AAPM Task Group Report 261: Comprehensive quality control methodology and management of dental and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems.

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems specifically designed and manufactured for dental, maxillofacial imaging (MFI) and otolaryngology (OLR) applications have been commercially available in the United States since 2001 and have been in widespread clinical use since. Until recently, there has been a lack of professional guidance available for medical physicists about how to assess and evaluate the performance of these systems and about the establishment and management of quality control (QC) programs. The owners and users of dental CBCT systems may have only a rudimentary understanding of this technology, including how it differs from conventional multidetector CT (MDCT) in terms of acceptable radiation safety practices. Dental CBCT systems differ from MDCT in several ways and these differences are described. This report provides guidance to medical physicists and serves as a basis for stakeholders to make informed decisions regarding how to manage and develop a QC program for dental CBCT systems. It is important that a medical physicist with experience in dental CBCT serves as a resource on this technology and the associated radiation protection best practices. The medical physicist should be involved at the pre-installation stage to ensure that a CBCT room configuration allows for a safe and efficient workflow and that structural shielding, if needed, is designed into the architectural plans. Acceptance testing of new installations should include assessment of mechanical alignment of patient positioning lasers and x-ray beam collimation and benchmarking of essential image quality performance parameters such as image uniformity, noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution, and artifacts. Several approaches for quantifying radiation output from these systems are described, including simply measuring the incident air-kerma (Kair) at the entrance surface of the image receptor. These measurements are to be repeated at least annually as part of routine QC by the medical physicist. QC programs for dental CBCT, at least in the United States, are often driven by state regulations, accreditation program requirements, or manufacturer recommendations.

Professional stereotypes among specialties and fields of work within the veterinary community.

BACKGROUND: Medical specialties hold varying degrees of prestige, stemming from the existence of stereotypes among them. These have been shown to lead to prejudice against specific specialists, which not only influences career choices but also affects the perception of equality among specialties. METHOD: The aim of the research was to determine the presence of stereotypes in the UK veterinary community. Using an online questionnaire, participants were asked to provide an adjective that best characterises 15 specialties, in addition to their perceptions on prestige and gender association. Word cloud analysis coupled with sentiment analysis in Python using the language processing software Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) was used to assess sentiments with respect to the adjectives. RESULTS: There were 665 questionnaire respondents, and there was evidence of their construction of specialty-specific stereotypes. Some specialties were perceived more negatively than others, including equine general practitioners, surgeons, pathologists, dermatologists and public health veterinarians/epidemiologists. Gender bias was identified within this study, most prominently within production animal and behavioural medicine veterinarians. The most prestigious specialties were neurology, surgery and cardiology. CONCLUSION: Specialty-specific stereotypes exist within the veterinary community. Acknowledging their existence is a first step to recognising the influence they have on career choices.

Publisher Correction: Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric Cone Beam CT.

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

PET/CT and PET/MRI in ophthalmic oncology (Review).

Orbital and ocular anatomy is quite complex, consisting of several tissues, which can give rise to both benign and malignant tumors, while several primary neoplasms can metastasize to the orbital and ocular space. Early detection, accurate staging and re­staging, efficient monitoring of treatment response, non­invasive differentiation between benign and malignant lesions, and accurate planning of external radiation treatment, are of utmost importance for the optimal and individualized management of ophthalmic oncology patients. Addressing these challenges requires the employment of several diagnostic imaging techniques, such as high­definition digital fundus photography, ultrasound imaging, optical coherence tomography, optical coherence tomography (OCT)­angiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In recent years, technological advances have enabled the development of hybrid positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and PET/MRI systems, setting new standards in cancer diagnosis and treatment. The capability of simultaneously targeting several cancer­related biochemical procedures using positron emitting­radiopharmaceuticals, while morphologically characterizing lesions by CT or MRI, together with the intrinsic quantitative capabilities of PET­imaging, provide incremental diagnostic information, enabling accurate, highly efficient and personalized treatment strategies. Aim of the current review is to discuss the current applications of hybrid PET/CT and PET/MRI imaging in the management of patients presenting with the most commonly encountered orbital and ocular tumors.

