therapy [DOTs]/1000 days present) of broad-spectrum agents decreased (PRE 655.2 vs POST 585.8; P = .043) and narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased (69.1 vs 141.7; P < .001). Discrepant results occurred in 69/250 (28%) post-intervention episodes, resulting in incorrect ASP recommendations in 10/69 (14%). No differences in clinical outcomes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: While implementation of a phenotypic RDT + ASP can improve time to IPT, close coordination with Clinical Microbiology and continued ASP follow up are needed to optimize therapy. Although uncommon, the potential for erroneous ASP recommendations to de-escalate to inactive therapy following RDT results warrants further investigation.

Implementation of a pharmacist-driven immunization program designed to improve overall vaccination rates in indigent and uninsured patients.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the results of a pharmacist-driven immunization program designed to increase overall vaccination rates among the low-income, uninsured patients in a free clinic. SETTING: Cape Fear Clinic, a free clinic located in Wilmington, North Carolina. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Cape Fear Clinic provides medical, pharmacy, mental health, and dental services to adults in 4 eastern North Carolina counties who are uninsured and have incomes of no more than 200% of Federal Poverty Guidelines. PRACTICE INNOVATION: A pharmacist-driven immunization program consisting of a comprehensive chart review of every active clinic patient in order to improve the vaccination status of the clinic's patients at no cost to the patient. INTERVENTIONS: Student pharmacists completed a comprehensive chart review of every active clinic patient to identify patients eligible for immunizations according to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidelines. EVALUATION: More than 500 patients eligible for immunizations were notified of their immunization status and educated about indicated vaccinations. Patients willing to receive indicated vaccinations would present to the pharmacy and a pharmacist or student pharmacist administered the necessary doses. RESULTS: The vaccine initiative was introduced January 1, 2015 and has since delivered 1878 doses of vaccines as of June 30, 2016. CONCLUSION: The immunization program implemented by pharmacists and student pharmacists at Cape Fear Clinic has been successful in increasing awareness of vaccine preventable diseases as well as increasing rates of vaccination among eligible clinic patients.