Attitudes Toward and Use of eHealth Technologies Among German Dermatologists: Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey in 2019 and 2021.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, legal and infrastructural conditions have been set to improve the adoption of digital applications in health care in Germany. The impact of these actions was amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic. So far, no studies have confirmed this progress in dermatology. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure changes in knowledge, interest, expectation, and use of digital applications in health care among dermatologists in Germany in 2019 and 2021. METHODS: We administered a repeated cross-sectional survey among dermatologists in medical practices and clinics in Germany at 2 time points: t1 (2019; before the COVID-19 pandemic) and t2 (2021; during the COVID-19 pandemic). We used a standardized questionnaire, including items on respondents' knowledge, interest, expectation, and use of digital applications, as well as their demographics. The survey was distributed by post and email. The data were analyzed descriptively as well as with multiple logistic regressions. RESULTS: At t1, 585 (272/571, 47.6% female; mean age 52.4, SD 8.9 years) dermatologists and at t2, 792 (360/736, 48.9% female; mean age 54.3, SD 8.6 years) dermatologists participated in this survey. Interest in digital medicine was higher at t1 than at t2 (381/585, 65.1% vs 458/792, 57.8%; P≤.001). Nevertheless, 38.6% (306/792) had used digital applications more often since the beginning of the pandemic. For example, real-time telemedicine with patients (12/585, 2.1% vs 160/792, 7.6%; P≤.001) and other specialists did increase (33/385, 5.7% vs 181/792, 22.8%; P≤.001). Almost one-third expressed great concerns about digitalization (272/792, 34.3% vs 294/792, 37.1%; P=.21). Spatial analysis revealed higher interest in, more positive expectations toward, and higher use of digital applications in urban areas in comparison to rural areas. For instance, dermatologists from urban areas assessed future applications as having less risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.35-0.76) than did dermatologists from rural areas. The situation was similar with the age groups, as, for example, dermatologists aged <50 years also expected lower risks (aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.34-0.77) than those aged ≥50 years. There were no differences between sexes in use, but there were differences in knowledge and expectation; for example, male participants assessed their confidence in using digital applications as higher (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01-2.04) than did female participants. CONCLUSIONS: During the pandemic, the use of digital applications in dermatology increased but still remained at a moderate level. The regional and age-related disparities identified indicate the need for further action to ensure equal access to digital care.

Guideline on allergen immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2K Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology (SSAI), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), Society of Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Professional Association of Otolaryngologists (BVHNO), German Association of Paediatric and Adolescent Care Specialists (BVKJ), Federal Association of Pneumologists, Sleep and Respiratory Physicians (BdP), Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD).

Not available.

German S1 guideline: Contact dermatitis.

Contact dermatitis is an inflammation of the epidermis and dermis at the site of exposure triggered by external agents. The two main forms are irritant and allergic contact dermatitis, which cause significant health and socioeconomic costs in addition to a marked reduction in quality of life. The anamnesis and the clinical picture are decisive for the necessary diagnostic measures. The most accurate possible diagnostic classification of contact dermatitis by means of allergological testing is important for disease management, since not only classical eczema therapy but also avoidance of the exogenous triggering factors are of great importance here. The choice of therapy should be based on the acuity, clinical severity, morphology of the lesions and localization of the contact dermatitis. A combination of basic therapy, topical, physical, and systemic therapy adapted to the patient's needs is required, whereby not all forms of therapy must be carried out simultaneously but can be used in a varying manner. Primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies aim at the recognition of the triggering noxae or allergens with subsequent contact avoidance or minimization. The present S1-guideline on contact dermatitis is primarily intended to provide dermatologists, allergologists and physicians working in allergology and occupational dermatology with a decision-making aid for the selection and implementation of suitable and sufficient diagnostics, therapy, and prevention.

[Epidemiology of scabies in Germany: multisource analysis of primary and secondary data]. / Epidemiologie der Skabies in Deutschland: Multi-Source-Analyse von Primär- und Sekundärdaten.