The growing concern of radiation dose in paediatric dental and maxillofacial CBCT: an easy guide for daily practice.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an indication-based and scanner-specific radiation dose and risk guide for paediatric patients undergoing dental and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations. METHODS: Five commercially available scanners were simulated in EGSnrc Monte Carlo (MC) code. Dedicated, in-house built, head and neck voxel models, each consisting of 22 segmented organs, were used in the study. Organ doses and life attributable risk (LAR) for cancer incidence were assessed for males and females, aged 5 to 14 years old, for every clinically available protocol: central upper and lower incisors, upper and lower premolars, upper and lower jaws, cleft palate, temporal bone, sinus, dentomaxillofacial complex, and face and skull imaging. Dose results were normalised to the x-ray tube load (mAs) and logarithmic curves were fit to organ dose and risk versus age data. RESULTS: Females demonstrated higher LAR values in all cases. A well-established dose decreasing pattern with increasing age-at-exposure was observed. Central upper incisor protocols were those with the lowest risk, contrary to skull protocols which provided the highest LAR values. Salivary glands and oral mucosa were the highest irradiated organs in all cases, followed by extrathoracic tissue (ET) in protocols where the entire nasal cavity was inside the primary field. The dose to thyroid was considerably high for younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: This work provides an extensive dose assessment guide for 5 dental CBCTs, enabling detailed dose assessment for every paediatric patient. KEY POINTS: • Radiation dose concerns due to the growing use of paediatric dental and maxillofacial CBCT underline the need for justification that should in part be based on radiation exposure in radiology. • Patient-specific dose calculations based on Monte Carlo simulations and head-neck paediatric voxel models overcome the limitations of conventional thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) dosimetry and provide proper guidance for justification of CBCT exposures. • Monte Carlo simulations with head-neck models reveal an organ dose and radiation risk decreasing pattern with increasing age at exposure, and with decreasing size of the scanning volume of interest (field of view).

Halve the dose while maintaining image quality in paediatric Cone Beam CT.

Cone beam CT (CBCT) for dentomaxillofacial paediatric assessment has been widely used despite the uncertainties of the risks of the low-dose radiation exposures. The aim of this work was to investigate the clinical performance of different CBCT acquisition protocols towards the optimization of paediatric exposures. Custom-made anthropomorphic phantoms were scanned using a CBCT unit in six protocols. CT slices were blinded, randomized and presented to three observers, who scored the image quality using a 4-point scale along with their level of confidence. Sharpness level was also measured using a test object containing an air/PMMA e,dge. The effective dose was calculated by means of a customized Monte Carlo (MC) framework using previously validated paediatric voxels models. The results have shown that the protocols set with smaller voxel size (180 µm), even when decreasing exposure parameters (kVp and mAs), showed high image quality scores and increased sharpness. The MC analysis showed a gradual decrease in effective dose when exposures parameters were reduced, with an emphasis on an average reduction of 45% for the protocol that combined 70 kVp, 16 mAs and 180 µm voxel size. In contrast, both "ultra-low dose" protocols that combined a larger voxel size (400 µm) with lower mAs (7.4 mAs) demonstrated the lowest scores with high levels of confidence unsuitable for an anatomical approach. In conclusion, a significant decrease in the effective dose can be achieved while maintaining the image quality required for paediatric CBCT.

Estimation of the radiation dose for pediatric CBCT indications: a prospective study on ProMax3D.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of CBCT units and a wide variability of radiation doses have been reported in dentistry lately. AIM: To estimate the effective, cumulative, and organ absorbed doses in children exposed to CBCT over 2 years. DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted in children who underwent CBCT diagnostic imaging with the ProMax3D machine. Organ and effective doses were calculated by Monte Carlo simulation using 5- and 8-year-old pediatric voxel phantoms. Extrapolation procedures were applied to estimate doses for other ages and CBCT protocols used in clinical conditions. RESULTS: The median effective dose was 137.9 µSv, and the median cumulative dose was 231.4 µSv. Statistically significant differences in the effective doses and cumulative doses were found for various indications of CBCT in children (P < 0.001). The median absorbed organ dose for brain and thyroid was significantly higher for the clinical condition that required large FOVs (2.5 mGy and 1.05 mGy, respectively) compared to medium (0.19 and 0.51 mGy) and small FOVs (0.07 and 0.24 mGy; P < 0.05). The radiation dose of salivary glands did not vary significantly with FOV. CONCLUSION: The results revealed the variation of CBCT doses and the influence of FOV size in pediatric exposure.

Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement.

DIMITRA (dentomaxillofacial paediatric imaging: an investigation towards low-dose radiation induced risks) is a European multicenter and multidisciplinary project focused on optimizing cone-beam CT exposures for children and adolescents. With increasing use of cone-beam CT for dentomaxillofacial diagnostics, concern arises regarding radiation risks associated with this imaging modality, especially for children. Research evidence concerning cone-beam CT indications in children remains limited, while reports mention inconsistent recommendations for dose reduction. Furthermore, there is no paper using the combined and integrated information on the required indication-oriented image quality and the related patient dose levels. In this paper, therefore, the authors initiate an integrated approach based on current evidence regarding image quality and dose, together with the expertise of DIMITRA's members searching for a state of the art. The aim of this DIMITRA position statement is to provide indication-oriented and patient-specific recommendations regarding the main cone-beam CT applications in the pediatric field. The authors will review this position statement document when results regarding multidisciplinary approaches evolve, in a period of 5 years or earlier.

