Effect of macroscopic air bubbles on cell lysis by shock wave lithotripsy in vitro.

In studies of cells or stones in vitro, the material to be exposed to shock waves (SWs) is commonly contained in plastic vials. It is difficult to remove all air bubbles from such vials. Because SWs reflect at an air-fluid interface, and because existing gas bubbles can serve as nuclei for cavitation events, we sought to determine in our system whether the inclusion of small, visible bubbles in the specimen vial has an effect on SW-induced cell lysis. We found that even small bubbles led to increased lysis of red blood cells (1- to 3-mm diameter bubbles, 9.8+/-0.5% lysis, n = 7; no bubbles, 4.4+/-0.8%, n = 4), and that the degree of lysis increased with bubble size. Damage could not be reduced by centrifuging the cells to the opposite end of the vial, away from the bubble. B-scan ultrasound imaging of blood in polypropylene pipette bulbs showed that, with each SW, bubbles were recruited from the air interface, mixing throughout the fluid volume, and these appeared to serve as nuclei for increased echogenicity during impact by subsequent SWs; thus, bubble effects in vials could involve the proliferation of cavitation nuclei from existing bubbles. Whereas injury to red blood cells was greatly increased by the presence of bubbles in vials, lytic injury to cultured epithelial cells (LLC-PK1, which have a more complex cytoarchitecture than red blood cells) was not increased by the presence of small air bubbles. This suggests different susceptibility to SW damage for different types of cells. Thus, the presence of even a small air bubble can increase SW-induced cell damage, perhaps by increasing the number of cavitation nuclei throughout the vial, but this effect is variable with cell type.

Cell damage by lithotripter shock waves at high pressure to preclude cavitation.

Acoustic cavitation has been implicated as a cause of cell damage by lithotripter shock waves, particularly under in vitro conditions. When red blood cells were exposed to shock waves (from an electrohydraulic lithotripter) while under high hydrostatic pressure (> 80 atm), cell lysis was dramatically reduced over that seen at atmospheric pressure, which is consistent with damage due to acoustic cavitation. However, even at > 120 atm of pressure, lysis was still 97% above that of cells not exposed to shock waves, revealing significant damage that apparently was due to mechanisms other than cavitation. Hydrostatic pressure alone did not cause cell lysis, and shock-wave-dependent damage occurred when the cells were in fluid suspension, or when they were centrifuged to the end of the vial. Shock-wave damage at high pressure increased with increasing shock-wave number, and was seen at 24 and 20 kV, but not at 16 kV. This shock-wave damage at high pressure makes up a noteworthy portion of the total cell injury seen at atmospheric pressure (about 10% at 24 kV), suggesting significant noncavitational injury to cells in vitro. Because cavitation occurs far more readily in vitro than in vivo, the noncavitational damage seen in the present study could represent a substantial portion of cell injury seen in vivo with shock-wave lithotripsy.