Completion surgery vs. primary TME for early rectal cancer: a national study.

PURPOSE: While local excision by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an option for low-risk early rectal cancers, inaccuracies in preoperative staging may be revealed only upon histopathological evaluation of the resected specimen, demanding completion surgery (CS) by formal resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of CS in a national cohort. METHOD: This was a retrospective analysis of national registry data, identifying and comparing all Norwegian patients who, without prior radiochemotherapy, underwent local excision by TEM or TAMIS and subsequent CS, or a primary total mesorectal excision (pTME), for early rectal cancer during 2000-2017. Primary endpoints were 5-year overall and disease-free survival, 5-year local and distant recurrence, and the rate of R0 resection at completion surgery. The secondary endpoint was the rate of permanent stoma. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients received CS, and 1098 underwent pTME. There was no difference in overall survival (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.27-2.01), disease-free survival (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.32-1.63), local recurrence (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.14-8.27) or distant recurrence (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.21-2.18). In the CS group, 53% had a permanent stoma vs. 32% in the pTME group (P = 0.002); however, the difference was not significant when adjusted for age, sex, and tumor level (OR 2.17, 0.95-5.02). CONCLUSIONS: Oncological results were similar in the two groups. However, there may be an increased risk for a permanent stoma in the CS group.

Is there a role for routine colonoscopy in the follow-up after acute appendicitis?

BACKGROUND: Mechanical obstruction of the appendiceal lumen is proposed as a possible factor in the pathogenesis of acute appendicitis. Hence, patients over the age of 40 are often referred to a follow-up colonoscopy after admission for acute appendicitis. The use of CT scans question whether routine colonoscopy still has a place in follow-up for these patients. METHODS: All patients aged over 40 years with confirmed acute appendicitis admitted to St. Olav's Hospital in the period from 2010 to 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Findings and distribution of significant colorectal neoplasms (cancer and advanced adenomas) within three years after the admission were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-four (7.4%) of the 731 patients were found to have colonic neoplasms; 9 patients (1.2%) were found to have colorectal cancer of which 7 were located on the right side, 22 patients (3.0%) were found to have advanced adenomas and 23 patients (3.1%) were found to have non-advanced adenomas. The sensitivity and specificity for CT to discover cancer was 0.25 and 0.97, respectively. A total of 316 patients (43.2%) had colonoscopy within three years after admission. CONCLUSION: There may be an increased risk of colorectal neoplasms in patients over the age of 40 admitted with acute appendicitis. There seems to be an increased proportion of right-sided cancer relatively to other colonic locations. The sensitivity for CT scans to discover colorectal cancer in this group is low. Further studies are needed to decide whether routine colonoscopy is indicated after acute appendicitis in patients over 40 years.

National Early Rectal Cancer Treatment Revisited.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of early stage rectal cancer has excellent oncological results. To reduce treatment-related mortality and morbidity and improve functional results, a focus on local resections is increasingly important. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and total mesorectal excision for early stage rectal cancer (T1 + T2) in Norway. DESIGN: This was an observational study based on prospective data from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry. SETTINGS: The study was conducted as a national, population-based study. PATIENTS: All 543 patients with T1 and 1593 patients with T2 rectal cancer without distant metastases that was treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery or total mesorectal excision without radiochemotherapy during 2000-2009 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were 5-year relative survival and 5-year local recurrence rate. RESULTS: Among 543 patients with T1 cancer, the 5-year overall survival rate was 65.3% after transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus 81.5% after total mesorectal excision (p = 0.012). Adjusted for age and sex there was no excess mortality for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (HR = 1.28 (95% CI, 0.8-1.9); p = 0.22). The 5-year relative survival rate was 96.8% after transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus 98.2% after total mesorectal excision (p = 0.603), and the 5-year local recurrence rate was 14.5% versus 1.4% (p < 0.001). Among 1593 patients with T2 cancer, 5-year overall survival was 42.1% versus 76.1% (p < 0.001), 5-year relative survival was 65.4% versus 93.9% (p < 0.001), and 5 year local recurrence rate was 11.4% versus 4.4% in the 2 groups. LIMITATIONS: The study is limited by its observational design and that the 2 groups were different according to patient and tumor characteristics. Another limitation was the low number of transanal endoscopic microsurgery procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery had comparable 5-year relative survival to total mesorectal excision in T1 rectal cancer but inferior 5-year relative survival in T2 rectal cancer. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery was associated with higher local recurrence rates for both T1 and T2 tumors.

[Restorative proctocolectomy]. / Bekkenreservoarkirurgi.

BACKGROUND: Restorative proctocolectomy and pelvic pouch surgery (construction of a pelvic pouch from intestine) is standard surgical treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis. It is a surgical approach that has been used for more than 30 years. The goal with this study was to report complications and functional results of restorative proctocolectomy performed by gastric surgeons in a local hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All patients who had undergone pelvic pouch surgery at Levanger hospital in the period 1989 - 2006 were evaluated. Data were collected through retrospective assessment of journals, and through questionnaires (that the patients were requested to complete) on functioning of the pelvic pouch. RESULTS: The material consisted of 43 patients with a median follow-up time of 109 months (range 14 - 216). Four (9 %) patients with a non-functioning pelvic pouch were excluded from the analysis of self-defined function. 31 of 39 patients completed the questionnaire. Pouch-related complications were identified in 21(49 %) patients, and 9 (21 %) developed other complications. The mean number of daily defecation was 6 (range 3 - 11) and the mean number of nightly defection was 1 (range 0 - 4). Six (19 %) patients had some type of incontinence problem related to defecation. 29 (94 %) of the 31 patients who completed the questionnaire were content with functioning of their pouch. INTERPRETATION: Despite the high frequency of both pouch-related and other complications, most patients were content with having a pelvic pouch.