Development of a paediatric head voxel model database for dosimetric applications.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a database of paediatric head voxel models intended for Monte Carlo (MC) dosimetric applications. METHODS: Seventeen head and neck CT image data sets were retrieved from the picture archiving and communicating system of our hospital and were reformed into voxel models. 22 organs were segmented at each data set. The segmented organ masses were compared to the respective age- and gender-specific ICRP reference mass value. Adjustments were made such that segmented and reference mass values coincide within a tolerance of 10%. A dental cone beam CT cleft palate simulation study was set up to demonstrate the applicability of our database to MC frameworks and to investigate the need for age- and gender-specific paediatric models. RESULTS: The designed database covers the age range from 2 months to 14 years old. Each model represents a reference head voxel phantom for its corresponding age and gender category. The simulation study revealed absorbed organ dose differences larger than 50% among the 5, 8 and 12 years old models when exposed to identical conditions. CONCLUSION: Children cannot be represented by one average phantom covering the entire age range like adults due to the fact that their organs change rapidly in size and shape. A database of paediatric head voxel models was designed to enable dose calculations via MC simulations. Advances in knowledge: The application of each model of the database to MC frameworks provides age- and gender-specific organ dose estimations from medical exposures in the head and neck region.

Two examples of indication specific radiation dose calculations in dental CBCT and Multidetector CT scanners.

PURPOSE: To calculate organ doses and estimate the effective dose for justification purposes in patients undergoing orthognathic treatment planning purposes and temporal bone imaging in dental cone beam CT (CBCT) and Multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners. METHODS: The radiation dose to the ICRP reference male voxel phantom was calculated for dedicated orthognathic treatment planning acquisitions via Monte Carlo simulations in two dental CBCT scanners, Promax 3D Max (Planmeca, FI) and NewTom VGi evo (QR s.r.l, IT) and in Somatom Definition Flash (Siemens, DE) MDCT scanner. For temporal bone imaging, radiation doses were calculated via MC simulations for a CBCT protocol in NewTom 5G (QR s.r.l, IT) and with the use of a software tool (CT-expo) for Somatom Force (Siemens, DE). All procedures had been optimized at the acceptance tests of the devices. RESULTS: For orthognathic protocols, dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses compared to MDCT scanners. The estimated effective dose (ED) was 0.32mSv for a normal resolution operation mode in Promax 3D Max, 0.27mSv in VGi-evo and 1.18mSv in the Somatom Definition Flash. For temporal bone protocols, the Somatom Force resulted in an estimated ED of 0.28mSv while for NewTom 5G the ED was 0.31 and 0.22mSv for monolateral and bilateral imaging respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two clinical exams which are carried out with both a CBCT or a MDCT scanner were compared in terms of radiation dose. Dental CBCT scanners deliver lower doses for orthognathic patients whereas for temporal bone procedures the doses were similar.

Spatial and contrast resolution of ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging using iterative reconstruction technology.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine how iterative reconstruction technology (IRT) influences contrast and spatial resolution in ultralow-dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: A polymethyl methacrylate phantom with various inserts was scanned using a reference protocol (RP) at CT dose index volume 36.56 mGy, a sinus protocol at 18.28 mGy and ultralow-dose protocols (LD) at 4.17 mGy, 2.36 mGy, 0.99 mGy and 0.53 mGy. All data sets were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and the following IRTs: adaptive statistical iterative reconstructions (ASIRs) (ASIR-50, ASIR-100) and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR). Inserts containing line-pair patterns and contrast detail patterns for three different materials were scored by three observers. Observer agreement was analyzed using Cohen's kappa and difference in performance between the protocols and reconstruction was analyzed with Dunn's test at α = 0.05. RESULTS: Interobserver agreement was acceptable with a mean kappa value of 0.59. Compared with the RP using FBP, similar scores were achieved at 2.36 mGy using MBIR. MIBR reconstructions showed the highest noise suppression as well as good contrast even at the lowest doses. Overall, ASIR reconstructions did not outperform FBP. CONCLUSIONS: LD and MBIR at a dose reduction of >90% may show no significant differences in spatial and contrast resolution compared with an RP and FBP. Ultralow-dose CT and IRT should be further explored in clinical studies.

As Low Dose as Sufficient Quality: Optimization of Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Scanning Protocol for Tooth Autotransplantation Planning and Follow-up in Children.

