Scheduled versus as-needed postpartum analgesia and oxycodone utilization.

BACKGROUND: An optimal approach for providing sufficient postpartum analgesia while minimizing the risk of opioid misuse or diversion has yet to be elucidated. Moreover, there is scant literature on the efficacy of around-the-clock (ATC) scheduled dosing of opioid analgesia compared to pro re nata (PRN; as-needed) dosing for postpartum pain management. Here we evaluate a quality improvement intervention that aimed to proactively provide pain relief with a multimodal analgesic regimen that includes oxycodone at scheduled time intervals. This new protocol stands in stark contrast to many contemporary postpartum pain management regimens in which oral opioid medications are reserved for treating breakthrough pain. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine how inpatient oxycodone use is affected by as-needed compared to ATC scheduled dosing of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and low-dose oxycodone, with the option to decline any of these medications. We also sought to determine the effect of each modality on patient satisfaction with pain control. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries at ≥37 weeks of gestation at a tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2016. In month 21 of the 48-month study period, a new institutional protocol for postpartum pain management was implemented which consisted of scheduled dosing of a multimodal analgesic regimen. Prior to this, patients received pain relief only as needed, by reporting elevated pain scores to nursing staff. Patients were excluded for the following: NSAID or opioid allergies, protocol deviations, transition month deliveries, history of drug abuse, positive urine toxicology, delivery with general anesthesia, prolonged hospitalization, postpartum hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, incomplete records. Outcomes evaluated were the percentage of patients receiving oxycodone and mean oxycodone use per inpatient day (milligrams). Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series was performed to estimate linear time trends of oxycodone consumption pre- and post-protocol implementation. Results of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) standardized survey were also compared before and after implementation. RESULTS: A total of 19,192 deliveries were included. After adjusting for confounders, a significant downward trend in the percentage of patients receiving oxycodone was noted among both cesarean (0.004% decrease per month; p < .006) and vaginal deliveries (0.005% decrease per month; p < .0001) before implementation of the scheduled pain management protocol. Among cesarean deliveries, there was no shift at the time of implementation, and no change in the slope of the trend after implementation. Among vaginal deliveries, there was an upward shift at implementation (+7.4%, p < .0001) but no change in the slope of the trend after implementation. Regardless of mode of delivery, no trend in monthly mean oxycodone consumption per day existed before or after implementation of the new protocol, and there was no shift at the time of implementation. Scheduled multimodal analgesia was associated with an improvement in HCAHPS scores for patient reported pain control after cesarean section (63 versus 71% reporting "Always" well controlled; p < .001) but had no effect after vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: After cesarean delivery, scheduled multimodal analgesia that includes ATC dosing of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and low-dose oxycodone, with the option to decline any of these medications, does not increase the percentage of women who receive oxycodone or mean oxycodone consumption per inpatient day compared to as-needed analgesia. After vaginal delivery, scheduled multimodal analgesia is associated with an increase in the percentage of women who receive oxycodone but no change in mean oxycodone consumption per inpatient day.

Glycosylated hemoglobin, but not advanced glycation end products, predicts severity of coronary artery disease in patients with or without diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The association between coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) is strong but the physiologic mechanisms responsible for this association remain unclear. Patients with DM exhibit high circulating levels of glycated proteins and lipoproteins called advanced glycation end products (AGEs) which have been implicated in the development of oxidative damage to vascular endothelium. We examined the relationships between the presence and extent of CAD and AGEs in patients undergoing elective coronary artery catheterization in an urban teaching hospital. METHODS: Patients with possible CAD (n = 364) were recruited prior to elective cardiac catheterization (52% male, 48% diabetic). Regression and correlation analyses were used to examine the relationship between serum AGE concentrations, soluble AGE receptor (sRAGE) concentration, HbA1c, LDL and the presence of obstructive CAD along with the burden of CAD measured by SYNTAX and SYNTAX II scores. RESULTS: AGE and sRAGE levels did not significantly correlate with any of the studied coronary artery disease parameters. HbA1c showed positive correlation with both SYNTAX and SYNTAX II scores in patients with and without diabetes. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study of patients with possible CAD, serum AGEs and sRAGE concentrations did not correlate with SYNTAX or SYNTAX II scores regardless of diabetic status. HbA1C correlated positively with the SYNTAX and SYNTAX II scores in both diabetic and non-diabetic populations.

Complexity of Aortic Arch Anatomy Affects the Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Versus Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting.

