Sensorimotor function and standing balance in older adults with transtibial limb loss.

BACKGROUND: Limited research has focused on older prosthesis users despite the expected compounded effects of age and amputation on sensorimotor function, balance, and falls. This study compared sensorimotor factors and standing balance between older individuals with and without transtibial amputation, hypothesizing that prosthesis users would demonstrate worse sensorimotor function. Secondarily we assessed the relationship between standing balance and somatosensation in prosthesis users. METHODS: Thirteen persons with unilateral transtibial amputation (71.7 years) and 10 able-bodied controls (71.7 years) participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Passive joint range-of-motion, muscle strength, proprioception (joint position sense), tactile sensitivity, and standing balance (center-of-pressure sway) were compared between groups. A multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between proprioception and balance (without vision) in prosthesis users. FINDINGS: Our hypotheses were generally not supported, with the only differences being reduced joint range-of-motion and strength in prosthesis users (with large effect sizes), but comparable sensation and balance. Notably, prosthesis users demonstrated better proprioception than controls as reflected through better joint position sense when the limb was non-weight bearing. Worse amputated limb proprioception was associated with better standing balance in prosthesis users. INTERPRETATION: Older prosthesis users have impaired passive joint motion and muscle strength compared to controls that could challenge their ability to position and control the amputated limb to avoid falls during daily activities. However, their better amputated limb proprioception might help counteract those limitations by leveraging sensory feedback from the suspended limb. The relationship between amputated limb proprioception and standing balance suggests a nuanced relationship that warrants further study.

Effects of footwear on the gait kinematics of women with unilateral transtibial amputation: an observational case series.

PURPOSE: Prosthesis geometry and behaviour limit the footwear options available to women. Using a commercially available prosthetic foot that permits user-alignment to accommodate shoes with different heel heights, we investigated the effect of footwear on gait kinematics, with and without adjustment for differences in heel-forefoot differential. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three women with transtibial amputation walked at a self-selected pace, first in an athletic shoe (prosthetist-aligned; baseline condition), then (i) in a flatter shoe without realigning the prosthesis, and (ii) in flat and heeled shoes following user re-alignment. Kinematics in each condition were compared to baseline. RESULTS: Baseline gait patterns were highly variable across participants. Gait was slower in comparison to baseline in all conditions, but movement compensations varied across participants. An increased lower limb extension tendency was evident with the misaligned prosthesis. With user re-alignment to accommodate the shoe there were fewer deviations from baseline, however kinematic differences remained in both the flat and heeled shoes. CONCLUSIONS: The user-alignment feature of the prosthetic foot reduced the effect of a change in footwear on kinematics, and permitted walking in heeled shoes when it might otherwise not be possible. Persistence of some deviations suggests differences in walking task demand remained despite adjustment.Implications for rehabilitationPermitting prosthesis users to don footwear of choice may improve body image, well-being and quality of life following amputation.Prosthetic feet that permit user ankle adjustment can reduce gait deviations associated with a change in footwear heel height, although kinematic adaptations are individual.

Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets Effect on Gait Biomechanics in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare gait biomechanics of the Northwestern University Flexible Sub-Ischial Vacuum (NU-FlexSIV) Socket to the ischial containment (IC) socket. DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial with 2, 7-week periods. SETTING: Private prosthetic clinics and university research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 enrolled (n=30); 25 participants completed the study with full (n=18) or partial data (n=7). INTERVENTIONS: Two custom-fabricated sockets (IC and NU-FlexSIV), worn full-time for 7 weeks, with testing at 1, 4, and 7 weeks after socket delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait analyses were conducted at 1, 4, and 7 weeks post socket delivery. Differences between sockets in selected gait variables related to hip motion and coronal plane socket stability were assessed. RESULTS: For participants with data for both sockets at week 7 (n=19), there were no significant differences in any gait variables between sockets at self-selected normal walking speed. However, when all participants and all study time points were assessed (n=25), there was a significant main effect of socket (P=.013), with prosthetic side sagittal plane hip range of motion being significantly greater for the NU-FlexSIV Socket at self-selected normal walking speed. There were no other significant effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, compared to the IC socket, the NU-FlexSIV Socket did not alter gait biomechanics related to hip motion and coronal plane socket stability in people with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Comparison of Ischial Containment and Subischial Sockets on Comfort, Function, Quality of Life, and Satisfaction With Device in Persons With Unilateral Transfemoral Amputation: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare comfort and functional performance of the Northwestern University Flexible Subischial Vacuum (NU-FlexSIV) Socket with the ischial containment (IC) socket in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation. DESIGN: Randomized crossover trial with two 7-week periods. SETTING: Private prosthetic clinics and university research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 enrolled (N=30); 25 participants completed the study with full (n=18) or partial data (n=7). INTERVENTIONS: Two custom-fabricated sockets (IC and NU-FlexSIV), worn full-time for 7 weeks, with testing at 1, 4, and 7 weeks after socket delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in Socket Comfort Score (SCS) at 7 weeks. Secondary outcomes at 7 weeks included the Orthotic and Prosthetic Users' Survey (OPUS) to assess lower extremity functional status, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with device, as well as the 5-Times Rapid Sit-to-Stand Test, Four Square Step Test, and T-Test of Agility to assess functional performance. RESULTS: At 7 weeks, the mean SCS for IC (7.0±1.7) and NU-FlexSIV (8.4±1.1) Sockets were significantly different (P<.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.3). Results from a linear mixed-effects model, accounting for data from all time points, indicated that the SCS was 1.7 (SE=0.45) points higher for the NU-FlexSIV Socket (P<.001). For the secondary outcomes, only OPUS satisfaction with device was significantly better in the NU-FlexSIV Socket after accounting for all data points. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that after 7 weeks' accommodation, the NU-FlexSIV Socket was more comfortable and led to greater satisfaction with device than the IC socket in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation and K3/K4 mobility. Other patient-reported outcomes and function were no different between sockets.

Effects of Upper Limb Loss or Absence and Prosthesis Use on Postural Control of Standing Balance.

OBJECTIVE: Persons with upper limb loss or absence experience a high prevalence of falls. Although upper limb prostheses help perform upper limb tasks, fall likelihood increases by six times with prosthesis use. The effects of upper limb loss or absence and prosthesis use on postural control are poorly documented. DESIGN: Static posturography characterized postural control of standing balance between persons with unilateral upper limb loss or absence not wearing a prosthesis and wearing either a customary prosthesis or prosthesis that matched the mass, inertia, and length of their sound limb. Able-bodied controls were also compared to persons with unilateral upper limb loss or absence not wearing a prosthesis. Center-of-pressure anterior-posterior range, medial-lateral range, and sway area, as well as weight-bearing symmetry, were measured. RESULTS: Persons with upper limb loss or absence display greater standing postural sway than controls. Although wearing a prosthesis improved weight-bearing symmetry, this condition increased postural sway, which was pronounced in the medial-lateral direction. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of upper limb loss or absence increased postural control demands than able-bodied individuals as reflected in greater postural sway, which was further exacerbated with the use of prosthesis. Results suggest that upper limb loss or absence and prosthesis use may affect the internal models that guide motor commands to maintain body center-of-mass position equilibrium. The relatively greater postural control demands might help explain the increase fall prevalence in this patient group.

Effects of upper limb loss and prosthesis use on proactive mechanisms of locomotor stability.