BACKGROUND: Scabies is one of the most common and, in terms of burden of disease, one of the most significant skin diseases worldwide. In Germany, an increase in cases is currently being discussed, for which reliable data have been lacking until now. OBJECTIVES: The goal is to clarify the prevalence and treatment of scabies in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multisource analyses of treatment data from a nationwide statutory health insurance company, the Federal Statistical Office and company skin screenings. RESULTS: In Germany, the number of cases of scabies has been rising since 2009 and especially since 2014. In the outpatient setting, there was an increase of 52.8% to around 128,000 treatment cases between 2010 and 2015. Currently, more than 11,000 inpatient cases are documented annually in Germany with scabies as the main diagnosis (ICD-10 B86). The increase between 2010 and 2016 was about 306%. The main outpatient specialist groups providing care are dermatologists and general practitioners, while in the inpatient sector treatment is provided by departments of dermatology, paediatrics and internal medicine. CONCLUSION: Due to the aforementioned development of prevalence and incidence, the need for care will remain at a high level in the future, which suggests an increased need for education and early detection.

Inpatient care for skin diseases in Germany: multi-source analysis on the current and future health care needs.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, skin diseases are mainly treated in the 115 dermatological hospitals. METHODS: Health care and health economic analysis of dermatological inpatient care and prediction of future care needs based on primary and secondary data. RESULTS: Outpatient and inpatient care for dermatologic treatment indications is predominantly provided by dermatology specialists. Inpatient treatment was provided for 833,491 cases in 2018, corresponding to 4.21 % of all inpatient cases (19,808,687). Most common treatment cases were: epithelial skin cancer (total 87,386, of which dermatology clinics 52,608), followed by melanoma (23,917/17,774), psoriasis (19,291/13,352), erysipelas (73,337/11,260), other dermatitis (12,671/10,842), atopic dermatitis (AD) (11,421/9,734), and herpes zoster (26,249/9,652). With an average length of stay of 5.69 days, dermatology hospitals were in the bottom third. The proportion of inpatient indications cared for in dermatology hospitals was highest for prurigo (95.2 %), pemphigus (94.9 %), parapsoriasis (94.6 %), pemphigoid (90.3 %), eczema other than AD (85.6 %), and AD (85.2 %). While the total number of inpatient treatment cases in Germany has increased by an average of 17.5 % between 2000 and 2018, this is the case for 26.6 % of skin diseases and over 150 % for individual ones. The projection of current to future inpatient care suggests a continued high demand for inpatient care by dermatology hospitals. CONCLUSION: Inpatient dermatological care will continue to be an indispensable component of qualified, socially necessary care in Germany.

Praxis der Teledermatologie.

HINTERGRUND: Teledermatologische Anwendungen werden im deutschen Versorgungssystem in den nächsten Jahren erheblich an Bedeutung gewinnen. Das vorliegende Empfehlungspapier wurde als Expertenkonsens auf der Basis einer qualifizierten Literaturrecherche und eines strukturierten Entscheidungsprozesses der Autorengruppe entwickelt. ZIELSETZUNG: a) die IST-Analyse zum Einsatz der Telemedizin in der Dermatologie, b) die Bewertung der Evidenz ihres Nutzens und ihrer Sicherheit und, c) die Entwicklung von Verfahrensstandards für die ärztliche Praxis in den deutschsprachigen Ländern. Auf der Basis dieser Erkenntnisse soll durch einen Expertenkonsens eine Handlungsorientierung für den Einsatz der Teledermatologie gegeben werden. METHODEN: Dreistufiges Vorgehen: 1) Systematische Literaturrecherche in den internationalen medizinischen Onlinedatenbanken Pubmed und Embase, 2) Weitere, teils manuelle Recherchen, 3) Expertenkonsens mit einem systematischen Entscheidungsverfahren mit 21 Teilnehmern. ERGEBNISSE: In der strukturierten Literaturrecherche fanden sich 204 wissenschaftliche Originalarbeiten, in denen Anwendungen der Telemedizin bei Hautkrankheiten thematisiert wurden. Diese wurden systematisch aufgearbeitet, analysiert und bewertet. In der zweiten Stufe wurden in einer Handsuche zusätzliche relevante Schriften identifiziert und ebenfalls ausgewertet. Das Expertengremium entwickelte dann auf der Basis der externen Evidenz sowie der internen Diskussion Handlungsempfehlungen für die Praxis. Schlussfolgerung der wissenschaftlichen Studienlage ist, dass die telemedizinische Unterstützung der dermatologischen Behandlung und Prävention bei Einsatz leistungsfähiger Systeme, Kenntnis ihrer Anwendung sowie Beachtung der Indikationen und Kontrainidikationen einen erheblichen Mehrnutzen darstellt. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Die Teledermatologie hat in den deutschsprachigen Ländern wie auch weltweit einen zunehmenden Stellenwert und bietet aufgrund des hohen Innovationsgrades eine Vorreiter- und Vorbildfunktion für weitere telemedizinische Anwendungen anderer Fachrichtungen. Eine qualitätsgesicherte teledermatologische Behandlung ist in den deutschsprachigen Ländern praktikabel und kann zu einem relevanten Mehrnutzen in der Versorgung führen. Ihr Einsatz ist immer dann in Erwägung zu ziehen, wenn relevante Zusatznutzen für die Patienten ohne relevante Nachteile für sie und für die Versorgenden zu erwarten sind. Für die teledermatologische Behandlung wurden mit dem vorliegenden Konsensuspapier praxisrelevante Maßgaben festgelegt. Etwaige situationsabhängige Limitationen in der Versorgung sind stets zu beachten.

