Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(7): e16306, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716750

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to highlight neonatal Fc receptor inhibition (efgartigimod) as a valuable therapeutic option for patients with refractory seronegative myasthenia gravis (MG) and to emphasize the concept that seronegative MG is greatly constrained by the limitations of currently available diagnostic methods and therapeutic measures. METHODS: We describe the first refractory, generalized MG (gMG) patient successfully treated with efgartigimod after testing negative on standard autoantibody detection tests. RESULTS: Our patient presented with severe fluctuating bulbar and generalized weakness, resulting in multiple myasthenic crises requiring intubation. After a 28-year medical history of multiple failed lines of treatment, our patient was started on efgartigimod. Over five treatment cycles, a definite improvement in her clinical condition was observed (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class: IIIb to IIb; MG-Activities of Daily Living score: 11 to 0; MG-Quality of Life 15 score: 30 to 0; Quantitative MG score: 28 to 6). Standard autoantibody detection tests failed to detect known pathogenic autoantibodies, but cell-based assay (CBA) identified autoantibodies against clustered adult acetylcholine receptor (AChR). CONCLUSIONS: In light of recent approvals of efgartigimod by the European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration exclusively for AChR-positive gMG forms, our case highlights evidence suggesting that such an approach might be shortsighted and could limit therapeutic options for patients with refractory seronegative gMG. Additionally, introducing more sensitive analytical techniques, exemplified by CBA, may help bridge the gap between seronegative and seropositive patients. This represents an urgent unmet need for gMG patients, as the antibody profile dramatically influences the therapeutic approach.


Assuntos
Miastenia Gravis , Humanos , Miastenia Gravis/tratamento farmacológico , Miastenia Gravis/imunologia , Feminino , Autoanticorpos/sangue , Receptores Fc/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Receptores Colinérgicos/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(5): e16248, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376074

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic criteria, ancillary investigations and treatment response using real-life data in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data were collected from 110 patients enrolled in the Italian MMN database through a structured questionnaire. Twenty-six patients were excluded due to the unavailability of nerve conduction studies or the presence of clinical signs and symptoms and electrodiagnostic abnormalities inconsistent with the MMN diagnosis. Analyses were conducted on 73 patients with a confirmed MMN diagnosis and 11 patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria. RESULTS: The European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria were variably applied. AUTHOR: When applying the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine criteria, an additional 17% of patients fulfilled the criteria for probable/definite diagnosis whilst a further 9.5% missed the diagnosis. In 17% of the patients only compound muscle action potential amplitude, but not area, was measured and subsequently recorded in the database by the treating physician. Additional investigations, including anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, supported the diagnosis in 46%-83% of the patients. Anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies and nerve ultrasound demonstrated the highest sensitivity. Additional tests were frequently performed outside the EFNS/PNS guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the real-world diagnostic and management strategies for MMN, highlighting the challenges in applying diagnostic criteria.


Assuntos
Doença dos Neurônios Motores , Polineuropatias , Humanos , Polineuropatias/diagnóstico , Nervos Periféricos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Imunoglobulina M , Itália , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Doença dos Neurônios Motores/diagnóstico , Doença dos Neurônios Motores/tratamento farmacológico
3.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(4): e16190, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165011

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There are different criteria for the diagnosis of different variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). The 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) guidelines provide specific clinical criteria for each CIDP variant even if their therapeutical impact has not been investigated. METHODS: We applied the clinical criteria for CIDP variants of the 2021 EAN/PNS guidelines to 369 patients included in the Italian CIDP database who fulfilled the 2021 EAN/PNS electrodiagnostic criteria for CIDP. RESULTS: According to the 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria, 245 patients achieved a clinical diagnosis of typical CIDP or CIDP variant (66%). We identified 106 patients with typical CIDP (29%), 62 distal CIDP (17%), 28 multifocal or focal CIDP (7%), four sensory CIDP (1%), 27 sensory-predominant CIDP (7%), 10 motor CIDP (3%), and eight motor-predominant CIDP (2%). Patients with multifocal, distal, and sensory CIDP had milder impairment and symptoms. Patients with multifocal CIDP had less frequently reduced conduction velocity and prolonged F-wave latency and had lower levels of cerebrospinal fluid protein. Patients with distal CIDP more frequently had reduced distal compound muscle action potentials. Patients with motor CIDP did not improve after steroid therapy, whereas those with motor-predominant CIDP did. None of the patients with sensory CIDP responded to steroids, whereas most of those with sensory-predominant CIDP did. CONCLUSIONS: The 2021 EAN/PNS criteria for CIDP allow a better characterization of CIDP variants, permitting their distinction from typical CIDP and more appropriate treatment for patients.