Persons with upper limb loss (ULL) experience a high prevalence of falls, with the majority of falls occurring when walking. This issue may be related to altered arm dynamics, which play an important role in proactive mechanisms of locomotor stability. This study investigated effects of ULL and prosthesis use on proactive stability mechanisms, particularly if matching the mass and inertia of the impaired limb to the sound limb would enhance locomotor stability. Gait data were collected on adults with unilateral ULL during level walking while: (1) not wearing a prosthesis, (2) wearing their customary prosthesis, (3) wearing a mock prosthesis that matched the sound limb mass and inertia. Main and interaction effects of limb side and condition on trunk rotations, arm swing, step width, free vertical moment, and margin-of-stability were analyzed. Across conditions, arm swing, free vertical moment, and margin-of-stability were 2.27, 1.13, and 1.20 times greater, respectively, on the sound limb side than the impaired limb side. Persons with ULL display asymmetry in proactive mechanisms of locomotor stability with potentially greater medial-lateral stability on the sound limb side irrespective of prosthesis use, but heavier prostheses reduced the walking base of support. This bias may enhance fall risk on the impaired side if the prosthetic limb is used inappropriately to regain balance following a disturbance. Research is warranted to explore the consequences of this asymmetry on perturbation response.

Do Upper Limb Loss and Prosthesis Use Affect Lower Limb Gait Dynamics?

INTRODUCTION: Intentional interruption of upper and lower limb coordination of able-bodied subjects alters their gait biomechanics. However, the effect of upper-limb loss (ULL) on lower-limb gait biomechanics is not fully understood. The aim of this secondary study was to perform a follow-up analysis of a previous dataset to characterize the spatiotemporal parameters and lower-limb kinematics and kinetics of gait for persons with ULL when wearing and not wearing an upper limb prosthesis (ULP). We were particularly interested in quantifying the effects of matching the mass and inertia of the prosthetic limb to the sound limb. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten persons with unilateral ULL walked at a self-selected speed under three randomly presented conditions: 1) not wearing a prosthesis, 2) wearing their customary prosthesis, and 3) wearing a mock prosthesis that can be adjusted to match the length, mass, and inertial properties of each subject's sound limb. Walkway-embedded force plates and a 12-camera digital motion capture system recorded ground reaction forces (GRFs) and retroreflective marker position data, respectively. Average spatiotemporal (walking speed, cadence, stance time, swing time, step length, double support time), lower-limb kinematic (joint angles), and lower-limb kinetic (ground forces, joint moments and powers) data were processed and their statistical significance were analyzed. RESULT: Walking speed for each condition was nearly equivalent (1.20±0.01 m/s) and differences between condition were non-significant (p=0.769). The interaction effect (side× prosthesis) was significant for peak hip extension (p=0.01) and second peak (propulsive) vertical GRF (p=0.028), but separate follow-up analyses of both main effects were not significant (p≥0.099). All other main effect comparisons were not significant (p≥0.102). CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample cohort was small and heterogeneous, the results of this study suggest that persons with unilateral ULL did not display significant limb side asymmetry in lower-limb gait spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic parameters, regardless of ULP use.

The effect of positive sagittal spine balance and reconstruction surgery on standing balance.

BACKGROUND: Positive sagittal spine balance (PSSB) may adversely influence standing balance in individuals with degenerative spine diseases. PSSB is often corrected with the help of spinal reconstructive surgeries involving multiple vertebral units. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study investigated the effect of PSSB and reconstructive surgery on postural sway as a measure of standing balance. The secondary goal of this study was to investigate the effect of reconstructive surgery on lower limb kinematics. METHODS: Subjects who underwent spinal reconstructive surgery for correction of PSSB greater than or equal to 7 cm participated in this study. Postural sway data while standing quietly for 20 s on a force platform were analyzed pre-operatively, 6-12 months and 24 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Reconstructive surgery was successful in correcting PSSB in all individuals. There was a moderate correlation between PSSB and postural sway in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction before surgery (r = 0.58) and at 6-12 months post-surgery (r = 0.63). Reconstructive surgery had a significant main effect on postural sway in both the anterior-posterior (p < 0.009, F = 7.01) and medial-lateral directions (p < 0, F = 12.30). Reconstructive surgery also had a significant main effect on standing hip (p < 0, F = 17.01) and knee flexion (p < 0, F = 32.23). SIGNIFICANCE: These results reveal that PSSB in persons with degenerative spinal conditions compromised postural balance, which improved after reconstructive surgery. Additionally, persons with PSSB adopted a crouch posture, which resolved after reconstructive surgery.

Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks.

Upper limb myoelectric prostheses remain challenging to use and are often abandoned. A proficient user must be able to plan/execute arm movements while activating the residual muscle(s), accounting for delays and unpredictability in prosthesis response. There is no validated, low cost measure of skill in performing such actions. Trial-trial variability of joint angle trajectories measured during functional task performance, linearly normalised by time, shows promise. However, linear normalisation of time introduces errors, and expensive camera systems are required for joint angle measurements. This study investigated whether trial-trial variability, assessed using dynamic time warping (DTW) of limb segment acceleration measured during functional task performance, is a valid measure of user skill. Temporal and amplitude variability of forearm accelerations were determined in (1) seven myoelectric prosthesis users and six anatomically-intact controls and (2) seven anatomically-intact subjects learning to use a prosthesis simulator over repeated sessions. (1): temporal variability showed clear group differences (p<0.05). (2): temporal variability considerably increased on first use of a prosthesis simulator, then declined with training (both p<0.05). Amplitude variability showed less obvious differences. Analysing forearm accelerations using DTW appears to be a valid low-cost method for quantifying movement quality of upper limb prosthesis use during goal-oriented task performance.

Effect of foot and ankle immobilization on able-bodied gait as a model to increase understanding about bilateral transtibial amputee gait.

BACKGROUND: The anatomical foot-ankle complex facilitates advancement of the stance limb through foot rockers and late-stance power generation during walking, but this mechanism is altered for persons with bilateral transtibial amputation when using passive prostheses. OBJECTIVES: To study the effects of bilateral foot and ankle immobilization on able-bodied gait to serve as a model for understanding gait of persons with bilateral transtibial amputation and associated compensatory mechanisms. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. METHODS: Nine able-bodied persons walked at self-selected slow, normal, and fast speeds. They performed trials unaltered and when fitted with bilateral foot and ankle-immobilizing casts. Data from 10 individuals with bilateral transtibial amputation walking at self-selected fast speeds were used for qualitative comparison. RESULTS: The average speeds for the able-bodied fast speed cast and normal speed no-cast trials were similar and were compared with bilateral transtibial amputation data. The able-bodied cast condition data more closely matched bilateral transtibial amputation data than the no-cast data. Ankle range-of-motion and power generation at pre-swing in the cast condition were markedly decreased, while trunk lateral flexion and transverse rotation range-of-motion and peak hip power generation increased. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the absence of active ankle range-of-motion and power generation contributes to the development of characteristic compensatory gait mechanisms displayed by persons with bilateral transtibial amputation. Clinical relevance This study helps to improve understanding of compensatory mechanisms resulting from reduced foot and ankle joint motion to inform lower limb prosthesis design and function for improving gait quality of individuals with bilateral transtibial amputation.

Shock absorption during transtibial amputee gait: Does longitudinal prosthetic stiffness play a role?