What is psoriasis? - Perception and assessment of psoriasis among the German population.

BACKGROUND: Delivery of health care to psoriasis patients plays an important role in the field of dermatology. Following the 2014 WHO resolution and the 2016 WHO global report, there has been an increase in the awareness of psoriasis among the general public. However, the perception of psoriasis by the general population remains unclear. The goal of the present study was to investigate the perception and assessment of psoriasis among the German population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Representative telephone survey among 2,001 adults using a standardized questionnaire. Analyses with respect to place of residence, age, gender and level of education were conducted in a descriptive manner. RESULTS: Twenty-nine percent of participants were familiar with the term "Psoriasis"; 86 %, with the German designation "Schuppenflechte". Ninety-three percent considered the disease to be a significant burden for affected individuals; 59 % stated that there were effective drugs available for psoriasis; 9 % considered the disease to be communicable. Ten percent reported that they would not want to live in the same household as an affected individual; 23 % did not want to share the same swimming pool; and 27 % did not want to be in a personal relationship with someone affected. Twelve percent stated to be familiar with the WHO resolution on psoriasis; 6 % with the World Psoriasis Day; and 3 % with the "Bitte berühren" ("Please touch") campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of the German population is familiar with the term "Schuppenflechte", there is a significant lack of knowledge about the disease as well as prejudice toward affected individuals. Further measures are required to improve the level of information and decrease stigmatization.

Was ist Schuppenflechte? - Wahrnehmung und Bewertung der Psoriasis in der deutschen Bevölkerung.

HINTERGRUND: Die Versorgung der Psoriasis vulgaris nimmt in der Dermatologie einen wichtigen Stellenwert ein. Im Zuge der WHO-Resolution 2014 und des WHO Global Reports 2016 hat die öffentliche Aufmerksamkeit für die Psoriasis zugenommen. Unklar ist, wie Psoriasis in der Allgemeinbevölkerung wahrgenommen wird. Ziel ist die Erfassung der Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Psoriasis in der Bevölkerung. PATIENTEN UND METHODEN: Repräsentative Telefonumfrage mit 2001 Erwachsenen mittels eines standardisierten Fragebogens. Die Auswertungen erfolgten deskriptiv nach Region, Alter, Geschlecht und Bildungsstatus. ERGEBNISSE: Die Begriffe Psoriasis bzw. Schuppenflechte waren 29 % bzw. 86 % der Befragten, bekannt. 93 % schätzten die Krankheit als sehr belastend für die Betroffenen ein, 59 % nahmen an, dass es wirksame Medikamente gegen Schuppenflechte gibt und 9 % hielten diese Erkrankung für ansteckend. 10 % würden nicht mit einer betroffenen Person im Haushalt leben wollen, 23 % nicht mit Betroffenen ins Schwimmbad gehen und 27 % nicht in einer Partnerschaft sein. 12 % gaben an, die WHO-Resolution zur Psoriasis zu kennen, 6 % den Weltpsoriasistag und 3 % die Kampagne "Bitte berühren". SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN: Wenngleich einer Mehrheit in der deutschen Bevölkerung die Schuppenflechte bekannt ist, bestehen deutliche Wissensdefizite und teilweise Vorurteile gegenüber dieser Erkrankung. Weitergehende Maßnahmen zur besseren Information und zur Minderung der Stigmatisierung sind notwendig.

S2k-Leitlinie zum Gebrauch von Präparationen zur lokalen Anwendung auf der Haut (Topika).

Diese Leitlinie richtet sich an Assistenz- und Fachärzte der Dermatologie sowie an Kostenträger und politische Entscheidungsgremien. Die Leitlinie wurde im formellen Konsensusverfahren (S2k) von Dermatologen unter Einbindung von Apothekern erstellt. Die Leitlinie stellt allgemeine Aspekte der Pharmakokinetik sowie der regulatorischen Begrifflichkeiten dar. Es werden Empfehlungen zur Indikation von Magistralrezepturen sowie deren Qualitätssicherung gegeben. Die Bedeutung der galenischen Grundlagen und die Problematik bei einer Substitution gegeneinander verschiedener Grundlagen werden dargestellt. Die Leitlinie umfasst Kriterien zur Auswahl einer adäquaten Grundlage sowie spezifische Aspekte zur Therapieplanung. Die Leitlinie gibt Empfehlungen zum Management bei Unverträglichkeiten gegenüber Bestandteilen der Grundlagen oder Hilfsstoffe.

S2k guidelines for the use of topical preparations on the skin.

The present guidelines are aimed at dermatology residents and board-certified dermatologists as well as policymakers and insurance companies. Developed by dermatologists in collaboration with pharmacists using a formal consensus process (S2k), they include general aspects with respect to pharmacokinetics and regulatory terminology. Recommendations are provided on the various indications for extemporaneous preparations and their quality assurance. The importance of pharmaceutical vehicles and problems associated with substituting one vehicle for another are discussed. The guidelines include criteria for choosing a suitable pharmaceutical vehicle and for specific aspects in terms of treatment planning. In addition, recommendations are given for managing allergic reactions to vehicles or additives.

Biosimilars in der Dermatologie - Theorie wird Realität.

Biosimilars sind biologische Medikamente, bei denen es sich um Nachbildungen eines spezifischen Referenzprodukts handelt. Biosimilars der Tumornekrosefaktor-alpha-Inhibitoren Infliximab und Etanercept sind bereits zugelassen und stehen für dermatologische Indikationen zur Verfügung. Die Aufsichtsbehörden verlangen eine eingehende Analyse der physikochemischen und funktionellen Eigenschaften dieser hochkomplexen Moleküle sowie klinische Daten hinsichtlich ihrer gleichwertigen Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit anhand mindestens einer klinischen Studie mit einer sensitiven und homogenen Population. Für die Zulassung in einem regulierten Arzneimittelmarkt muss daher nachgewiesen werden, dass die Biosimilars praktisch gleichwertig mit dem jeweiligen Originalpräparat sind. Demzufolge werden diese Daten von einem Molekül (dem Originator) auf das andere (das Biosimilar) extrapoliert und die resultierende Zulassung umfasst die gleichen Indikationen wie beim Originalpräparat. Die Extrapolation ist zwar gut akzeptiert und reguliert, es fehlen jedoch klare Empfehlungen hinsichtlich der Austauschbarkeit von Originator und Biosimilar ebenso wie Daten über mehrmalige aufeinanderfolgende Umstellungen. Die aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse stehen einer Anwendung von Biosimilars bei dermatologischen Indikationen nicht entgegen. Eine mehrmalige Umstellung der Biosimilars sollte jedoch sorgfältig überdacht werden. Um das Vertrauen in Biosimilars zu festigen und ihre Evidenz zu verbessern, ist es essentiell das spezifische Produkt, das jeder Patient erhält, möglichst genau und möglichst im Rahmen von Patientenregister zu dokumentieren.

Biosimilars in Dermatology - theory becomes reality.

Biosimilars are biological medicines that are analogues of a specific reference product. Biosimilars of the tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors infliximab and etanercept are already approved and available for dermatological indications. Regulatory agencies require in-depth analysis of physicochemical and functional properties of these highly complex molecules as well as clinical data on their similarity regarding efficacy and safety in at least one clinical trial in a sensitive and homogeneous population. Thus, it must be shown that biosimilars are essentially the same as the originator product if they are to be licensed in regulated drug markets. As a consequence, these data are extrapolated from one molecule (the originator) to another (biosimilar) resulting in an approval that includes the same indications as the originator product. While extrapolation is well accepted and regulated, clear recommendations regarding the interchangeability of originators and biosimilars as well as data on multiple consecutive switching are missing. Current scientific knowledge does not argue against the use of biosimilars for dermatological indications, but sequential switching of biosimilars should be considered carefully. To increase confidence and enhance evidence for biosimilars, accurate documentation of the specific products given to each patient is essential and should preferably be included in patient registries.