Immunotherapy in mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer - Outcome and novel predictive markers.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess predictive markers for response to immunotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A study using two prospective cohorts from MD Anderson Cancer Center and Sheba Medical Center of consecutive patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC that were treated with immunotherapy between 2014-2022. Primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary outcome was overall response rate (ORR). Evaluated predictors included ECOG-PS score, RAS/BRAF status, single-agent versus doublet immunotherapy, metastatic sites, disease burden, and CEA levels prior to treatment initiation. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to analyze the effect of exposure variables on PFS. RESULTS: The study included 153 patients. Median follow-up time was 26 months (IQR 11-48). Median PFS was 51.6 months (95%CI 38.1-NR) and ORR was 58.1%. In a univariate analysis, male sex was associated with worse PFS with a HR of 1.67 (95% CI 1.00-2.79); Right-sided tumors were associated with improved PFS with a HR of 0.56 (95% CI 0.32-0.97); Liver or lung metastasis were associated with worse PFS with HRs of 2.35 (95%CI 1.43-3.88) and 2.30 (95%CI 1.31-4.04), respectively; ECOG-PS score ≥ 2, CEA levels ˃5 µg/L prior to treatment initiation and ≥ 3 metastatic sites were associated with worse PFS with HRs of 2.09 (95%CI 0.98-4.47), 2.23 (95%CI 1.30-3.81) and 3.11 (95%CI 1.61-6.03), respectively. Liver or lung metastasis remained significant in a multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS: Extent of disease (worse PFS with high CEA, poor ECOG-PS and ≥3 metastatic sites) and disease location (worse PFS with liver or lung metastasis and left sided tumor) were associated with immunotherapy outcome in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC.

Early Systemic Anti-neoplastic Treatment Post SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients with Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear how soon after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection it is safe to resume systemic anti-neoplastic treatment in patients with cancer. We assessed the risk of admissions or postponed treatment cycle in vaccinated patients with breast cancer receiving early systemic anti-neoplastic treatment following SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted during Omicron SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in Israel, January-July 2022. SARS-CoV-2 cohort included 30 vaccinated patients with breast cancer with SARS-CoV-2 infection 7-14 days prior to systemic treatment. All patients had resolved symptoms and a negative antigen detection test on the day of treatment. The pre-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic cohort consisted of 49 matched patients with breast cancer treated with systemic anti-neoplastic agents during 2019. RESULTS: In 30 vaccinated patients with breast cancer who received systemic anti-neoplastic treatment 7-14 days following SARS-CoV-2 infection, compared with 49 matched patients treated in 2019, the rates of emergency department (ED) visits (13% versus 6%, respectively), hospitalizations (3% versus 4%), next cycle of treatment given per protocol (90% versus 88%), and death (0% versus 0%) were similar. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of vaccinated patients with breast cancer who received systemic anti-neoplastic treatment 7-14 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection, we did not observe substantially higher rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, or deaths compared with a similar cohort of pre-COVID-19 patients with breast cancer. Most patients received the next planned cycle on time. Early resumption of systemic anti-neoplastic treatment following SARS-CoV-2 infection in vaccinated patients with breast cancer with a negative antigen test at the day of treatment appeared to be safe. Additional data on larger cohorts and other malignancies are needed to support clinical guidelines.

Tumor Differentiation as a Prognostic Marker in Clinically Staged T1bN0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Current guidelines recommend that clinically staged T1N0 esophageal cancers are to be referred to surgery or endoscopic resection. Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 733 individuals with clinically staged T1N0 esophageal carcinoma, who underwent upfront surgery and did not receive any prior treatment. We assessed upstaging, which was defined as ≥ T2 disease or positive lymph nodes. Poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas were associated with upstaging, whereas squamous cell carcinomas were not. Specifically, the percentage of upstaging among individuals with clinically staged T1b and poorly differentiated tumor was 33.8%. Therefore, clinically staged T1bN0 poorly differentiated esophageal adenocarcinomas are at high risk for upstaging following surgery.

Benefit for single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Current NCCN guidelines exclude the possibility of using single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, while allowing doublet chemotherapy. However, single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy is a valid treatment option in other gastrointestinal malignancies, preferred for elderly and/or frail patients. The current study used a nationwide oncology database to assess the benefit of single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy, specifically in the elderly population. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2016) we identified 1953 individuals with non-metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent upfront D2 gastrectomy with pathologic stage ≥ T3 or Npos and free surgical margins, and had not received either preoperative chemotherapy or pre-/postoperative radiotherapy. We used IPTW analysis to compare overall survival between individuals receiving either single- or multi-agent adjuvant chemotherapy, or referred to observation alone. RESULTS: Individuals receiving single-agent chemotherapy had an overall survival benefit compared with observation alone, with an HR of 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.88, p < 0.001). Individuals over the age of 65 had an OS benefit with an HR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.46-0.82, p < 0.001). Comparing individuals over the age of 65 receiving single- vs. multi-agent chemotherapy, there was no overall survival difference with an HR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.64-1.18, p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine in locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma following D2 gastrectomy can improve overall survival in elderly patients. Clinicians may consider using either capecitabine or 5-FU as a treatment option in the adjuvant setting for this age group.