BACKGROUND: Reduced-stiffness components are often prescribed in lower-limb prostheses, but their efficacy in augmenting shock absorption has been inconclusive. OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic variation of longitudinal prosthetic stiffness over a wide range of values and to evaluate its effect on shock absorption during gait. STUDY DESIGN: Repeated-measures crossover experiment. METHODS: Twelve subjects with a unilateral transtibial amputation walked at normal and fast self-selected speeds. Longitudinal prosthetic stiffness was modified by springs within a shock-absorbing pylon: normal (manufacturer recommended), 75% of normal (medium), 50% of normal (soft), and rigid (displacement blocked). The variables of interest were kinematic (stance-phase knee flexion and pelvic obliquity) and kinetic (prosthetic-side ground reaction force loading peak magnitude and timing). RESULTS: No changes were observed in kinematic measures during gait. A significant difference in peak ground reaction force magnitudes between medium and normal ( p = 0.001) during freely selected walking was attributed to modified walking speed ( p = 0.008). Ground reaction force peaks were found to be statistically different during fast walking, but only between isolated stiffness conditions. Thus, altering longitudinal prosthesis stiffness produced no appreciable change in gait biomechanics. CONCLUSION: Prosthesis stiffness does not appear to substantially influence shock absorption in transtibial prosthesis users. Clinical relevance Varying the level of longitudinal prosthesis stiffness did not meaningfully influence gait biomechanics at self-selected walking speeds. Thus, as currently prescribed within a transtibial prosthesis, adding longitudinal stiffness in isolation may not provide the anticipated shock absorption benefits. Further research into residual limb properties and compensatory mechanisms is needed.

Impact testing of the residual limb: System response to changes in prosthetic stiffness.

Currently, it is unknown whether changing prosthetic limb stiffness affects the total limb stiffness and influences the shock absorption of an individual with transtibial amputation. The hypotheses tested within this study are that a decrease in longitudinal prosthetic stiffness will produce (1) a reduced total limb stiffness, and (2) reduced magnitude of peak impact forces and increased time delay to peak force. Fourteen subjects with a transtibial amputation participated in this study. Prosthetic stiffness was modified by means of a shock-absorbing pylon that provides reduced longitudinal stiffness through compression of a helical spring within the pylon. A sudden loading evaluation device was built to examine changes in limb loading mechanics during a sudden impact event. No significant change was found in the peak force magnitude or timing of the peak force between prosthetic limb stiffness conditions. Total limb stiffness estimates ranged from 14.9 to 17.9 kN/m but were not significantly different between conditions. Thus, the prosthetic-side total limb stiffness was unaffected by changes in prosthetic limb stiffness. The insensitivity of the total limb stiffness to prosthetic stiffness may be explained by the mechanical characteristics (i.e., stiffness and damping) of the anatomical tissue within the residual limb.

Pelvic and Spinal Motion During Walking in Persons With Transfemoral Amputation With and Without Low Back Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Low back pain (LBP) is prevalent in people with transfemoral amputation (TFA), imposing significant disability. Yet, limited data exist describing spine kinematics in people with and without LBP despite the suggestion that gait adaptations required to walk with a prosthesis may be associated or causative of LBP. Hence, the purpose of this study was to determine if there were any differences in pelvic and spinal kinematics in persons with TFA with and without LBP. DESIGN: With the use of a lower body model combined with a regional spine model, pelvic, lumbar, and thoracic kinematics were recorded while walking and compared for participants with TFA with (n = 12) and without (n = 11) self-reported LBP. RESULTS: Opposite patterns of motion were observed between groups in sagittal and transverse lumbar kinematics but inferential analysis using the χ test was unable to confirm that these differing patterns were independently related to LBP. CONCLUSIONS: For community ambulators with TFA who report low levels of LBP, differences in lumbar and thoracic motion do not seem to be independently related to LBP. Results may not generalize to those with higher levels of LBP and associated disability.

A novel in vivo impact device for evaluation of sudden limb loading response.

The lower limbs are subjected to large impact forces on a daily basis during gait, and ambulators rely on various mechanisms to protect the musculoskeletal system from these potentially damaging shocks. However, it is difficult to assess the efficacy of anatomical mechanisms and potential clinical interventions on impact forces because of limitations of the testing environment. The current paper describes a new in vivo measurement device (sudden loading evaluation device, or SLED) designed to address shortcomings of previous loading protocols. To establish the repeatability and validity of this testing device, reliability and human participant data were collected while the stiffnesses of simulated and prosthetic limbs were systematically varied. The peak impact forces delivered by the SLED ranged from 706±3 N to 2157±32 N during reliability testing and from 784±30 N to 938±18 N with the human participant. The relatively low standard deviations indicate good reliability within the impacts delivered by the SLED, while the magnitude of the loads experienced by the human participant (98-117% BW) were comparable to ground reaction forces during level walking. Thus, the SLED may be valuable as a research tool for investigations of lower-limb impact loading events.

Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.

BACKGROUND: Current upper limb prostheses do not replace the active degrees-of-freedom distal to the elbow inherent to intact physiology. Limited evidence suggests that transradial prosthesis users demonstrate shoulder and trunk movements to compensate for these missing volitional degrees-of-freedom. The purpose of this study was to enhance understanding of the effects of prosthesis use on motor performance by comparing the movement quality of upper body kinematics between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks that reflect activities of daily living. METHODS: Upper body kinematics were collected on six able-bodied controls and seven myoelectric transradial prosthesis users during execution of goal-oriented tasks. Range-of-motion, absolute kinematic variability (standard deviation), and kinematic repeatability (adjusted coefficient-of-multiple-determination) were quantified for trunk motion in three planes, shoulder flexion/extension, shoulder ab/adduction, and elbow flexion/extension across five trials per task. Linear mixed models analysis assessed between-group differences and correlation analysis evaluated association between prosthesis experience and kinematic repeatability. RESULTS: Across tasks, prosthesis users demonstrated increased trunk motion in all three planes and shoulder abduction compared to controls (p ≤ 0.004). Absolute kinematic variability was greater for prosthesis users for all degrees-of-freedom irrespective of task, but was significant only for degrees-of-freedom that demonstrated increased range-of-motion (p ≤ 0.003). For degrees-of-freedom that did not display increased absolute variability for prosthesis users, able-bodied kinematics were characterized by significantly greater repeatability (p ≤ 0.015). Prosthesis experience had a strong positive relationship with average kinematic repeatability (r = 0.790, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The use of shoulder and trunk movements by prosthesis users as compensatory motions to execute goal-oriented tasks demonstrates the flexibility and adaptability of the motor system. Increased variability in movement suggests that prosthesis users do not converge on a defined motor strategy to the same degree as able-bodied individuals. Kinematic repeatability may increase with prosthesis experience, or encourage continued device use, and future work is warranted to explore these relationships. As compensatory dynamics may be necessary to improve functionality of transradial prostheses, users may benefit from dedicated training that encourages optimization of these dynamics to facilitate execution of daily living activity, and fosters adaptable but reliable motor strategies.

Mediolateral foot placement ability during ambulation in individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiplegia.

Mediolateral (ML) foot placement is an effective way to redirect the lateral trajectory of the body center of mass (BCoM) during ambulation, but has only been partly characterized in the chronic post-stroke population despite their increased risk for falling [1]. During able-bodied gait, the locomotor system coordinates lower limb swing phase kinematics such that an appropriate ML foot placement occurs upon foot contact. Muscle weakness and abnormal motor patterns may impair foot placement ability post-stroke. The purpose of this study was to characterize ML foot placement ability during post-stroke ambulation by quantifying ML foot placement accuracy and precision, for the both sound and affected feet. Age matched able-bodied individuals were recruited for comparison. All participants were instructed to target step widths ranging from 0 to 45% leg length, as marked on the laboratory floor. Results of this study confirmed that ML foot placement accuracy and precision were significantly lower for the post-stroke group as compared to the control group (p=0.0). However, ML foot placement accuracy and precision were not significantly different between the affected and sound limbs in the post-stroke group. The lowest accuracy for post-stroke subjects was observed at both extreme step width targets (0 and 45%). Future work should explore potential mechanisms underlying these findings such as abnormal motor coordination, lower limb muscle strength, and abnormal swing phase movement patterns.