BACKGROUND: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has been shown to have half the rates of transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, and death compared with transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS). Successful outcomes of TFCAS require careful patient selection. The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes of TFCAS versus TCAR in both simple (type I) and complex (type II and III) aortic arches. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing TFCAS versus TCAR with simple and complex aortic arches using the Vascular Quality Initiative registry from August 2011 to May 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital TIA/stroke/death. RESULTS: About 6,108 carotid artery interventions were analyzed, including 3,536 (57.9%) patients with type I, 2,013 (33.0%) with type II, and 559 (9.2%) with type III aortic arch. In 3,535 patients with a simple arch, 1,917 underwent TFCAS and 1,619 had TCAR. Mean age was 70.6 (±9.5) years, and 2,382 (67.4%) patients were males. The primary outcome of postoperative TIA/stroke/death was seen significantly less frequently in those undergoing TCAR compared with TFCAS in simple arches (odds ratio [OR], 0.63; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.43-0.94; P = 0.0236). Although the individual outcome of death occurred less often in TCAR (P = 0.0025), there was no difference in the occurrence of in-hospital stroke (P = 0.8836) or TIA (P = 0.4608). On multivariable analysis, TCAR was associated with improved outcomes (P = 0.0062). A worse outcome was associated with increasing age (P < 0.001), a prior stroke (P < 0.0001), and increasing number of stents (P = 0.0483). In 2,572 patients with a complex arch, 1,416 underwent TFCAS and 1,156 had TCAR. Mean age was 73.0 (±9.1) years, and 1,655 (64.4%) were males. In complex arch anatomy, the primary outcome of in-hospital TIA/stroke/death was seen significantly less frequently in TCAR compared with TFCAS (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31-0.77; P = 0.0022). Again noted was a significant difference in death, with better outcomes in TCAR (P = 0.0133). Although the occurrence of in-hospital TIA was no different between the 2 approaches (P = 0.6158), there were significantly fewer strokes in those treated with TCAR (P = 0.0132). TCAR (P = 0.0146) was associated with improved outcomes. A worse outcome was seen with advancing age (P = 0.0003), prior strokes (P = 0.01), and a left-sided lesion (P = 0.0176). CONCLUSIONS: TCAR has improved outcomes of TIA/stroke/death compared with TFCAS in both simple and complex aortic arch anatomy. In simple aortic arches, there is no difference in neurologic outcomes between both approaches. In complex arch anatomy, TCAR has fewer strokes.

Cross-clamp location affects short-term survival in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

INTRODUCTION: Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (oAAA) repair in the era of advanced endovascular aortic techniques is used in challenging anatomy. The impact of the location of the proximal aortic cross-clamp (suprarenal [SR] vs infrarenal [IR]) on outcomes remains to be determined. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of proximal aortic cross-clamp location on short-term and overall survival after oAAA repair in a contemporary series. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing oAAA repair with SR and IR aortic cross-clamping using the Vascular Quality Initiative registry from January 2003 to September 2018. Our primary end point was short-term mortality. RESULTS: There were 7601 patients who underwent oAAA repair. Their mean age was 69.3 ± 8.5 years and 5555 patients (73.1%) were male. The aortic cross-clamp location was IR in 4044 patients (53.2%). The SR group had increased maximum AAA diameter (58 mm vs 56 mm; P < .0001), hypertension (85.5% vs 82.0%; P < .0001), preoperative creatinine (1.11 vs 1.08; P = .001), and were more likely to be in American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV (37.4% vs 30.6%; P < .0001). Postoperative renal failure occurred significantly more often in the SR group (24.4 vs 11.4%; P < .0001). Short-term mortality was 2.7% in the IR group and 4.7% in the SR group (P < .0001). Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 93.7% and 83.8% in the IR group and 90.9% and 81.2% in the SR group at 1 and 5 years, respectively (P = .007). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that SR cross-clamping was significantly associated with short-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.78; P = .01); however, it did not affect overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.28; P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: A SR cross-clamp location is associated with an increased short-term mortality in patients undergoing oAAA repair. Overall survival is not affected by a SR cross-clamp location.

Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for chronic aortic dissections.

BACKGROUND: Open surgical repair remains the "gold standard" treatment for chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBD) with aneurysm. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has gained popularity in recent years for the treatment of thoracic aortic diseases, including cTBD. We assessed the effectiveness of TEVAR in the treatment of cTBD using the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database. METHODS: The VQI registry identified 4713 patients treated with TEVAR from July 2010 to November 2015, including 125 repairs for cTBD. We analyzed TEVAR outcomes in this cohort per the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards for TEVAR. RESULTS: Median age was 65.0 years (interquartile range [IQR], 56.0-72.0 years), and 85 (68.0%) were male. Median aneurysm diameter was 5.5 cm (IQR, 4.8-6.3 cm). Sixty-two (49.6%) patients were asymptomatic on presentation, 57 (45.6%) were symptomatic, and 6 (4.8%) presented with rupture. Median length of stay was 8.0 days (IQR, 4.0-11.0 days). Fluoroscopy time was 17.3 minutes (IQR, 10.5-25.6 minutes). The distal landing zone was aortic zone 4 in 27 (21.6%) and aortic zone 5 and distal in 98 (78.4%) patients. Successful device delivery occurred in 123 (98.4%) patients. Conversion to open repair occurred in one (0.8%) patient. A type IA endoleak was present in 2 (1.6%), type IB endoleak in 2 (1.6%), and type II endoleak in 2 (1.6%) patients. Perioperative complications included stroke in 1 (0.8%), respiratory complications in 6 (4.8%), and spinal cord ischemia symptoms present at discharge in 3 (2.4%) patients. In-hospital mortality occurred in three (2.4%) patients. Reintervention was required in two (1.6%) patients for false lumen perfusion and in two (1.6%) patients for extension of the dissection. Follow-up was available for 43 patients at a median time of 239 days (IQR, 38-377 days). Median change in sac diameter was -0.2 cm (IQR, -0.5 to 0.1 cm). Sac shrinkage of 0.5 cm was noted in 12 (27.9%), with sac growth >0.5 cm in four (9.3%) patients. Extent of stent graft coverage did not affect sac shrinkage (P = .65). Patients with aneurysms ≥5.5 cm compared with <5.5 cm were more likely to demonstrate shrinkage (-0.6 cm vs 0.0 cm; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-11.7; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR for cTBD may be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality. Changes in sac diameter in the midterm are promising. Long-term data are needed to determine whether this approach is durable.