INTRODUCTION: Tooth autotransplantation (TAT) offers a viable biological approach to tooth replacement in children. To enhance the outcome predictability of the TAT procedure, a cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT)-based surgical planning and transfer technique has been developed. The aim of this study was to optimize the CBCT scanning protocol to achieve a dose as low as possible and to maintain sufficient image quality. METHODS: A sectional head phantom (SK150; The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) was scanned using 18 exposure protocols in 3 different CBCT machines: 3D Accuitomo 170 (Morita, Kyoto, Japan), ProMax 3D MAX (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland), and NewTom VGI EVO (QR Verona, Verona, Italy). The effective dose (ED) was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation and pediatric voxel phantoms (5- and 8-year-old males and a 12-year-old female). Image quality was assessed by comparing segmented teeth volumes, evaluation of the visibility of the lamina dura, and morphologic surface analysis of 3-dimensional models. A general linear mixed model was fit to combine image quality parameters and radiation effective dose for each protocol in order to rank and compare the protocols examined in the study. RESULTS: The ED for the preoperative scan can be reduced to the range of 74.6-157.9 µSv, with ProMax with ultra-low-dose high-definition reconstruction (Planmeca) 100 × 90 scoring the highest. The ED for the postoperative scan can be reduced to the range of 24.2-41.5 µSv with ProMax with ultra-low-dose normal-dose reconstruction 50 × 55 and NewTom 50 × 50 with the standard mode scoring the highest. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable reduction in the pediatric ED can be achieved while maintaining sufficient image quality for tooth autotransplantation planning and follow-up using the dose optimization protocols.

Ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging and iterative reconstruction techniques: variability of Hounsfield units and contrast-to-noise ratio.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether application of ultralow dose protocols and iterative reconstruction technology (IRT) influence quantitative Hounsfield units (HUs) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in dentomaxillofacial CT imaging. METHODS: A phantom with inserts of five types of materials was scanned using protocols for (a) a clinical reference for navigated surgery (CT dose index volume 36.58 mGy), (b) low-dose sinus imaging (18.28 mGy) and (c) four ultralow dose imaging (4.14, 2.63, 0.99 and 0.53 mGy). All images were reconstructed using: (i) filtered back projection (FBP); (ii) IRT: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-50 (ASIR-50), ASIR-100 and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR); and (iii) standard (std) and bone kernel. Mean HU, CNR and average HU error after recalibration were determined. Each combination of protocols was compared using Friedman analysis of variance, followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Pearson's sample correlation coefficients were all >0.99. Ultralow dose protocols using FBP showed errors of up to 273 HU. Std kernels had less HU variability than bone kernels. MBIR reduced the error value for the lowest dose protocol to 138 HU and retained the highest relative CNR. ASIR could not demonstrate significant advantages over FBP. CONCLUSIONS: Considering a potential dose reduction as low as 1.5% of a std protocol, ultralow dose protocols and IRT should be further tested for clinical dentomaxillofacial CT imaging. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: HU as a surrogate for bone density may vary significantly in CT ultralow dose imaging. However, use of std kernels and MBIR technology reduce HU error values and may retain the highest CNR.

Patient dose in cardiac radiology.

INTRODUCTION: In diagnostic and interventional cardiology procedures performed with the use of X-ray diagnostic imaging systems, the long fluoroscopy time and the large number of cine projections, as well as the repetition of the procedure due to the recurrence of the lesion--a common event--result in a high locally delivered skin dose, which may even lead to patient skin necrosis. The purpose of this study was to collect information in order to estimate the patient dose during coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty procedures, using the dose-area product measuring system of the X-ray angiographic machine. METHODS: Dose-area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, number of sequences and frames per sequence were collected for each of 108 coronary angiography and 101 coronary angioplasty procedures, using the dedicated X-ray machine of the hospital's haemodynamic department, where more than 3000 procedures are performed per year. RESULTS: The median values of DAP were 19.96 and 40.17 Gy.cm(2) for coronary angiography and angioplasty, respectively; fluoroscopy times were 7.7 and 23.4 minutes; and the numbers of frames were 457 and 641, respectively. There was a strong correlation between DAP and fluoroscopy time, the number of frames per sequence, and hence the cine recording time. CONCLUSIONS: The entrance skin dose delivered to the patient in the haemodynamic department was lower than that of other studies, although the mean fluoroscopy time per patient was longer. The practices in use satisfy the diagnostic reference levels as far as DAP values and number of frames per patient are concerned, but not with regard to fluoroscopy time. We did not find the correlation between doctors' experience and DAP values reported in other studies, as we did not take into account the complexity index of the lesion.