Coronal plane socket stability during gait in persons with transfemoral amputation: Pilot study.

Little research describes which transfemoral socket design features are important for coronal plane stability, socket comfort, and gait. Our study objectives were to (1) relate socket comfort during gait to a rank order of changes in ischial containment (IC) and tissue loading and (2) compare socket comfort during gait when tissue loading and IC were systematically manipulated. Six randomly assigned socket conditions (IC and tissue compression) were assessed: (1) IC and high, (2) IC and medium, (3) IC and low, (4) no IC and high, (5) no IC and medium, and (6) no IC and low. For the six subjects in this study, there was a strong, negative relationship between comfort and changes in IC and tissue loading (rho = -0.89). With the ischium contained, tissue loading did not influence socket comfort (p = 0.47). With no IC, the socket was equally comfortable with high tissue loading (p = 0.36) but the medium (p = 0.04) and low (p = 0.02) tissue loading conditions decreased comfort significantly. Coronal plane hip moments, lateral trunk lean, step width, and walking speed were invariant to changes in IC and/or tissue loading. Our results suggest that in an IC socket, medial tissue loading mattered little in terms of comfort. Sockets without IC required high tissue loading to be as comfortable as those with IC, while suboptimal tissue loading compromised comfort.

The effects of walking speed and prosthetic ankle adapters on upper extremity dynamics and stability-related parameters in bilateral transtibial amputee gait.

Bilateral transtibial amputee (BTA) gait has been investigated less and is not as well understood compared to that of their unilateral counterparts. Relative to able-bodied individuals, BTAs walk with reduced self-selected speeds, increased step width, hip-hiking, and greater metabolic cost. The clinically observed upper body motions of these individuals have not been quantified, but appear substantially different from able-bodied ambulators and may impact upright balance. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the upper extremity kinematics of BTAs during steady-state walking. We measured medial-lateral ground reaction forces, step width and extrapolated center-of-mass (XCoM) trajectory, and observed effects of walking speed and increased prosthetic ankle range-of-motion (ROM) on these parameters. Significantly, BTAs display greater lateral trunk flexion ROM and shoulder abduction than able-bodied individuals when walking at similar speeds, and the inclusion of prosthetic adaptors for increasing passive ankle ROM slightly reduced step width. Overall, exaggerated lateral trunk flexion ROM was invariant with step width. Results suggest that lateral trunk motion is useful for shifting the body center-of-mass laterally onto the leading stance limb while simultaneously unloading the trailing limb. However, exaggerated lateral trunk flexion may introduce an unstable scenario if the XCoM is displaced beyond the lateral base-of-support. Further studies would be useful to identify if either prostheses that assist limb advancement and/or gait training may be effective in reducing this lateral sway while still maintaining efficient ambulation.

Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket.

Prosthetic gel liners are often prescribed for persons with lower-limb amputations to make the prosthetic socket more comfortable. However, their effects on residual limb pressures and gait characteristics have not been thoroughly explored. This study investigated the effects of gel liner thickness on peak socket pressures and gait patterns of persons with unilateral transtibial amputations. Pressure and quantitative gait data were acquired while subjects walked on liners of two different uniform thicknesses. Fibular head peak pressures were reduced (p = 0.04) with the thicker liner by an average of 26 +/- 21%, while the vertical ground reaction force (GRF) loading peak increased 3 +/- 3% (p = 0.02). Most subjects perceived increased comfort within the prosthetic socket with the thicker liner, which may be associated with the reduced fibular head peak pressures. Additionally, while the thicker liner presumably increased comfort by providing a more compliant limb-socket interface, the higher compliance may have reduced force and vibration feedback to the residual limb and contributed to the larger vertical GRF loading peaks. We conclude that determining optimal gel liner thickness for a particular individual will require further investigations to better identify and understand the compromises that occur between user perception, residual-limb pressure distribution, and gait biomechanics.