Assuntos
Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica , Humanos , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/diagnóstico , Nervos Periféricos , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais
4.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 94(8): 614-621, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37015771

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To assess the ability of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) clinical criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) to include within their classification the whole spectrum of clinical heterogeneity of the disease and to define the clinical characteristics of the unclassifiable clinical forms. METHODS: The 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria for CIDP were applied to 329 patients fulfilling the electrodiagnostic (and in some cases also the supportive) criteria for the diagnosis of CIDP. Clinical characteristics were reviewed for each patient not strictly fulfilling the clinical criteria ('unclassifiable'). RESULTS: At study inclusion, 124 (37.5%) patients had an unclassifiable clinical presentation, including 110 (89%) with a typical CIDP-like clinical phenotype in whom some segments of the four limbs were unaffected by weakness ('incomplete typical CIDP'), 10 (8%) with a mild distal, symmetric, sensory or sensorimotor polyneuropathy confined to the lower limbs with cranial nerve involvement ('cranial nerve predominant CIDP') and 4 (1%) with a symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy limited to the proximal and distal areas of the lower limbs ('paraparetic CIDP'). Eighty-one (65%) patients maintained an unclassifiable presentation during the entire disease follow-up while 13 patients progressed to typical CIDP. Patients with the unclassifiable clinical forms compared with patients with typical CIDP had a milder form of CIDP, while there was no difference in the distribution patterns of demyelination. CONCLUSIONS: A proportion of patients with CIDP do not strictly fulfil the 2021 EAN/PNS clinical criteria for diagnosis. These unclassifiable clinical phenotypes may pose diagnostic challenges and thus deserve more attention in clinical practice and research.


Assuntos
Polineuropatias , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica , Humanos , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/diagnóstico , Nervos Periféricos , Nervos Cranianos , Fenótipo , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia
5.
Eur J Neurol ; 30(7): 1907-1918, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37000158

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the risk of relapse after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, and its safety and tolerability, in patients with chronic inflammatory neuropathies. METHODS: In this multicenter, cohort and case-crossover study, the risk of relapse associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was assessed by comparing the frequency of relapse in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients who underwent or did not undergo vaccination. Frequency of relapse in the 3 months prior to and after vaccination, and safety and tolerability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, were also assessed. RESULTS: In all, 336 patients were included (278 CIDP, 58 MMN). Three hundred and seven (91%) patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Twenty-nine patients (9%) did not undergo vaccination. Mild and transient relapses were observed in 16 (5%) patients (13 CIDP, 3 MMN) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and in none of the patients who did not undergo vaccination (relative risk [RR] 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19-52.25). There was no increase in the specific risk of relapse associated with type of vaccine or diagnosis. Comparison with the 3-month control period preceding vaccination revealed an increased risk of relapse after vaccination (RR 4.00, 95% CI 1.35-11.82), which was restricted to CIDP patients (RR 3.25, 95% CI 1.07-9.84). The safety profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate local and systemic adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in CIDP and MMN patients does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of relapse at the primary end-point, although a slightly increased risk in CIDP patients was found compared to the 3 months before vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Polineuropatias , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica , Humanos , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/diagnóstico , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Cross-Over , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , Recidiva
6.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 93(12): 1239-1246, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36190959

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society (EAN/PNS) diagnostic criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) with those of the 2010 European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS). METHODS: Sensitivity and specificity of the two sets of criteria were evaluated in 330 patients with CIDP and 166 axonal peripheral neuropathy controls. Comparison of the utility of nerve conduction studies with different number of nerves examined and of the sensitivity and specificity of the two criteria in typical CIDP and its variants were assessed. RESULTS: EFNS/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 92% for possible CIDP and 85% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a sensitivity of 83% for possible CIDP and 74% for CIDP. Using supportive criteria, the sensitivity of the EAN/PNS criteria for possible CIDP increased to 85% and that of CIDP to 77%, remaining lower than that of the EFNS/PNS criteria. Specificity of the EFNS/PNS criteria was 68% for possible CIDP and 84% for probable/definite CIDP, while the EAN/PNS criteria had a specificity of 88% for possible CIDP and 98% for CIDP. More extended studies increased the sensitivity of both sets of criteria by 4%-7% but reduced their specificity by 2%-3%. The EFNS/PNS criteria were more sensitive for the diagnosis of typical CIDP while the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific for the diagnosis of distal and sensory CIDP. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, the EAN/PNS criteria were more specific but less sensitive than the EFNS/PNS criteria. With the EAN/PNS criteria, more extended nerve conduction studies are recommended to obtain an acceptable sensitivity while maintaining a high specificity.


Assuntos
Neurologia , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica , Humanos , Polirradiculoneuropatia Desmielinizante Inflamatória Crônica/diagnóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Nervos Periféricos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Condução Nervosa/fisiologia
8.
Front Genet ; 11: 399, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32477400

RESUMO

Homozygous and compound heterozygous mutations in GNB5 gene have been associated with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, ranging from neurodevelopmental issues with or without cardiac arrhythmia (LADCI) to severe developmental delay with epileptic encephalopathy, retinal dystrophy, and heart rhythm abnormalities (IDDCA). While missense or missense/non-sense mutations usually lead to milder form, the biallelic loss of function of GNB5 gene causes the severe multisystemic IDDCA phenotype. So far, only 27 patients have been described with GNB5-associated disease. We report the first case of a patient carrying a homozygous 15q21.2 microdeletion, encompassing GNB5 and the two contiguous genes BCL2L10 and MYO5C. The clinical features of the child are consistent with the severe IDDCA phenotype, thus confirming the GNB5 loss-of-function mechanism in determining such presentation of the disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA